Abstract
Successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has often been based on the restoration of the knee to neutral alignment postoperatively. Numerous reports have linked malaligned TKA components to increased wear, poor functional outcomes, and failure. There have been many different alignment philosophies and surgical techniques that have been established to attain the goal of proper alignment, which includes such techniques as computerized navigation, and custom cutting guides. In addition, these methods could potentially have the added benefit of leading to improved functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. In this report, we have reviewed and analyzed recent reports concerning mechanical, anatomic, and kinematic axis/alignment schemes used in total knee arthroplasty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Blumenfeld TJ. CORR Insights (R): is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3996.
Barrett WP, Mason JB, Moskal JT, Dalury DF, Oliashirazi A, Fisher DA. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1273.
D'Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell Jr CW. Polyethylene contact stresses, articular congruity, and knee alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:232.
Pickering S, Armstrong D. Focus on alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012. http://www.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/focus/alignment-total-knee-replacement. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.
D'Lima DD, Hermida JC, Chen PC, Colwell Jr CW. Polyethylene wear and variations in knee kinematics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:124.
Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26.
Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:156.
Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1991;73:709.
Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud HM. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8:419.
Sikorski JM. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90:1121.
Johnson AJ, Harwin SF, Krakow KA, Mont MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty: where have we come from and where are we going? Surg Technol Int. 2011;XXI:183.
Incavo SJ, Schmid S, Sreenivas K, Ismaily S, Noble PC. Total knee arthroplasty using anatomic alignment can produce mid-flexion laxity. Clin Biomech. 2013;28:429. With the use of anatomic alignment in TKA, mid-lexion laxity becomes a concern.
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57.
Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2007;89:893.
Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, Fischer M, Krismer M, Kessler O. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:180.
Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ. Three-dimensional component alignment and functional outcome in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing two navigation systems. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1285.
Molli RG, Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer-assisted navigation software advancements improve the accuracy of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:432.
Schmitt J, Hauk C, Kienapfel H, Pfeiffer M, Efe T, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, et al. Navigation of total knee arthroplasty: rotation of components and clinical results in a prospectively randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:16.
Harvie P, Sloan K, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:667.
Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? Int Orthop. 2009;33:1567.
Luo CF. Reference axes for reconstruction of the knee. Knee. 2004;11:251.
Tang WM, Zhu YH, Chiu KY. Axial alignment of the lower extremity in Chinese adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A:1603.
Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ. Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:745.
Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:332.
Willcox NM, Clarke JV, Smith BR, Deakin AH, Deep K. A comparison of radiological and computer navigation measurements of lower limb coronal alignment before and after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2012;94:1234.
Swanson KE, Stocks GW, Warren PD, Hazel MR, Janssen HF. Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:246.
Koshino T, Takeyama M, Jiang LS, Yoshida T, Saito T. Underestimation of varus angulation in knees with flexion deformity. Knee. 2002;9:275.
Scott W. Kinematic Alignment In Total Knee Arthroplasty. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. 5th ed. Ch. 121; 1255–1268. Churchill Livingstone: 2012.
Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1000. Kinematically aligned TKA restores function without failure regardless of the alignment category.
Dossett HG, Swartz GJ, Estrada NA, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. Kinematically vs mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e160. Kinematic alignment of the knee lead to superior outcomes in WOMAC, Oxford Score, KSS, and flexion compared with mechanical alignment.
Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;255:215.
Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:45. A large portion of the population has a natural alignment of 3° of varus or more. Restoration of mechanical axis may not be desirable in these patients.
Fahlman L, Sangeorzan E, Chheda N, Lambright D. Older adults without radiographic knee osteoarthritis: knee alignment and knee range of motion. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;7:1. This study demonstrated that a large portion of the population has varying alignment of both lower extremities.
Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:13.
Hungerford DS, Krackow KA. Total joint arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:23.
Eckhoff DG, Bach JM, Spitzer VM, Reinig KD, Bagur MM, Baldini TH, et al. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87 Suppl 2:71.
Hollister AM, Jatana S, Singh AK, Sullivan WW, Lupichuk AG. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;290:259.
Teixeira LF, Olney SJ. Relationship between alignment and kinematic and kinetic measures of the knee of osteoarthritic elderly subjects in level walking. Clin Biomech. 1996;11:126.
Nogler M, Hozack W, Collopy D, Mayr E, Deirmengian G, Sekyra K. Alignment for total knee replacement: a comparison of kinematic axis vs mechanical axis techniques. A cadaver study. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2249. In cadavers there were no significant differences in overall alignment between the use of kinematic and mechanical axis techniques.
Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B, van der Weegen W, van Drumpt RA, Kort NP. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2206. There was no difference in obtaining mechanical axis and correct component position between patient specific surgery and conventional TKA.
Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 Suppl):39.
Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomic alignment result in better function and quality of life?.Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:560.
Khan MM, Khan MW, Al-Harbi HH, Weening BS, Zalzal PK. Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:271. The use of CAS in TKA showed no improvement in WOMAC and SF-12 survey with functional arc alignment.
Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143. Patients that are outliers of mechanical alignment did not necessarily result in worse outcomes after total knee.
Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1571. This study demonstrated that custom-fit total knee has similar alignment compared with conventional techniques.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
ᅟ
Conflict of Interest
Jeffrey J. Cherian, Samik Banerjee, Julio J. Jauregui, and Kimona Issa declare that they have no conflict of interest. Bhaveen H. Kapadia reports personal fees and other from Sage Products, Inc., outside the submitted work.
Michael A. Mont receives royalties from Stryker; Wright Medical Technology, Inc; is a paid consultant for DJ Orthopaedics; Janssen; Joint Active Systems; Medtronic; Sage Products, Inc.; Stryker; TissueGene; Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; has received research support from DJ Orthopaedics; Joint Active Systems; National Institutes of Health (NIAMS & NICHD); Sage Products, Inc.; Stryker; Tissue Gene; Wright Medical Technology, Inc.; is in editorial/governing board of American Journal of Orthopedics; Journal of Arthroplasty; Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American; Journal of Knee Surgery; Surgical Techniques International; and is a board member for AAOS.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cherian, J.J., Kapadia, B.H., Banerjee, S. et al. Mechanical, Anatomical, and Kinematic Axis in TKA: Concepts and Practical Applications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 7, 89–95 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-014-9218-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-014-9218-y