Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of room temperature on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been little published data on the effects of temperature on the performance of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machines. We examined the effect of changes in ambient room temperature on the performance of three DXA scanners (DPXL, Expert-XL and Prodigy). The study involved repeat measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) using three different spine phantoms scanned at different ambient room temperatures, both before and after calibration procedures. The calibration or quality assurance (QA) scan calibrates the scanner, adjusting for the ambient room temperature at the time of calibration. There was a moderate correlation between change in temperature and change in BMD measured prior to recalibration for the Expert-XL (r=0.58) during normal clinical scanning conditions. There was no observed change in phantom BMD with change in temperature measured using the DXPL or Prodigy. After temperature change, without repeat calibration measurements, there was a strong correlation between temperature change and change in BMD measured using the Expert-XL (r=0.96, p<0.001). From the regression equation, a change of 2.5 °C could alter the calculated BMD result measured by the Expert-XL by 1.5%, which would significantly affect the precision of the DXA system. There was no significant correlation between temperature and BMD in the DXPL or Prodigy. The observed differences between the densitometers and the effect of temperature change are most likely due to the differing types of detector systems used. Operators must be made aware that solid state detectors of the sort used in the Expert-XL (charge-coupled devices, CCDs) are significantly affected by changes in ambient room temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mazess RB, Hanson JA, Payne R, Nord R, Wilson M. Axial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:158–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barthe N, Braillon P, Ducassou D, Basse-Cathalinat B. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A). Br J Radiol 1997;70:728–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thorpe JA, Steel SA. Image resolution of the Lunar Expert-XL. Osteoporos Int 1999;10:95–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glenn F. Knoll. Radiation detection and measurements, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1989.

  5. Expert-XL imaging densitometer, reference manual. Madison, WI: Lunar Corporation, 1998.

  6. Scientific Imaging Technologies, Inc. An introduction to scientific imaging charge-coupled devices. Beaverton, OR: Scientific Imaging Technologies, 1994.

  7. Lang T, Takada M, Gee R, et al. A preliminary evaluation of the lunar Expert-XL for bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:136–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaye GW, Laby TH. Tables of physical and chemical constants. London: Longman, 1993.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ian Webb, Medtel Australia, for his technical expertise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Culton, N.L., Pocock, N.A. The effect of room temperature on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 14, 137–140 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-002-1330-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-002-1330-y

Keywords

Navigation