Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mining activity and habitat use by mountain sheep (Ovis canadensis)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied mountain sheep in the vicinity of three high-wall limestone mines in San Bernardino County, CA, USA to evaluate factors that influenced habitat use and, specifically, to investigate the influence of mining activity on distribution of those specialized ungulates. We used aerial telemetry data to estimate a resource selection function by fitting a logistic regression model and then comparing environmental characteristics at observed sheep locations to those at random locations. Distribution of mountain sheep was most influenced by a fire in 1999 that resulted in an area they avoided. Mountain sheep used steeper slopes, areas of lower terrain roughness, higher elevations, and areas closer to escape terrain than were random points. In contrast, sheep avoided areas near roads (federal and state highways, local roads, and off-road vehicle trails) but used areas near hiking trails and a railway. Water sources had the smallest effect of the factors considered, with sheep being associated with areas further from water points than were random locations. The disturbed area associated with the mines had a moderate influence on distribution, with sheep being associated with areas closer to the mine than were random points. Mining activities can alter terrain features and vegetation structure or composition in a way that promotes occupancy by sheep if they create steep slopes and rugged terrain (escape terrain) or reduce vegetation density or height (i.e., improve visibility). Whether increased occupancy reflects a benefit depends on the demographic responses of those sheep to the resources and conditions available on mine sites; information about those responses remains lacking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew NG, Bleich VC, August PV (1999) Habitat selection by mountain sheep in the Sonoran Desert: implications for conservation in the United States and Mexico. Calif Wildl Cons Bull 12:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Animal Care and Use Committee (1998) Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. J Mammal 79:1416–1431 doi:10.2307/1383033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC (1999) Mountain sheep and coyotes: patterns of predator evasion in a mountain ungulate. J Mammal 80:283–289 doi:10.2307/1383228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Holl SA (1982) Management of chaparral habitat for mule deer and mountain sheep in southern California. In: Conrad CE, Oechel WC (tech cords) General Technical Report PSW-58. Dynamics and management of Mediterranean ecosystems. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California, pp 247–254

  • Bleich VC, Wehausen JD, Holl SA (1990) Desert-dwelling mountain sheep: conservation implications of a naturally fragmented distribution. Conserv Biol 4:383–390 doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00312.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Bowyer RT, Pauli AM, Nicholson MC, Anthes RW (1994) Mountain sheep Ovis canadensis and helicopter surveys: ramifications for the conservation of large mammals. Biol Conserv 70:1–7 doi:10.1016/0006-3207(94)90292-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Wehausen JD, Ramey RR, Rechel JL (1996) Metapopulation theory and mountain sheep: implications for conservation. In: McCullough DR (ed) Metapopulations and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 353–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Bowyer RT, Wehausen JD (1997) Sexual segregation in mountain sheep: resources or predation? Wildl Monogr 134:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Chun CSY, Anthes RW, Evans TE, Fischer JK (2001) Visibility bias and development of a sightability model for tule elk. Alces 37:315–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Villepique JT, Stephenson TR, Pierce BM, Kutliyev GM (2005) Efficacy of aerial telemetry as an aid to capturing specific individuals—a comparison of 2 techniques. Wildl Soc Bull 33:332–336 doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[332:FTFEOA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Pierce BM, Jones J, Bowyer RT (2006) Variance in survival rates among young mule deer in the Sierra Nevada, California. Calif Fish Game 92:24–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Johnson HM, Holl SA, Konde L, Torres SG, Krausman PR (2008) Fire history in a chaparral ecosystem: implications for conservation of a native ungulate. Rangeland Ecol Manage 61: (in press).

  • Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Modell 157:281–300 doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCesare NJ, Pletscher DH (2006) Movements, connectivity, and resource selection of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. J Mammal 87:531–538 doi:10.1644/05-MAMM-A-259R1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Divine DD, Douglas CL (1996) Bighorn sheep monitoring program for the Eagle Mountain landfill project: phase one report. Coop Stud Unit, Nat Biol Serv, Univ Nevada, Las Vegas. p 54

  • Dwernychuck LW, Boag DA (1972) Ducks nesting in association with gulls—an ecological trap? Can J Zool 50:559–563 doi:10.1139/z72-076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott CL, McKendrick JD (1984) Food habits of dall sheep on revegetated coal stripmine spoils in Alaska. Bien Symp N Wild Sheep Goat Counc Proc 4:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Epps CW, Bleich VC, Wehausen JD, Torres SG (2003) Status of bighorn sheep in California. Desert Bighorn Counc Trans 47:20–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Epps CW, Wehausen JD, Bleich VC, Torres SG, Brashares JS (2007) Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. J Appl Ecol 44:714–724 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01325.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding AH, Haworth PF (1995) Testing the generality of bird-habitat models. Conserv Biol 9:1466–1481 doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061466.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (1998) Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol Evol 13:58–63 doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01237-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toigo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393 doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates JE, Gysel LW (1978) Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59:871–883 doi:10.2307/1938540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist V (1975) On the management of mountain sheep: theoretical considerations. In: Trefethen JA (ed) The wild sheep in modern North America. Winchester Press, New York, pp 77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies CS, Hebblewhite M, Nielsen SE, Krawchuk MA, Aldridge CL, Friar JL, Saher DJ, Stevens SE, Jerde CL (2006) Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. J Anim Ecol 75:887–898 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01106.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham H (1980) The impact of modern man. In: Monson G, Sumner L (eds) The desert bighorn: its life history, ecology, and management. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 288–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks LL, Elder JM (1979) Human disturbance of Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. J Wildl Manage 43:909–915 doi:10.2307/3808274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl SA, Bleich VC (1983) San Gabriel mountain sheep: biological and management considerations. San Bernardino National Forest, San Bernardino, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Holl SA, Bleich VC, Torres SG (2004) Population dynamics of bighorn sheep in the San Gabriel Mountains, California, 1967–2002. Wildl Soc Bull 32:412–426 doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[412:PDOBSI]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberty CJ (1994) Applied discriminant analysis. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JR (1994) Demography and movements of desert-dwelling mountain sheep in the Kingston and Clark Mountain Ranges, California. MS Thesis, Univ Nevada, Las Vegas

  • Jansen BD, Krausman PR, Heffelfinger JR, DeVos JC (2006) Bighorn sheep selection of landscape features in an active copper mine. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1121–1126 doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1121:BSSOLF]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen BD, Krausman PR, Heffelfinger JR, DeVos JC (2007) Influence of mining on behavior of bighorn sheep. Southwest Nat 52:418–423 doi:10.1894/0038-4909(2007)52[418:IOMOBO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessup DA, Clark WE, Fowler MA (1986) Wildlife restraint handbook, 3rd edn. Calif Dep Fish and Game, Rancho Cordova

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CJ, Boyce MS, Case RL, Cluff HD, Gau RJ, Gunn A, Mulders R (2005) Cumulative effects of human developments on arctic wildlife. Wildl Monogr 160:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausman PR, Hervert JJ, Ordway LL (1984) Radiotracking desert mule deer and bighorn sheep with light aircraft. In: Krausman PR, Smith NS (eds) Deer in the southwest: a workshop. School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, pp 115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausman PR, Hervert JJ, Ordway LL (1985) Capturing deer and mountain sheep with a net-gun. Wildl Soc Bull 13:71–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausman PR, Leopold BD, Seegmiller RF, Torres SG (1989) Relationships between desert bighorn sheep and habitat in western Arizona. Wildl Monogr 102:1–66

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum B (1988) Seasonal and spatial distribution of bighorn sheep at an open pit mining site in the Alberta foothills. Bienn Symp N Wild Sheep Goat Counc Proc 6:106–120

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum BN (1992) Population dynamics of bighorn sheep using reclaimed habitat in open pit coal mines in west-central Alberta. Bienn Symp N Wild Sheep Goat Counc Proc 8:374

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum BN, Geist V (1992) Mountain restoration: soil and surface wildlife habitat. GeoJournal 27:23–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney T, Boe SR, DeVos JC (2003) GIS-based evaluation of escape terrain and desert bighorn sheep populations in Arizona. Wildl Soc Bull 31:1229–1236

    Google Scholar 

  • Medcraft JR, Clark WR (1986) Big game habitat use and diets on a surface mine in northeastern Wyoming. J Wildl Manage 50:135–142 doi:10.2307/3801503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller G, Smith EL (1985) Human activity in desert bighorn habitat: what disturbs sheep? Desert Bighorn Counc Trans 29:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgantini LE, Worbets BW (1988) Bighorn sheep use of a gas wellsite during servicing and testing: a case study of impact and mitigation. Bien Symp N Wild Sheep Goat Counc Proc 6:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson MC, Bowyer RT, Kie JG (1997) Habitat selection and survival of mule deer: tradeoffs associated with migration. J Mammal 78:483–504 doi:10.2307/1382900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SE, Boyce MS, Stenhouse GB, Munro RHM (2002) Modeling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead ecosystem of Alberta: taking autocorrelation seriously. Ursus 13:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SE, Boyce MS, Stenhouse GB, Munro RHM (2003) Development and testing of phenologically driven grizzly bear habitat models. Ecoscience 10:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SE, Stenhouse GB, Boyce MS (2006) A habitat-based framework for grizzly bear conservation in Alberta. Biol Conserv 130:217–229 doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehler MW, Bowyer RT, Bleich VC (2003) Home ranges of female mountain sheep, Ovis canadensis nelsoni: effects of precipitation in a desert ecosystem. Mammalia 67:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehler MW, Bleich VC, Bowyer RT, Nicholson MC (2005) Mountain sheep and mining: implications for conservation and management. Calif Fish Game 91:149–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Papouchis CM, Singer FJ, Sloan WB (2001) Responses of desert bighorn sheep to increased human recreation. J Wildl Manage 65:573–582 doi:10.2307/3803110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paysen TE, Derby JA, Black H, Bleich VC, Mincks JW (1980) A vegetation classification system applied to southern California. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-45. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Riverside, California

  • Pearce JL, Boyce MS (2005) Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. J Appl Ecol 43:405–412 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01112.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey FL, Shafer DW (2002) The statistical sleuth: a course in methods of data analysis, 2nd edn. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley CV (1954) The utilization of reclaimed coal strip lands for the production of wildlife. Trans N Am Wildl Conf 19:324–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel DF (1979) Utilization of surface mines by wildlife in northern West Virginia. Proc W Va Acad Sci 51:182–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz OA, Bleich VC, Holl SA (1986) Genetics and the conservation of mountain sheep Ovis canadensis nelsoni. Biol Conserv 37:179–190 doi:10.1016/0006-3207(86)90090-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer FJ, Bleich VC, Gudorf MA (2000) Restoration of bighorn sheep metapopulations in and near western national parks. Restor Ecol 8:14–24 doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80062.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TS, Hardin PJ, Flinders JT (1999) Responses of bighorn sheep to clear-cut logging and prescribed burning. Wildl Soc Bull 27:840–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson JR, Calcarone GM (1999) Southern California mountains and foothills assessment: habitat and species conservation issues. United States Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-172. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Albany, California

  • Thomas DL, Taylor EJ (1990) Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. J Wildl Manage 54:322–330 doi:10.2307/3809050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JC, Douglas CL, Hallum CR, Krausman PR, Ramey RR (2004) Determination of critical habitat of the endangered Nelson’s bighorn sheep in southern California. Wildl Soc Bull 32:427–448 doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[427:DOCHFT]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdez R, Krausman PR (1999) Mountain sheep of North America. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakelyn LA (1987) Changing habitat conditions on bighorn sheep ranges in Colorado. J Wildl Manage 51:904–912 doi:10.2307/3801758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Regional Climate Center (2007) Historical climate information. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/CLIMATEDATA.html (accessed 2 February 2007)

  • Yeager LE (1942) Coal-stripped land as mammal habitat, with special reference to fur animals. Am Midl Nat 27:613–634 doi:10.2307/2420916

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Adams, R. Barboza, R. Botta, K. Brennan, C. Davis, D. DeJesus, T. Glenner, A. Hunter, K. Jones, L. Konde, J. McKeever, A. Pauli, B. Pierce, T. Stephenson, P. Swift, R. Teagle, J. Villepique (CDFG), and S. DeJesus (Landells Aviation) for capturing and handling sheep, T. Evans (CDFG) for conducting telemetry flights, C. Davis and K. Brennan for acting as telemetry observers, and numerous other individuals, particularly those representing the Society for the Conservation of Bighorn Sheep, who assisted in the field. We thank D. Shumway and D. Rib (Mitsubishi Cement Corporation) and D. Anderson (Specialty Minerals Corporation) for logistical help. L. Konde helped with GIS analyses, D. Anderson provided GIS coverages of the area disturbed by mining activity, and D. Studer (US Forest Service) provided information on trails in the San Bernardino National Forest. Funding for this project was provided by the CDFG Mountain Sheep Conservation Program, the Mitsubishi Cement Corporation, and the Granite Bay Chapter of Safari Club International; this is Professional Paper 065 from the Eastern Sierra Center for Applied Population Ecology. All aspects of field work for this project followed standard protocols for animal and personnel safety established by the California Department of Fish and Game (Jessup et al. 1986) and complied with acceptable field methods adopted by the American Society of Mammalogists (Animal Care and Use Committee 1998).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vernon C. Bleich.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Krausman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bleich, V.C., Davis, J.H., Marshal, J.P. et al. Mining activity and habitat use by mountain sheep (Ovis canadensis). Eur J Wildl Res 55, 183–191 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0234-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0234-3

Keywords

Navigation