Skip to main content
Log in

New perspectives on the definition and the management of severe osteoporosis: The patient with two or more fragility fractures

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis is the most common skeletal disorder in the elderly, being characterized by impaired bone strength and increased risk of fracture. Severe osteoporosis is currently defined by the threshold of bone density value below the −2.5 SDS of T-score, determined by dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry, and the presence of one or more fragility fractures. This definition does not entirely reflect the spectrum of severity of the disease that provides a variable increase in fracture risk. Methods: This manuscript reports a consensus statement on the diagnostic criteria for severe osteoporosis in real-life clinical setting, achieved in an event held by Italian physicians with expertise in osteoporosis and metabolic bone diseases. Results: The group stated that a large number of fractures occur in subjects with T-score above −2.5. In light of recent advances on the structural basis of skeletal fragility, it became clear that bone density represents only one of the contributors to bone strength and number and severity of fragility fractures. The group suggests that the condition of two or more fragility fractures should be considered as severe osteoporosis, independently of bone density. Conclusions: The consensus statement proposes a more specific definition of severe osteoporosis, which should consider not only densitometric measurements, but also the number and severity of fragility fractures. Patients’ management and choice of treatment should take into consideration the type and severity of osteoporotic fractures, in addition to bone density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001, 285: 785–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sambrook P, Cooper C. Osteoporosis. Lancet 2006, 367: 2010–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for post-menopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1994, 843: 1–129

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JP, Josse RG. Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 2002, 167(Suppl 10): S1–34.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kish MA, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guide to development of practice guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2001, 32: 851–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 1993, 341: 72–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Carey MA, Johnston CC Jr. Choosing between predictors of fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1995, 10: 1816–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. JAMA 1990, 263: 665–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Black DM, Cummings SR, Genant HK, Nevitt MC, Palermo L, Browner W. Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women. J Bone Miner Res 1992, 7: 633–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 2004, 34: 195–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Siris ES, Brenneman SK, Barrett-Connor E, et al. The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50–99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int 2006, 17: 565–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 2001, 285: 320–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 2000, 15: 721–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Helden S, Cals J, Kessels F, Brink P, Dinant GJ, Geusens P. Risk of new clinical fractures within 2 years following a fracture. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17: 348–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Inter Med 1999, 159: 1215–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC, Scott JC, Black D. Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int 2000, 11: 556–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gallagher JC, Genant HK, Crans GG, Vargas SJ, Krege JH. Teriparatide reduces the fracture risk associated with increasing number and severity of osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005, 90: 1583–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ. The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 1996, 11: 1010–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. [No authors listed] Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 2002, 17: 716–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lyritis GP. Epidemiology of hip fracture: the MEDOS study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 1996, 6(Suppl 3): 11–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnell O, Gullberg B, Kanis JA, et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 1995, 10: 1802–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Piscitelli P, Iolascon G, Gimigliano F, et al. SIOMMMS study group; CERSUM research group. Incidence and costs of hip fractures compared to acute myocardial infarction in the Italian population: a 4-year survey. Osteoporos Int 2007, 18: 211–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Adami S, Isaia G, Luisetto G, et al. ICARO Study Group. Fracture incidence and characterization in patients on osteoporosis treatment: the ICARO study. J Bone Miner Res 2006, 21: 1565–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1999, 10: 150–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1997, 7: 36–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lips P, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, et al. The development of a European questionnaire for quality of life in patients with vertebral osteoporosis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1996, 103: 84–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Krege JH, Siminoski K, Adachi JD, Misurski DA, Chen P. A simple method for determining the probability a new vertebral fracture is present in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2006, 17: 379–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fechtenbaum J, Cropet C, Kolta S, Horlait S, Orcel P, Roux C. The severity of vertebral fractures and health-related quality of life in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2005, 16: 2175–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, et al. Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2000, 15: 1384–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Majumdar SR, Kim N, Colman I, et al. Incidental vertebral fractures discovered with chest radiography in the emergency department: prevalence, recognition, and osteoporosis management in a cohort of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2005, 165: 905–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spangler L, Cummings P, Tencer AF, Mueller BA, Mock C. Biomechanical factors and failure of transcervical hip fracture repair. Injury 2001, 32: 223–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Nuti MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nuti, R., Brandi, M.L., Isaia, G. et al. New perspectives on the definition and the management of severe osteoporosis: The patient with two or more fragility fractures. J Endocrinol Invest 32, 783–788 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03346537

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03346537

Key-words

Navigation