Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Generating Derived Relational Networks Via The Abstraction of Common Physical Properties: A Possible Model of Analogical Reasoning

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide a demonstration of equivalence-equivalence responding based on the abstraction of common formal properties, thus extending the functional-analytic model of analogical reasoning shown by Barnes, Hegarty, and Smeets (1997), In Experiment 1, 9 college students were taught, using a delayed matching-to-sample procedure, to choose a particular nonsense syllable in the presence of each of four blue and four red geometric shapes. In a subsequent test, all 9 subjects demonstrated equivalence formation based on the abstraction of color by consistently matching nonsense syllables related to same-colored shapes to each other. Of these 9 subjects, 8 then showed equivalence-equivalence responding in which equivalence relations from the previous part of the experiment were related to other equivalence relations and nonequivalence relations were related to other nonequivalence relations. In Experiment 2, 3 out of 4 additional subjects showed this analogical-type responding based on larger relational networks than those established in Experiment 1, and in Experiment 3, 3 further subjects showed analogical responding based on the abstraction of the relatively complex property of age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D. (1996), Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264–267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, R. J. (1993a). Stimulus equivalence and connectionism: Implications for behavior analysis and cognitive science. The Psychological Record, 43, 617–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, R. J. (1993b). Learning to learn: The contribution of behavior analysis to connectionist models of inferential skill in humans. In G. Orchard (Ed.), Neural computing research and applications I (pp. 129–138). London: Lor

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., HEGARTY, N. S., SMEETS, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D. S., ROCHE, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders’ commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & CULLINAN, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., HEALY, O., & HAYES, S. C., (2001). Relational frame theory and the Relational Evaluation Procedure: Approaching human language as derived relational responding. In J. C. Leslie & D. E. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analyses of human behavior. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARRIGAN, P., & SIDMAN, M. (1992). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 58, 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, J. D., MCWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). Psyscope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25(2), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251–267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on Verbal Behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9–30). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & BARNES, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235–270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as the basis for rule governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & WILSON, K. G. (1994). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Altering the verbal support for experiential avoidance. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 289–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (1998). Stimulus familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEADER, G., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. (2000). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure III. The Psychological Record, 50, 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus functions in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275–303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ROCHE, B., STEWART, I., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (1999). PsyScope: An easy-touse graphical system for deSigning and controlling equivalence experiments. The Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 17, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, R. R., SAUNDERS, K. G., KIRBY, K. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145–162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., & LIPKENS, R. (2001). Relations among relations: Analogies, metaphors and stories. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post Skinnerian approach to language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland

    Ian Stewart, Dermot Barnes-Holmes & Bryan Roche

  2. Leiden University, The Netherlands

    Paul M. Smeets

Authors
  1. Ian Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dermot Barnes-Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bryan Roche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul M. Smeets
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dermot Barnes-Holmes.

Additional information

This research was conducted as part of Ian Stewart’s doctoral research program under the supervision of Dermot Barnes-Holmes. The research was funded by a Postgraduate Scholarship and Bursary awarded to Ian Stewart by the National University of Ireland, Maynooth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B. et al. Generating Derived Relational Networks Via The Abstraction of Common Physical Properties: A Possible Model of Analogical Reasoning. Psychol Rec 51, 381–408 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395405

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395405

Search

Navigation