Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) provides an indirect score of trabecular microarchitecture from lumbar spine (LS) dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Increasing soft tissue thickness artifactually reduces TBS values; we evaluated the effect of a fictitious increase of soft tissue thickness on TBS and bone mineral density (BMD) reproducibility on a phantom model.

Methods

A Hologic spine phantom was scanned with a QDR-Discovery W Hologic densitometer. Fresh pork rind layers of 5 mm were used to simulate the in-vivo soft tissues. For each scan mode (fast array [FA], array, high definition [HD]), 25 scans were consecutively performed without phantom repositioning, at 0 (no layers), 1 cm, 3 cm, and 6 cm of thickness. BMD and TBS reproducibility was calculated as the complement to 100% of least significant change.

Results

Both BMD and TBS reproducibility slightly decreased with increasing soft tissue; this difference was statistically significant only for BMD using HD modality (reproducibility decreased from 99.4% at baseline to 98.4% at 6-cm of thickness). TBS reproducibility was slightly lower compared to that of BMD, and ranged between 98.8% (array, 0 cm) and 97.4% (FA, 6 cm). Without taking into account manufacturer BMI optimization, we found a progressive decrease of TBS mean values with increasing soft tissue thickness. The highest TBS difference between baseline scan and 6 cm was −0.179 (−14.27%) using HD.

Conclusions

Despite being slightly lower than that of BMD, TBS reproducibility was not affected up to 6 cm of increasing soft tissue thickness, and was even less influenced by fat than BMD reproducibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.C. Silva, W.D. Leslie, H. Resch, O. Lamy, O. Lesnyak, N. Binkley, E.V. McCloskey, J.A. Kanis, J.P. Bilezikian, Trabecular bone score: a noninvasive analytical method based upon the DXA image. J. Bone Miner. Res. 29, 518–530 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. N.C. Harvey, C.C. Glüer, N. Binkley, E.V. McCloskey, M.-L. Brandi, C. Cooper, D. Kendler, O. Lamy, A. Laslop, B.M. Camargos, J.-Y. Reginster, R. Rizzoli, J.A. Kanis, Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice. Bone 78, 216–224 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Martineau, W.D. Leslie, Trabecular bone score (TBS): method and applications. Bone 104, 66–72 (2017)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. B.C. Silva, S.B. Broy, S. Boutroy, J.T. Schousboe, J.A. Shepherd, W.D. Leslie, Fracture risk prediction by Non-BMD DXA measures: the 2015 ISCD official positions part 2: trabecular bone score. J. Clin. Densitom. 18, 309–330 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Amnuaywattakorn, C. Sritara, C. Utamakul, W. Chamroonrat, A. Kositwattanarerk, K. Thamnirat, B. Ongphiphadhanakul, Simulated increased soft tissue thickness artefactually decreases trabecular bone score: a phantom study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 17, 17 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Winzenrieth, F. Michelet, D. Hans, Three-dimensional (3D) microarchitecture correlations with 2D projection image gray-level variations assessed by trabecular bone score using high-resolution computed tomographic acquisitions: effects of resolution and noise. J. Clin. Densitom. 16, 287–296 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. J.H. Kim, H.J. Choi, E.J. Ku, A.R. Hong, K.M. Kim, S.W. Kim, N.H. Cho, C.S. Shin, Regional body fat depots differently affect bone microarchitecture in postmenopausal Korean women. Osteoporos. Int. 27, 1161–1168 (2016)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Mazzetti, C. Berger, W.D. Leslie, D. Hans, L. Langsetmo, D.A. Hanley, C.S. Kovacs, J.C. Prior, S.M. Kaiser, K.S. Davison, R. Josse, A. Papaioannou, J.R. Adachi, D. Goltzman, S.N. Morin, CaMos Research Group, Densitometer-specific differences in the correlation between body mass index and lumbar spine trabecular bone score. J. Clin. Densitom. 20, 233–238 (2017)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Bandirali, A. Poloni, L.M. Sconfienza, C. Messina, G.D.E. Papini, M. Petrini, F.M. Ulivieri, G. Di Leo, F. Sardanelli, Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study. Eur. Radiol. 25, 2194–2198 (2015)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Bandirali, G. Di Leo, C. Messina, M.J. Pastor Lopez, A. Mai, F.M. Ulivieri, F. Sardanelli, Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study. Skelet. Radiol. 44, 573–576 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Food and Agriculture Organization-Meat processing technology (2005) Agenda 1–3. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/ai407e/ai407e00.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2018

  12. A. Delnevo, M. Bandirali, G. Di Leo, C. Messina, L.M. Sconfienza, A. Aliprandi, F.M. Ulivieri, F. Sardanelli, Differences among array, fast array, and high-definition scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry on a phantom. Clin. Radiol. 68, 616–619 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. E.M. Lewiecki, C.M. Gordon, S. Baim, M.B. Leonard, N.J. Bishop, M.-L. Bianchi, H.J. Kalkwarf, C.B. Langman, H. Plotkin, F. Rauch, B.S. Zemel, N. Binkley, J.P. Bilezikian, D.L. Kendler, D.B. Hans, S. Silverman, International society for clinical densitometry 2007 adult and pediatric official positions. Bone 43, 1115–1121 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. K.M. Knapp, J.R. Welsman, S.J. Hopkins, I. Fogelman, G.M. Blake, Obesity increases precision errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements. J. Clin. Densitom. 15, 315–319 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. B.C. Silva, W.D. Leslie, A new DXA-derived measurement for fracture risk assessment. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 46, 153–180 (2017)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Bandirali, L.M. Sconfienza, A. Aliprandi, G. Di Leo, D. Marchelli, F.M. Ulivieri, F. Sardanelli, In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Radiol. Med. 119, 257–260 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmelo Messina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Institutional Review Board approval was not needed, as no patients are involved.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Messina, C., Poloni, A., Chianca, V. et al. Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study. Endocrine 61, 336–342 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1647-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1647-8

Keywords

Navigation