Abstract
We consider a scale-invariant inverse seesaw model with dynamical breaking of gauge symmetry and lepton number. In some regions of the parameter space, the Majoron — the pseudo-Goldstone of lepton number breaking — is a viable dark matter candidate. The bound on the Majoron decay rate implies a very large dilaton vacuum expectation value, which also results in a suppression of other dark matter couplings. Because of that, the observed dark matter relic abundance can only be matched via the freeze-in mechanism. The scalar field which gives mass to heavy neutrinos can play the role of the inflaton, resulting in a tensor-to-scalar ratio r ≲ 0.01 for metric inflation and r ≲ 0.21 for Palatini gravity.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex spinors and unified theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [arXiv:1306.4669] [INSPIRE].
P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2) × U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].
T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 165 [INSPIRE].
C. Wetterich, Neutrino masses and the scale of B-L violation, Nucl. Phys. B 187 (1981) 343 [INSPIRE].
M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy, Phys. Lett. B 94 (1980) 61 [INSPIRE].
T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Neutrino masses, mixings and oscillations in SU(2) × U(1) models of electroweak interactions, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2860 [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, H. Lew, X.G. He and G.C. Joshi, Seesaw neutrino masses induced by a triplet of leptons, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441 [INSPIRE].
S.M. Boucenna, S. Morisi and J.W.F. Valle, The low-scale approach to neutrino masses, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014 (2014) 831598 [arXiv:1404.3751] [INSPIRE].
G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135 [INSPIRE].
W.A. Bardeen, On naturalness in the standard model, in the proceedings of the Ontake summer institute on particle physics, (1995) [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg, Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888 [INSPIRE].
E. Gildener and S. Weinberg, Symmetry breaking and scalar bosons, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 3333 [INSPIRE].
R. Hempfling, The next-to-minimal Coleman-Weinberg model, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 153 [hep-ph/9604278] [INSPIRE].
K.A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Conformal symmetry and the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 648 (2007) 312 [hep-th/0612165] [INSPIRE].
K.A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Conformal invariance from non-conformal gravity, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 086005 [arXiv:0907.3298] [INSPIRE].
K.A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Effective action, conformal anomaly and the issue of quadratic divergences, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 260 [arXiv:0710.2840] [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze and R.R. Volkas, Electroweak Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance, Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 156 [arXiv:0704.1165] [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, K.L. McDonald and R.R. Volkas, Neutrino mass in radiatively-broken scale-invariant models, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 075014 [arXiv:0706.1829] [INSPIRE].
T. Hambye and M.H.G. Tytgat, Electroweak symmetry breaking induced by dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 651 [arXiv:0707.0633] [INSPIRE].
M. Holthausen, M. Lindner and M.A. Schmidt, Radiative symmetry breaking of the minimal left-right symmetric model, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 055002 [arXiv:0911.0710] [INSPIRE].
S. Iso, N. Okada and Y. Orikasa, The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 115007 [arXiv:0909.0128] [INSPIRE].
S. Iso, N. Okada and Y. Orikasa, Classically conformal B-L extended standard model, Phys. Lett. B 676 (2009) 81 [arXiv:0902.4050] [INSPIRE].
L. Alexander-Nunneley and A. Pilaftsis, The minimal scale invariant extension of the standard model, JHEP 09 (2010) 021 [arXiv:1006.5916] [INSPIRE].
T. Hur and P. Ko, Scale invariant extension of the standard model with strongly interacting hidden sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 141802 [arXiv:1103.2571] [INSPIRE].
E. Gabrielli et al., Towards completing the standard model: vacuum stability, EWSB and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015017 [arXiv:1309.6632] [INSPIRE].
A. Farzinnia, H.-J. He and J. Ren, Natural electroweak symmetry breaking from scale invariant Higgs mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 141 [arXiv:1308.0295] [INSPIRE].
M. Holthausen, J. Kubo, K.S. Lim and M. Lindner, Electroweak and conformal symmetry breaking by a strongly coupled hidden sector, JHEP 12 (2013) 076 [arXiv:1310.4423] [INSPIRE].
H. Davoudiasl and I.M. Lewis, Right-handed neutrinos as the origin of the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 033003 [arXiv:1404.6260] [INSPIRE].
S. Benic and B. Radovcic, Majorana dark matter in a classically scale invariant model, JHEP 01 (2015) 143 [arXiv:1409.5776] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer et al., Light dark matter, naturalness, and the radiative origin of the electroweak scale, JHEP 01 (2015) 032 [arXiv:1408.3429] [INSPIRE].
A. Farzinnia and J. Ren, Higgs partner searches and dark matter phenomenology in a classically scale invariant Higgs boson sector, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015019 [arXiv:1405.0498] [INSPIRE].
M. Lindner, S. Schmidt and J. Smirnov, Neutrino masses and conformal electro-weak symmetry breaking, JHEP 10 (2014) 177 [arXiv:1405.6204] [INSPIRE].
J. Kubo, K.S. Lim and M. Lindner, Electroweak symmetry breaking via QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091604 [arXiv:1403.4262] [INSPIRE].
A. Karam and K. Tamvakis, Dark matter and neutrino masses from a scale-invariant multi-Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 075010 [arXiv:1508.03031] [INSPIRE].
P. Humbert, M. Lindner and J. Smirnov, The inverse seesaw in conformal electro-weak symmetry breaking and phenomenological consequences, JHEP 06 (2015) 035 [arXiv:1503.03066] [INSPIRE].
P. Humbert, M. Lindner, S. Patra and J. Smirnov, Lepton number violation within the conformal inverse seesaw, JHEP 09 (2015) 064 [arXiv:1505.07453] [INSPIRE].
A. Karam and K. Tamvakis, Dark matter from a classically scale-invariant SU(3)X, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055004 [arXiv:1607.01001] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Helmboldt, P. Humbert, M. Lindner and J. Smirnov, Minimal conformal extensions of the Higgs sector, JHEP 07 (2017) 113 [arXiv:1603.03603] [INSPIRE].
A. Ahriche, K.L. McDonald and S. Nasri, The scale-invariant scotogenic model, JHEP 06 (2016) 182 [arXiv:1604.05569] [INSPIRE].
A. Ahriche, A. Manning, K.L. McDonald and S. Nasri, Scale-invariant models with one-loop neutrino mass and dark matter candidates, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 053005 [arXiv:1604.05995] [INSPIRE].
V. Brdar, Y. Emonds, A.J. Helmboldt and M. Lindner, Conformal realization of the neutrino option, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 055014 [arXiv:1807.11490] [INSPIRE].
M. Kierkla, A. Karam and B. Swiezewska, Conformal model for gravitational waves and dark matter: a status update, JHEP 03 (2023) 007 [arXiv:2210.07075] [INSPIRE].
N. Rojas, R.A. Lineros and F. Gonzalez-Canales, Majoron dark matter from a spontaneous inverse seesaw model, arXiv:1703.03416 [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas, S. Choubey and S. Khan, Inverse seesaw and dark matter in a gauged B-L extension with flavour symmetry, JHEP 08 (2018) 062 [arXiv:1805.00568] [INSPIRE].
T. Nomura and H. Okada, An inverse seesaw model with U(1)R gauge symmetry, LHEP 1 (2018) 10 [arXiv:1806.01714] [INSPIRE].
A. Abada et al., Gauged inverse seesaw from dark matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 758 [arXiv:2107.02803] [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and N. Okada, Conformal B-L and pseudo-Goldstone dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 095023 [arXiv:2302.11072] [INSPIRE].
M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J.W.F. Valle, Fast decaying neutrinos and observable flavor violation in a new class of Majoron models, Phys. Lett. B 216 (1989) 360 [INSPIRE].
Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra and R.D. Peccei, Are there real Goldstone bosons associated with broken lepton number?, Phys. Lett. B 98 (1981) 265 [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino decay and spontaneous violation of lepton number, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 774 [INSPIRE].
S. Mandal, J.C. Romão, R. Srivastava and J.W.F. Valle, Dynamical inverse seesaw mechanism as a simple benchmark for electroweak breaking and Higgs boson studies, JHEP 07 (2021) 029 [arXiv:2103.02670] [INSPIRE].
T. Brune and H. Päs, Massive Majorons and constraints on the Majoron-neutrino coupling, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 096005 [arXiv:1808.08158] [INSPIRE].
C. Biggio, L. Calibbi, T. Ota and S. Zanchini, Majoron dark matter from a type II seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 115003 [arXiv:2304.12527] [INSPIRE].
C. Gross, O. Lebedev and T. Toma, Cancellation mechanism for dark-matter-nucleon interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 191801 [arXiv:1708.02253] [INSPIRE].
A.A. Starobinsky, A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99 [INSPIRE].
A.H. Guth, The inflationary universe: a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347 [INSPIRE].
A.D. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389 [INSPIRE].
A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt, Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220 [INSPIRE].
J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin, Encyclopædia inflationaris, Phys. Dark Univ. 5-6 (2014) 75 [arXiv:1303.3787] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Embedding inflation into the standard model — more evidence for classical scale invariance, JHEP 06 (2014) 154 [arXiv:1405.3987] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike et al., Dynamically induced Planck scale and inflation, JHEP 05 (2015) 065 [arXiv:1502.01334] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Linear inflation from quartic potential, JHEP 01 (2016) 035 [arXiv:1509.05423] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Super-heavy dark matter — towards predictive scenarios from inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 918 (2017) 162 [arXiv:1605.09378] [INSPIRE].
L. Marzola and A. Racioppi, Minimal but non-minimal inflation and electroweak symmetry breaking, JCAP 10 (2016) 010 [arXiv:1606.06887] [INSPIRE].
M. Artymowski and A. Racioppi, Scalar-tensor linear inflation, JCAP 04 (2017) 007 [arXiv:1610.09120] [INSPIRE].
A. Racioppi, Coleman-Weinberg linear inflation: metric vs. Palatini formulation, JCAP 12 (2017) 041 [arXiv:1710.04853] [INSPIRE].
A. Karam et al., Constant-roll (quasi-)linear inflation, JCAP 05 (2018) 011 [arXiv:1711.09861] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, A. Kubarski, L. Marzola and A. Racioppi, A minimal model of inflation and dark radiation, Phys. Lett. B 792 (2019) 74 [arXiv:1810.12689] [INSPIRE].
A. Karam, T. Pappas and K. Tamvakis, Nonminimal Coleman-Weinberg inflation with an R2 term, JCAP 02 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1810.12884] [INSPIRE].
A. Racioppi, New universal attractor in nonminimally coupled gravity: linear inflation, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123514 [arXiv:1801.08810] [INSPIRE].
A. Racioppi, Non-minimal (self-)running inflation: metric vs. Palatini formulation, JHEP 21 (2020) 011 [arXiv:1912.10038] [INSPIRE].
I.D. Gialamas, A. Karam and A. Racioppi, Dynamically induced Planck scale and inflation in the Palatini formulation, JCAP 11 (2020) 014 [arXiv:2006.09124] [INSPIRE].
A. Racioppi, J. Rajasalu and K. Selke, Multiple point criticality principle and Coleman-Weinberg inflation, JHEP 06 (2022) 107 [arXiv:2109.03238] [INSPIRE].
A. Karam et al., Primordial black holes and inflation from double-well potentials, JCAP 09 (2023) 002 [arXiv:2305.09630] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, A. Kubarski and L. Marzola, Geometry of flat directions in scale-invariant potentials, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 115034 [arXiv:1904.07867] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, K. Loos and L. Marzola, Minima of classically scale-invariant potentials, JHEP 06 (2021) 128 [arXiv:2011.12304] [INSPIRE].
L. Marzola, A. Racioppi and V. Vaskonen, Phase transition and gravitational wave phenomenology of scalar conformal extensions of the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 484 [arXiv:1704.01034] [INSPIRE].
M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J.W.F. Valle, Enhanced lepton flavor violation with massless neutrinos: a study of muon and tau decays, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7 (1992) 477 [INSPIRE].
J. Bernabeu et al., Lepton flavor nonconservation at high-energies in a superstring inspired standard model, Phys. Lett. B 187 (1987) 303 [INSPIRE].
N. Rius and J.W.F. Valle, Leptonic CP violating asymmetries in Z0 decays, Phys. Lett. B 246 (1990) 249 [INSPIRE].
G.C. Branco, M.N. Rebelo and J.W.F. Valle, Leptonic CP violation with massless neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 225 (1989) 385 [INSPIRE].
J.A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Oscillating neutrinos and μ → e, γ, Nucl. Phys. B 618 (2001) 171 [hep-ph/0103065] [INSPIRE].
F. Deppisch and J.W.F. Valle, Enhanced lepton flavor violation in the supersymmetric inverse seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 036001 [hep-ph/0406040] [INSPIRE].
F. Bazzocchi, D.G. Cerdeno, C. Munoz and J.W.F. Valle, Calculable inverse-seesaw neutrino masses in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 051701 [arXiv:0907.1262] [INSPIRE].
D.V. Forero, S. Morisi, M. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Lepton flavor violation and non-unitary lepton mixing in low-scale type-I seesaw, JHEP 09 (2011) 142 [arXiv:1107.6009] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban et al., The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP 09 (2020) 178 [arXiv:2007.14792] [INSPIRE].
S. Roy Choudhury and S. Choubey, Updated bounds on sum of neutrino masses in various cosmological scenarios, JCAP 09 (2018) 017 [arXiv:1806.10832] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP 12 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1307.3536] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, Vacuum stability conditions from copositivity criteria, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2093 [arXiv:1205.3781] [INSPIRE].
T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, LHC benchmark scenarios for the real Higgs singlet extension of the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 268 [arXiv:1601.07880] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137963 [arXiv:2301.10731] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 933 [arXiv:2303.01214] [INSPIRE].
MEG collaboration, Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+ → e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 434 [arXiv:1605.05081] [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, Search for lepton-flavor-violating tau-lepton decays to ℓγ at Belle, JHEP 10 (2021) 019 [arXiv:2103.12994] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [Erratum ibid. 652 (2021) C4] [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
C.A. Argüelles et al., Dark matter decay to neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 123021 [arXiv:2210.01303] [INSPIRE].
C. Garcia-Cely and J. Heeck, Neutrino lines from Majoron dark matter, JHEP 05 (2017) 102 [arXiv:1701.07209] [INSPIRE].
J. Heeck and H.H. Patel, Majoron at two loops, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095015 [arXiv:1909.02029] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul et al., FeynRules 2.0 — a complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
G. Belanger, A. Mjallal and A. Pukhov, Recasting direct detection limits within micrOMEGAs and implication for non-standard dark matter scenarios, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 239 [arXiv:2003.08621] [INSPIRE].
G. Alguero, G. Belanger, S. Kraml and A. Pukhov, Co-scattering in micrOMEGAs: a case study for the singlet-triplet dark matter model, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 124 [arXiv:2207.10536] [INSPIRE].
L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West, Freeze-in production of FIMP dark matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 080 [arXiv:0911.1120] [INSPIRE].
T. Prokopec and J. Weenink, Frame independent cosmological perturbations, JCAP 09 (2013) 027 [arXiv:1304.6737] [INSPIRE].
L. Järv et al., Frame-independent classification of single-field inflationary models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 151302 [arXiv:1612.06863] [INSPIRE].
T. Koivisto and H. Kurki-Suonio, Cosmological perturbations in the Palatini formulation of modified gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2355 [astro-ph/0509422] [INSPIRE].
F. Bauer and D.A. Demir, Inflation with non-minimal coupling: metric versus Palatini formulations, Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 222 [arXiv:0803.2664] [INSPIRE].
I.D. Gialamas, A. Karam, T.D. Pappas and E. Tomberg, Implications of Palatini gravity for inflation and beyond, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 20 (2023) 2330007 [arXiv:2303.14148] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [arXiv:1807.06211] [INSPIRE].
F.L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, The standard model Higgs boson as the inflaton, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 703 [arXiv:0710.3755] [INSPIRE].
G.K. Karananas, M. Shaposhnikov and S. Zell, Field redefinitions, perturbative unitarity and Higgs inflation, JHEP 06 (2022) 132 [arXiv:2203.09534] [INSPIRE].
BICEP and Keck collaborations, Improved constraints on primordial gravitational waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck observations through the 2018 observing season, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 151301 [arXiv:2110.00483] [INSPIRE].
I.D. Gialamas, A. Karam, T.D. Pappas and V.C. Spanos, Scale-invariant quadratic gravity and inflation in the Palatini formalism, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 023521 [arXiv:2104.04550] [INSPIRE].
LiteBIRD collaboration, LiteBIRD: JAXA’s new strategic L-class mission for all-sky surveys of cosmic microwave background polarization, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 11443 (2020) 114432F [arXiv:2101.12449] [INSPIRE].
NASA PICO collaboration, PICO: Probe of Inflation and Cosmic Origins, arXiv:1902.10541 [INSPIRE].
R. Cottle, G. Habetler and C. Lemke, On classes of copositive matrices, Linear Alg. Appl. 3 (1970) 295.
L. Sartore and I. Schienbein, PyR@TE 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 261 (2021) 107819 [arXiv:2007.12700] [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Lorenzo Calibbi for useful discussions. This work was supported by the Estonian Research Council grants MOBTT5, PRG356, PRG434 and PRG1055.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2306.07865
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kannike, K., Kubarski, A., Marzola, L. et al. Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in a radiative inverse seesaw scenario. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 166 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2023)166
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2023)166