Abstract
Dismissing traditional naturalness concerns while embracing the Higgs boson mass measurement and unification motivates careful analysis of trans-TeV supersymmetric theories. We take an effective field theory (EFT) approach, matching the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) onto the Standard Model (SM) EFT by integrating out heavy superpartners, and evolving MSSM and SMEFT parameters according to renormalization group equations in each regime. Our matching calculation is facilitated by the recent covariant diagrams formulation of functional matching techniques, with the full one-loop SUSY threshold corrections encoded in just 30 diagrams. Requiring consistent matching onto the SMEFT with its parameters (those in the Higgs potential in particular) measured at low energies, and in addition requiring unification of bottom and tau Yukawa couplings at the scale of gauge coupling unification, we detail the solution space of superpartner masses from the TeV scale to well above. We also provide detailed views of parameter space where Higgs coupling measurements have probing capability at future colliders beyond the reach of direct superpartner searches at the LHC.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Willenbrock and C. Zhang, Effective field theory beyond the standard model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 64 (2014) 83 [arXiv:1401.0470] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, Effective field theory approach to LHC Higgs data, Pramana 87 (2016) 39 [arXiv:1505.00046] [INSPIRE].
LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector, arXiv:1610.07922 [INSPIRE].
D.M. Pierce, J.A. Bagger, K.T. Matchev and R.-j. Zhang, Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 491 (1997) 3 [hep-ph/9606211] [INSPIRE].
P. Draper, G. Lee and C.E.M. Wagner, Precise estimates of the Higgs mass in heavy supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 055023 [arXiv:1312.5743] [INSPIRE].
E. Bagnaschi, G.F. Giudice, P. Slavich and A. Strumia, Higgs mass and unnatural supersymmetry, JHEP 09 (2014) 092 [arXiv:1407.4081] [INSPIRE].
J. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro, SusyHD: Higgs mass determination in supersymmetry, JHEP 07 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1504.05200] [INSPIRE].
G. Lee and C.E.M. Wagner, Higgs bosons in heavy supersymmetry with an intermediate m A, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 075032 [arXiv:1508.00576] [INSPIRE].
P. Athron et al., Precise Higgs mass calculations in (non-)minimal supersymmetry at both high and low scales, JHEP 01 (2017) 079 [arXiv:1609.00371] [INSPIRE].
F. Staub and W. Porod, Improved predictions for intermediate and heavy Supersymmetry in the MSSM and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 338 [arXiv:1703.03267] [INSPIRE].
E. Bagnaschi, J. Pardo Vega and P. Slavich, Improved determination of the Higgs mass in the MSSM with heavy superpartners, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 334 [arXiv:1703.08166] [INSPIRE].
K. Tobe and J.D. Wells, Revisiting top bottom tau Yukawa unification in supersymmetric grand unified theories, Nucl. Phys. B 663 (2003) 123 [hep-ph/0301015] [INSPIRE].
G. Elor, L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, Yukawa unification and the superpartner mass scale, JHEP 10 (2012) 111 [arXiv:1206.5301] [INSPIRE].
M.K. Gaillard, The effective one loop lagrangian with derivative couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 669 [INSPIRE].
L.-H. Chan, Derivative expansion for the one loop effective actions with internal symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 1199 [INSPIRE].
O. Cheyette, Effective action for the standard model with large Higgs mass, Nucl. Phys. B 297 (1988) 183 [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, How to use the standard model effective field theory, JHEP 01 (2016) 023 [arXiv:1412.1837] [INSPIRE].
A. Drozd, J. Ellis, J. Quevillon and T. You, The universal one-loop effective action, JHEP 03 (2016) 180 [arXiv:1512.03003] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, One-loop matching and running with covariant derivative expansion, JHEP 01 (2018) 123 [arXiv:1604.01019] [INSPIRE].
S.A.R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You and Z. Zhang, Mixed heavy-light matching in the universal one-loop effective action, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 166 [arXiv:1604.02445] [INSPIRE].
J. Fuentes-Martin, J. Portoles and P. Ruiz-Femenia, Integrating out heavy particles with functional methods: a simplified framework, JHEP 09 (2016) 156 [arXiv:1607.02142] [INSPIRE].
Z. Zhang, Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching, JHEP 05 (2017) 152 [arXiv:1610.00710] [INSPIRE].
S.A.R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You and Z. Zhang, Extending the universal one-loop effective action: heavy-light coefficients, JHEP 08 (2017) 054 [arXiv:1706.07765] [INSPIRE].
C.-W. Chiang and R. Huo, Standard model effective field theory: integrating out a generic scalar, JHEP 09 (2015) 152 [arXiv:1505.06334] [INSPIRE].
R. Huo, Standard model effective field theory: integrating out vector-like fermions, JHEP 09 (2015) 037 [arXiv:1506.00840] [INSPIRE].
R. Huo, Effective field theory of integrating out sfermions in the MSSM: complete one-loop analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 075013 [arXiv:1509.05942] [INSPIRE].
F. del Aguila, Z. Kunszt and J. Santiago, One-loop effective lagrangians after matching, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 244 [arXiv:1602.00126] [INSPIRE].
M. Boggia, R. Gomez-Ambrosio and G. Passarino, Low energy behaviour of standard model extensions, JHEP 05 (2016) 162 [arXiv:1603.03660] [INSPIRE].
P.A. Baikov, K.G. Chetyrkin and J.H. Kuhn, Scalar correlator at O(α 4 s ), Higgs decay into b-quarks and bounds on the light quark masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 012003 [hep-ph/0511063] [INSPIRE].
M. Butenschoen, F. Fugel and B.A. Kniehl, O(G 2 F m 4 t ) two-loop electroweak correction to Higgs-boson decay to bottom quarks, Nucl. Phys. B 772 (2007) 25 [hep-ph/0702215] [INSPIRE].
J. Davies, M. Steinhauser and D. Wellmann, Completing the hadronic Higgs boson decay at order α 4 s , Nucl. Phys. B 920 (2017) 20 [arXiv:1703.02988] [INSPIRE].
D. Noth and M. Spira, Supersymmetric Higgs Yukawa couplings to bottom quarks at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 06 (2011) 084 [arXiv:1001.1935] [INSPIRE].
L. Mihaila and C. Reisser, O(α 2 s ) corrections to fermionic Higgs decays in the MSSM, JHEP 08 (2010) 021 [arXiv:1007.0693] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin and C. Greub, Two-loop supersymmetric QCD corrections to Higgs-quark-quark couplings in the generic MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015013 [Erratum ibid. D 87 (2013) 079901] [arXiv:1210.7453] [INSPIRE].
R. Gauld, B.D. Pecjak and D.J. Scott, QCD radiative corrections for \( h\to b\overline{b} \) in the standard model dimension-6 EFT, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 074045 [arXiv:1607.06354] [INSPIRE].
G. Buchalla, O. Cata and C. Krause, On the power counting in effective field theories, Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 80 [arXiv:1312.5624] [INSPIRE].
G. Buchalla, O. Catà and C. Krause, A systematic approach to the SILH lagrangian, Nucl. Phys. B 894 (2015) 602 [arXiv:1412.6356] [INSPIRE].
B.M. Gavela, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and L. Merlo, Analysis of general power counting rules in effective field theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 485 [arXiv:1601.07551] [INSPIRE].
G. Buchalla, O. Catà, A. Celis and C. Krause, Comment on “Analysis of general power counting rules in effective field theory”, arXiv:1603.03062 [INSPIRE].
M. Beneke and V.A. Smirnov, Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold, Nucl. Phys. B 522 (1998) 321 [hep-ph/9711391] [INSPIRE].
V.A. Smirnov, Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics volume 177, Springer, Germany (2002).
B. Jantzen, Foundation and generalization of the expansion by regions, JHEP 12 (2011) 076 [arXiv:1111.2589] [INSPIRE].
S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 18 (1998) 1 [Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 21 (2010) 1] [hep-ph/9709356] [INSPIRE].
S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Regularization dependence of running couplings in softly broken supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 331 [hep-ph/9308222] [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP 12 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1307.3536] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators I: formalism and λ dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Bednyakov, B.A. Kniehl, A.F. Pikelner and O.L. Veretin, On the b-quark running mass in QCD and the SM, Nucl. Phys. B 916 (2017) 463 [arXiv:1612.00660] [INSPIRE].
H. Arason et al., Renormalization group study of the standard model and its extensions. 1. The Standard model, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 3945 [INSPIRE].
J.A. Casas, A. Lleyda and C. Muñoz, Strong constraints on the parameter space of the MSSM from charge and color breaking minima, Nucl. Phys. B 471 (1996) 3 [hep-ph/9507294] [INSPIRE].
W.G. Hollik, A new view on vacuum stability in the MSSM, JHEP 08 (2016) 126 [arXiv:1606.08356] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS, CMS collaboration, A. Ventura, Searches for supersymmetry, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 46 (2018) 1860006 [arXiv:1711.00152] [INSPIRE].
S.A.R. Ellis and J.D. Wells, High-scale supersymmetry, the Higgs boson mass and gauge unification, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055024 [arXiv:1706.00013] [INSPIRE].
L.J. Hall, R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, The Top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7048 [hep-ph/9306309] [INSPIRE].
R. Hempfling, Yukawa coupling unification with supersymmetric threshold corrections, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6168 [INSPIRE].
M. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski and C.E.M. Wagner, Electroweak symmetry breaking and bottom-top Yukawa unification, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 269 [hep-ph/9402253] [INSPIRE].
C.F. Kolda et al., Predictions for constrained minimal supersymmetry with bottom tau mass unification, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3498 [hep-ph/9404253] [INSPIRE].
M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and M. Tamburini, Cosmology and astrophysics of minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 787 (2007) 152 [arXiv:0706.4071] [INSPIRE].
M. Beneke, C. Hellmann and P. Ruiz-Femenia, Heavy neutralino relic abundance with Sommerfeld enhancements — A study of pMSSM scenarios, JHEP 03 (2015) 162 [arXiv:1411.6930] [INSPIRE].
M. Beneke et al., Relic density of wino-like dark matter in the MSSM, JHEP 03 (2016) 119 [arXiv:1601.04718] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry at the high luminosity LHC with the ATLAS experiment, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-010 (2014).
CMS Collaboration, Supersymmetry discovery potential in future LHC and HL-LHC running with the CMS detector, CMS-PAS-SUS-14-012 (2014).
ATLAS collaboration, Projections for measurements of Higgs boson signal strengths and coupling parameters with the ATLAS detector at a HL-LHC, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-016 (2014).
CMS collaboration, Projected performance of an upgraded CMS detector at the LHC and HL-LHC: contribution to the Snowmass process, arXiv:1307.7135 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for additional heavy neutral Higgs and gauge bosons in the ditau final state produced in 36 fb −1 of pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 01 (2018) 055 [arXiv:1709.07242] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for a neutral MSSM Higgs boson decaying into ττ with 12.9 fb −1 of data at \( \sqrt{s}=13 \) TeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-16-037 (2016).
CMS collaboration, Projected performance of Higgs analyses at the HL-LHC for ECFA 2016, CMS-PAS-FTR-16-002 (2016).
M. Carena et al., MSSM Higgs boson searches at the LHC: benchmark scenarios after the discovery of a Higgs-like particle, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2552 [arXiv:1302.7033] [INSPIRE].
G. Durieux, C. Grojean, J. Gu and K. Wang, The leptonic future of the Higgs, JHEP 09 (2017) 014 [arXiv:1704.02333] [INSPIRE].
T. Barklow et al., Improved formalism for precision Higgs coupling fits, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 053003 [arXiv:1708.08912] [INSPIRE].
K. Fujii et al., Physics case for the 250 GeV stage of the international linear collider, arXiv:1710.07621 [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1711.04774
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wells, J.D., Zhang, Z. Effective field theory approach to trans-TeV supersymmetry: covariant matching, Yukawa unification and Higgs couplings. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 182 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)182
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)182