Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of a Group Contingency Intervention on Academic Engagement and Problem Behavior of At-Risk Students

  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A successful learning environment can be characterized by actively engaged students displaying appropriate student behavior. We implemented a group contingency intervention as a novel component to a school-wide behavior management system to decrease the frequency of inappropriate behaviors and, conversely, increase the academic engagement of students in four elementary school classrooms. Twelve students with behavioral risks served as target students to monitor effects. A reversal design was implemented to evaluate behaviors across experimental conditions. Results indicated that the frequency of inappropriate behaviors decreased and academic engaged time increased for all 12 participants. These results suggested that the group contingency was an effective class-wide intervention. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babyak, A.E., Luze, G.J., & Kamps, D.M. (2000). The Good Student Game: Behavior management for diverse classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35, 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, F.J., Bakken, J.P., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1992). Cooperative behavior management: Strategies for promoting a positive classroom environment. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, March, 3–12.

  • Cashwell, T.H., Skinner, C.H., & Smith, E.S. (2001). Increasing second-grade students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors via direct instruction, group reinforcement, and progress feedback: A replication and extension. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, G., Kameenui, E.J., & Sugai, G. (1993). Reconceptualizing behavior management and school-wide discipline in general education. Educ. and Treatment of Children, 16, 361–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embry, D.D. (2002). The Good Behavior Game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 273–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, S., and Lignugaris / Kraft, B. (2005). Effects of a dependent group contingency on the verbal interactions of middle school student with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelshaw-Levering, K., Sterling-Turner, H.E., Henry, J.R., & Skinner, C.H. (2000). Randomized interdependent group contingencies: Group reinforcement with a twist. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 523–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, L., Dunlap, G., Childs, K.E., & Clarke, S. (1994). Use of a classwide self-management program to improve the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 445–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salend, S.J., Whittaker, C.R., & Reeder, E. (1992). Group evaluation: A collaborative, peer-mediated behavior management system. Exceptional Children, 59, 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T. (2001). A schoolwide example of positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 3, 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C.H., Skinner, C.F., & Cashwell, T.H. (1999). Using interdependent contingencies with groups of students: Why the principal kissed a pig. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 806–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage, S.A., & Quiroz, D.R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2002). Introduction to the special series on positive behavior support in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodore, L.A., Bray, M.A., Kehle, T.J., & Jenson, W.R. (2001). Randomization of group contingencies and reinforcers to reduce classroom disruptive behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H.M. & Severson, H.H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders (SSBD): User’s guide and technical manual. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Community Living Opportunities, Lawrence, USA

    Stephanie Thorne Ph.D., BCBA

  2. University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA

    Debra Kamps Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Stephanie Thorne Ph.D., BCBA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debra Kamps Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorne, S., Kamps, D. The Effects of a Group Contingency Intervention on Academic Engagement and Problem Behavior of At-Risk Students. Behav Analysis Practice 1, 12–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391723

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391723

Descriptors

Search

Navigation