Abstract
Cholinergic modulation of prefrontal cortex is essential for attention. In essence, it focuses the mind on relevant, transient stimuli in support of goal-directed behavior. The excitation of prefrontal layer VI neurons through nicotinic acetylcholine receptors optimizes local and top-down control of attention. Layer VI of prefrontal cortex is the origin of a dense feedback projection to the thalamus and is one of only a handful of brain regions that express the α5 nicotinic receptor subunit, encoded by the gene chrna5. This accessory nicotinic receptor subunit alters the properties of high-affinity nicotinic receptors in layer VI pyramidal neurons in both development and adulthood. Studies investigating the consequences of genetic deletion of α5, as well as other disruptions to nicotinic receptors, find attention deficits together with altered cholinergic excitation of layer VI neurons and aberrant neuronal morphology. Nicotinic receptors in prefrontal layer VI neurons play an essential role in focusing attention under challenging circumstances. In this regard, they do not act in isolation, but rather in concert with cholinergic receptors in other parts of prefrontal circuitry. This review urges an intensification of focus on the cellular mechanisms and plasticity of prefrontal attention circuitry. Disruptions in attention are one of the greatest contributing factors to disease burden in psychiatric and neurological disorders, and enhancing attention may require different approaches in the normal and disordered prefrontal cortex.
Similar content being viewed by others
Attention has been eloquently described as the ‘searchlight’ that focuses on relevant information in the midst of distraction in order to support goal-directed behavior [1]. In particular, it plays a pivotal role in mediating the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex [2, 3], a site of sensorimotor and emotional integration that is uniquely positioned to execute top-down control permissive to the orchestration of complex, flexible, and purposeful behavior such as problem solving, planning, and decision making [1, 3–5]. Given its intimate relationship to awareness, attention has also been qualified as the gateway to consciousness [2, 3, 6, 7].
Acetylcholine has long been known to play a role in cognition [8–10]. Non-specific lesions of the cholinergic neurons of the basal forebrain first suggested a more specific involvement of acetylcholine in attention [11–16], and it subsequently became clear that cholinergic projections to the prefrontal cortex are especially important in this regard [17, 18]. The importance of cholinergic modulation of prefrontal cortex can be seen in the detrimental effects for attention of specific lesions to its cholinergic projections. These projections, as shown in the schematic in Fig. 1,
include a dense cholinergic innervation from the basal forebrain, principally from the basal nucleus and parts of the diagonal band, but also from the magnocellular preoptic nucleus and substantia innominata [19–26]. Intrabasalis infusions of the cholinergic immunotoxin 192 IgG-saporin lead to the loss of cortical cholinergic afferents, reduced acetylcholine efflux in the prefrontal cortex, and significant impairments on attention tasks [27, 28]. Bilateral infusions of 192 IgG saporin in medial prefrontal cortex are equally detrimental and demonstrate that its deafferentation of cholinergic projections is sufficient to produce attentional impairments [17, 18, 29].
The importance of prefrontal cholinergic modulation was further suggested by microdialysis studies showing robust acetylcholine efflux within the prefrontal cortex during the performance of attention tasks [30–32], which reflects both attentional effort [33, 34] and behavioral context [35]. Moreover, the development of choline-sensitive microelectrodes, which offer greater temporal resolution than microdialysis probes, has further revealed that acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex increases rapidly and transiently—on the timescale of seconds to minutes—during the performance of attention tasks [29] where, as we will emphasize in this review, it can exert profound effects on corticothalamic neurons via the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors [36–38].
Layer VI corticothalamic neurons of the prefrontal cortex play a central role in attention
Acetylcholine optimizes prefrontal cortical circuitry for top-down control [39–41]. Corticothalamic neurons, which constitute a large proportion of layer VI pyramidal cells [42], are uniquely positioned to exert these top-down influences and are robustly excited by acetylcholine [36]. These neurons integrate highly processed information from layer V pyramidal cells, from layer VI cortico-cortical neurons, and from direct thalamic inputs [42]. In turn, they exert powerful feedback influences on the thalamus [43–46]. While not all neurons in layer VI are corticothalamic, it is important to note that there are ten times more corticothalamic feedback projections than there are thalamocortical afferents [47], such that cholinergic modulation of these neurons will exert important influences on the circuits of attention.
Layer VI corticothalamic neurons constitute the major source of excitatory afferents to the thalamus [48], where they affect both the inhibitory reticular thalamic neurons [49] and the excitatory thalamocortical projection neurons [50]. During the tonic firing of wakefulness, the overall effect of this corticothalamic feedback is to focus thalamic and thalamocortical excitation [51], in part by modulating the sensitivity of thalamic neurons to incoming sensory stimuli [48, 52–54]. Prefronto-thalamic connectivity is further privileged in its modulation of attention due to its relationship with the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei that have long been implicated in awareness and attention [54–58].
The high percentage of layer VI neurons responding to acetylcholine [59] suggests that corticothalamic neurons are not the exclusive population of neurons subject to cholinergic modulation. This point should be emphasized since recent work has shown that layer VI neurons as a class exert powerful gain control over all the other cortical layers [60]. Cholinergic innervation is present in all layers of the prefrontal cortex [24, 26], but appears biased toward activation of the deepest layers [61]. Clear labeling of cholinergic fibers is observed in the deep cortical layers [24, 26], as demonstrated with immunostaining for choline-acetyltransferase (ChAT), the enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of acetylcholine from acetyl-CoA and choline. Furthermore, anterograde labeling of ChAT positive cholinergic afferents from the basal forebrain indicate preferential projection to deep layers V/VI [62]. The apical dendrites from a large fraction of layer VI neurons extend all the way to the pial surface [63], where they may also be stimulated by cholinergic projections (and possibly also by cholinergic interneurons [64]) in superficial layers II/III [26, 64].
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and their modulation of prefrontal layer VI neurons
The neurotransmitter acetylcholine acts on two classes of receptors—the ionotropic nicotinic receptors, which are the main focus of this review, and the metabotropic muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, which are G-protein coupled. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are pentameric ligand-gated cation channels [65, 66], permeable to Na+, K+, and Ca2+ ions [65, 67]. Two families of subunits can contribute to the pentameric structure necessary for functional nicotinic receptors: the α subunits (α2–α10) and the β subunits (β2–β4) [65, 66, 68]. They are arranged in a pinwheel around a central pore, assembled either as α-containing homomers or α/β heteromers. Nicotinic receptors are widely expressed in the central nervous system, and subunit composition differs from one region to the next [65, 66]. The subunit composition and stoichiometry of nicotinic receptors influence their functional properties, with important implications for nicotinic signaling [37, 69–72].
The most widely expressed nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain are the α4β2-containing receptors (α4β2*) [65, 73–75], which are prominently expressed throughout cortex [76–79]. The homomeric α7 nicotinic receptors are also expressed in cortex, although only weak labeling has been documented in cortical layer VI [80]. Interestingly, while the α4, α5, α7, and β2 nicotinic receptor subunits show similar expression patterns in rodent and primate brain [81], there are some species differences in the expression of nicotinic receptors with potential implications for cholinergic modulation of attention circuitry. For example, the α2 nicotinic subunit is only widely expressed in primate brain [81], although it is not enriched in layer VI.
The α4β2* receptors have high affinity for nicotinic agonists (including acetylcholine and nicotine) and desensitize slowly, on the timescale of seconds [65, 82–84]. As illustrated in the schematic in Fig. 2,
the α4β2* nicotinic receptors can assume different stoichiometries, including (α4)2(β2)3 and (α4)3(β2)2. In the relatively rare brain regions that express the accessory α5 nicotinic subunit, such as layer VI of prefrontal cortex [86], these receptors can also incorporate the accessory α5 subunit to form (α4)2(β2)2(α5) receptors (α4α5β2) [65, 66, 85–88]. The accessory α5 subunits cannot form functional channels by themselves, since they do not contribute to the acetylcholine binding site and thus require co-assembly with other α and β subunits [65, 79]. However, inclusion of α5 can alter α4β2* nicotinic receptor properties substantially [71, 87, 88]: it can enhance receptor assembly and expression [87, 89], modulate receptor sensitivity to acetylcholine [37, 65, 69, 88, 90, 91], increase Ca2+ permeability [88], and confer sensitivity to allosteric modulation by galanthamine [36, 88].
Immunohistochemistry for YFP-tagged nicotinic α4 subunits in a knockin mouse suggests that high-affinity nicotinic receptors are densely expressed in layer VI of prefrontal cortex [92], where the accessory α5 subunit is also prominently expressed [86, 93–95]. Interestingly, while only one-fifth of all α4β2* nicotinic receptors in the brain are estimated to contain the α5 accessory subunit [65, 89, 96], prefrontal layer VI nicotinic receptors appear to incorporate α5 to a disproportionately large extent [37]. Indeed, functional concentration–response analyses of prefrontal corticothalamic neurons from WT and α5 knockout mice (α5−/−) suggest that the vast majority of α4β2* nicotinic receptors of its layer VI neurons are affected by this subunit [37]. As we will see, this unique expression pattern has ramifications for attentional signaling and behavior [37].
During the performance of attention tasks, brief transients of acetylcholine are released in medial prefrontal cortex [97, 98]. Population calcium imaging in slices of prefrontal cortex has demonstrated that nicotinic receptor stimulation by acetylcholine predominantly activates neurons within the deep cortical layers V/VI [61]. At the cellular level, acetylcholine elicits robust excitatory responses in the layer VI corticothalamic neurons of the medial prefrontal cortex that appear to be directly mediated by stimulation of somatodendritic postsynaptic α4α5β2 nicotinic receptors [36, 37, 59]. Acetylcholine binding to the nicotinic receptor leads to rapid conformational changes that result in channel opening and the flow of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ cations through the pore [65, 66, 83]. Nicotinic receptors rectify at more depolarized membrane potential [99, 100], such that acetylcholine likely exerts more profound effects near the resting membrane potential, where the effect of nicotinic stimulation is excitatory and results in depolarization. When sufficiently large, this membrane depolarization can lead to the generation of action potentials. Acetylcholine depolarizes the vast majority of layer VI pyramidal cells in this way [36], but these excitatory nicotinic responses are completely eliminated in β2−/− mice [38, 59], which lack functional α4β2* nicotinic receptors, and are significantly reduced in α5−/− mice [59].
The nicotinic responses that result from the current carried by the flow of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ ions through the nicotinic receptor pore can be examined electrophysiologically in voltage clamp (where the membrane potential can be held constant experimentally so as to allow the measurement of the nicotinic current) or in current clamp (where the membrane potential is allowed to fluctuate and the injected current, or lack thereof, is held constant). Figure 3 illustrates
the robust excitatory effects of nicotinic stimulation that were recorded in retrogradely labeled corticothalamic neurons in slices of prefrontal cortex [36]. Since corticothalamic neurons can also be distinguished from cortico-cortical cells based on electrophysiological properties [101, 102], Kassam et al. [36] were further able to establish that nicotinic stimulation exerts more profound excitation of cortico-thalamic than cortico-cortical neurons of layer VI prefrontal cortex.
The excitatory nicotinic responses of layer VI pyramidal neurons are directly mediated by postsynaptic somatodendritic receptors since currents are resistant to blockade of synaptic transmission by the Na+ channel antagonist tetrodotoxin and to pharmacological inhibition of ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors [36]. Pharmacologically, these nicotinic currents are suppressed by the α4β2* competitive antagonist DHβE, insensitive to the α7 antagonist MLA and potentiated by the α5 allosteric modulator galanthamine [36, 88]. These findings are consistent with α4α5β2 nicotinic receptor involvement [36]. Most convincing, however, is the demonstration that nicotinic excitation of layer VI pyramidal cells is substantially reduced in mice in which the α5 subunit has been genetically deleted (α5−/−) [37]. Together, these findings highlight that the relatively rare α5 subunit plays an important role in mediating optimal cholinergic excitation of layer VI neurons of the prefrontal cortex, where it is densely expressed and incorporated into α4β2* nicotinic receptors.
Nicotinic receptors and attentional performance
At the behavioral level, the α5 subunit is required for normal attention performance under challenging conditions [37]. The five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) is a commonly used attention task that involves sustained and divided attention [103]. Briefly, the animal is placed in an operant chamber, illustrated in Fig. 4.
A light stimulus, whose duration can be varied to alter the difficulty of the attention task, is randomly flashed in one of five apertures. The animal is required to attend to, and subsequently accurately recall, the location of this stimulus within a fixed time period. Attention performance is assessed by correct identification of the location of the stimulus by nose poke. This task measures various aspects of attentional control, including accuracy (correct responses), omissions (lack of response, reflects inattentiveness), perseveration (repeated responses at the same location, reflects lack of flexibility), and premature responses (responding before the end of the inter-trial interval, reflects impulsivity). The α5−/− mice show deficits in accuracy on the 5-CSRTT when stimulus duration is brief, a condition that requires greater attentional demand, but perform normally under baseline training conditions, when stimulus duration is longer. Interestingly, equivalent deficits in attention performance in humans are highly disruptive to cognitive function [104–107]. Mice lacking the β2 subunit (β2−/−) also show significant impairments on the 5-CSRTT, and these deficits can be rescued by lentiviral vector-mediated re-expression of β2-containing nicotinic receptors in the prefrontal cortex [38]. The 5-CSRTT studies in α5−/− and β2−/− mice employed different training and testing approaches, which may explain subtle differences in the nature of the attention deficit observed [37, 38].
Compensatory plasticity of cholinergic responses in prefrontal layer VI neurons
The question arises whether the differences in attention performance observed in α5−/− mice result completely from the impaired nicotinic stimulation of α4α5β2-containing nicotinic receptors within corticothalamic circuits of adult prefrontal cortex or whether the loss of this nicotinic stimulation leads to functional or structural alterations of attention circuitry. It is conceivable that plasticity in the cholinergic system might ameliorate attention deficits that might otherwise be more severe; for example, allowing α5−/− mice to perform at near-normal levels of accuracy when longer stimulus durations are used in the 5-CSRTT [37].
We have observed that cholinergic excitation of the layer VI pyramidal cells primarily involves nicotinic receptors in wild-type mice [59]; however, genetic deletion of the nicotinic α5 or β2 subunits (α5−/− and β2−/−, respectively) leads to the compensatory upregulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor excitation [59]. These G-protein coupled receptors couple to second messenger cascades and exert slower excitatory actions, significantly changing the mechanisms and timing of the cholinergic response in these layer VI neurons [59]. A schematic of this compensatory plasticity is shown in Fig. 5;
it appears to affect neurons from β2−/− mice to a greater degree than those from α5−/− mice [59]. This unusual plasticity of layer VI cholinergic responsiveness indicates that the attention impairments associated with disruption of nicotinic signaling are more complex than originally anticipated. It is unclear at what stage of maturation this plasticity occurs and whether it can be reversed given sufficient time after adult rescue of the missing nicotinic receptor subunits [38].
Nicotinic receptor α5 subunit and morphological maturation of prefrontal layer VI neurons
The maturation of executive function and attention requires the normal development of prefrontal cortex [108–110], and developmental lesions of the cholinergic system disrupt neuronal morphology and cortical circuitry [111–114]. Cortical nicotinic acetylcholine receptors play an important role in the development of attention circuitry [36, 63, 115], and aberrations in cortical nicotinic binding are reported to occur in many neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism [116, 117], epilepsy [118], and schizophrenia [119, 120].
Cholinergic innervation of the prefrontal cortex is well developed by the third week of postnatal life in rodents [121, 122], a time period equivalent to the perinatal period in humans [123, 124]. Dense ChAT immunostaining can be seen in the frontal cortex at this time [122], and high levels of α4β2* nicotinic binding are observed in prefrontal layer VI [125]. Furthermore, peak mRNA levels for the α5 subunit are seen in layer VI during the first 2–3 weeks of postnatal development [95]. By contrast, cortical mRNA levels for the α4 and β2 subunits show a somewhat different pattern with a peak at birth and a slight decline before maintaining relatively constant expression across postnatal development [126, 127].
Developmental differences in nicotinic excitation and dendritic morphology coincide temporally with changes in α5 expression. The excitatory nicotinic currents of layer VI neurons exhibit a developmental profile, peaking within the first postnatal month [36]. Nicotinic stimulation can influence neuronal morphology and spur neurite retraction [128, 129], and in the first morphological analysis of these cells, Bailey et al. [63] showed that key developmental changes in neuronal complexity appear to be initiated within this critical time period. Specifically, there appears to be a developmental retraction of the apical dendrites of layer VI prefrontal cortex: whereas almost all the apical dendrites of layer VI pyramidal neurons extend to the pial surface in young mice at postnatal week 3, half of them terminate in the mid-layers by adulthood [63]. As illustrated in Fig. 6,
these maturational changes in the dendritic morphology of layer VI neurons are absent in the α5−/− mice, without any further differences in overall cortical morphology [63]. Furthermore, layer VI neurons of α5−/− mice show negligible developmental changes in nicotinic excitation [63]. Thus, the α5 subunit appears to be essential for the normal maturation of corticothalamic circuitry and drives developmental differences in layer VI excitation and morphology.
In summary, there are extensive differences between WT and α5−/− mice in development and adulthood. These differences are relevant to the deficits in attention performance seen in α5−/− mice in adulthood and are summarized in Table 1.
Sex differences in nicotinic excitation of layer VI neurons during postnatal development
Interestingly, there are also developmental sex differences in nicotinic excitation [92]. Prefrontal layer VI nicotinic currents show a similar developmental profile in males and females, with peak nicotinic excitation achieved around the 3rd week of postnatal life and declining by the 5th week. However, within the 1st postnatal month, nicotinic currents are larger and observed in a greater proportion of cells in males than in females. It is not known whether there are any sex differences in α5 expression or function, although it appears that a similar percentage of layer VI neurons express α4 nAChRs in developing male and female mice [92]. In fact, this sex difference in nicotinic excitation of layer VI neurons during postnatal development may arise from differences in cortical neurosteroid levels between males and females. The sex steroid progesterone, for example, can directly suppress nicotinic currents through negative allosteric modulation of α4β2* nAChRs [130, 131]. The pre-pubertal rodent brain expresses all the enzymes necessary for the de novo synthesis of progesterone from cholesterol [132, 133], and the rate-limiting enzyme in this pathway shows a trend toward greater cortical expression in females than males at this stage of development [132]. Furthermore, evidence suggests that estrogenic steroid hormones may directly interact with the nicotinic receptor to potentiate excitatory ACh responses [134]. Developmental sex differences in the maturation of attention circuitry may help account for vulnerability to attention deficit disorders, which are twice as prevalent in males than females [135–137].
Additional mechanisms of cholinergic modulation of prefrontal cortex
Although nicotinic receptors located on pyramidal neurons in layer VI of the medial prefrontal cortex play a critical role in mediating attentional processes, they do not act in isolation. There are cholinergic receptors on other prefrontal neurons and on neurons in other brain regions that also contribute to attentional processing in prefrontal cortex. Relevant cholinergic receptors within prefrontal cortex itself include those on layer V neurons, on the terminals of thalamocortical projections, monoaminergic projections, and on cortical interneurons.
Acetylcholine exerts layer-specific effects in the prefrontal cortex [61], and although nicotinic stimulation exerts many effects across the prefrontal cortical column, it appears to enhance preferentially deep layer activation [61]. An elegant optogenetic study by Olsen et al. [60] has recently demonstrated that in the visual cortex, activation of layer VI cells exerts powerful gain control by means of feedback inhibition of the cortical column. It is tempting to speculate that preferential activation of the deep layers of prefrontal cortex by acetylcholine facilitates such information processing. As we have seen, layer VI pyramidal neurons show a robust excitatory response to acetylcholine mediated by postsynaptic somatodendritic nicotinic receptors [36, 37]. In contrast to layer VI, the layer V pyramidal neurons of the prefrontal cortex are predominantly subject to muscarinic modulation [138], although a rapid α7-mediated nicotinic response has been documented in the prefrontal cortex of juvenile mice [61]. Importantly in this layer, α4β2*-containing nicotinic receptors on thalamocortical terminals strongly facilitate thalamic excitation of layer V pyramidal neurons [139–141], an indirect effect that translates into a large increase in the frequency of rapid, glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic currents. Of note, a positive feedback relationship has been demonstrated between nicotinic-elicited prefrontal glutamatergic release and the release of acetylcholine itself from cholinergic terminals in prefrontal cortex [97, 98, 142]. Nicotinic receptors have also been implicated in the modulation of monoamine release in the prefrontal cortex [143–145].
Nicotinic modulation of prefrontal GABAergic interneurons also likely contributes to attentional processing. Although α4β2*- and α7-containing nicotinic receptors excite only limited subpopulations of interneurons in the cerebral cortex [146, 147], many layer-specific effects have been documented. In layer VI, fast-spiking interneurons are excited indirectly by nicotinic stimulation [36], presumably due to innervation by corticothalamic axon collaterals [101]. In layer V, stimulation of nicotinic receptors on GABAergic interneurons increases the frequency of inhibitory postsynaptic currents on pyramidal neurons [148, 149], promotes intracolumnar inhibition [150], and modulates spike timing-dependent synaptic plasticity [149]. Most pyramidal neurons in layer II/III do not contain nicotinic receptors, nor do they receive glutamatergic inputs subject to nicotinic modulation ([61], but see [151, 152]). Instead, nicotinic receptors are found on interneurons that exert feedforward inhibition onto layer II/III pyramidal cells [61]. Nicotinic stimulation of the superficial layer I interneurons enhances synchronous activity of inhibitory cortical networks in superficial cortex [153, 154].
Nicotinic receptor and prefrontal attention circuitry in health and disease
The prefrontal cortex is a critical node in widespread and dynamic brain networks that sustain higher cognitive function in health and that perpetuate executive dysfunction in psychiatric illness [155, 156]. The cholinergic modulation of prefrontal cortex is especially powerful in its ability to subsequently influence downstream cortical and subcortical networks [4, 157, 158], as well as being uniquely positioned to exert feedback control on neuromodulatory centers [159], including the cholinergic nuclei [160, 161]. Neuroimaging studies have revealed that the prefrontal cortex is consistently activated on attention tasks, often in conjunction with the parietal cortex [162–165], which is recruited by the prefrontal cortex under conditions of increased attentional demand [157].
A substantial body of work addresses the effects of acetylcholine on attention by manipulating endogenous levels of acetylcholine and by pharmacologically or genetically altering nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Indeed, many genetic and pharmacological studies using both animal models and human subjects have found that nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are of particular importance for attention, as summarized in Table 2.
Knockout mouse strains for the α5, β2, and α7 nicotinic receptor subunits have all been found to display impaired attention performance on the 5-CSRTT [37, 38, 166, 167], and human subjects expressing genetic variations in the α5, α4, or β2 genes are associated with increased risk for nicotine dependence [168–174], which may in part develop as a result of attention deficits that promote early experimentation with drugs and alcohol [168, 170, 172]. Pharmacologically, various nicotinic agonists have been found to improve attention performance in animal studies [175–180], whereas nicotinic antagonists appear to disrupt attention [178, 181]. However, it is important to note that the effects of nicotine may depend on the history of nicotine exposure [182] and on strain/species differences [37, 183].
The agonist nicotine is an interesting example since it is selective for nicotinic receptors and has been used in a large number of animal and human studies. Overall, the effects of nicotine in humans are far more complex and controversial, with inconsistent effects on attention performance [184, 185]. While nicotine has also been shown to improve attention in humans [186–188], this is not always the case [189–193]. Evidence suggests that nicotine may have differential effects in human smoker and non-smoker populations [185, 194–196], and in patients with attention deficits [197, 198].
At the cellular level, nicotinic receptors are subject to desensitization; that is, they can become temporarily inactive in the continued presence of agonist, leading to a reduction in response [83, 84]. Nicotine, at levels normally seen in the blood of smokers (~300 nM) [199–201], can have such an effect on α4β2* receptors [36, 37], as illustrated in Fig. 7.
Interestingly, Bailey et al. [37] reported that the α5 subunit normally protects against nicotine-induced desensitization, since layer VI neurons from WT mice show half as much desensitization as those of α5−/− mice. The low-affinity α7* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, on the other hand, do not appear to desensitize at these concentrations [202].
Deficits in attention have been reported in normal human aging [203] as well as a multitude of neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease and schizophrenia [204–207]. Decreases in prefrontal nicotinic receptor binding are observed in patients suffering from mild cognitive impairment [208, 209] as well as Alzheimer’s disease [210–215], and schizophrenia has been associated both with α7 subunit polymorphisms and expression changes [216, 217], as well as a with a higher incidence of the noncoding α5 nicotinic subunit polymorphism [218, 219]. What is more, nicotinic agonists of the α4β2* and α7 nicotinic receptors have been proposed as potential therapeutics for schizophrenia [220], Alzheimer’s disease [221–224], and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [225–229].
In conclusion
Layer VI nicotinic receptors are integral components of prefrontal attention circuitry in development and adulthood. Despite recent advances, there remains much to be understood about their effects on the maturation of the prefrontal cortex and the modulation of its neurons and networks. Fundamental questions about the regulation of nicotinic receptors in neurons of the living brain remain unanswered. An apparently large reserve of nicotinic receptors within layer VI prefrontal neurons [63, 92], for example, suggests the potential for targeted upregulation to the membrane [230, 231]. It is interesting to note that nicotinic receptor trafficking abnormalities have been documented in psychiatric illness [232]. The issue of physiological and structural plasticity [59, 63] further suggests that the brain may be fundamentally different in certain conditions, and the best treatments may not be those that would improve the performance of the normal brain. In this regard, it is essential for research to examine the realities of prefrontal attention circuitry in different conditions associated with attention deficits. These issues are all the more important to resolve given that nicotinic receptors in layer VI of prefrontal cortex are positioned to be potential drug targets in the treatment of the attention deficits associated with psychiatric and neurological diseases [233].
References
Crick F (1984) Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. PNAS 81:4586–4590
Knudsen EI (2007) Fundamental components of attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:57–78. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256
Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:167–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
Funahashi S (2001) Neuronal mechanisms of executive control by the prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Res 39:147–165
Baddeley A (1992) Working memory. Science 255:556–559
Dehaene S, Changeux J-P (2011) Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron 70:200–227. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
Petersen SE, Posner MI (2012) The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu Rev Neurosci 35:73–89. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525
Deutsch JA, Rocklin KW (1967) Amnesia induced by scopolamine and its temporal variations. Nature 216:89–90. doi:10.1038/216089b0
Deutsch JA (1971) The cholinergic synapse and the site of memory. Science 174:788–794
Warburton DM, Brown K (1971) Attenuation of stimulus sensitivity induced by scopolamine. Nature 230:126–127. doi:10.1038/230126a0
Robbins TW, Everitt BJ, Marston HM et al (1989) Comparative effects of ibotenic acid- and quisqualic acid-induced lesions of the substantia innominata on attentional function in the rat: further implications for the role of the cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis in cognitive processes. Behav Brain Res 35:221–240
Dunnett SB, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1991) The basal forebrain-cortical cholinergic system: interpreting the functional consequences of excitotoxic lesions. Trends Neurosci 14:494–501
Muir JL, Dunnett SB, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1992) Attentional functions of the forebrain cholinergic systems: effects of intraventricular hemicholinium, physostigmine, basal forebrain lesions and intracortical grafts on a multiple-choice serial reaction time task. Exp Brain Res 89:611–622
Muir JL, Page KJ, Sirinathsinghji DJ et al (1993) Excitotoxic lesions of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons: effects on learning, memory and attention. Behav Brain Res 57:123–131
Pang K, Williams MJ, Egeth H, Olton DS (1993) Nucleus basalis magnocellularis and attention: effects of muscimol infusions. Behav Neurosci 107:1031–1038
Voytko ML, Olton DS, Richardson RT et al (1994) Basal forebrain lesions in monkeys disrupt attention but not learning and memory. J Neurosci 14:167–186
Dalley JW, Theobald DE, Bouger P et al (2004) Cortical cholinergic function and deficits in visual attentional performance in rats following 192 IgG-saporin-induced lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 14:922–932. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh052
Newman LA, McGaughy J (2008) Cholinergic deafferentation of prefrontal cortex increases sensitivity to cross-modal distractors during a sustained attention task. J Neurosci 28:2642–2650. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5112-07.2008
Bigl V, Woolf NJ, Butcher LL (1982) Cholinergic projections from the basal forebrain to frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and cingulate cortices: a combined fluorescent tracer and acetylcholinesterase analysis. Brain Res Bull 8:727–749
Mesulam MM, Mufson EJ, Wainer BH, Levey AI (1983) Central cholinergic pathways in the rat: an overview based on an alternative nomenclature (Ch1–Ch6). Neuroscience 10:1185–1201
Mesulam MM, Mufson EJ, Levey AI, Wainer BH (1983) Cholinergic innervation of cortex by the basal forebrain: cytochemistry and cortical connections of the septal area, diagonal band nuclei, nucleus basalis (Substantia innominata), and hypothalamus in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 214:170–197. doi:10.1002/cne.902140206
Woolf NJ, Eckenstein F, Butcher LL (1983) Cholinergic projections from the basal forebrain to the frontal cortex: a combined fluorescent tracer and immunohistochemical analysis in the rat. Neurosci Lett 40:93–98
Rye DB, Wainer BH, Mesulam MM et al (1984) Cortical projections arising from the basal forebrain: a study of cholinergic and noncholinergic components employing combined retrograde tracing and immunohistochemical localization of choline acetyltransferase. Neuroscience 13:627–643. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(84)90083-6
Lewis DA (1991) Distribution of choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive axons in monkey frontal cortex. Neuroscience 40:363–374
Woolf NJ (1991) Cholinergic systems in mammalian brain and spinal cord. Prog Neurobiol 37:475–524
Mrzijak L, Pappy M, Leranth C, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995) Cholinergic synaptic circuitry in the-1. J Comp Neurol 357:603–617. doi:10.1002/cne.903570409
McGaughy J, Kaiser T, Sarter M (1996) Behavioral vigilance following infusions of 192 IgG-saporin into the basal forebrain: selectivity of the behavioral impairment and relation to cortical AChE-positive fiber density. Behav Neurosci 110:247–265
McGaughy J, Dalley JW, Morrison CH et al (2002) Selective behavioral and neurochemical effects of cholinergic lesions produced by intrabasalis infusions of 192 IgG-saporin on attentional performance in a five-choice serial reaction time task. J Neurosci 22:1905–1913
Parikh V, Kozak R, Martinez V, Sarter M (2007) Prefrontal acetylcholine release controls cue detection on multiple timescales. Neuron 56:141–154. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.025
Passetti F, Dalley JW, O’Connell MT et al (2000) Increased acetylcholine release in the rat medial prefrontal cortex during performance of a visual attentional task. Eur J Neurosci 12:3051–3058
Dalley JW, McGaughy J, O’Connell MT et al (2001) Distinct changes in cortical acetylcholine and noradrenaline efflux during contingent and noncontingent performance of a visual attentional task. J Neurosci 21:4908–4914
Himmelheber AM, Sarter M, Bruno JP (2000) Increases in cortical acetylcholine release during sustained attention performance in rats. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 9:313–325
Kozak R, Bruno JP, Sarter M (2006) Augmented prefrontal acetylcholine release during challenged attentional performance. Cereb Cortex 16:9–17. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi079
Sarter M, Gehring WJ, Kozak R (2006) More attention must be paid: the neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Res Rev 51:145–160. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.11.002
Howe WM, Berry AS, Francois J et al (2013) Prefrontal cholinergic mechanisms instigating shifts from monitoring for cues to cue-guided performance: converging electrochemical and fMRI evidence from rats and humans. J Neurosci 33:8742–8752. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5809-12.2013
Kassam SM, Herman PM, Goodfellow NM et al (2008) Developmental excitation of corticothalamic neurons by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurosci 28:8756–8764. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2645-08.2008
Bailey CDC, De Biasi M, Fletcher PJ, Lambe EK (2010) The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha5 subunit plays a key role in attention circuitry and accuracy. J Neurosci 30:9241–9252. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2258-10.2010
Guillem K, Bloem B, Poorthuis RB et al (2011) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor beta2 subunits in the medial prefrontal cortex control attention. Science 333:888–891. doi:10.1126/science.1207079
Sarter M, Paolone G (2011) Deficits in attentional control: cholinergic mechanisms and circuitry-based treatment approaches. Behav Neurosci 125:825–835. doi:10.1037/a0026227
Sarter M, Givens B, Bruno JP (2001) The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom–up. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 35:146–160
Sarter M, Hasselmo ME, Bruno JP, Givens B (2005) Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 48:98–111. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.08.006
Thomson AM (2010) Neocortical layer 6, a review. Front Neuroanat 4:13. doi:10.3389/fnana.2010.00013
Alitto HJ, Usrey WM (2003) Corticothalamic feedback and sensory processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:440–445
Gabbott PL, Warner TA, Jays PR et al (2005) Prefrontal cortex in the rat: projections to subcortical autonomic, motor, and limbic centers. J Comp Neurol 492:145–177. doi:10.1002/cne.20738
Zikopoulos B, Barbas H (2006) Prefrontal projections to the thalamic reticular nucleus form a unique circuit for attentional mechanisms. J Neurosci 26:7348–7361. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5511-05.2006
Briggs F, Usrey WM (2011) Corticogeniculate feedback and visual processing in the primate. J Physiol-London 589:33–40. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.193599
Cudeiro J, Sillito AM (2006) Looking back: corticothalamic feedback and early visual processing. Trends Neurosci 29:298–306. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.05.002
Sherman SM (2007) The thalamus is more than just a relay. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:417–422. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.003
Zhang L, Jones EG (2004) Corticothalamic inhibition in the thalamic reticular nucleus. J Neurophysiol 91:759–766. doi:10.1152/jn.0 0624.2003
von Krosigk M, Monckton JE, Reiner PB, Mccormick DA (1999) Dynamic properties of corticothalamic excitatory postsynaptic potentials and thalamic reticular inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in thalamocortical neurons of the guinea-pig dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Neuroscience 91:7–20
Destexhe A (2000) Modelling corticothalamic feedback and the gating of the thalamus by the cerebral cortex. J Physiol Paris 94:391–410
Smythies J (1997) The functional neuroanatomy of awareness: with a focus on the role of various anatomical systems in the control of intermodal attention. Conscious Cogn 6:455–481. doi:10.1006/ccog 1997.0315
Guillery RW, Sherman SM (2002) Thalamic relay functions and their role in corticocortical communication: generalizations from the visual system. Neuron 33:163–175
Van der Werf Y, Witter M, Groenewegen H (2002) The intralaminar and midline nuclei of the thalamus. Anatomical and functional evidence for participation in processes of arousal and awareness. Brain Res Rev 39:107–140
Berendse HW, Groenewegen HJ (1991) Restricted cortical termination fields of the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei in the rat. Neuroscience 42:73–102
Hoover WB, Vertes RP (2007) Anatomical analysis of afferent projections to the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat. Brain Struct Funct 212:149–179. doi:10.1007/s00429-007-0150-4
Vertes RP (2006) Interactions among the medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and midline thalamus in emotional and cognitive processing in the rat. Neuroscience 142:1–20. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.06.027
Dempsey EW, Morison RS (1942) The electrical activity of a thalamocortical relay system. Am J Physiol 138:283–296
Tian MK, Bailey CDC, De Biasi M et al (2011) Plasticity of prefrontal attention circuitry: upregulated muscarinic excitability in response to decreased nicotinic signaling following deletion of α5 or β2 subunits. J Neurosci 31:16458–16463. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3600-11.2011
Olsen SR, Bortone DS, Adesnik H, Scanziani M (2012) Gain control by layer six in cortical circuits of vision. Nature 482:47–52. doi:10.1038/nature10835
Poorthuis RB, Bloem B, Schak B et al (2012) Layer-specific modulation of the prefrontal cortex by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Cereb Cortex 23:148–161. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr390
Henny P, Jones BE (2008) Projections from basal forebrain to prefrontal cortex comprise cholinergic, GABAergic and glutamatergic inputs to pyramidal cells or interneurons. Eur J Neurosci 27:654–670. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06029.x
Bailey CDC, Alves NC, Nashmi R et al (2012) Nicotinic α5 subunits drive developmental changes in the activation and morphology of prefrontal cortex layer VI neurons. Biol Psychiatry 71:120–128. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.09.011
Houser CR, Crawford GD, Salvaterra PM, Vaughn JE (1985) Immunocytochemical localization of choline acetyltransferase in rat cerebral cortex: a study of cholinergic neurons and synapses. J Comp Neurol 234:17–34. doi:10.1002/cne.902340103
Gotti C, Clementi F, Fornari A et al (2009) Structural and functional diversity of native brain neuronal nicotinic receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 78:703–711. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.024
Albuquerque EX, Pereira EFR, Alkondon M, Rogers SW (2009) Mammalian nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 89:73–120. doi:10.1152/physrev.00015.2008
Fucile S (2004) Ca2+ permeability of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Cell Calcium 35:1–8
Lindstrom J (2000) The structures of neuronal nicotinic receptors. In: Neuronal nicotinic receptors. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 101–162
Moroni M, Zwart R, Sher E et al (2006) alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptors with high and low acetylcholine sensitivity: pharmacology, stoichiometry, and sensitivity to long-term exposure to nicotine. Mol Pharmacol 70:755–768. doi:10.1124/mol.106.023044
Marks MJ, Meinerz NM, Brown RWB, Collins AC (2010) 86Rb+ efflux mediated by alpha4beta2*-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with high and low-sensitivity to stimulation by acetylcholine display similar agonist-induced desensitization. Biochem Pharmacol 80:1238–1251. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2010.06.040
Tapia L, Kuryatov A, Lindstrom J (2007) Ca2+ permeability of the (alpha4)3(beta2)2 stoichiometry greatly exceeds that of (alpha4)2(beta2)3 human acetylcholine receptors. Mol Pharmacol 71:769–776. doi:10.1124/mol.106.030445
Grady SR, Wageman CR, Patzlaff NE, Marks MJ (2012) Low concentrations of nicotine differentially desensitize nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that include α5 or α6 subunits and that mediate synaptosomal neurotransmitter release. Neuropharmacology 62:1935–1943. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.12.026
Ferreira M, Ebert SN, Perry DC et al (2001) Evidence of a functional alpha7-neuronal nicotinic receptor subtype located on motoneurons of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296:260–269
Léna C, Changeux J-P (1999) The role of beta2-subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain explored with a mutant mouse. Ann N Y Acad Sci 868:611–616
Perry DC, Xiao Y, Nguyen HN et al (2002) Measuring nicotinic receptors with characteristics of alpha4beta2, alpha3beta2 and alpha3beta4 subtypes in rat tissues by autoradiography. J Neurochem 82:468–481
Wada E, Wada K, Boulter J et al (1989) Distribution of alpha2, alpha3, alpha4, and beta2 neuronal nicotinic receptor subunit mRNAs in the central nervous system: a hybridization histochemical study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 284:314–335. doi:10.1002/cne.902840212
Hill JA, Zoli M, Bourgeois JP, Changeux J-P (1993) Immunocytochemical localization of a neuronal nicotinic receptor: the beta2-subunit. J Neurosci 13:1551–1568
Nakayama H, Shioda S, Okuda H et al (1995) Immunocytochemical localization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in rat cerebral cortex. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 32:321–328
Gotti C, Clementi F (2004) Neuronal nicotinic receptors: from structure to pathology. Prog Neurobiol 74:363–396. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.09.006
Dominguez del Toro E, Juiz JM, Peng X et al (1994) Immunocytochemical localization of the alpha 7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 349:325–342. doi:10.1002/cne.903490302
Han ZY, Le Novère N, Zoli M et al (2000) Localization of nAChR subunit mRNAs in the brain of Macaca mulatta. Eur J Neurosci 12:3664–3674
Gotti C, Zoli M, Clementi F (2006) Brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: native subtypes and their relevance. Trends Pharmacol Sci 27:482–491. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2006.07.004
Giniatullin R, Nistri A, Yakel JL (2005) Desensitization of nicotinic ACh receptors: shaping cholinergic signaling. Trends Neurosci 28:371–378. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2005.04.009
Quick MW, Lester RAJ (2002) Desensitization of neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Neurobiol 53:457–478. doi:10.1002/neu.10109
Conroy WG, Vernallis AB, Berg DK (1992) The alpha5 gene product assembles with multiple acetylcholine receptor subunits to form distinctive receptor subtypes in brain. Neuron 9:679–691
Wada E, McKinnon D, Heinemann S et al (1990) The distribution of mRNA encoded by a new member of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene family (alpha5) in the rat central nervous system. Brain Res 526:45–53
Ramirez-Latorre J, Yu CR, Qu X et al (1996) Functional contributions of alpha5 subunit to neuronal acetylcholine receptor channels. Nature 380:347–351. doi:10.1038/380347a0
Kuryatov A, Onksen J, Lindstrom J (2008) Roles of accessory subunits in alpha4beta2(*) nicotinic receptors. Mol Pharmacol 74:132–143. doi:10.1124/mol.108.046789
Mao D, Perry DC, Yasuda RP et al (2008) The alpha4beta2alpha5 nicotinic cholinergic receptor in rat brain is resistant to up-regulation by nicotine in vivo. J Neurochem 104:446–456. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05011.x
McClure-Begley TD, King NM, Collins AC et al (2009) Acetylcholine-stimulated [3H]GABA release from mouse brain synaptosomes is modulated by alpha4beta2 and alpha4alpha5beta2 nicotinic receptor subtypes. Mol Pharmacol 75:918–926. doi:10.1124/mol.108.052274
Grady SR, Salminen O, McIntosh JM et al (2010) Mouse striatal dopamine nerve terminals express alpha4alpha5beta2 and two stoichiometric forms of alpha4beta2*-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Mol Neurosci 40:91–95. doi:10.1007/s12031-009-9263-y
Alves NC, Bailey CDC, Nashmi R, Lambe EK (2010) Developmental sex differences in nicotinic currents of prefrontal layer VI neurons in mice and rats. PLoS ONE 5:e9261. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009261
Marks MJ, Pauly JR, Gross SD et al (1992) Nicotine binding and nicotinic receptor subunit RNA after chronic nicotine treatment. J Neurosci 12:2765–2784
Salas R, Orr-Urtreger A, Broide RS et al (2003) The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit alpha5 mediates short-term effects of nicotine in vivo. Mol Pharmacol 63:1059–1066
Winzer-Serhan UH, Leslie FM (2005) Expression of alpha5 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit mRNA during hippocampal and cortical development. J Comp Neurol 481:19–30. doi:10.1002/cne.20357
Brown RWB, Collins AC, Lindstrom JM, Whiteaker P (2007) Nicotinic alpha5 subunit deletion locally reduces high-affinity agonist activation without altering nicotinic receptor numbers. J Neurochem 103:204–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04700.x
Parikh V, Man K, Decker MW, Sarter M (2008) Glutamatergic contributions to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist-evoked cholinergic transients in the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 28:3769–3780. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5251-07.2008
Howe WM, Ji J, Parikh V et al (2010) Enhancement of attentional performance by selective stimulation of alpha4beta2(*) nAChRs: underlying cholinergic mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacol 35:1391–1401. doi:10.1038/npp.2010.9
A Mathie DCSGC-C (1990) Rectification of currents activated by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat sympathetic ganglion neurones. J Physiol 427:625
Forster I, Bertrand D (1995) Inward rectification of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors investigated by using the homomeric alpha7 receptor. Proc Biol Sci 260:139–148. doi:10.1098/rspb 1995.0071
West DC, Mercer A, Kirchhecker S et al (2006) Layer 6 cortico-thalamic pyramidal cells preferentially innervate interneurons and generate facilitating EPSPs. Cereb Cortex 16:200–211. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi098
Mercer A, West DC, Morris OT et al (2005) Excitatory connections made by presynaptic cortico-cortical pyramidal cells in layer 6 of the neocortex. Cereb Cortex 15:1485–1496. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi027
Robbins TW (2002) The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacology 163:362–380. doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1154-7
Sunderland T, Weingartner H, Cohen RM et al (1989) Low-dose oral lorazepam administration in Alzheimer subjects and age-matched controls. Psychopharmacology 99:129–133
Foldi NS, Jutagir R, Davidoff D, Gould T (1992) Selective attention skills in Alzheimer’s disease: performance on graded cancellation tests varying in density and complexity. J Gerontol 47:P146–P153
Okonkwo OC, Wadley VG, Ball K et al (2008) Dissociations in visual attention deficits among persons with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 15:492–505. doi:10.1080/13825580701844414
Okonkwo OC, Crowe M, Wadley VG, Ball K (2008) Visual attention and self-regulation of driving among older adults. Int Psychogeriatr 20:162–173. doi:10.1017/S104161020700539X
Shaw P, Eckstrand K, Sharp W et al (2007) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. PNAS 104:19649–19654. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707741104
Sullivan RM, Brake WG (2003) What the rodent prefrontal cortex can teach us about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the critical role of early developmental events on prefrontal function. Behav Brain Res 146:43–55
Krain AL, Castellanos FX (2006) Brain development and ADHD. Clin Psychol Rev 26:433–444. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.01.005
Nishimura A, Hohmann CF, Johnston MV, Blue ME (2002) Neonatal electrolytic lesions of the basal forebrain stunt plasticity in mouse barrel field cortex. Int J Dev Neurosci 20:481–489
Kuczewski N, Aztiria E, Leanza G, Domenici L (2005) Selective cholinergic immunolesioning affects synaptic plasticity in developing visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci 21:1807–1814. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04014.x
Robertson RT, Gallardo KA, Claytor KJ et al (1998) Neonatal treatment with 192 IgG-saporin produces long-term forebrain cholinergic deficits and reduces dendritic branching and spine density of neocortical pyramidal neurons. Cereb Cortex 8:142–155
Sherren N, Pappas BA (2005) Selective acetylcholine and dopamine lesions in neonatal rats produce distinct patterns of cortical dendritic atrophy in adulthood. Neuroscience 136:445–456. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.053
Heath CJ, Picciotto MR (2009) Nicotine-induced plasticity during development: modulation of the cholinergic system and long-term consequences for circuits involved in attention and sensory processing. Neuropharmacology 56(Suppl 1):254–262. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.07.020
Perry EK, Lee ML, Martin-Ruiz CM et al (2001) Cholinergic activity in autism: abnormalities in the cerebral cortex and basal forebrain. Am J Psychiatry 158:1058–1066
Martin-Ruiz CM, Lee M, Perry RH et al (2004) Molecular analysis of nicotinic receptor expression in autism. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 123:81–90. doi:10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.01.003
Picard F, Bruel D, Servent D et al (2006) Alteration of the in vivo nicotinic receptor density in ADNFLE patients: a PET study. Brain 129:2047–2060. doi:10.1093/brain/awl156
Breese CR, Lee MJ, Adams CE et al (2000) Abnormal regulation of high affinity nicotinic receptors in subjects with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol 23:351–364. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00121-4
Marutle A, Zhang X, Court J et al (2001) Laminar distribution of nicotinic receptor subtypes in cortical regions in schizophrenia. J Chem Neuroanat 22:115–126
Kristt DA (1979) Acetylcholinesterase-containing neurons of layer VIb in immature neocortex: possible component of an early formed intrinsic cortical circuit. Anat Embryol 157:217–226
Mechawar N, Descarries L (2001) The cholinergic innervation develops early and rapidly in the rat cerebral cortex: a quantitative immunocytochemical study. Neuroscience 108:555–567
Romijn HJ, Hofman MA, Gramsbergen A (1991) At what age is the developing cerebral cortex of the rat comparable to that of the full-term newborn human baby? Early Hum Dev 26:61–67
Watson RE, Desesso JM, Hurtt ME, Cappon GD (2006) Postnatal growth and morphological development of the brain: a species comparison. Birth Defect Res B 77:471–484. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20090
Tribollet E, Bertrand D, Marguerat A, Raggenbass M (2004) Comparative distribution of nicotinic receptor subtypes during development, adulthood and aging: an autoradiographic study in the rat brain. Neuroscience 124:405–420. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.09.028
Cimino M, Marini P, Colombo S, et al (1995) Expression of neuronal acetylcholine nicotinic receptor α4 and β2 subunits during postnatal development of the rat brain. J Neural Transm 100:77–92. doi:10.1007/BF01271531
Zhang X, Liu C, Miao H et al (1998) Postnatal changes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha2, alpha3, alpha4, alpha7 and beta2 subunits genes expression in rat brain. Int J Dev Neurosci 16:507–518
Lipton SA, Frosch MP, Phillips MD et al (1988) Nicotinic antagonists enhance process outgrowth by rat retinal ganglion cells in culture. Science 239:1293–1296
Pugh PC, Berg DK (1994) Neuronal acetylcholine receptors that bind alpha-bungarotoxin mediate neurite retraction in a calcium-dependent manner. J Neurosci 14:889–896
Bertrand D, Valera S, Bertrand S et al (1991) Steroids inhibit nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. NeuroReport 2:277–280
Valera S, Ballivet M, Bertrand D (1992) Progesterone modulates a neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. PNAS 89:9949–9953
Kohchi C, Ukena K, Tsutsui K (1998) Age- and region-specific expressions of the messenger RNAs encoding for steroidogenic enzymes p450scc, P450c17 and 3beta-HSD in the postnatal rat brain. Brain Res 801:233–238
Zwain IH, Yen SS (1999) Neurosteroidogenesis in astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and neurons of cerebral cortex of rat brain. Endocrinology 140:3843–3852
Paradiso K, Zhang J, Steinbach JH (2001) The C terminus of the human nicotinic alpha4beta2 receptor forms a binding site required for potentiation by an estrogenic steroid. J Neurosci 21:6561–6568
Brown RT, Freeman WS, Perrin JM et al (2001) Prevalence and assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in primary care settings. Pediatrics 107:E43
Cuffe SP, Moore CG, McKeown RE (2005) Prevalence and correlates of ADHD symptoms in the national health interview survey. J Atten Disord 9:392–401. doi:10.1177/1087054705280413
Smalley SL, McGough JJ, Moilanen IK et al (2007) Prevalence and psychiatric comorbidity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in an adolescent Finnish population. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 46:1575–1583. doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e3181573137
Gulledge AT, Bucci DJ, Zhang SS et al (2009) M1 receptors mediate cholinergic modulation of excitability in neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 29:9888–9902. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1366-09.2009
Lambe EK, Picciotto MR, Aghajanian GK (2003) Nicotine induces glutamate release from thalamocortical terminals in prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacol 28:216–225. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300032
Gioanni Y, Rougeot C, Clarke PB et al (1999) Nicotinic receptors in the rat prefrontal cortex: increase in glutamate release and facilitation of mediodorsal thalamo-cortical transmission. Eur J Neurosci 11:18–30
Lambe EK, Olausson P, Horst NK et al (2005) Hypocretin and nicotine excite the same thalamocortical synapses in prefrontal cortex: correlation with improved attention in rat. J Neurosci 25:5225–5229. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0719-05.2005
Parikh V, Ji J, Decker MW, Sarter M (2010) Prefrontal beta2 subunit-containing and alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors differentially control glutamatergic and cholinergic signaling. J Neurosci 30:3518–3530. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5712-09.2010
Livingstone PD, Dickinson JA, Srinivasan J et al (2010) Glutamate-dopamine crosstalk in the rat prefrontal cortex is modulated by Alpha7 nicotinic receptors and potentiated by PNU-120596. J Mol Neurosci 40:172–176. doi:10.1007/s12031-009-9232-5
Livingstone PD, Srinivasan J, Kew JNC et al (2009) alpha7 and non-alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors modulate dopamine release in vitro and in vivo in the rat prefrontal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 29:539–550. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06613.x
Kennett A, Heal DJ, Wonnacott S (2012) Pharmacological differences between rat frontal cortex and hippocampus in the nicotinic modulation of noradrenaline release implicate distinct receptor subtypes. Nicotine Tob Res 14:1339–1345. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts128
Porter JT, Cauli B, Tsuzuki K et al (1999) Selective excitation of subtypes of neocortical interneurons by nicotinic receptors. J Neurosci 19:5228–5235
Krenz I, Kalkan D, Wevers A et al (2001) Parvalbumin-containing interneurons of the human cerebral cortex express nicotinic acetylcholine receptor proteins. J Chem Neuroanat 21:239–246
Alkondon M, Pereira EF, Eisenberg HM, Albuquerque EX (2000) Nicotinic receptor activation in human cerebral cortical interneurons: a mechanism for inhibition and disinhibition of neuronal networks. J Neurosci 20:66–75
Couey JJ, Meredith RM, Spijker S et al (2007) Distributed network actions by nicotine increase the threshold for spike-timing-dependent plasticity in prefrontal cortex. Neuron 54:73–87. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.03.006
Xiang Z, Huguenard JR, Prince DA (1998) Cholinergic switching within neocortical inhibitory networks. Science 281:985–988
Vidal C, Changeux J-P (1993) Nicotinic and muscarinic modulations of excitatory synaptic transmission in the rat prefrontal cortex in vitro. Neuroscience 56:23–32
Gil Z, Connors BW, Amitai Y (1997) Differential regulation of neocortical synapses by neuromodulators and activity. Neuron 19:679–686
Christophe E, Roebuck A, Staiger JF et al (2002) Two types of nicotinic receptors mediate an excitation of neocortical layer I interneurons. J Neurophysiol 88:1318–1327. doi:10.1152/jn.0 0199.2002
Bandyopadhyay S (2006) Endogenous acetylcholine enhances synchronized interneuron activity in rat neocortex. J Neurophysiol 95:1908–1916. doi:10.1152/jn.00881.2005
Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR (2006) Intermediate phenotypes and genetic mechanisms of psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:818–827. doi:10.1038/nrn1993
Tekin S, Cummings JL (2002) Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update. J Psychosom Res 53:647–654
Nelson CL, Sarter M, Bruno JP (2005) Prefrontal cortical modulation of acetylcholine release in posterior parietal cortex. Neuroscience 132:347–359. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.007
Arnsten AFT, Wang MJ, Paspalas CD (2012) Neuromodulation of thought: flexibilities and vulnerabilities in prefrontal cortical network synapses. Neuron 76:223–239. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.038
Uylings HBM, Groenewegen HJ, Kolb B (2003) Do rats have a prefrontal cortex? Behav Brain Res 146:3–17
Gaykema RPA, Luiten PGM, Nyakas C, Traber JR (1990) Cortical projection patterns of the medial septum-diagonal band complex. J Comp Neurol 293:103–124. doi:10.1002/cne.902930109
Zaborszky L, Gaykema RP, Swanson DJ, Cullinan WE (1997) Cortical input to the basal forebrain. Neuroscience 79:1051–1078
Kumari V, Gray JA, Ffytche DH et al (2003) Cognitive effects of nicotine in humans: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 19:1002–1013. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00110-1
Milham MP, Erickson KI, Banich MT et al (2002) Attentional control in the aging brain: insights from an fMRI Study of the Stroop Task. Brain Cogn 49:277–296. doi:10.1006/brcg 2001.1501
Hao J, Li K, Li K et al (2005) Visual attention deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: an fMRI study. Neurosci Lett 385:18–23. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2005.05.028
Small DM, Gitelman DR, Gregory MD et al (2003) The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention. NeuroImage 18:633–641. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00012-5
Hoyle E, Genn RF, Fernandes C, Stolerman IP (2006) Impaired performance of alpha7 nicotinic receptor knockout mice in the five-choice serial reaction time task. Psychopharmacology 189:211–223. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0549-2
Young JW, Crawford N, Kelly JS et al (2007) Impaired attention is central to the cognitive deficits observed in alpha7 deficient mice. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17:145–155. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.03.008
Rigbi A, Kanyas K, Yakir A et al (2008) Why do young women smoke? V. Role of direct and interactive effects of nicotinic cholinergic receptor gene variation on neurocognitive function. Genes Brain Behav 7:164–172. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2007.00329.x
Bierut LJ, Stitzel JA, Wang JC et al (2008) Variants in nicotinic receptors and risk for nicotine dependence. Am J Psychiatry 165:1163–1171. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111711
Schlaepfer IR, Hoft NR, Collins AC et al (2008) The CHRNA5/A3/B4 gene cluster variability as an important determinant of early alcohol and tobacco initiation in young adults. Biol Psychiatry 63:1039–1046. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.10.024
Stevens VL, Bierut LJ, Talbot JT et al (2008) Nicotinic receptor gene variants influence susceptibility to heavy smoking. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:3517–3525. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0585
Weiss RB, Baker TB, Cannon DS et al (2008) A candidate gene approach identifies the CHRNA5-A3-B4 region as a risk factor for age-dependent nicotine addiction. PLoS Genet 4:e1000125. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000125
Caporaso N, Gu F, Chatterjee N et al (2009) Genome-wide and candidate gene association study of cigarette smoking behaviors. PLoS ONE 4:e4653. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004653
Saccone NL, Saccone SF, Hinrichs AL et al (2009) Multiple distinct risk loci for nicotine dependence identified by dense coverage of the complete family of nicotinic receptor subunit (CHRN) genes. Am J Med Genet 150B:453–466. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30828
Prendergast MA, Jackson WJ, Terry AV et al (1998) Central nicotinic receptor agonists ABT-418, ABT-089, and (−)-nicotine reduce distractibility in adult monkeys. Psychopharmacology 136:50–58
McGaughy J, Decker MW, Sarter M (1999) Enhancement of sustained attention performance by the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-418 in intact but not basal forebrain-lesioned rats. Psychopharmacology 144:175–182
Mirza NR, Bright JL (2001) Nicotine-induced enhancements in the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats are strain-dependent. Psychopharmacology 154:8–12. doi:10.1007/s002130000605
Rezvani A, Bushnell P, Levin E (2002) Effects of nicotine and mecamylamine on choice accuracy in an operant visual signal detection task in female rats. Psychopharmacology 164:369–375. doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1221-0
Rezvani AH, Cauley M, Sexton H et al (2011) Sazetidine-A, a selective α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand: effects on dizocilpine and scopolamine-induced attentional impairments in female Sprague–Dawley rats. Psychopharmacology 215:621–630. doi:10.1007/s00213-010-2161-8
Hahn B, Sharples CGV, Wonnacott S et al (2003) Attentional effects of nicotinic agonists in rats. Neuropharmacology 44:1054–1067. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(03)00099-6
Grottick AJ, Higgins GA (2000) Effect of subtype selective nicotinic compounds on attention as assessed by the five-choice serial reaction time task. Behav Brain Res 117:197–208. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00305-3
Hahn B, Stolerman IP (2002) Nicotine-induced attentional enhancement in rats: effects of chronic exposure to nicotine. Neuropsychopharmacol 27:712–722. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00348-2
Pattij T, Janssen MCW, Loos M et al (2007) Strain specificity and cholinergic modulation of visuospatial attention in three inbred mouse strains. Genes Brain Behav 6:579–587. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00284.x
Picciotto MR (2003) Nicotine as a modulator of behavior: beyond the inverted U. Trends Pharmacol Sci 24:493–499. doi:10.1016/S0165-6147(03)00230-X
Newhouse PA, Potter A, Singh A (2004) Effects of nicotinic stimulation on cognitive performance. Curr Opin Pharmacol 4:36–46. doi:10.1016/j.coph.2003.11.001
Wesnes K, Warburton DM (1984) Effects of scopolamine and nicotine on human rapid information processing performance. Psychopharmacology 82:147–150
Mumenthaler MS, Taylor JL, O’Hara R, Yesavage JA (1998) Influence of nicotine on simulator flight performance in non-smokers. Psychopharmacology 140:38–41
Levin ED, Conners CK, Silva D et al (1998) Transdermal nicotine effects on attention. Psychopharmacology 140:135–141
Le Houezec J, Halliday R, Benowitz NL et al (1994) A low dose of subcutaneous nicotine improves information processing in non-smokers. Psychopharmacology 114:628–634
Kleykamp BA, Jennings JM, Blank MD, Eissenberg T (2005) The effects of nicotine on attention and working memory in never-smokers. Psychol Addict Behav 19:433–438. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.433
Heishman SJ, Snyder FR, Henningfield JE (1993) Performance, subjective, and physiological effects of nicotine in non-smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend 34:11–18
Foulds J, Stapleton J, Swettenham J et al (1996) Cognitive performance effects of subcutaneous nicotine in smokers and never-smokers. Psychopharmacology 127:31–38
Heishman SJ, Henningfield JE (2000) Tolerance to repeated nicotine administration on performance, subjective, and physiological responses in nonsmokers. Psychopharmacology 152:321–333. doi:10.1007/s002130000541
Parrott AC, Roberts G (1991) Smoking deprivation and cigarette reinstatement: effects upon visual attention. J Psychopharmacol (Oxford) 5:404–409. doi:10.1177/026988119100500435
Warburton DM, Arnall C (1994) Improvements in performance without nicotine withdrawal. Psychopharmacology 115:539–542
Dawkins L, Powell JH, West R et al (2007) A double-blind placebo-controlled experimental study of nicotine: II—effects on response inhibition and executive functioning. Psychopharmacology 190:457–467. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0634-6
Newhouse PA, Sunderland T, Tariot PN et al (1988) Intravenous nicotine in Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study. Psychopharmacology 95:171–175
Zabala A, Eguiluz JI, Segarra R et al (2009) Cognitive performance and cigarette smoking in first-episode psychosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 259:65–71. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-0835-6
Henningfield JE, Stapleton JM, Benowitz NL et al (1993) Higher levels of nicotine in arterial than in venous blood after cigarette smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 33:23–29
Rose JE, Mukhin AG, Lokitz SJ et al (2010) Kinetics of brain nicotine accumulation in dependent and nondependent smokers assessed with PET and cigarettes containing 11C-nicotine. PNAS 107:5190–5195. doi:10.1073/pnas.0909184107
Matta SG, Balfour DJ, Benowitz NL et al (2007) Guidelines on nicotine dose selection for in vivo research. Psychopharmacology 190:269–319. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0441-0
Wooltorton JRA, Pidoplichko VI, Broide RS, Dani JA (2003) Differential desensitization and distribution of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in midbrain dopamine areas. J Neurosci 23:3176–3185
Gazzaley A, Cooney JW, Rissman J, D’Esposito M (2005) Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nat Neurosci 8:1298–1300. doi:10.1038/nn1543
Cullum CM, Harris JG, Waldo MC et al (1993) Neurophysiological and neuropsychological evidence for attentional dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 10:131–141
Perry RJ, Hodges JR (1999) Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. A critical review. Brain 122(Pt 3):383–404. doi:10.1093/brain/122.3.383
Chen WJ, Faraone SV (2000) Sustained attention deficits as markers of genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am J Med Genet 97:52–57
Gur RE, Calkins ME, Gur RC et al (2006) The consortium on the genetics of schizophrenia: neurocognitive endophenotypes. Schizophr Bull 33:49–68. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbl055
Terrière E, Dempsey MF, Herrmann LL et al (2010) 5-123I-A-85380 binding to the α4β2-nicotinic receptor in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 31:1885–1893. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.10.008
Kendziorra K, Wolf H, Meyer PM et al (2010) Decreased cerebral α4β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor availability in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease assessed with positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:515–525. doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1644-5
Wu J, Ishikawa M, Zhang J, Hashimoto K (2010) Brain imaging of nicotinic receptors in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Alzheimer’s Dis 2010:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.095
Whitehouse PJ, Martino AM, Antuono PG et al (1986) Nicotinic acetylcholine binding sites in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res 371:146–151
Nordberg A, Winblad B (1986) Reduced number of [3H]nicotine and [3H]acetylcholine binding sites in the frontal cortex of Alzheimer brains. Neurosci Lett 72:115–119
Nordberg A, Adem A, Hardy J, Winblad B (1988) Change in nicotinic receptor subtypes in temporal cortex of Alzheimer brains. Neurosci Lett 86:317–321
Sugaya K, Giacobini E, Chiappinelli VA (1990) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in human frontal cortex: changes in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Res 27:349–359. doi:10.1002/jnr.490270314
Sihver W, Gillberg PG, Svensson AL, Nordberg A (1999) Autoradiographic comparison of [3H](-)nicotine, [3H]cytisine and [3H]epibatidine binding in relation to vesicular acetylcholine transport sites in the temporal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 94:685–696
Freedman R, Coon H, Myles-Worsley M et al (1997) Linkage of a neurophysiological deficit in schizophrenia to a chromosome 15 locus. PNAS 94:587–592
Guan ZZ, Zhang X, Blennow K, Nordberg A (1999) Decreased protein level of nicotinic receptor alpha7 subunit in the frontal cortex from schizophrenic brain. NeuroReport 10:1779–1782
Hong LE, Yang X, Wonodi I et al (2011) A CHRNA5 allele related to nicotine addiction and schizophrenia. Genes Brain Behav 10:530–535. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2011.00689.x
Jackson KJ, Fanous AH, Chen J et al (2013) Variants in the 15q25 gene cluster are associated with risk for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Genet 23:20–28. doi:10.1097/YPG.0b013e32835bd5f1
Martin L, Kem W, Freedman R (2004) Alpha-7 nicotinic receptor agonists: potential new candidates for the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology. doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1750-1
Kem WR (1997) Alzheimer’s drug design based upon an invertebrate toxin (anabaseine) which is a potent nicotinic receptor agonist. Invert Neurosci 3:251–259
Kem WR, Mahnir VM, Prokai L et al (2004) Hydroxy metabolites of the Alzheimer’s drug candidate 3-[(2,4-dimethoxy)benzylidene]-anabaseine dihydrochloride (GTS-21): their molecular properties, interactions with brain nicotinic receptors, and brain penetration. Mol Pharmacol 65:56–67. doi:10.1124/mol.65.1.56
Toyohara J, Hashimoto K (2010) α7 Nicotinic receptor agonists: potential therapeutic drugs for treatment of cognitive impairments in schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease. Open Med Chem J 4:37–56. doi:10.2174/1874104501004010037
Nie H, Wang Z, Zhao W et al (2013) Neuroscience letters. Neurosci Lett 537:29–34. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.001
Wilens TE, Biederman J, Spencer TJ et al (1999) A pilot controlled clinical trial of ABT-418, a cholinergic agonist, in the treatment of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 156:1931–1937
Wilens TE, Gault LM, Childress A et al (2011) Safety and efficacy of ABT-089 in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results from two randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 50(73–84):e1. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.10.001
Apostol G, Abi-Saab W, Kratochvil CJ et al (2011) Efficacy and safety of the novel α4β2 neuronal nicotinic receptor partial agonist ABT-089 in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Psychopharmacology 219:715–725. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2393-2
Bain EE, Robieson W, Pritchett Y et al (2013) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of α4β2 agonist ABT-894 in adults with ADHD. Neuropsychopharmacol 38:405–413. doi:10.1038/npp.2012.194
Jucaite A, Öhd J, Potter AS et al (2013) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of α4β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist AZD1446 (TC-6683) in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychopharmacology. doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3116-7
Lester HA, Xiao C, Srinivasan R et al (2009) Nicotine is a selective pharmacological chaperone of acetylcholine receptor number and stoichiometry. Implications for drug discovery. AAPS J 11:167–177. doi:10.1208/s12248-009-9090-7
Miwa JM, Lester HA, Walz A (2012) Optimizing cholinergic tone through lynx modulators of nicotinic receptors: implications for plasticity and nicotine addiction. Physiology 27:187–99
Lewis AS, Picciotto MR (2013) High-affinity nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression and trafficking abnormalities in psychiatric illness. Psychopharmacology 229:477–485. doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3126-5
Taly A, Corringer P-J, Guedin D et al (2009) Nicotinic receptors: allosteric transitions and therapeutic targets in the nervous system. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8:733–750. doi:10.1038/nrd2927
Young JW, Finlayson K, Spratt C et al (2004) Nicotine improves sustained attention in mice: evidence for involvement of the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Neuropsychopharmacol 29:891–900. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300393
Winterer G, Mittelstrass K, Giegling I et al (2010) Risk gene variants for nicotine dependence in the CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 cluster are associated with cognitive performance. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 153B:1448–1458. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.31126
Todd RD, Lobos EA, Sun L-W, Neuman RJ (2003) Mutational analysis of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha 4 subunit gene in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence for association of an intronic polymorphism with attention problems. Molecular Psychiatry 8:103–108. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001257
Greenwood PM, Fossella JA, Parasuraman R (2005) Specificity of the effect of a nicotinic receptor polymorphism on individual differences in visuospatial attention. J Cognitive Neurosci 17:1611–1620. doi:10.1162/089892905774597281
Espeseth T, Sneve MH, Rootwelt H, Laeng B (2010) Nicotinic receptor gene CHRNA4 interacts with processing load in attention. PLoS ONE 5:e14407. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014407
Muir JL, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1994) AMPA-induced excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain: a significant role for the cortical cholinergic system in attentional function. J Neurosci 14:2313–2326
Muir JL, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1995) Reversal of visual attentional dysfunction following lesions of the cholinergic basal forebrain by physostigmine and nicotine but not by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron. Psychopharmacology 118:82–92
Muir JL, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1996) The cerebral cortex of the rat and visual attentional function: dissociable effects of mediofrontal, cingulate, anterior dorsolateral, and parietal cortex lesions on a five-choice serial reaction time task. Cereb Cortex 6:470–481
Chudasama Y, Passetti F, Rhodes SEV et al (2003) Dissociable aspects of performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task following lesions of the dorsal anterior cingulate, infralimbic and orbitofrontal cortex in the rat: differential effects on selectivity, impulsivity and compulsivity. Behav Brain Res 146:105–119
Birrell JM, Brown VJ (2000) Medial frontal cortex mediates perceptual attentional set shifting in the rat. J Neurosci 20:4320–4324
Witte EA, Davidson MC, Marrocco RT (1997) Effects of altering brain cholinergic activity on covert orienting of attention: comparison of monkey and human performance. Psychopharmacology 132:324–334
Mirza NR, Stolerman IP (1998) Nicotine enhances sustained attention in the rat under specific task conditions. Psychopharmacology 138:266–274
Blondel A, Sanger DJ, Moser PC (2000) Characterisation of the effects of nicotine in the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats: antagonist studies. Psychopharmacology 149:293–305
Grilly DM, Simon BB, Levin ED (2000) Nicotine enhances stimulus detection performance of middle- and old-aged rats: a longitudinal study. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:665–670
Rezvani AH, Levin ED (2004) Nicotine-antipsychotic drug interactions and attentional performance in female rats. Eur J Pharmacol 486:175–182. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.12.021
Rezvani AH, Caldwell DP, Levin ED (2005) Nicotinic–serotonergic drug interactions and attentional performance in rats. Psychopharmacology 179:521–528. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-2060-y
Grottick AJ, Wyler R, Higgins GA (2001) A study of the nicotinic agonist SIB-1553A on locomotion and attention as measured by the five-choice serial reaction time task. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 70:505–513
Hahn B, Shoaib M, Stolerman IP (2002) Nicotine-induced enhancement of attention in the five-choice serial reaction time task: the influence of task demands. Psychopharmacology 162:129–137. doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1005-6
Day M, Pan JB, Buckley MJ et al (2007) Differential effects of ciproxifan and nicotine on impulsivity and attention measures in the 5-choice serial reaction time test. Biochem Pharmacol 73:1123–1134. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2006.12.004
Hahn B, Shoaib M, Stolerman IP (2011) Selective nicotinic receptor antagonists: effects on attention and nicotine-induced attentional enhancement. Psychopharmacology 217:75–82. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2258-8
Semenova S, Stolerman IP, Markou A (2007) Chronic nicotine administration improves attention while nicotine withdrawal induces performance deficits in the 5-choice serial reaction time task in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 87:360–368. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2007.05.009
Allison C, Shoaib M (2013) Nicotine improves performance in an attentional set shifting task in rats. Neuropharmacology 64:314–320. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.055
Young JW, Meves JM, Geyer MA (2013) Nicotinic agonist-induced improvement of vigilance in mice in the 5-choice continuous performance test. Behav Brain Res 240:119–133. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.028
Min S, Moon I-W, Ko R, Shin H (2001) Effects of transdermal nicotine on attention and memory in healthy elderly non-smokers. Psychopharmacology 159:83–88. doi:10.1007/s002130100899
Griesar WS, Zajdel DP, Oken BS (2002) Nicotine effects on alertness and spatial attention in non-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 4:185–194. doi:10.1080/14622200210123617
Thiel CM, Zilles K, Fink GR (2005) Nicotine modulates reorienting of visuospatial attention and neural activity in human parietal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacol. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300633
Giessing C, Thiel CM, Rösler F, Fink GR (2006) The modulatory effects of nicotine on parietal cortex activity in a cued target detection task depend on cue reliability. Neuroscience 137:853–864. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.005
Poltavski DV, Petros T (2006) Effects of transdermal nicotine on attention in adult non-smokers with and without attentional deficits. Physiol Behav 87:614–624. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.12.011
Meinke A, Thiel CM, Fink GR (2006) Effects of nicotine on visuo-spatial selective attention as indexed by event-related potentials. Neuroscience 141:201–212. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.072
Vossel S, Thiel CM, Fink GR (2007) Behavioral and neural effects of nicotine on visuospatial attentional reorienting in non-smoking subjects. Neuropsychopharmacol 33:731–738. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301469
Knott VJ, Bolton K, Heenan A et al (2009) Effects of acute nicotine on event-related potential and performance indices of auditory distraction in nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res 11:519–530. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp044
Knott VJ, Millar AM, McIntosh JF et al (2011) Separate and combined effects of low dose ketamine and nicotine on behavioural and neural correlates of sustained attention. Biol Psychol 88:83–93. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.06.012
Wignall ND, de Wit H (2011) Effects of nicotine on attention and inhibitory control in healthy nonsmokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 19:183–191. doi:10.1037/a0023292
Myers CS, Taylor RC, Salmeron BJ et al (2013) Nicotine enhances alerting, but not executive, attention in smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res 15:277–281. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts108
Terry AV, Risbrough VB, Buccafusco JJ, Menzaghi F (2002) Effects of (±)-4-[[2-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)ethyl]thio]phenol hydrochloride (SIB-1553A), a selective ligand for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, in tests of visual attention and distractibility in rats and monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301:284–292
Buccafusco JJ, Terry AV Jr, Decker MW, Gopalakrishnan M (2007) Profile of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists ABT-594 and A-582941, with differential subtype selectivity, on delayed matching accuracy by young monkeys. Biochem Pharmacol 74:1202–1211. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.010
Rezvani AH, Kholdebarin E, Brucato FH et al (2009) Effect of R3487/MEM3454, a novel nicotinic alpha7 receptor partial agonist and 5-HT3 antagonist on sustained attention in rats. Progress Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33:269–275. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.11.018
Mohler EG, Franklin SR, Rueter LE et al (2010) Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 95:146–157. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2009.12.019
Mirza NR, Stolerman IP (2000) The role of nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in attention. Psychopharmacology 148:243–250
Ruotsalainen S, Miettinen R, MacDonald E et al (2000) Blockade of muscarinic, rather than nicotinic, receptors impairs attention, but does not interact with serotonin depletion. Psychopharmacology 148:111–123
Ellis JR, Ellis KA, Bartholomeusz CF et al (2006) Muscarinic and nicotinic receptors synergistically modulate working memory and attention in humans. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 9:175–189. doi:10.1017/S1461145705005407
Yesavage JA, Mumenthaler MS, Taylor JL et al (2002) Donepezil and flight simulator performance: effects on retention of complex skills. Neurology 59:123–125
Rokem A, Landau AN, Garg D et al (2010) Cholinergic enhancement increases the effects of voluntary attention but does not affect involuntary attention. Neuropsychopharmacol 35:2538–2544. doi:10.1038/npp.2010.118
Paxinos G, Franklin K (2001) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
Luiten PG, Gaykema RP, Traber J, Spencer DG (1987) Cortical projection patterns of magnocellular basal nucleus subdivisions as revealed by anterogradely transported Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. Brain Res 413:229–250
Mckay BE, Placzek AN, Dani JA (2007) Regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity by neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 74:1120–1133. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.001
Dalley JW, Cardinal RN, Robbins TW (2004) Prefrontal executive and cognitive functions in rodents: neural and neurochemical substrates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28:771–784. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.006
Bailey CDC, Tian MK, Kang L, O’Reilly R, Lambe EK (2013) Chrna5 genotype determines the long-lasting effects of developmental in vivo nicotine exposure on prefrontal attention circuitry. Neuropharmacology. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.09.003
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by grants to EKL from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR, MOP 89825), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and the Province of Ontario (Early Researcher Award). EKL holds a Canada Research Chair (tier II) in Developmental Cortical Neurophysiology. EP is supported by a doctoral fellowship from the Ontario Mental Health Foundation. MP is supported by an NSERC undergraduate student research award. MKT is supported by a Banting and Best Canada Graduate Scholarship. CDCB is funded by an NSERC Discovery Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Proulx, E., Piva, M., Tian, M.K. et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in attention circuitry: the role of layer VI neurons of prefrontal cortex. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 1225–1244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1481-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1481-3