Skip to main content
Log in

Hämodynamisches Monitoring in der Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin

Integration klinischer und sonographischer Befunde

Hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care and emergency medicine

Integration of clinical signs and ultrasound findings

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Ein hämodynamisches Monitoring gehört zum Standard in der Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin bei Patienten im Schock. Sowohl die klinische Untersuchung wie auch nichtinvasive Verfahren können hierzu genutzt werden. Insbesondere bei der Volumentherapie und dem kardiogenen Schock ist eine bettseitige Ultraschalluntersuchung bereits in den Leitlinien implementiert. Zur Differenzierung der Ursache und zur Steuerung der Therapie ist ein Monitoring unerlässlich. Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit zeigt die Möglichkeiten der Integration von klinischen und sonographischen Untersuchungstechniken auf und vergleicht diese mit invasiven Monitoringverfahren.

Abstract

Hemodynamic monitoring is required in critically ill patients presenting with circulatory shock. Besides the clinical evaluation, noninvasive technologies can be used. Guidelines on volume resuscitation and cardiogenic shock already recommend bedside ultrasound as a diagnostic tool. To differentiate the cause of circulatory shock and monitor the effects of therapies, hemodynamic monitoring is necessary. This review discusses possibilities of the different invasive and noninvasive monitoring tools with a focus on the integration of clinical and sonographic parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Sakr Y, Reinhard K, Vincent JL et al (2006) Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit Care Med 34(3):589–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincent JL, De Backer D (2013) Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 369(18):1726–1734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cecconi M, DeBacker D, Antonelli M et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care 40(12):1795–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD et al (2012) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 33(14):1787–1847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Her S (2012) Physiology of hemodynamic homeostasis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 26(4):409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D et al (2006) Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 34:1402–1407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoit BD, Shaw D (1994) The paradoxical pulse in tamponade: mechanisms and echocardiographic correlates. Echocardiography 11(5):477–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wittkowski U, Spies C, Sander M et al (2009) Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data. Anaesthesist 58(8):764–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345:1368–1377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 41(2):580–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT et al (2014) A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 370(18):1683–1693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M et al (2014) Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 371(16):1496–1506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS et al (2015) Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 372(14):1301–1311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D et al (2012) ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33(20):2569–2619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Werdan K, Ruß M, Buerke M et al (2011) Deutsch-österreichische S3-Leitlinie „Infarktbedingter kardiogener Schock – Diagnose, Monitoring und Therapie“. Kardiologe 5:166–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G et al (2014) 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 35(43):3033–3069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marx G, Albers J, Bauer M et al (2014) S3-Leitlinie Intravasale Volumentherapie beim Erwachsenen. (Registernummer 001 – 020) http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/001-020.html

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gheorghiade M, Follath F, Ponikowski P et al (2010) Assessing and grading congestion in acute heart failure: a scientific statement from the acute heart failure committee of the heart failure association of the European Society of Cardiology and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Eur J Heart Fail 12(5):423–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson KL, Jenq KY, Fields JM et al (2013) Diagnosing heart failure among acutely dyspneic patients with cardiac, inferior vena cava, and lung ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med 31(8):1208–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferre RM, Chioncel O, Pang PS et al (2015) Acute heart failure: the role of focused emergency cardiopulmonary ultrasound in identification and early management. Eur J Heart Fail 17(12):1223–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L (2014) Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 40(5):845–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Juhl-Olsen P, Frederiksen CA, Sloth E (2012) Ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava collapsibility is not a valid measure of preload changes during triggered positive pressure ventilation: a controlled cross-over study. Ultraschall Med 33(2):152–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagueh SF, Bhatt R, Vivo RP et al (2011) Echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamics in patients with decompensated systolic heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4(3):220–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Respiratory Society (ERS), Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) et al (2016) 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 37(1):67–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vermeiren GL, Malbrain ML, Walpot JM (2015) Cardiac Ultrasonography in the critical care setting: a practical approach to asses cardiac function and preload for the „non-cardiologist“. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 47:s89–s104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA et al (1997) Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 30(6):1527–1533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Michels G, Breitkreutz R, Pfister R (2014) Value of lung ultrasound in emergency and intensive care medicine. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 139(45):2301–2307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsiao SH, Lin SK, Wang WC et al (2006) Severe tricuspid regurgitation shows significant impact in the relationship among peak systolic tricuspid annular velocity, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19(7):902–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(3):233–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J et al (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(7):685–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gudmundsson P, Rydberg E, Winter R, Willenheimer R (2005) Visually estimated left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography is closely correlated with formal quantitative methods. Int J Cardiol 101(2):209–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Unlüer EE, Karagöz A, Akoğlu H, Bayata S (2014) Visual estimation of bedside echocardiographic ejection fraction by emergency physicians. West J Emerg Med 15(2):221–226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Matos J, Kronzon I, Panagopoulos G, Perk G (2012) Mitral annular plane systolic excursion as a surrogate for left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(9):969–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bergenzaun L, Ohlin H, Gudmundsson P (2013) Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) in shock: a valuable echocardiographic parameter in intensive care patients. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 11:16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiran A, Adawi S, Ganaeem M, Asmer E (2009) Accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular outflow tract diameter measurement using transthoracic when compared with transesophageal echocardiography in systole and diastole. Eur J Echocardiogr 10(2):319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Michels.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

D. Hempel, R. Pfister und G. Michels geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

L. Engelmann, Leipzig

U. Janssens, Eschweiler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hempel, D., Pfister, R. & Michels, G. Hämodynamisches Monitoring in der Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 111, 596–604 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-016-0172-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-016-0172-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation