Abstract
Behavior analysts have traditionally defined rules as discriminative stimuli. Three problems with this interpretation are discussed. First, because the effects of rules are often delayed, and the effects of discriminative stimuli are immediate, classifying rules as discriminative stimuli violates the definitional requirements of the latter. Second, when rules are defined as discriminative stimuli, other truly unique effects of rules may be obscured. Finally, both rules and contingencies develop new behavioral relations; however, when rules are interpreted as discriminative stimuli, their effects are not readily compared with those of contingencies. As an alternative, we suggest that rules be interpreted as function-altering contingency-specifying stimuli. Implications of this function-altering interpretation for terminology and research strategy are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, J. D., & Baldwin, J. I. (1981). Behavior principles in everyday life. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Brewer, W. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in normal, adult, human beings. In W. Weimer & D. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 1–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brownstein, A. J., & Shull, R. L. (1985). A rule for the use of the term, “Rule-governed behavior.” The Behavior Analyst, 8, 265–267.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
Catania, A.C. (1984). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactical structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.
Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53–70.
Hayes, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog—verbal reports and the analysis of rules: A review of Ericsson and Simon’s protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351–363.
Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1977). Stimulus control: Attentional factors. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 481–513). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Michael, J. (1980). The discriminative stimulus or SD. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 47–50.
Michael, J. (1983). Evocative and repertoire-altering effects of an environmental event. VB News, 2, 21–23.
Michael, J. (1986). Repertoire-altering effects of remote contingencies. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 4, 10–18.
Palmer, D. C. (1986, June). A behavioral interpretation of memory. (Paper presented at the Summer Institute on Verbal Relations, Bad Kreuznach, Germany.)
Reynolds, G. S. (1975). A primer of operant conditioning (rev. ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Rilling, M. (1977). Stimulus control and inhibitory processes. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 432–480). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Schlinger, H., & Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 41–46.
Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Matthews, B. A. (1981). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207–220.
Skinner, B. F. (1966). An operant analysis of problem-solving. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, teaching (pp. 225–257). New York: Wiley.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
Terrace, H. S. (1966). Stimulus control. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 271–344). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Vaughan, M. E. (1985). Repeated acquisition in the analysis of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental A nalysis of Behavior, 44, 175–184.
Vaughan, M. E. (1987). Rule-governed behavior and higher mental processes. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B.F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 257–264). Barcombe, England: Falmer Press.
Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blakely, E., Schlinger, H. Rules: Function-Altering Contingency-Specifying Stimuli. BEHAV ANALYST 10, 183–187 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392428
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392428