Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-layer solid-phase extraction and evaporation—enrichment methods for polar organic chemicals from aqueous matrices

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analysis of polar organic chemicals in the aquatic environment is exacerbated by the lack of suitable and widely applicable enrichment methods. In this work, we assessed the suitability of a novel combination of well-known solid-phase extraction (SPE) materials in one cartridge as well as an evaporation method and for the enrichment of 26 polar model substances (predominantly log D < 0) covering a broad range of physico-chemical properties in three different aqueous matrices. The multi-layer solid-phase extraction (mlSPE) and evaporation method were investigated for the recovery and matrix effects of the model substances and analyzed with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS). In total, 65% of the model substances were amenable (> 10% recovery) to the mlSPE method with a mean recovery of 76% while 73% of the model substances were enriched with the evaporation method achieving a mean recovery of 78%. Target and non-target screening comparison of both methods with a frequently used reversed-phase SPE method utilizing “hydrophilic and lipophilic balanced” (HLB) material was performed. Target analysis showed that the mlSPE and evaporation method have pronounced advantages over the HLB method since the HLB material retained only 30% of the model substances. Non-target screening of a ground water sample with the investigated enrichment methods showed that the median retention time of all detected features on a HILIC system decreased in the order mlSPE (3641 features, median tR 9.7 min), evaporation (1391, 9.3 min), HLB (4414, 7.2 min), indicating a higher potential of the described methods to enrich polar analytes from water compared with HLB-SPE.

Schematic of the method evaluation (recovery and matrix effects) and method comparison (target and non-target analysis) of the two investigated enrichment methods for very polar chemicals in aqueousmatrices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daughton CG. Non-regulated water contaminants: emerging research. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004;24(7–8):711–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reemtsma T, Weiss S, Mueller J, Petrovic M, González S, Barcelo D, et al. Polar pollutants entry into the water cycle by municipal wastewater: a European perspective. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(17):5451–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sjerps RMA, Vughs D, van Leerdam JA, ter Laak TL, van Wezel AP. Data-driven prioritization of chemicals for various water types using suspect screening LC-HRMS. Water Res. 2016;93:254–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wirth O, Bunke D. PMT-Stoffe erkennen und ihre Emissionen vermeiden. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/362/dokumente/2017_05_02_ridp_ws5_wasser_final.pdf. Last Access 07 2017.

  5. Reemtsma T, Berger U, Arp HPH, Gallard H, Knepper TP, Neumann M, et al. Mind the gap: persistent and mobile organic compounds water contaminants that slip through. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(19):10308–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ibáñez M, Pozo ÓJ, Sancho JV, López FJ, Hernández FJ. Re-evaluation of glyphosate determination in water by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Chromatogr A. 2006;1134(1):51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Quintana JB, Reemtsma T. Rapid and sensitive determination of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid in water samples by ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1145(1):110–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buszewski B, Noga S. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)—a powerful separation technique. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;402(1):231–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greco G, Grosse S, Letzel T. Serial coupling of reversed-phase and zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction LC/MS for the analysis of polar and nonpolar phenols in wine. J Sep Sci. 2013;36(8):1379–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Montes R, Aguirre J, Vidal X, Rodil R, Cela R, Quintana JB. Screening for polar chemicals in water by trifunctional mixed-mode liquid chromatography−high resolution mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:6250–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guillarme D, Veuthey J-L. Alternative strategies to reverse-phase liquid chromatography for the analysis of pharmaceutical compounds. Am Pharm Rev. 2017;20:46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scheurer M, Michel A, Brauch H-J, Ruck W, Sacher F. Occurrence and fate of the antidiabetic drug metformin and its metabolite guanylurea in the environment and during drinking water treatment. Water Res. 2012;46(15):4790–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Armbruster D, Happel O, Scheurer M, Harms K, Schmidt TC, Brauch HJ. Emerging nitrogenous disinfection byproducts: transformation of the antidiabetic drug metformin during chlorine disinfection of water. Water Res. 2015;79:104–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knepper TP, Werner A, Bogenschütz G. Determination of synthetic chelating agents in surface and waste water by ion chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2005;1085(2):240–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu Z, Jin F, Hu J, Zhang X, Sun J, Yang M. An improved method for analyzing chlormequat and mepiquat in source waters by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2010;678(1):90–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scheurer M, Storck FR, Graf C, Brauch H-J, Ruck W, Lev O, et al. Correlation of six anthropogenic markers in wastewater, surface water, bank filtrate, and soil aquifer treatment. J Environ Monit. 2011;13(4):966–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zahn D, Frömel T, Knepper TP. Halogenated methanesulfonic acids: a new class of organic micropollutants in the water cycle. Water Res. 2016;101:292–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huntscha S, Singer HP, McArdell CS, Frank CE, Hollender J. Multiresidue analysis of 88 polar organic micropollutants in ground, surface and wastewater using online mixed-bed multilayer solid-phase extraction coupled to high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1268:74–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boos K-S, Fleischer C. Multidimensional on-line solid-phase extraction (SPE) using restricted access materials (RAM) in combination with molecular imprinted polymers (MIP). Fresenius J Anal Chem. 2001;371(1):16–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Castillo M, Alonso MC, Riu J, Barceló D. Identification of polar, ionic, and highly water soluble organic pollutants in untreated industrial wastewaters. Environ Sci Technol. 1999;33(8):1300–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Young, MS. Solid-phase extraction with Oasis® HLB sorbent: simple procedures for superior sample preparation. Operating manual; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pluskal T, Castillo S, Villar-Briones A, Orešič M. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(1):395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chemicalize. Calculation. https://www.chemicalize.com. Accessed Nov 16 2017.

  24. Scheurer M, Sacher F, Brauch H-J. Occurrence of the antidiabetic drug metformin in sewage and surface waters in Germany. J Environ Monit. 2009;11(9):1608–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tran NH, Hu J, Ong SL. Simultaneous determination of PPCPs, EDCs, and artificial sweeteners in environmental water samples using a single-step SPE coupled with HPLC-MS/MS and isotope dilution. Talanta. 2013;113:82–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Longley D, Harkin D, Johnston P. 5-Fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(5):330–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Golkiewicz W, Werkhoven-Goewie CE, Brinkman UAT, Frei RW, Colin H, Guiochon G. Use of pyrocarbon sorbents for trace enrichment of polar compounds from aqueous samples with on-line HPLC analysis. J Chromatogr Sci. 1983;21(1):27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liska I, Krupcík J, Leclercq PA. The use of solid sorbents for directaccumulation of organic compounds from water matricesa review of solid-phase extraction techniques. J High Resolut Chromatogr. 1989:577–90.

Download references

Funding

This work has been funded by the BMBF (02WU1347B) in the frame of the collaborative international consortium WATERJPI2013 - PROMOTE of the Water Challenges for a Changing World Joint Programming Initiative (Water JPI) Pilot Call.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Frömel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 502 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köke, N., Zahn, D., Knepper, T.P. et al. Multi-layer solid-phase extraction and evaporation—enrichment methods for polar organic chemicals from aqueous matrices. Anal Bioanal Chem 410, 2403–2411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0921-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0921-1

Keywords

Navigation