Abstract
Background
The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in detecting left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus and to analyze the difference between the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging sequences.
Methods
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies from 2000 to 2017 that compared CMR with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in detecting LA/LAA thrombus. The CMR images were analyzed in four categories: (1) cine-CMR; (2) first-pass contrast-enhanced 3D CMR angiography (CE-MRA); (3) delayed-enhancement CMR (DE-CMR); and (4) CMR, regardless of the magnetic resonance sequences used. Descriptive and quantitative information was extracted and Meta-DiSc 1.4 was used to perform the analysis.
Results
The analysis included 582 patients from seven publications. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic of cine-CMR were 91.00%, 93.00%, 50.43, 10.04, 0.24, and 93.93%, respectively; for CE-MRA, the values were 77.00%, 97.00%, 179.21, 51.77, 0.30, and 97.63%, respectively; for DE-CMR, 100.00%, 99.00%, 849.70, 77.62, 0.09, and 99.38%, respectively; and for CMR, 80.00%, 99.00%, 187.54, 24.21, 0.17, and 97.71%, respectively.
Conclusion
In patients with atrial fibrillation, CMR has been proven to be a favorable diagnostic technique for the detection and assessment of LA/LAA thrombus. Among the imaging sequences evaluated, DE-CMR had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Ziel der vorliegenden Metaanalyse war es, die Genauigkeit der kardialen Magnetresonanztomographie (CMR) bei der Diagnose eines Thrombus im linken Vorhof (linkes Atrium, LA) oder im linken Herzohr („left atrial appendage“, LAA) zu untersuchen und den Unterschied zwischen der diagnostischen Genauigkeit verschiedener Bildgebungssequenzen zu ermitteln.
Methoden
Die Datenbanken PubMed, Web of Science, Embase und die Cochrane Library wurden systematisch nach Studien von 2000 bis 2017 durchsucht, in denen die CMR mit der transösophagealen Echokardiographie (TEE) bei der Erkennung eines LA-/LAA-Thrombus verglichen wurde. Die CMR-Aufnahmen wurden in 4 Kategorien ausgewertet: (1) Cine-CMR, (2) kontrastmittelverstärkte 3‑D-CMR-First-Pass-Angiographie (CE-MRA), (3) CMR mit verzögerter Kontrastverstärkung („delayed enhancement CMR“, DE-CMR) und (4) CMR, unabhängig von den verwendeten MR-Sequenzen. Daraus wurden Informationen zur Beschreibung und quantitativen Erfassung erhoben; die Auswertung erfolgte mit dem Programm Meta-DiSc 1.4.
Ergebnisse
In die Auswertung wurden 582 Patienten aus 7 Publikationen einbezogen. Die gepoolte Sensitivität, Spezifität, diagnostische Odds Ratio, der positive Wahrscheinlichkeitsquotient, der negative Wahrscheinlichkeitsquotient und der summarische Receiver-Operating-Characteristic-Wert der Cine-CMR betrugen 91,00 %; 93,00 %; 50,43; 10,04; 0,24 bzw. 93,93 %; für die CE-MRA lagen die Werte bei 77,00 %; 97,00 %; 179,21; 51,77; 0,30 bzw. 97,63 %; für die DE-CMR bei 100,00 %; 99,00 %; 849,70; 77,62; 0,09 bzw. 99,38 %, und bei der CMR betrugen die Werte 80,00 %; 99,00 %; 187,54; 24,21; 0,17 bzw. 97,71 %.
Schlussfolgerung
Bei Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern hat sich die CMR als vorteilhaftes diagnostisches Verfahren zur Erkennung und Beurteilung eines LA-/LAA-Thrombus erwiesen. Von den untersuchten Bildgebungssequenzen wies die DE-CMR die höchste Sensitivität, Spezifität und diagnostische Genauigkeit auf.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AF:
-
Atrial fibrillation
- CCT:
-
Cardiac computed tomography
- CE-MRA:
-
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
- CHA2DS2-VASc:
-
Congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, age 65–74 years, sex category
- CMR:
-
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- DE-CMR:
-
Equilibrium phase delayed enhancement CMR
- HAS-BLED:
-
Hypertension, abnormal renal function or abnormal liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile INR, elderly, prior alcohol or drug usage history or medication usage predisposing to bleeding
- LA/LAA:
-
Left atrial/left atrial appendage
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PV:
-
Pulmonary veins
- TEE:
-
Transesophageal echocardiography
References
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB et al (2014) AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:e1–e76
Fabritz L, Guasch E, Antoniades C, Bardinet I, Benninger G, Betts TR, Brand E et al (2016) Defining the major health modifiers causing atrial fibrillation: a roadmap to underpin personalized prevention and treatment. Nat Rev Cardiol 13:230–237
Han SW, Nam HS, Kim SH, Lee JY, Lee KY, Heo JH (2007) Frequency and significance of cardiac sources of embolism in the TOAST classification. Cerebrovasc Dis 24:463–468
Odell JA, Blackshear JL, Davies E, Byrne WJ, Kollmorgen CF, Edwards WD, Orszulak TA (1996) Thoracoscopic obliteration of the left atrial appendage: potential for stroke reduction. Ann Thorac Surg 61:565–569
Jung BC, Kim NH, Nam GB, Park HW, On YK, Lee YS et al (2015) The Korean heart rhythm society’s 2014 statement on antithrombotic therapy for patients with Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Korean Heart Rhythm Society. Korean Circ J 45:9–19
Jaber WA, White RD, Kuzmiak SA, Boyle JM, Natale A, Apperson-Hansen C, Thomas JD et al (2004) Comparison of ability to identify left atrial thrombus by three-dimensional tomography versus transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 93:486–489
Stöllberger C, Günther E, Bonner E, Finsterer J, Slany J (2003) Left atrial appendage morphology: comparison of transesophageal images and postmortem casts. Z Kardiol 92:303–308
Romero J, Husain SA, Kelesidis I, Sanz J, Medina HM, Garcia MJ (2013) Detection of left atrial appendage thrombus by cardiac computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation a Meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:185–194
Kim SC, Chun EJ, Choi SI, Lee SJ, Chang HJ, Han MK, Bae HJ et al (2010) Differentiation between spontaneous echocardiographic contrastand left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with suspected embolic stroke using two-phase multidetector computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 106:1174–1181
Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, Ho VB et al (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:2614–2662
Yarmohammadi H, Shenoy C (2015) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging before catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: much more than left atrial and pulmonary venous anatomy. Int J Cardiol 179:461–464
Kitkungvan D, Nabi F, Ghosn MG, Dave AS, Quinones M, Zoghbi WA, Valderrabano M et al (2016) Detection of LA and LAA thrombus by CMR in patients referred for pulmonary vein isolation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:809–818
Rathi VK, Reddy ST, Anreddy S, Belden W, Yamrozik JA, Williams RB, Doyle M et al (2013) Contrast-enhanced CMR is equally effective as TEE in the evaluation of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation procedure. Heart Rhythm 10:1021–1027
Ohyama H, Hosomi N, Takahashi T, Mizushige K, Osaka K, Kohno M, Koziol JA (2003) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and transesophageal echocardiography in detection of thrombus in the left atrial appendage. Stroke 34:2436–2243
Mohrs OK, Nowak B, Petersen SE, Welsner M, Rubel C, Magedanz A, Kauczor HU et al (2006) Thrombus detection in the left atrial appendage using contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:198–205
Anreddy S, Balhan S, Yamrozik JA, Williams RB, Doyle M, Grant SB, Biederman RWW et al (2011) Is cardiovascular MRI equally effective as TEE in evaluation of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation? J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:1–2
Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Eggebrecht H, Schüler WO, Sabin GV, Erbel R, Debatin JF (2002) Detection and characterization of Intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1539–1544
Paydarfar D, Krieger D, Dib N, Blair RH, Pastore JO, Stetz JJ Jr, Symes JF (2001) In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and surgical histopathology of intracardiac masses: distinct features of subacute thrombi. Cardiology 95:40–47
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536
Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, Vet HCWD, van Windt DDAWM, Bezemer PD (2002) Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2:9
Deeks JJ (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 323:157–162
Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane collaboration (www. Cochrane-handbook. org)
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893
Wittkampf FH, Vonken EJ, Derksen R, Loh P, Velthuis B, Wever EF, Boersma LV, Rensing BJ, Cramer MJ (2003) Pulmonary vein ostium geometry analysis by magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation 107:21–22
Daccarett M, McGann CJ, Akoum NW, MacLeod RS, Marrouche NF (2014) MRI of the left atrium: predicting clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 9:105–111
Dill T, Neumann T, Ekinci O, Breidenbach C, John A, Erdogan A, Bachmann G et al (2003) Pulmonary vein diameter reduction after radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation evaluated by contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 107:845–850
Manning WJ, Spahillari A (2016) Combined pulmonary vein and LA/LAA thrombus assessment can CMR kill two birds with one stone? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:819–821
Zhan Y (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to assess left atrial appendage thrombi. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:1833
Omran H, Jung W, Rabahieh R, Wirtz P, Becher H, Illien S, Schimpf R et al (1999) Imaging of thrombi and assessment of left atrial appendage function: a prospective study comparing transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart 81:192–198
Weinsaft JW, Kim HW, Shah DJ, Klem I, Crowley AL, Brosnan R, James OG et al (2008) Detection of left ventricular thrombus by delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance prevalence and markers in patients with systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:148–157
Author contributions.
All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. M. Liao and J. Chen were involved in the conception and design of the review; J. Chen, H. Zhang, D. Zhu, Y. Wang, and S. Byanju were involved in the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
J. Chen, H. Zhang, D. Zhu, Y. Wang, S. Byanju, and M. Liao declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Caption Electronic Supplementary Material
59_2017_4676_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Supplementary Table 1 Study results. SEN sensitivity, SPE specificity, FN false negative, FP false positive, TN true negative, TP true positive
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Zhang, H., Zhu, D. et al. Cardiac MRI for detecting left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation. Herz 44, 390–397 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-017-4676-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-017-4676-9