Skip to main content
Log in

Cytoskeletal control of nuclear migration and anchoring in developing cells ofMicrasterias denticulata and the change caused by the anti-microtubular herbicide amiprophos-methyl (APM)

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Postmitotic nuclear migration and anchoring inMicrasterias seems to be mediated by two distinct microtubule (MT)-systems: the moving MT-system, called “posttelophase system of MT” (PTS) which arises from a node-like structure, possibly a microtubulecenter (MC) and the anchoring MT-system, called “isthmus system of MT” (IS) which surrounds the nucleus at its central position. The nucleus or parts of its envelope seems to be involved in the nucleation and orientation of these MT-systems. The moving force of the nuclear migration process obviously originates from interaction between the MT-system (PTS) and its adjacent microfilaments.

Under the influence of the herbicide amiprophos-methyl (APM) a destruction of both of the MT-systems followed by a disoriented nuclear migration occurs.

Recovery experiments after APM treatment revealed a reestablishment of both the PTS and the IS although a disoriented formation could often be observed. Depending on the orientation of the reestablished MT-system (PTS) either remigration of the nucleus or dislocated anchoring at one of the lobe invaginations of the cell takes place. An interaction between the nucleus and distinct sites of the plasma membrane is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton, E., 1916: Studies on nuclear division in the desmids 1.Hyalotheca dissiliens. Ann. Bot.30, 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassels, A. R., Kuehnert, Ch. C., Miller, J. H., 1981: Nuclear migration and asymmetric cell division inOnoclea sensibilis spores: An ultrastructural and cytochemical study. Amer. J. Bot.68(3), 350–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Miller, J. H., 1982: The effect of centrifugation on asymmetric cell division and differentiation of fern spores. Ann. Bot.50, 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkson, B. M., 1970: Centriole: Its role in fungal nuclear motility. Cytologia35, 471–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawley, S. H., Wetherbee, R., Quatrano, R. S., 1976: Fine structural studies of the gametes and embryo ofFucus vesiculosus L. (Phaeophyta). I. Fertilization and pro-nuclear fusion. J. Cell. Sci.20, 233–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —,Quatrano, R. S., 1979: Effects of microtubule inhibitors on pronuclear migration and embryogenesis inFucus distichus (Phaeophyta). J. Phycol.15, 266–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britz, S. J., 1975: Inhibitor studies on the mechanism of chloroplast movement inUlva. Carnegie Institution of Washington Yearbook74, 803–805

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1979: Chloroplast and nuclear migration. In: Physiology of Movements. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol.7 (Haupt, W.,Feinleib, M. E., eds.), pp. 170–205.

  • Brown, R. C., Lemmon, B. E., 1981: Aperture development in spores of the mossTrematodon longicollis Mx. Protoplasma106, 273 -287.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1982: Ultrastructure of meiosis in the mossRhynchostegium serrulatum. I. Prophasic microtubules and spindle dynamics. Protoplasma110, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., 1970: Interaction between microtubules and the nuclear envelope during mitosis in a fern. Protoplasma71, 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N., 1920: Studies on the chloroplast of desmids. IV. Ann. Bot.34, 305–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filner, Ph., Yadav, N. S., 1979: Intracellular movements. In: Physiology of Movements. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol. 7 (Haupt, W.,Feinleib, M. E., eds.), pp. 95–113.

  • Galatis, B., Apostolakos, P., Katsaros, Ch., 1983: Microtubules and their organizing centers in differentiating guard cells ofAdiatum capillus veneris. Protoplasma115, 176–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girbardt, M., 1968: Ultrastructure and dynamics of the moving nucleus. In: Aspects of Cell Motility. 22nd Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. (Miller, P. L., ed.), pp. 249–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, B. E. S., Hardham, A. R., 1979: Microtubules and morphogenesis in plants. Endeavour, New Series3, 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1982: Microtubules. Ann.-Rev. Plant Physiol.33, 651–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —,Hughes, J. E., 1978: Pre-prophase bands of microtubules in all categories of formative and proliferative cell division inAzolla roots. Planta143, 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Hughes, J. E., Hardham, A. R., 1978: Formative and proliferative cell division, cell differentiation, and developmental changes in the meristem ofAzolla roots. Planta143, 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, I. B., Heath, M. C., 1978: Microtubules and organelle movements in the rust fungusUromyces phaseoli var. vignae. Europ. J. Cell Biol.16, 393–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepler, P. K., Palevitz, B. A., 1974: Microtubules and microfilaments. Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol.25, 309–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. J., 1981: Ultrastructural analysis of hyphal tip cell growth in fungi: Spitzenkörper, cytoskeleton and endomembranes after freeze-substitution. J. Cell Sci.48, 89–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —,Aist, J. R., 1977: Effects of MBC on hyphal tip organization, growth and mitosis ofFusarum acuminatum, and their antagonism by D2O. Protoplasma92, 195–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1980: Cytoplasmic microtubules and fungal morphogenesis: Ultrastructural effects of Methyl-Benzimidazol-2-yl-carbamate determined by freeze-substitution of hyphal tip cells. J. Cell Biol.87, 55–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiermayer, O., 1964: Untersuchungen über die Morphogenese und Zellwandbildung beiMicrasterias denticulata Bréb. Protoplasma59, 97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiermayer, O., 1966 a:Micrasterias denticulata (Desmidiaceae) — Morphogenese, Film E 868, Inst. Wiss. Film Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiermayer, O., 1966 b: Differenzierung und Wachstum vonMicrasterias denticulata (Conjugatae), Film C 924, Inst. Wiss. Film, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1968 a: The distribution of microtubules in differentiating cells ofMicrasterias denticulata Bréb. Planta83, 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1968 b: Hemmung der Kern- und Chloroplastenmigration vonMicrasterias durch Colchicin. Naturwissenschaften55, 299–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1968 c: Microtubuli um den Posttelophase-Nucleus vonMicrasterias und ihre mögliche Funktion. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges.81, 319.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970 a: Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zum Problem der Cytomorphogenese vonMicrasterias denticulata Bréb. I. Allgemeiner Überblick. Protoplasma69, 97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1970 b: Causal aspects of cytomorphogenesis inMicrasterias. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.175, 686–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1972: Beeinflussung der postmitotischen Kernmigration vonMicrasterias denticulata Bréb. durch das Herbizid Trifluralin. Protoplasma75, 421–426.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: Störung der Kernmigration vonMicrasterias denticulata (Desmidiaceae) durch eine die Mikrotubuli beeinflussende Substanz Chlor-isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamat (CIPC), Film B 1070, Inst. Wiss. Film, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976: Formbildung des Chloroplasten vonMicrasterias denticulata (Desmidiaceae) Film B 1106, Inst. Wiss. Film, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiermayer, O., 1980: Control of morphogenesis inMicrasterias. In: Handbook of Phycological Methods, Cytological and Developmental Methods (Gantt, B., ed.). London-New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Cytoplasmic basis of morphogenesis inMicrasterias. In: Cytomorphogenesis in Plants (Kiermayer, O., ed.). Wien-New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Fedtke, C., 1977: Strong anti-microtubule action of amiprophos-methyl (APM) inMicrasterias. Protoplasma92, 163–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Hepler, P. K., 1970: Hemmung der Kernmigration von Jochalgen (Micrasterias) durch Isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamat. Naturwissenschaften5, 252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanners, H. N., 1980: Pronuclei ofHeliophyra erhardi Mathes during conjugation and their differential association with coated and uncoated microtubules. J. Cell Sci45, 245–255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, U., Kiermayer, O., 1981: Biologischer Test zur Bestimmung der Antimikrotubuli-Wirkung verschiedener Stoffe mit Hilfe der GrünalgeMicrasterias denticulata. Mikroskopie38, 325–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1982 a: Über die Kern- und Chloroplastenmigration vonMicrasterias denticulata Bréb. I. Licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen der Kernmigration nach Behandlung mit Antimikrotubuli-Substanzen. Phyton22 (1), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1982 b: Über die Kern- und Chloroplastenmigration vonMicrasterias denticulata Bréb. II. Die Chloroplastenmigration und ihre Veränderung durch verschiedene Stoffe. Phyton22 (2), 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., Greany, R., 1976: Rhizoid differentiation in fern spores: experimental manipulation. Science193, 687–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakai, Y., Ushiyama, R., 1978: Fine structure of shiitake,Lentinus edodes. VI., Cytoplasmic microtubules in relation to nuclear movement. Can. J. Bot.56, 1206–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus-Url, G., Kiermayer, O., 1982: Observations of microtubules and microtubule-microfilament associations on osmotically treated cells ofMicrasterias denticulata Bréb. Europ. J. Cell Biol.27, 206–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, B. R., Morris, N. R., 1980: Nuclear movement is β-tubulin-dependent inAspergillus nidulans. Cell19, 255–262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, D. W., Brown, R. M., Jr., 1972: Light and electron microscopical observations on mitosis inVaucheria litorea Hofman ex. C. Agardh. Br. phycol. J.7, 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1974: Developmental cytology of the genusVaucheria. I. Organisation of the vegetative filament. Br. phycol. J.9, 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps, J. D., 1969: Preprophase microtubule bands in some abnormal mitotic cells of wheat. J. Cell Sci.4, 397–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1972: Cell division inCosmarium botrytis. J. Phycol.8 (4), 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Fowke, L. C., 1970: Mitosis, cytokinesis and cell elongation in the desmidClosterium littorale. J. Phycol.6 (2), 189–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Northcote, D. H., 1966 a: Organisation of microtubules and endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis in wheat meristem. J. Cell Sci.1, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1966 b: Cell division in the formation of the stomatal complex of the young leaves of wheat. J. Cell Sci.1, 121–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, K. R., 1966: Cytoplasmic microtubules and their function. In: CIBA Foundation Symposium on Principles of Biomolecular Organization. London: J. A. Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. J., Peace, G. W., Slabas, A. R., Lloyd, C. W., 1982: The detergent-resistant cytoskeleton of higher plant protoplasts contains nucleus-associated fibrillar bundles in addition to microtubules. J. Cell Sci.56, 319–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raudaskoski, M., 1972: Occurence of microtubules in the hyphae ofSchizophyllum commune during intercellular nuclear migration. Arch. Mikrobiol.86, 91–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Griseofulvin-induced alterations in site of dividing nuclei and structure in a dikaryon ofSchizophyllum commune. Protoplasma103, 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Koltin, Y., 1973: Ultrastructural aspects of a mutant ofSchizophyllum commune with continous nuclear migration. J. Bacteriology116 (2), 981–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiedel, G., Reiss, H.-D., Schnepf, E., 1981: Associations between membranes and microtubules during mitosis and cytokinesis in caulonema tip cells of the mossFunaria hygrometrica. Protoplasma108, 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,SchnepF, E., 1979 a: Side branch formation and orientation in the caulonema of the moss,Funaria hygrometrica: Normal development and fine structure. Protoplasma100, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1979 b: Side branch formation and orientation in the caulonema of the moss,Funaria hygrometrica: Experiments with inhibitors and with centrifugation. Protoplasma101, 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1980: Polarity and growth of caulonema tip cells of the mossFunaria hygrometrica. Planta147, 405–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnepf, E., Heinzmann, J., 1980: Nuclear movement, tip growth and colchicine effects inLagenisma coscinodisci Drebes (Oomycetes, Lagenidiales). Biochem Physiol. Pflanzen175, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. W., Fuller, M. S., 1980: Microtubules, organelle movement and cross-wall formation at the sporangial-rhizoidal interface in the fungusChytridium confervae. Protoplasma104, 201–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treibelmayer, K., Pohlhammer, K., 1974: Die Verwendung eines Mikrofiltergerätes bei der Fixierung und Entwässerung kleiner biologischer Objekte der Elektronenmikroskopie. Mikroskopie30, 229–233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelmann, Th. C, Bassels, A. R., Miller, J. H., 1981: Effects of microtubule- inhibitors on nuclear migration and rhizoid differentiation in germinating fern spores (Onoclea sensibilis). Protoplasma109, 195–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Miller, J. H., 1980: Nuclear migration in germinating spores ofOnoclea sensibilis: The path and kinetics of movement. Amer. J. Bot.67 (5), 648–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, 1981: The effect of methanol on spore germination and rhizoid differentiation inOnoclea sensibilis. J. Bot.68 (9), 1177–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, M., Mineyuki, Y., Kadota, A., Furuya, M., 1980: The changes of nuclear position and distribution of circumferentially aligned cortical microtubules during the progression of cell cycle inAdiantum protonema. Bot. Mag. Tokyo93, 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,O'Brien, T. P., 1975: Observations on the structure of the protonema ofAdiantum capillus-veneris L. undergoing cell division following white-light irradiation. Planta126, 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waris, H., 1950: Cytophysiological studies onMicrasterias. I. Nuclear and cell division. Physiol. Plant.3, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Ch. L., Aist, J. R., 1967: Motility of fungal nuclei. Phytopathologie57, 769–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, C. L. F., 1971: The anchoring of nuclei by cytoplasmic microtubules inAcetabularia. J. Cell Sci.8, 611–621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meindl, U. Cytoskeletal control of nuclear migration and anchoring in developing cells ofMicrasterias denticulata and the change caused by the anti-microtubular herbicide amiprophos-methyl (APM). Protoplasma 118, 75–90 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284749

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284749

Keywords

Navigation