Skip to main content
Log in

A History of the Term Radical Behaviorism: From Watson to Skinner

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the origins and evolution of the term radical behaviorism. John B. Watson’s coining of behaviorism in 1913 is presented first, followed by a discussion of the uses of “radical” within psychology during these early years. When the term radical behaviorism first emerged in the early 1920s, its referent was Watson’s behaviorism, most specifically his stance on consciousness. In the 1930s, B. F. Skinner described his own position with the term radical behaviorism in an unpublished manuscript, and then in 1945 first referred in print to his views as such. Today, radical behaviorism is generally applied to Skinner’s views alone. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of a similarity in Watson’s and Skinner’s positions on consciousness, which seems a possible historical and philosophical connection between their respective radical behaviorisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1983). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, J. R. (1913). Behavior as a category of psychology. Psychological Review, 20, 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bode, B. H. (1914). Psychology as a science of behavior. Psychological Review, 21, 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brightman, E. S. (1930). Behaviorism and experience. In W. P. King (Ed.), Behaviorism: A battle line (pp. 307–330). Nashville, TN: Cokesbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J., & Wheelwright, P. (1932). Introduction to philosophical analysis. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. C. (1968). On the origins of behaviorism. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 4, 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. R. (1979). The emerging field of the sociology of psychological knowledge. In A. R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 1–24). New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, M. W. (1913). Psychology and the behaviorist. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 288–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, M. W. (1921). The truly psychological behaviorism. Psychological Review, 28, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, M. W. (1930). The case against behaviorism. Sewanee Review, 38, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calverton, V. F. (1924). The rise of objective psychology. Psychological Review, 31, 418–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, H. (1930). Functionalism. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930 (pp. 59–78). Worcester, MA: Clark University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, C. (1975). James and the identity theory. Behaviorism, 3, 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, J. P., & Krawiec, T. S. (1979). Systems and theories of psychology (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. R. (1985). B. F. Skinner, 1926–1928: From literature to psychology. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 77–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. F., Jr. (1980). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 203–262). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Day, W. (1983). On the difference between radical and methodological behaviorism. Behaviorism, 11, 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, F. (1932). An historical and critical study of radical behaviorism as a philosophical doctrine. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotterer, R. H. (1933). Philosophy by way of the sciences: An introductory textbook. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, G. C., & George, F. H. (1953). Studies of animal learning. In E. A. Mace (Ed.), Current trends in British psychology (pp. 172–184). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, K. (1916). Thought-content and feeling. Psychological Review, 23, 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. (1982). Bibliography. In B. F. Skinner, Skinner for the classroom (R. Epstein, Ed., pp. 277–284). Champaign, IL: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. L. (1924). The reactions of a religionist to behaviorism. Journal of Religion, 4, 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. I. (1981). Dialogue with B. F. Skinner. New York: Praeger. (Original work published 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkenstaedt, T., Leisi, E., & Wolff, D. (1970). A chronological English dictionary: Listing 80,000 words in order of their earliest known occurrence. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1981). The mind-body problem. Scientific American, 244, 114–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, W. E. (1930). Behaviorism—A technique of control, not a measure of values. In W. P. King (Ed.), Behaviorism: A battle line (pp. 149–170). Nashville, TN: Cokesbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. C. (1922). Three witnesses against behaviourism. The Philosophical Review, 31, 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, C. R. (1943). Principles of systematic psychology. Urbana: University of Illinois.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, W., & Harrison, R. (1938). The rise and fall of behaviorism. Journal of General Psychology, 18, 367–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven psychologies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R. (1948). Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, E. R. (1956). Theories of learning (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillner, K.P. (1984). History and systems of modern psychology. New York: Gardner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, E. B. (1931). Animal drive and the learning process: An essay toward radical empiricism (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, G. (1929). Freud and the configurationists. In C. J. Herrick, G. Humphrey, J. Jastrow, F. H. Allport, & E. A. Burtt, Mind and behavior (pp. 47–69). New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1904a). Does ‘consciousness’ exist? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 1, 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1904b). A world of pure experience, I. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 1, 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1909). The meaning of truth. London: Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastrow, J. (1927). The reconstruction of psychology. Psychological Review, 34, 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. H. (1915). The method of psychology. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 12, 462–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, J. R. (1921). An objective interpretation of meanings. American Journal of Psychology, 32, 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, J. R. (1933). In defense of stimulus-response psychology. Psychological Review, 40, 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1967). Behaviorism. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 1, pp. 268–273). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. (1973). The definition of psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, T. J. (1974). Reference guide to B.F. Skinner: A comprehensive bibliography of published works by and concerning B. F. Skinner from 1929 through 1973. Reno, NV: Clifford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1924). Introspection and the method of psychology. The British Journal of Psychology, 15, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langfeld, H. S. (1945). Symposium on operationism: Introduction. Psychological Review, 52, 241–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lashley, K. S. (1923). The behavioristic interpretation of consciousness, I. Psychological Review, 30, 237–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, T. H. (1980). A history of psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, T. H. (1984). Behaviorism. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 130–133). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logue, A. W. (1985). The growth of behaviorism: Controversy and diversity. In C. Buxton (Ed.), Points of view in the modern history of psychology (pp. 169–196). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E. (1960). The science of mechanics (T. J. McCormack, Trans.). LaSalle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1883)

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntosh, D. C. (1915). The problem of knowledge. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MackIntosh, N. J. (1983). Behaviorism. In R. Harré & R. Lamb (Eds.), The encyclopedic dictionary of psychology (p. 56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. Z. (1984). Philosophy of psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, M. J. (1984). Conceptual approaches and issues. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 353–362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, M. J. (1985). ‘Tis the gift to be simple: A retrospective appreciation of Mach’s The science of mechanics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 129–138.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marvin, W. T. (1914). General problems; Mind and body. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marvin, W. T. (1915). General problems; Mind and body. Psychological Bulletin, 12, 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, M. H. (Ed.). (1951). Psychological theory: Contemporary readings. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, M. H., & Hillix, W. A. (1979). Systems and theories in psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W. (1926). Men or robots, I. In M. Bentley, K. Dunlap, W. S. Hunter, K. Koffka, W. Kohler, W. McDougall, M. Prince, J. B. Watson, & R. S. Woodworth, Psychologies of 1925 (pp. 273–291). Worcester, MA: Clark University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W. (1930). The psychology they teach in New York. In W. P. King (Ed.), Behaviorism: A battle line (pp. 31–62). Nashville, TN: Cokesbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N. J. (1914). [Review of La psychologie objective, by W. Bechterew]. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 11, 357–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. L. (1985). Behavior analysis: A radical perspective. In B. L. Hammonds (Ed.), The master lecture series: Vol. 4. Psychology and learning (pp. 99–121). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1981). On mentalism, methodological behaviorism, and radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 9, 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1985). Some historical and conceptual relations among logical positivism, operationism, and behaviorism. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 53–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. S. (1921). The foundations of psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. L. (1922). Consciousness and the unconscious. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (pp. 143–169). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, N. L. (1950). Handbook of psychological research on the rat. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neel, A. (1977). Theories of psychology: A handbook (rev. & enl. ed.). New York: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, L. J., & Hake, D. F. (1983). Toward a science of history. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 121–132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pear, T. H. (1922). Remembering and forgetting. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, S. C. (1934). The conceptual framework of Tolman’s purposive behaviorism. Psychological Review, 41, 108–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, C. C. (1945). Operationism in psychology. Psychological Review, 52, 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rall, H. F. (1930). What does behaviorism mean for religion? In W. P. King (Ed.), Behaviorism: A battle line (pp. 288–304). Nashville, TN: Cokesbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roback, A. A. (1923). Behaviorism and psychology. Cambridge, MA: University Bookstore.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roback, A. A. (1937). Behaviorism at twenty-five. Cambridge, MA: Sci-Art.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, D. (1969). The Chicago pragmatists. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runes, D. D. (Ed.). (1962). Dictionary of philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1956). A study of radical behaviorism. In H. Feigl & M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 1. The foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psychoanalysis (pp. 88–130). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, R. W. (1926). The principles and problems of philosophy. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidis, B. (1914). The foundations of normal and abnormal psychology. Boston: Badger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1931). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 427–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (c. 1934). A sketch for an epistemology. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277, 291-294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 140, 951–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1964). Behaviorism at fifty. In T. W. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology (pp. 79–97). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1976). Particulars of my life. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1979). The shaping of a behaviorist. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1980). The experimental analysis of operant behavior: A history. In R. W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 191–202). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1937). Psychology down the ages (Vol. 1). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, K. W. (1948). The postulates and methods of ‘behavorism.’ Psychological Review, 55, 67–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, K.W. (1952). Mathematical formulations of learning phenomena. Psychological Review, 59, 152–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolurow, L. M. (Ed.). (1953). Readings in learning. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warden, C. J., Jenkins, T. N., & Warner, L. H. (1934). Introduction to comparative psychology. New York: Ronald.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. C. (1914a). The mental and the physical. Psychological Review, 21, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. C. (1914b). Terminology. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 10–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. C. (1921). Some unusual visual after-effects. Psychological Review, 28, 453–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. C. (1934). Dictionary of psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, M. F. (1922). Introspection as an objective method. Psychological Review, 29, 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913a). Image and affection in behavior. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 10, 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913b). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1914). Behavior: An introduction to comparative psychology. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1920). Practical and theoretical problems in instinct and habit. In H. S. Jennings, J. B. Watson, A. Meyer, & W. I. Thomas, Suggestions of modern science concerning education (pp. 53–99). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1924). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1927). The origin and growth of behaviorism. Archiv für Systematische Philosophie und Sociologie, 30, 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (rev. ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. I. (Ed.). (1976). Eminent contributors to psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. P. (1919). The mind and the man-within. Psychological Review, 26, 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. P. (1924). Behaviorism and behavior, I. Psychological Review, 31, 32–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. P. (1929). A theoretical basis of human behavior (2nd ed., rev.). Columbus, OH: R. G. Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, F. L. (1913). [Review of The science of human behavior, by M. Parmelee]. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 280–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R. H. (1923). Introspection and behavior. Psychological Review, 30, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieman, H. N. (1919). The nature of mentality. Psychological Review, 26, 230–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, J. (1969). The radical empiricism of William James. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1976). Keywords. New York: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A.B. (1921). The motivation of radicalism. Psychological Review, 28, 280–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, B. B. (1981). Contemporary theories and systems in psychology (2nd ed., rev.). New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1922). Dynamic psychology. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1924). Four varieties of behaviorism. Psychological Review, 31, 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1931). Contemporary schools of psychology. New York: Ronald.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M. (1917). Behaviorism and genetic psychology. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 14, 154–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. T. (1924). The phenomenological point of view. Psychological Review, 31, 288–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, P. T. (1943). Emotion in man and animal: Its nature and relation to attitude and motive. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuriff, G. E. (1984). Radical behaviorism and theoretical entities. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article was written while the first author was supported by a Graduate Honors Fellowship from the University of Kansas, and is based on a paper given at the 1986 meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, S.M., Morris, E.K. A History of the Term Radical Behaviorism: From Watson to Skinner. BEHAV ANALYST 10, 27–39 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392404

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392404

Key words

Navigation