Abstract
The assumption that inquiry-based instruction is more effective in influencing student science achievement than traditional didactic teaching has been the driving force of science education reform in recent decades and in many countries. However, the empirical relationship between these two kinds of science teaching and student science performance is not soundly established, which is worth a careful examination. Framed through the theoretical perspectives of inquiry-based instruction and culturally relevant pedagogy, using a two-level hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) approach and simultaneous multiple regression, this study examines the above relationship using the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011 8th grade dataset from Singapore, Chinese Taipei, and the US. The study found that for the low-performing students, none of the inquiry-based teaching practice items measured had a significant relationship with the science achievements at any performance levels of students in any country/region except for the case of two inquiry-based teaching practice items that were positively related to Chinese Taipei students’ achievements. No didactic teaching practice items were associated with the Singapore students’ science achievement, three of these practice items were found negatively related to Chinese Taipei students’ science achievement, and one traditional didactic teaching practice was negatively related to the science achievement of U.S. students. However, for medium- and high-performing students, none of these inquiry-based or traditional didactic science-teaching practices were found to be positive predictors of science performance in all three countries/regions. However, in the case of Chinese Taipei, one didactic teaching practice item was negatively related with the medium level performing students’ achievement and two didactic teaching practices were found to hinder high-performing students’ science achievements.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Ledennan, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., …, & Tuan, H.-L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. doi: 10.1002/sce.10118
Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Acock, A. C. (2005). Working with missing values. Jounal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 1012–1028. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00191.x
Akkus, R., Gunel, M., & Hand, B. (2007). Comparing an inquiry-based approach known as the science writing heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: Are there differences? International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1745–1765. doi: 10.1080/09500690601075629
Anderson, R. D. (1996). Study of curriculum reform. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015171124982
Apple, M. W. (2001). Markets, standards, teaching, and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 182–196. doi: 10.1177/0022487101052003002
Aun, T. K., Tiong, H. B., Kum, W. Y., & Ang, D. (2004). Science teachers’ perceptions: Similarities and differences in the U.S., England, Singapore and Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 24(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/0218879040240102
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Factors associated with middle and secondary students’ perceived science competence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 800–814. doi: 10.1002/tea.20166
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577–616. doi:10.1002/sce.20390
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499. doi: 10.1002/tea.20131
Byrnes, J. P., & Miller, D. C. (2007). The relative importance of predictors of math and science achievement: An opportunity-propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 599–629.
Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
Carlone, H. B., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459–485. doi: 10.1002/tea.20413
Chang, C.-Y., Chang, Y.-H., & Yang, F.-Y. (2009). Exploring secondary science teachers’ perceptions on the goals of earth science education in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 316(17), 2315–2334. doi: 10.1080/09500690802314868
Chang, C.-Y, & Mao, S. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340–346.
Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315–1346. doi: 10.1080/09500690600621100
Dean, Jr. D., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91(3), 384–397. doi: 10.1002/sce.20194
Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 57(787), 121–127.
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school-Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Edward, S. (2001). Examining school effectiveness at the fourth grade: A hierarchical analysis of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
Ertepinar, H., & Geban, Ö. (1996). Effector instruction supplied with the investigative-oriented laboratory approach on achievement in a science course. Educational Research, 38(3), 333–343. doi: 10.1080/0013188960380306
Flick, L. B. (1995). Complex instruction in complex classrooms: A synthesis of research on inquiry teaching methods and explicit teaching strategies. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. San Francisco, CA.
Fogleman, J., McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Examining the effect of teachers’ adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 149–169. doi: 10.1002/tea.20399
Foy, P., & Olson, J. F. (2007). Supplement 3: Variables derived from the student, teacher, and school questionnaire data. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. doi: 10.3102/0034654312457206
Gao, S. (2014). The relationship between teaching approaches and student science achievement for four racial groups in us eighth grade classes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
Garson, G. D. (Ed.). (2013). Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922–939. doi: 10.1002/tea.20248
Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. doi: 10.1002/sce.10039
Gilbert, A., & Yerrick, R. (2001). Same school, separate worlds: A sociocultural study of identity, resistance, and negotiation in a rural, lower track science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 574–598. doi: 10.1002/tea.1019
Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009-001 Revised). Retrieved September 19, 2014, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdf
Griner, A. C., & Stewart, M. L. (2013). Addressing the achievement gap and disproportionality through the use of culturally responsive teaching practices. Urban Education, 48(4), 585–621. doi: 10.1177/0042085912456847
Hogan, D., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Maung Aye, K., Loo, S. C., Sheng, Y. Z., & Luo, W. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1(1), 57–106. doi:10.1002/rev3.3002
House, J. D. (2005). Classroom instruction and science achievement in Japan, Hong Kong, and Chinese Taipei: Results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(3), 295–312.
Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Huang, M.-H. (2013). After-school tutoring and the distribution of student performance. Comparative Education Review, 57(4), 689–710.
Jackson, A. W., & Hornbeck, D. W. (1989). Educating young adolescents: Why must we restructure middle grade schools? American Psychologist, 44(5), 831–836.
Jenkins, E. W. (2009). Reforming school science education: A commentary on selected reports and policy documents. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 65–92. doi: 10.1080/03057260802681813
Kaya, S., & Rice, D. C. (2010). Multilevel effects of student and classroom factors on elementary science achievement in five countries. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1337–1363. doi: 10.1080/09500690903049785
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645. doi: 10.1002/tea.1023
Kingir, S., Geban, O., & Gunel, M. (2012). How does the science writing heuristic approach affect students’ performances of different academic achievement levels? A case for high school chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 428–436. doi: 10.1039/C2RP20013A
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39–81. doi: 10.3102/00028312034001039
Labaree, D. F. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education: Difficult practices that look easy. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 228–233. doi: 10.1177/0022487100051003011
Labaree, D. F. (2008). The winning ways of a losing strategy: Educationalizing social problems in the United States. Educational Theory, 58(4), 441–460. doi: 10.HH/j.1741-5446.2008.00299.x
Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, NC: Jossey-Bass.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). It doesn’t add up: African American students’ mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 697–708.
Lee, O. (1997). Diversity and equity for Asian American students in science education. Science Education, 81(1), 107–122. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199701)81:K107::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-M
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, J. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 607–636. doi: 10.1002/tea.20141
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, O., Luykx, A., Buxton, C., & Shaver, A. (2007). The challenge of altering elementary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding linguistic and cultural diversity in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1269–1291. doi: 10.1002/tea.20198
Lee, Y.-J. (2010). Not if but when pedagogy collides with culture in Singapore. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(1), 17–26. doi: 10.1080/15544800903406274
Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., Calderhead, W. J., Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E. C., & Freer, B. D. (2010). Learning the control of variables strategy in higher and lower achieving classrooms: Contributions of explicit instruction and experimentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 90–101.
Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 912–946. doi: 10.1002/tea.20080
Luykx, A., & Lee, O. (2007). Measuring instructional congruence in elementary science classrooms: Pedagogical and methodological components of a theoretical framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 424–447. doi: 10.1002/tea.20127
Ma, X. (2010). Socioeconomic gaps in academic achievement within schools: Are they consistent across subject areas? Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 6(4), 337–355. doi: 10.1076/edre.6.4.337.6935
Mac Iver, D. J., & Epstein, J. L. (2012). Middle grades research: Not yet mature, but no longer achild. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 519–533.
Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (Eds.). (2012). Methods and procedures in TMSS and PIRLS 2011. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. The American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
Meyer, X., & Crawford, B. A. (2011). Teaching science as a cultural way of knowing: Merging authentic inquiry, nature of science, and multicultural strategies. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(3), 525–547. doi: 10.1007/sll422-011-9318-6
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984. to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. doi: 10.1002/tea.20347
Ministry of Education (Chinese Taiwan). (1999). 国民中小学九年一贯课程纲要自然与生活 科技学习领域 [Curriculum outline for “Nature Science and Living Technology”]. Retrieved September 30. 2014, from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/data/files/class_rules/nature.pdf
Ministry of Education, Singapore (2008). Science syllabus, lower secondary express/normal (academic). Retrieved September 19, 2014, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/science-lower-secondary-2008.pdf
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., Arora, A., & Erberber, E. (2005). TMSS 2007 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Muller, R. A., Stage, F. K., & Kinzie, J. (2001). Science achievement growth trajectories: Understanding factors related to gender and racial-ethnic differences in precollege science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 981–1012. doi: 10.3102/00028312038004981
Mutegi, J. W. (2011). The inadequacies of “Science for All” and the necessity and nature of a socially transformative curriculum approach for African American science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 301–316. doi: 10.1002/tea.20410
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Niehoff, B. P., Turnley, W. H., Yen, H. J. R., & Sheu, C. (2001). Exploring cultural differences in classroom expectations of students from the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5), 289–293. doi: 10.1080/08832320109599651
Odom, A. L., Stoddard, E. R., & LaNasa, S. M. (2007). Teacher practices and middle-school science achievements. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1329–1346. doi: 10.1080/09500690601001971
Ogbu, J. U., & Simons, H. D. (1994). Cultural models of school achievement: A quantitative test of Ogbu’s theory (Project 12). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. I). Retrieved September 29, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852548.pdf
OECD. (2011). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Retrieved September 15, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/46623978.pdf
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved September 19, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
Olson, J. F., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2007). TIMSS 2007 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regressions in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Peng, S. S., & Wright, D. (1994). Explanation academic achievement of Asian of American students. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(6), 346–352.
Piaget, J. (1973). The child’s conception of the world. St. Albans, England: Granada Publishing Ltd.
Pine, J., Aschbacher, P., Roth, E., Jones, M., McPhee, C., Martin, C., Phelps, S.,… & Foley, B. (2006). Fifth graders’ science inquiry abilities: A comparative study of students in hands-on and textbook curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 467–484. doi: 10.1002/tea.20140
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
Provasnik, S., Kastberg, D., Ferraro, D., Lemanski, N., Roey, S., & Jenkins, F. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2013-009). Retrieved September 19, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED537756.pdf
Roehrig, G., & Garrow, S. (2007). The impact of teacher classroom practices on student achievement during the implementation of a reform-based chemistry curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1789–1811.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York, NY: Macmillan.
She, H.-C., & Fisher, D. (2002). Teacher communication behavior and its association with students’ cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 63–78. doi: 10.1002/tea.10009
Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. C., & Alport, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curriculum on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387–404. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200504
Smerdon, B. A., Burkam, D. T., & Lee, V. E. (1999). Access to constructivist and didactic teaching: Who gets it? Where is it practiced? Teachers College Record, 101(1), 5–34.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2011). A new mission for the middle grades. Retrieved September 19, from http://publications.sreb.org/2011/HE15_Mid_Grades_Com.pdf
Sykes, G., Bird, T., & Kennedy, M. (2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464–476. doi: 10.1177/0022487110375804
Taraban, R., Box, C., Myers, R., Pollard, R., & Bowen, C. W. (2007). Effects of active-learning experiences on achievement, attitudes, and behaviors in high school biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 960–979. doi: 10.1002/tea.20183
Thomas, J. W. (1993). Promoting independent learning in the middle grades: The role of instructional support practices. The Elementary School Journal, 93(5), 575–591.
Trueba, H. T., Cheng, L., & Ima, J. (1993). Myth or reality: Adaptive strategies of Asian Americans in California. Washington, D.C: The Falmer Press.
Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733–1750. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000230776
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y., & O’Dwyer, L. (2011). Teacher-directed student-use of technology and mathematics achievement: Examining trends in international patterns. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), 79–135.
White, J. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461–481.
Williams, T., Ferraro, D., Roey, S., Brenwald, S., Kastberg, D., Jocelyn, L., Smith, C., & Stearns, P. (2009). TMSS 2007 U.S. technical report and user guide (NCES 2009-012). Washington, D.C: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 279–301. doi: 10.1002/tea.20329
Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321–341. doi: 10.1007/slll65-007-9052-y
Yerrick, R. K, & Gilbert, A. (2011). Constraining the discourse community: How science discourse perpetuates marginalization of underrepresented students. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6(1), 67–91. doi: 10.1080/17447143.2010.510909
Yerrick, R. K., Schiller, J., & Reisfeld, J. (2011). “Who are you callin’ expert?”: Using student narratives to redefine expertise and advocacy lower track science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 13–36. doi:10.1002/tea.20388
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, S. Relationship between Science Teaching Practices and Students’ Achievement in Singapore, Chinese Taipei, and the US: An Analysis Using TIMSS 2011 Data. Front Educ China 9, 519–551 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397039
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397039