Zusammenfassung
Ein hämodynamisches Monitoring gehört zum Standard in der Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin bei Patienten im Schock. Sowohl die klinische Untersuchung wie auch nichtinvasive Verfahren können hierzu genutzt werden. Insbesondere bei der Volumentherapie und dem kardiogenen Schock ist eine bettseitige Ultraschalluntersuchung bereits in den Leitlinien implementiert. Zur Differenzierung der Ursache und zur Steuerung der Therapie ist ein Monitoring unerlässlich. Die vorliegende Übersichtsarbeit zeigt die Möglichkeiten der Integration von klinischen und sonographischen Untersuchungstechniken auf und vergleicht diese mit invasiven Monitoringverfahren.
Abstract
Hemodynamic monitoring is required in critically ill patients presenting with circulatory shock. Besides the clinical evaluation, noninvasive technologies can be used. Guidelines on volume resuscitation and cardiogenic shock already recommend bedside ultrasound as a diagnostic tool. To differentiate the cause of circulatory shock and monitor the effects of therapies, hemodynamic monitoring is necessary. This review discusses possibilities of the different invasive and noninvasive monitoring tools with a focus on the integration of clinical and sonographic parameters.
Literatur
Sakr Y, Reinhard K, Vincent JL et al (2006) Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit Care Med 34(3):589–597
Vincent JL, De Backer D (2013) Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 369(18):1726–1734
Cecconi M, DeBacker D, Antonelli M et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care 40(12):1795–1815
McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD et al (2012) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 33(14):1787–1847
De Her S (2012) Physiology of hemodynamic homeostasis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 26(4):409–419
Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D et al (2006) Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 34:1402–1407
Hoit BD, Shaw D (1994) The paradoxical pulse in tamponade: mechanisms and echocardiographic correlates. Echocardiography 11(5):477–487
Wittkowski U, Spies C, Sander M et al (2009) Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data. Anaesthesist 58(8):764–778
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345:1368–1377
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A et al (2013) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 41(2):580–637
Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT et al (2014) A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 370(18):1683–1693
Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M et al (2014) Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 371(16):1496–1506
Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS et al (2015) Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 372(14):1301–1311
Steg PG, James SK, Atar D et al (2012) ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33(20):2569–2619
Werdan K, Ruß M, Buerke M et al (2011) Deutsch-österreichische S3-Leitlinie „Infarktbedingter kardiogener Schock – Diagnose, Monitoring und Therapie“. Kardiologe 5:166–224
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G et al (2014) 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 35(43):3033–3069
Marx G, Albers J, Bauer M et al (2014) S3-Leitlinie Intravasale Volumentherapie beim Erwachsenen. (Registernummer 001 – 020) http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/001-020.html
Gheorghiade M, Follath F, Ponikowski P et al (2010) Assessing and grading congestion in acute heart failure: a scientific statement from the acute heart failure committee of the heart failure association of the European Society of Cardiology and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Eur J Heart Fail 12(5):423–433
Anderson KL, Jenq KY, Fields JM et al (2013) Diagnosing heart failure among acutely dyspneic patients with cardiac, inferior vena cava, and lung ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med 31(8):1208–1214
Ferre RM, Chioncel O, Pang PS et al (2015) Acute heart failure: the role of focused emergency cardiopulmonary ultrasound in identification and early management. Eur J Heart Fail 17(12):1223–1227
Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L (2014) Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 40(5):845–853
Juhl-Olsen P, Frederiksen CA, Sloth E (2012) Ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava collapsibility is not a valid measure of preload changes during triggered positive pressure ventilation: a controlled cross-over study. Ultraschall Med 33(2):152–159
Nagueh SF, Bhatt R, Vivo RP et al (2011) Echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamics in patients with decompensated systolic heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4(3):220–227
Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Respiratory Society (ERS), Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) et al (2016) 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 37(1):67–119
Vermeiren GL, Malbrain ML, Walpot JM (2015) Cardiac Ultrasonography in the critical care setting: a practical approach to asses cardiac function and preload for the „non-cardiologist“. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 47:s89–s104
Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA et al (1997) Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 30(6):1527–1533
Michels G, Breitkreutz R, Pfister R (2014) Value of lung ultrasound in emergency and intensive care medicine. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 139(45):2301–2307
Hsiao SH, Lin SK, Wang WC et al (2006) Severe tricuspid regurgitation shows significant impact in the relationship among peak systolic tricuspid annular velocity, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19(7):902–910
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(3):233–270
Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J et al (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(7):685–713
Gudmundsson P, Rydberg E, Winter R, Willenheimer R (2005) Visually estimated left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography is closely correlated with formal quantitative methods. Int J Cardiol 101(2):209–212
Unlüer EE, Karagöz A, Akoğlu H, Bayata S (2014) Visual estimation of bedside echocardiographic ejection fraction by emergency physicians. West J Emerg Med 15(2):221–226
Matos J, Kronzon I, Panagopoulos G, Perk G (2012) Mitral annular plane systolic excursion as a surrogate for left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(9):969–974
Bergenzaun L, Ohlin H, Gudmundsson P (2013) Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) in shock: a valuable echocardiographic parameter in intensive care patients. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 11:16
Shiran A, Adawi S, Ganaeem M, Asmer E (2009) Accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular outflow tract diameter measurement using transthoracic when compared with transesophageal echocardiography in systole and diastole. Eur J Echocardiogr 10(2):319–324
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
D. Hempel, R. Pfister und G. Michels geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Additional information
Redaktion
L. Engelmann, Leipzig
U. Janssens, Eschweiler
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hempel, D., Pfister, R. & Michels, G. Hämodynamisches Monitoring in der Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 111, 596–604 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-016-0172-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-016-0172-x