Skip to main content
Log in

An improved effective microorganism (EM) soil ball-making method for water quality restoration

  • Selected Papers from the 2nd Contaminated Land, Ecological Assessment and Remediation (CLEAR 2014) Conference: Environmental Pollution and Remediation
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil balls containing the so-called effective microorganisms (EM) have been applied to improve water quality of small ponds, lakes, and streams worldwide. However, neither the physical conditions facilitating their proper application nor the diversity of microbial community in such soil balls have been investigated. In this study, the application of 0.75 % of hardener to the soil balls exerted almost neutral pH (pH 7.3) which caused up to a fourfold increased hardness of the soil ball. Moreover, the 0.75 % of hardener in the soil ball also improved the water quality due to a significant reduction in dissolved oxygen, total phosphorus, and total nitrogen contents. Metagenomic analysis of the microbial community in the soil ball with 0.75 % hardener was compared with control (traditional soil ball) through next-generation sequencing. The traditional soil ball microbial community comprised 96.1 % bacteria, 2.7 % eukaryota, and 1 % archaea, whereas the soil ball with 0.75 % hardener comprised 71.4 % bacteria, 27.9 % eukaryota, and 0.2 % viruses. Additionally, metagenomic profiles for both traditional and improved soil balls revealed that the various xenobiotic biodegradation, such as those for caprolactam, atrazine, xylene, toluene, styrene, bisphenol, and chlorocyclohexane might be responsible for organic waste cleanup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn, Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, Water Environment Federation 252

  • Buckley DH, Graber JR, Schmidt TM (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of nonthermophilic members of the kingdom Crenarchaeota and their diversity and abundance in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4333–4339

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bundy JG, Paton GI, Campbell CD (2002) Microbial communities in different soil types do not converge after diesel contamination. J Appl Microbiol 92:276–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bustin S (2002) Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. J Mol Endocrinol 29:23–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen H, Hansen M, Sørensen J (1999) Counting and size classification of active soil bacteria by fluorescence in situ hybridization with an rRNA oligonucleotide probe. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1753–1761

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denman S, McSweeney C (2005) Quantitative (real-time) PCR. In: Makkar HS, McSweeney C (eds) Methods in gut microbial ecology for ruminants. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 105–115

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ekpeghere KI, Kim B-H, Son H-S, Whang K-S, Kim H-S, Koh S-C (2012) Functions of effective microorganisms in bioremediation of the contaminated harbor sediments. J Environ Sci Health A 47:44–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Jackson JA, Vilgalys R, Jackson RB (2005) Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4117–4120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbride KA, Lee DY, Beaudette LA (2006) Molecular techniques in wastewater: understanding microbial communities, detecting pathogens, and real-time process control. J Microbiol Methods 66:1–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannoni SJ, Britschgi TB, Moyer CL, Field KG (1990) Genetic diversity in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton. Nature 345:60–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green JL et al (2004) Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature 432:747–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grover M, Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Rasul A, Venkateswarlu B (2011) Role of microorganisms in adaptation of agriculture crops to abiotic stresses. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1231–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM (1996) Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res 6:986–994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hesham Ael L, Qi R, Yang M (2011) Comparison of bacterial community structures in two systems of a sewage treatment plant using PCR-DGGE analysis. J Environ Sci (China) 23:2049–2054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higa T (1998) An earth saving revolution: a means to resolve our world’s problems through effective microorganisms (EM). Sunmark Publishing, Inc., Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Higa T, Parr JF (1994) Beneficial and effective microorganisms for a sustainable agriculture and environment (vol. 1). Atami, Japan

  • Javaid A (2010) Growth and yield response of wheat to EM (effective microorganisms) and parthenium green manure. Afr J Biotechnol 9:3373

    Google Scholar 

  • Kariminiaae-Hamedaani H-R, Kanda K, Kato F (2003) Wastewater treatment with bacteria immobilized onto a ceramic carrier in an aerated system. J Biosci Bioeng 95:128–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malik S, Beer M, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2008) The use of molecular techniques to characterize the microbial communities in contaminated soil and water. Environ Int 34:265–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mielczarek AT, Saunders AM, Larsen P, Albertsen M, Stevenson M, Nielsen JL, Nielsen PH (2013) The microbial database for Danish wastewater treatment plants with nutrient removal (MiDas-DK)—a tool for understanding activated sludge population dynamics and community stability. Water Sci Technol 67:2519–2526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moura A, Tacão M, Henriques I, Dias J, Ferreira P, Correia A (2009) Characterization of bacterial diversity in two aerated lagoons of a wastewater treatment plant using PCR-DGGE analysis. Microbiol Res 164:560–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NIAST (2000) Method of soil and plant analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology (NIAST), Suwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol GW, Leininger S, Schleper C, Prosser JI (2008) The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10:2966–2978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nogales B, Moore ER, Llobet-Brossa E, Rossello-Mora R, Amann R, Timmis KN (2001) Combined use of 16S ribosomal DNA and 16S rRNA to study the bacterial community of polychlorinated biphenyl-polluted soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1874–1884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjard L, Richaume A (2001) Quantitative and qualitative microscale distribution of bacteria in soil. Res Microbiol 152:707–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravenschlag K, Sahm K, Knoblauch C, Jorgensen BB, Amann R (2000) Community structure, cellular rRNA content, and activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in marine arctic sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3592–3602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee SK, Liu X, Wu L, Chong SC, Wan X, Zhou J (2004) Detection of genes involved in biodegradation and biotransformation in microbial communities by using 50-mer oligonucleotide microarrays. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4303–4317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz K et al (2004) Spatial structure in soil chemical and microbiological properties in an upland grassland. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49:191–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rousk J, Brookes PC, Bååth E (2009) Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1589–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz JL, Köchling T (2007) Molecular biology techniques used in wastewater treatment: an overview. Process Biochem 42:119–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shin S-E, Choi D, Lee C-B, Cha W-S (2006) Phosphorus removal in pilot plant using biofilm filter process from farm wastewater. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 11:325–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Small J, Call DR, Brockman FJ, Straub TM, Chandler DP (2001) Direct detection of 16S rRNA in soil extracts by using oligonucleotide microarrays. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4708–4716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teruo H, James FP (1994) Beneficial and effective microorganisms for a sustainable agriculture and environment. International Nature Farming Research Centre, Nagano

    Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik V, Salte K, Sorheim R, Goksoyr J (1990) Comparison of phenotypic diversity and DNA heterogeneity in a population of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:776–781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria Z, Gairola S, Shariff NM (2010) Effective microorganisms (EM) technology for water quality restoration and potential for sustainable water resources and management. Biol Programme Sch Distance Educ 11800:1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the Korea Ministry of Environment as the Eco-Innovation project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Ho Shin.

Ethics declarations

The present research did not involve human participants and/or animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Robert Duran

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. A1

Soil ball dissociation in water tank after 7 days in controlled flow. a Soil ball containing 0 % (w/w) 3CaO∙SiO2 and b soil ball containing 0.75 % (w/w) 3CaO∙SiO2. (JPEG 134 kb)

Fig. A2

The shape of soil balls. a Soil ball making with loess and b soil ball making with send and zeolite. (JPEG 250 kb)

Fig. A3

Composition of microbial community pie charts of soil balls. a Traditional soil ball. b Improved soil ball with 0.5 % hardener. c Improved soil ball with 0.75 % hardener. (JPEG 70 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, GS., Khan, A.R., Kwak, Y. et al. An improved effective microorganism (EM) soil ball-making method for water quality restoration. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 1100–1107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5617-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5617-x

Keywords

Navigation