Skip to main content
Log in

Science teachers' views of professional development

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seventy-five science teachers from schools across Australia were interviewed in 1991 as part of the Science Education Professional Development Project (SEPD), a Department of Employment, Education and Training (DEET) funded Project of National Significance with a brief to develop a strategy to enhance the professional development of science teachers. At the time of interviewing there was considerable discussion about the implementation of a new classification, the Advanced Skilled Teacher. A major purpose of this Award Restructuring was to offer a career path for classroom teachers. In order to retain good science teachers and to encourage them to continue in the important role of classroom teaching it is crucial to understand and to meet their professional development needs. But what does it mean to develop and grow as a science teacher? What constitutes quality professional development? What do science teachers expect from professional development activities? This paper explores science teachers' expectations in relation to professional development and examines the implications for policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Commonwealth Schools Commission. (1988).Teachers learning: Improving Australian schools through inservice training and development. Department of Employment, Education and Training, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.M. (1990).Teachers at work: achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J.J., & Ingvarson, L. (1991a).Loose connections: Science teachers' views on status, careers, evaluation and professional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Gold Coast.

  • Loughran, J.J., & Ingvarson, L. (1991b). Keeping up a dilemma for science teachers.Research in Science Education, 21, 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S., & Smith, B. (1991). In P. Reyes. (Ed.),Teachers and their workplace. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M.W., Talbert, J.E. & Bascia, N. (1990). The contexts of teaching in secondary schools: teachers' realities. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nott, M., Watts, M., & Oakes, M. (1992). What is ideal INSET?Education in Science, 148 (June), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57, (1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Specializations: science education, reflective practice, teaching and learning.

Specializations: professional development, educational evaluation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loughran, J., Ingvarson, L. Science teachers' views of professional development. Research in Science Education 23, 174–182 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357058

Keywords

Navigation