Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of abamectin seed treatment on Pratylenchus zeae, Meloidogyne incognita and Heterodera schachtii

Wirkung einer Saatgutbehandlung mit Abamectin auf Pratylenchus zeae, Meloidogyne incognita und Heterodera schachtii

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the effect of various concentrations of abamectin on the reduction of early root penetration of three nematode species and on plant growth, when applied as a seed treatment on maize, cotton and sugar beet. The study revealed that penetration of Pratylenchus zeae was reduced more than 80% in maize at a dose of 1.0 mg a.i. seed−1. The number of galls caused by Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in cotton was also reduced more than 80% with 0.1 mg a.i. seed−1. Penetration of Heterodera schachtii in sugar beets was reduced over 60% when seeds were treated at a concentration of 0.3 mg a.i. seed−1. Root length, as well as shoot and root weights in all plants treated with abamectin were not significantly different from controls. Our investigation determined that using abamectin as a seed treatment is an effective way of reducing early root infestation of the three different nematodes at low concentrations in a variety of crops and does not negatively affect plant growth.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, den Einfluss verschiedener zur Saatgutbehandlung eingesetzter Abamectin-Konzentrationen auf Befall von Mais, Baumwolle und Zuckerrübe mit pflanzenparasitären Nematodenarten zu untersuchen sowie mögliche Nebenwirkung auf das Pflanzenwachstum zu ermitteln. Die Untersuchungen zeigten, dass bei einer Saat-gutbehandlung mit Abamectin mit einer Konzentration von 1.0 mg a.i. seed−1 die Eindringung von Pratylenchus zeae in Mais über 80% reduziert wurde. Im Falle von Baumwollsaat-gut, welches mit einer Abamectin-Konzentration von 0.1 mg a.i. seed−1 behandelt wurde, betrug die Wirksamkeit gegen-über Meloidogyne incognita (Rasse 3) ebenfalls 80%, bei Zuckerrübensaatgut, behandelt mit einer Abamectin-Konzen-tration von 0.3 mg a.i. seed−1, wurde eine Wirksamkeit gegen-über Heterodera schachtii von 60% festgestellt. Wurzellänge als auch die Spross- bzw. Wurzelgewichte von Pflanzen, deren Saatgut mit Abamectin behandelt wurde, unterschieden sich nicht signifikant von denen unbehandelter Pflanzen. Die Untersuchungen verdeutlichten, dass eine Saatgutbehand-lung mit Abamectin für die praktische Anwendung geeignet ist. Eine hohe Wirksamkeit in verschiedenen Kulturen ohne negative Auswirkungen auf das Pflanzenwachstum wurde festgestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, W.S., 1925: A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 18, 265–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub, S.M., 1980: Plant Nematology, an Agricultural Training Aid. Nema Aid Publications, Sacramento, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, T.J., K.L. Nielsen, B. Koutstaal, 2000: Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerised analysis of root length and diameter. Plant Soil 218, 185–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cayrol, J.C., C. Djian, J.P. Frankowski, 1993: Efficacy of abam-ectin B1 for the control of Meloidogyne arenaria. Fund. Appl. Nematol. 16, 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D., 1993: Nematodes parasites of sugar beet. In: K. Evans, D.L. Trudgill, J.M. Webster (eds.): Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Temperate Agriculture, pp. 133–169. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybas, R., L. Grosso, P. Wislocki, 1989: Environmental aspects of abamectin use in crop protection. In: W.C. Campbell (ed.): Ivermectin and Abametin, pp. 10–14. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K., D.L. Trudgill, J.M. Webster, 1993: Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Temperate Agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency, 1990: Pesticide fact sheet number 89.2: Avermectin B1. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, 10–143. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faske, T.R., J.L. Starr, 2006: Sensitivity of Meloidogyne incongita and Rotylenchulus reniformis to abamectin. J. Nematol. 38, 240–244.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Faske, T.R., J.L. Starr, 2007: Cotton root protection from plant-parasitic nematodes by abamectin-treated seed. J. Nematol. 39, 27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Franzmann, D., L.R. Zappia, A.L. Tilbury, B.M. Patterson, G.B. Davis, R.T. Mandelbaum, 2000: Bioaugmentation of atrazine and fenamiphos impacted groundwater: laboratory evaluation. Bioremed. J. 4, 237–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garabedian, S., S.D. Van Gundy, 1983: Use of avermectins for the control of Meloidogyne incognita on tomatoes. J. Nematol. 15, 503–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, G.D., 1988: Comparative nematicidal control of Heterodera schachtii on sugar beet as affected by soil temperature and soil type. Plant Dis. 72, 617–621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D.J., 1990: Extraction and processing of plant and soil nematodes. In: M. Luc, R.A. Sikora, J. Bridge (eds.): Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and ropical Agriculture, pp. 45–68. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homeyer, B., 1971: Nemacur, a highly effective nematocide for protective and curative application. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr. Bayer 24, 48–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, R., K. Barker, 1973: A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 57, 1025–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, R., S. Rabatin, 1997: Curative and residual efficacy of injection applications of avermectins for control of plant-parasitic nematodes on banana. J. Nematol. 29, 695–702.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, R., S. Rabatin, 1998: Potential of foliar, dip, and injection applications of avermectins for control of plant-parasitic nematodes. J. Nematol. 30, 65–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Karpouzas, D.G., I.O. Giannakou, 2002: Biodegradation and enhanced biodegradation: a reason for reduced biological efficacy of nematicides. Russ. J. Nematol. 10, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C.W., 2002: Phytotoxicity in pearl millet varies among in-furrow insecticides. Crop Prot. 21, 799–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koenning, S.R., T.L. Kirkpatrick, J.D. Mueller, A.J. Wrather, J.L. Starr, N.R. Walker, 2004: Plant-parasitic nematodes in cotton: Production challenges past and present. Plant Dis. 88, 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luc, M., R.A. Sikora, J. Bridge, 2005: Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture, Second Edition. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, K.S., G.W. Lawrence, 2003: Efficacy of aldicarb to Rotylenchus reniformis and biodegradation in cotton field soils. J. Nematol. 35 65–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A.H., J.H. Luis, G.C. Loots, D. De Waele, 1987: Chemical control of root-lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) on maize in South Africa. Phytophylactica, 19, 479–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A.H., J.M. Nicol, 2005: Nematode parasites of cereals. In: M. Luc, R. Sikora, J. Bridge (eds.): Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture, Second Edition, pp. 131–19. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Monfort, W.S., T.L. Kirkpatrick, D.L. Long, S. Rideout, 2006: Efficacy of a novel nematicidal seed treatment against Meloidogyne incognita on cotton. J. Nematol. 38, 245–249.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Motulsky, H.J., A. Christopoulus, 2003: Fitting models to biological data using linear and non-linear regression. A practical guide to curve fitting. GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou, L.T., J.E. Thomas, D.W. Dickson, 1994: Degradation of fenamiphos in soil with a history of continuous fenamiphos applications. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 1139–1147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Putter, I., J.G. Maconnel, F.A. Preiser, A.A. Haidri, S.S. Ristich, R.A. Dybas, 1981: Avermectins: novel insecticides, acaricides and nematicides from a soil microorganism. Experientia 37, 963–964.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P.A., W.C. Matthews, 1995: Disinfection alternatives for control of Ditylenchus dipsaci in garlic seed cloves. J. Nematol. 27, 448–456.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, J.N., T.L. Kirkpatrick, R.A. Dybas, 1982: Efficacy of avermectins for root-knot control in tobacco. Plant Dis. 66, 691–693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, P.J., R.J. Neeson, P.A. Williams, 1992: Phytotoxicity of some organophosphate insecticides to onions and carrots during germination and emergence. Plant Protect. Quart. 7, 23–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, J.L., R.G. Carneiro, O. Ruano, 2005: Nematodes parasites of cotton and other tropical fibre crops. In: M. Luc, R.A. Sikora, J. Bridge (eds.): Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture, Second Edition, pp. 733–750. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, A.M., G.R. Stirling, I.C. Macrae, 1992: Microbial degradation of fenamiphos after repeated application to tomato growing soil. Nematologica 38, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M.J., J.M. Schaeffer, 1989: Mode of action of ivermectin. In: W.C. Campbell (ed.): Ivermectin and Abamectin, pp. 73–88. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Cabrera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabrera, J.A., Kiewnick, S., Grimm, C. et al. Efficacy of abamectin seed treatment on Pratylenchus zeae, Meloidogyne incognita and Heterodera schachtii. J Plant Dis Prot 116, 124–128 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356298

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356298

Key words

Stichwörter

Navigation