Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of temporal and spatial variability of groundwater irrigation quality using geostatistical techniques on the coastal aquifer of Çarşamba Plain, Turkey, from 1990 to 2012

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate variations in groundwater quality parameters between 1990 and 2012, and to assess the suitability of groundwater for irrigation. Groundwater samples were taken in the summers of 1990 and 2012, and hydrochemical characteristics were investigated through Piper and USSL diagrams. The electrical conductivity (EC), sodium percentage (%Na), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), residual sodium carbonate (RSC), magnesium hazard (MR), potential salinity (PS), and Kelly’s ratios (KI) were used as the indicators for the water quality. Water quality parameters were assessed through geostatistical techniques and geographical information systems. Initially, semivariograms were determined for each water quality index, and spatial distribution maps were created for each sampling period through ordinary kriging techniques. Results revealed excessive increases in EC, Na, and Cl values with time. EC values of groundwater were over 1.25 dS/m in 4.64% of the study area in 1990. The area increased to 37.38% in the year 2012. With regard to the Kelly Index, there were not any problems in the study area in 1990, but problems were encountered over 5.75% of the study area in the year 2012. While the ratio of problematic sites with regard to RSC was 2.44% in 1990, the ratio increased to 12.13% in the year 2012. Similar increases were also observed in other water quality parameters except for MR. Higher deteriorations were observed in water quality parameters through the eastern sections of the study area. From 1990 to 2012, increased deteriorations were observed in water quality parameters, and excessive groundwater withdrawal and resultant seawater intrusion were considered as the basic reasons for such deteriorations. Therefore, groundwater withdrawals along the coastal lines should be performed in a controlled fashion, and water quality should continuously be monitored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi SH, Sedghamiz A (2007) Geostatistical analysis of spatial and temporal variations of groundwater level. Environ Monit Assess 129:277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan H (2014) Estimation of spatial distribution of groundwater level and risky areas of seawater intrusion on the coastal region in Carsamba Plain, Turkey, using different interpolation methods. Environ Monit Assess 186:5123–5134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan H, Cemek B, Demir Y (2012) Determination of seawater intrusion via hydrochemicals and ısotopes in Bafra Plain, Turkey. Water Resour Manag 26:3907–3922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan H, Güler M, Cemek B (2013) Spatial estimation of the risky areas for drainage and salinity in suluova plain, turkey using geostatistical methods. Fresenius Environ Bull 22(10):2916–2924

    Google Scholar 

  • Arumugam K, Elangovan K (2009) Hydrochemical characteristics and groundwater quality assessment in Tirupur region, Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Geol 58:1509–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field–scale variability soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(5):1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado C, Pacheco J, Cabrea A, Baltlori E, Orellana R, Baustista F (2010) Quality of groundwater for irrigation in tropical karst environment; the case of Yucatan, Mexico. Water Management 97:1423–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DSI (1993) Çarşamba Ovası Hidrojeolojik Etüd Raporu (Hydrogeology report of Çarşamba Plain). DSİ, Samsun (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton FM (1950) Significance of carbonates in irrigation waters. Soil Sci 69:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1994). Water Quality for Agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper

  • Guler M, Arslan H, Cemek B, Ersahin S (2014) Long-term changes in spatial variation of soil electrical conductivity and exchangeable sodium percentage in irrigated mesic Ustifluvents. Agric Water Manag 135:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Wang GC, Cravotta CA, Hu WY, Bian YY, Zhang ZW, Liu YY (2013) Hydrogeochemical evolution of Ordovician limestone groundwater in Yanzhou, North China. Hydrol Process 27:2247–2257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrakhimov M, Khamzina A, Forkutsa I, Paluasheva G, Lamers JPA, Tischbein B, Vlek PLG, Martius C (2007) Groundwater table and salinity: spatial and temporal distribution and influence on soil salinization in Khorezm region (Uzbekistan, Aral Sea Basin). Irrig Drain Syst 21(3):219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishaku JM, Ahmed AS, Abubakar MA (2012) Assessment of groundwater quality using chemical indices and GIS mapping in Jada area, Northeastern Nigeria. Int Res J Geol Min (IRJGM) 2(3):54–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasmin I, Mallikarjuna P (2014) Physicochemical quality evaluation of groundwater and development of drinking water quality index for Araniar River Basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Enviro Monit Assess 186:935–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaprakash M, Giridharan L, Venugopal T, Kumar SPK, Periakali P (2008) Characterization and evaluation of the factors affecting the geochemistry of groundwater in Neyveli, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Geol 54:855–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly WP (1940) Permissible composition and concentration of irrigated waters. In: Proceedings of the A.S.C.F, 607

  • Manap MA, Sulaiman WNA, Ramli MF, Pradhan B, Surip N (2013) A knowledge-driven GIS modeling technique for groundwater potential mapping at the Upper Langat Basin, Malaysia. Arab J Geosci 6(5):1621–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag SK, Ghosh P (2013) Variation in groundwater levels and water quality in Chhatna Block, Bankura District, West Bengal—A GIS Approach. J Geol Soc India 81:261–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narany TS, Ramli MF, Aris AZ, Sulaiman WNA, Fakharian K (2015) Groundwater irrigation quality mapping using geostatistical techniques in Amol–Babol Plain, Iran. Arab J Geosci 8(2):961–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nematollahi MJ, Ebrahimi p, Razmara M, Ghasemi A (2016) Hydrogeochemical investigations and groundwater quality assessment of Torbat-Zaveh plain, Khorasan Razavi, Iran. Environ Monit Assess 188:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peragón JM, Delgado A, Pérez-Latorre FJ (2015) A GIS-based quality assessment model for olive tree irrigation water in southern Spain. Agric Water Manag 148:232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper AM (1944) Graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analyses. Trans Am Geophys 25:914–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravikumar P, Venkatesharaju K, Prakash KL, Somashekar RK (2011) Geochemistry of groundwater and groundwater prospects evaluation, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka, India. Environ Monit Assess 179:93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rina K, Datta PS, Singh CK, Mukherjee S (2012) Characterization and evaluation of processes governing the groundwater quality in parts of the Sabarmati basin, Gujarat using hydrochemistry integrated with GIS. Hydrol Process 26(10):1538–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taany RA, Tahboub AB, Saffarini GA (2009) Geostatistical analysis of spatiotemporal variability of groundwater level fluctuations in Amman–Zarqa basin, Jordan: a case study. Environ Geol 57:525–535. doi:10.1007/s00254-008-1322-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temizel KE, Arslan H, Sağlam M (2015) Applicatıons of factor analysis and geographical information systems for precision agriculture over Alluvial Lands. Fresen Environ Bull 24(7):2374–2383

    Google Scholar 

  • Thivya C, Chidambaram S, Singaraja C, Thilagavathi R, Prasanna MV, Jainab I (2013) A study on the significance of lithology in groundwater quality of Madurai district, Tamil Nadu (India). Environ Dev Sustain 15(5):1365–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincy MV, Brilliant R, Pradeepkumar AP (2015) Hydrochemical characterization and quality assessment of groundwater for drinking and irrigation purposes: a case study of Meenachil River Basin, Western Ghats, Kerala, India. Environ Monit Assess 187:4217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanda EMM, Gulula LC, Phiri A (2013) Hydrochemical assessment of groundwater used for irrigation in Rumphi and Karonga districts, Northern Malawi. Phys Chem Earth 66:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding LP (1985) Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation andimplication to soil surveys. In: Nielsen DR, Bouma J (eds) Soil Spatial Vari-ability. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 166–194

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Ondokuz Mayıs University, Scientific Research Programs, under the project no. PYO. ZRT. 1901.12.005. The author is also grateful to the Seventh regional Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSI), Samsun, Turkey, for providing the data used in 1990 year.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Arslan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arslan, H. Determination of temporal and spatial variability of groundwater irrigation quality using geostatistical techniques on the coastal aquifer of Çarşamba Plain, Turkey, from 1990 to 2012. Environ Earth Sci 76, 38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6375-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6375-x

Keywords

Navigation