Abstract
The discrepancy between the muon g − 2 measurement and the Standard Model prediction points to new physics around or below the weak scale. It is tantalizing to consider the loop effects of a heavy axion (in the general sense, also known as an axion-like particle) coupling to leptons and photons as an explanation for this discrepancy. We provide an updated analysis of the necessary couplings, including two-loop contributions, and find that the new physics operators point to an axion decay constant on the order of 10s of GeV. This poses major problems for such an explanation, as the axion couplings to leptons and photons must be generated at low scales. We outline some possibilities for how such couplings can arise, and find that these scenarios predict new charged matter at or below the weak scale and new scalars can mix with the Higgs boson, raising numerous phenomenological challenges. These scenarios also all predict additional contributions to the muon g−2 itself, calling the initial application of the axion effective theory into question. We conclude that there is little reason to favor an axion explanation of the muon g – 2 measurement relative to other models postulating new weak-scale matter.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Muon g-2 collaboration, Final report of the muon E821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Muon g − 2 and α(\( {M}_Z^2 \)): a new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 114025 [arXiv:1802.02995] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
S. Borsányi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature 593 (2021) 51 [arXiv:2002.12347] [INSPIRE].
E.-H. Chao, R.J. Hudspith, A. Gérardin, J.R. Green, H.B. Meyer and K. Ottnad, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g − 2)μ from lattice QCD: a complete calculation, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 651 [arXiv:2104.02632] [INSPIRE].
L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature 588 (2020) 61 [INSPIRE].
ACME collaboration, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature 562 (2018) 355 [INSPIRE].
Muon (g-2) collaboration, An improved limit on the muon electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 052008 [arXiv:0811.1207] [INSPIRE].
MEG collaboration, Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+ → e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 434 [arXiv:1605.05081] [INSPIRE].
R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791 [INSPIRE].
R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440 [INSPIRE].
F. Wilczek, Problem of strong P and T invariance in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223 [INSPIRE].
D. Chang, W.-F. Chang, C.-H. Chou and W.-Y. Keung, Large two loop contributions to g − 2 from a generic pseudoscalar boson, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 091301 [hep-ph/0009292] [INSPIRE].
W.J. Marciano, A. Masiero, P. Paradisi and M. Passera, Contributions of axionlike particles to lepton dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115033 [arXiv:1607.01022] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Collider probes of axion-like particles, JHEP 12 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1708.00443] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, Axionlike particles, lepton-flavor violation, and a new explanation of aμ and ae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 211803 [arXiv:1908.00008] [INSPIRE].
C. Cornella, P. Paradisi and O. Sumensari, Hunting for ALPs with lepton flavor violation, JHEP 01 (2020) 158 [arXiv:1911.06279] [INSPIRE].
M. Chala, G. Guedes, M. Ramos and J. Santiago, Running in the ALPs, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 181 [arXiv:2012.09017] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, The low-energy effective theory of axions and ALPs, JHEP 04 (2021) 063 [arXiv:2012.12272] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal et al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2020 Workshop Report, arXiv:2102.12143 [INSPIRE].
S.M. Barr and A. Zee, Electric dipole moment of the electron and of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 21 [Erratum ibid. 65 (1990) 2920] [INSPIRE].
M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong CP problem with a harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199 [INSPIRE].
A.R. Zhitnitsky, On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions (in Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260 [Yad. Fiz. 31 (1980) 497] [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi, D.B. Kaplan and L. Randall, Manifesting the invisible axion at low-energies, Phys. Lett. B 169 (1986) 73 [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, Consistent treatment of axions in the weak chiral lagrangian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 081803 [arXiv:2102.13112] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi, C.S. Shin and S. Yun, Axion scales and couplings with Stückelberg mixing, JHEP 12 (2019) 033 [arXiv:1909.11685] [INSPIRE].
K. Fraser and M. Reece, Axion periodicity and coupling quantization in the presence of mixing, JHEP 05 (2020) 066 [arXiv:1910.11349] [INSPIRE].
D. Tong, Line operators in the standard model, JHEP 07 (2017) 104 [arXiv:1705.01853] [INSPIRE].
E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Monodromy in the CMB: gravity waves and string inflation, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 106003 [arXiv:0803.3085] [INSPIRE].
P.S.B. Dev, R.N. Mohapatra and Y. Zhang, Lepton flavor violation induced by a neutral scalar at future lepton colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 221804 [arXiv:1711.08430] [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan, Looking forward to Lepton-flavor-violating ALPs, arXiv:2006.04795 [INSPIRE].
MEG II collaboration, The design of the MEG II experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 380 [arXiv:1801.04688] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, S. Iguro and T. Kitahara, Probing eμ flavor-violating ALP at Belle II, JHEP 06 (2020) 040 [arXiv:2002.05948] [INSPIRE].
D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse, New measurement of the electron magnetic moment and the fine structure constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 120801 [arXiv:0801.1134] [INSPIRE].
D. Hanneke, S.F. Hoogerheide and G. Gabrielse, Cavity control of a single-electron quantum cyclotron: measuring the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) 052122 [arXiv:1009.4831] [INSPIRE].
R.H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model, Science 360 (2018) 191 [arXiv:1812.04130] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo, P. Panci, D. Teresi and R. Ziegler, Xenon1T excess from electron recoils of non-relativistic dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 817 (2021) 136310 [arXiv:2011.08919] [INSPIRE].
D. Aloni, C. Fanelli, Y. Soreq and M. Williams, Photoproduction of axionlike particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 071801 [arXiv:1903.03586] [INSPIRE].
Belle-II collaboration, Search for axion-like particles produced in e+e− collisions at Belle II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 161806 [arXiv:2007.13071] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 011102 [arXiv:1606.03501] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
L. Darmé, F. Giacchino, E. Nardi and M. Raggi, Invisible decays of axion-like particles: constraints and prospects, JHEP 06 (2021) 009 [arXiv:2012.07894] [INSPIRE].
J.E. Kim, Weak interaction singlet and strong CP invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103 [INSPIRE].
M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493 [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Experimental targets for photon couplings of the QCD axion, JHEP 02 (2018) 006 [arXiv:1709.06085] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for heavy stable charged particles with 12.9 fb−1 of 2016 data, CMS-PAS-EXO-16-036 (2016).
K. Choi and S.H. Im, Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry, JHEP 01 (2016) 149 [arXiv:1511.00132] [INSPIRE].
D.E. Kaplan and R. Rattazzi, Large field excursions and approximate discrete symmetries from a clockwork axion, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 085007 [arXiv:1511.01827] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem, Fortsch. Phys. 58 (2010) 528 [arXiv:0706.2050] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi, H. Kim and S. Yun, Natural inflation with multiple sub-Planckian axions, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023545 [arXiv:1404.6209] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi, S.H. Im and C.S. Shin, Recent progress in physics of axions or axion-like particles, arXiv:2012.05029 [INSPIRE].
M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, F. Rompineve and A. Tesi, The photo-philic QCD axion, JHEP 01 (2017) 095 [arXiv:1611.09855] [INSPIRE].
L. Darmé, L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti and E. Nardi, Selective enhancement of the QCD axion couplings, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015034 [arXiv:2010.15846] [INSPIRE].
M. Srednicki, Axion couplings to matter. 1. CP conserving parts, Nucl. Phys. B 260 (1985) 689 [INSPIRE].
G.C. Branco, P.M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M.N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J.P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1106.0034] [INSPIRE].
V.D. Barger, J.L. Hewett and R.J.N. Phillips, New constraints on the charged Higgs sector in two Higgs doublet models, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3421 [INSPIRE].
N. Craig and S. Thomas, Exclusive signals of an extended Higgs sector, JHEP 11 (2012) 083 [arXiv:1207.4835] [INSPIRE].
N. Craig, J. Galloway and S. Thomas, Searching for signs of the second Higgs doublet, arXiv:1305.2424 [INSPIRE].
B.A. Dobrescu, G.L. Landsberg and K.T. Matchev, Higgs boson decays to CP odd scalars at the Tevatron and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 075003 [hep-ph/0005308] [INSPIRE].
S. Chang, P.J. Fox and N. Weiner, Visible cascade Higgs decays to four photons at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 111802 [hep-ph/0608310] [INSPIRE].
M. Lisanti and J.G. Wacker, Discovering the Higgs with low mass muon pairs, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 115006 [arXiv:0903.1377] [INSPIRE].
D. Curtin et al., Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 075004 [arXiv:1312.4992] [INSPIRE].
J. Haller, A. Hoecker, R. Kogler, K. Mönig, T. Peiffer and J. Stelzer, Update of the global electroweak fit and constraints on two-Higgs-doublet models, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 675 [arXiv:1803.01853] [INSPIRE].
A. Dedes and H.E. Haber, Can the Higgs sector contribute significantly to the muon anomalous magnetic moment?, JHEP 05 (2001) 006 [hep-ph/0102297] [INSPIRE].
J.F. Gunion, A Light CP-odd Higgs boson and the muon anomalous magnetic moment, JHEP 08 (2009) 032 [arXiv:0808.2509] [INSPIRE].
A. Cherchiglia, P. Kneschke, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, The muon magnetic moment in the 2HDM: complete two-loop result, JHEP 01 (2017) 007 [arXiv:1607.06292] [INSPIRE].
A. Cherchiglia, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Muon g − 2 in the 2HDM: maximum results and detailed phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035001 [arXiv:1711.11567] [INSPIRE].
A. Broggio, E.J. Chun, M. Passera, K.M. Patel and S.K. Vempati, Limiting two-Higgs-doublet models, JHEP 11 (2014) 058 [arXiv:1409.3199] [INSPIRE].
T. Abe, R. Sato and K. Yagyu, Lepton-specific two Higgs doublet model as a solution of muon g − 2 anomaly, JHEP 07 (2015) 064 [arXiv:1504.07059] [INSPIRE].
E.J. Chun, Z. Kang, M. Takeuchi and Y.-L.S. Tsai, LHC τ-rich tests of lepton-specific 2HDM for (g − 2)μ, JHEP 11 (2015) 099 [arXiv:1507.08067] [INSPIRE].
E.J. Chun and J. Kim, Leptonic precision test of leptophilic two-Higgs-doublet model, JHEP 07 (2016) 110 [arXiv:1605.06298] [INSPIRE].
L. Wang, J.M. Yang, M. Zhang and Y. Zhang, Revisiting lepton-specific 2HDM in light of muon g − 2 anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 519 [arXiv:1809.05857] [INSPIRE].
X.-F. Han, T. Li, L. Wang and Y. Zhang, Simple interpretations of lepton anomalies in the lepton-specific inert two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 095034 [arXiv:1812.02449] [INSPIRE].
A. Freitas, J. Lykken, S. Kell and S. Westhoff, Testing the muon g − 2 anomaly at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2014) 145 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2014) 155] [arXiv:1402.7065] [INSPIRE].
R. Dermisek, J.P. Hall, E. Lunghi and S. Shin, Limits on vectorlike leptons from searches for anomalous production of multi-lepton events, JHEP 12 (2014) 013 [arXiv:1408.3123] [INSPIRE].
R. Dermisek, K. Hermanek, N. McGinnis and N. McGinnis, Highly enhanced contributions of heavy higgs bosons and new leptons to muon g − 2 and prospects at future colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 191801 [arXiv:2011.11812] [INSPIRE].
R. Dermisek, K. Hermanek and N. McGinnis, Muon g − 2 in two Higgs doublet models with vectorlike leptons, arXiv:2103.05645 [INSPIRE].
M. Abe et al., A new approach for measuring the muon anomalous magnetic moment and electric dipole moment, PTEP 2019 (2019) 053C02 [arXiv:1901.03047] [INSPIRE].
H. Al Ali et al., The muon smasher’s guide, arXiv:2103.14043 [INSPIRE].
T. Han, Y. Ma and K. Xie, High energy leptonic collisions and electroweak parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) L031301 [arXiv:2007.14300] [INSPIRE].
E. Eichten and A. Martin, The muon collider as a H/A factory, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 125 [arXiv:1306.2609] [INSPIRE].
N. Chakrabarty, T. Han, Z. Liu and B. Mukhopadhyaya, Radiative return for heavy Higgs boson at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 015008 [arXiv:1408.5912] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo, D. Redigolo, F. Sala and A. Tesi, Fusing vectors into scalars at high energy lepton colliders, JHEP 11 (2018) 144 [arXiv:1807.04743] [INSPIRE].
P. Bandyopadhyay and A. Costantini, Obscure Higgs boson at colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015025 [arXiv:2010.02597] [INSPIRE].
T. Han, S. Li, S. Su, W. Su and Y. Wu, Heavy Higgs bosons in 2HDM at a muon collider, arXiv:2102.08386 [INSPIRE].
W. Liu and K.-P. Xie, Probing electroweak phase transition with multi-TeV muon colliders and gravitational waves, JHEP 04 (2021) 015 [arXiv:2101.10469] [INSPIRE].
A. Costantini et al., Vector boson fusion at multi-TeV muon colliders, JHEP 09 (2020) 080 [arXiv:2005.10289] [INSPIRE].
T. Han, Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang and X. Wang, WIMPs at high energy muon colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 075004 [arXiv:2009.11287] [INSPIRE].
R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni, R. Simoniello and J. Zurita, Hunting wino and higgsino dark matter at the muon collider with disappearing tracks, JHEP 06 (2021) 133 [arXiv:2102.11292] [INSPIRE].
M. Chiesa, F. Maltoni, L. Mantani, B. Mele, F. Piccinini and X. Zhao, Measuring the quartic Higgs self-coupling at a multi-TeV muon collider, JHEP 09 (2020) 098 [arXiv:2003.13628] [INSPIRE].
T. Han, D. Liu, I. Low and X. Wang, Electroweak couplings of the Higgs boson at a multi-TeV muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 013002 [arXiv:2008.12204] [INSPIRE].
R. Capdevilla, D. Curtin, Y. Kahn and G. Krnjaic, Discovering the physics of (g − 2)μ at future muon colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 075028 [arXiv:2006.16277] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo and P. Paradisi, Probing the muon g − 2 anomaly at a muon collider, arXiv:2012.02769 [INSPIRE].
R. Capdevilla, D. Curtin, Y. Kahn and G. Krnjaic, A no-lose theorem for discovering the new physics of (g − 2)μ at muon colliders, arXiv:2101.10334 [INSPIRE].
N. Chen, B. Wang and C.-Y. Yao, The collider tests of a leptophilic scalar for the anomalous magnetic moments, arXiv:2102.05619 [INSPIRE].
W. Yin and M. Yamaguchi, Muon g − 2 at multi-TeV muon collider, arXiv:2012.03928 [INSPIRE].
H.H. Patel, Package-X: a Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197 (2015) 276 [arXiv:1503.01469] [INSPIRE].
R. Jackiw, When radiative corrections are finite but undetermined, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 14 (2000) 2011 [hep-th/9903044] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2104.03267
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Buen-Abad, M.A., Fan, J., Reece, M. et al. Challenges for an axion explanation of the muon g − 2 measurement. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2021)101
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2021)101