Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidence and costs of hip fractures compared to acute myocardial infarction in the Italian population: a 4-year survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Few data are available about the incidence and costs of hip fractures in Italy. We aimed to determine the impact of hip fractures vs. acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods

We studied the national hospitalization database to calculate their incidence and costs in adults aged ≥45 between 1999 and 2002.

Results

In 2002, there were 86,719 hip fractures with a 10.0% increase over 4 years. We observed a predominance of women (77.1%) and a strong age effect: 92.7% of patients were ≥65 years old and 80% of fractures occurred in women aged ≥75, showing a clear relationship with the incidence of osteoporosis. Hospitalizations due to AMI after 45 years of age in 1999 were only 9% higher than those for hip fracture, although this difference increased over the 4 examined years up to 24%. Considering the DRGs costs, hip fractures resulted in being more expensive than AMI overall and concerning elderly people.

Conclusions

This study shows that in the Italian population aged ≥45, hospitalizations following hip fracture and AMI between 1999 and 2002 were comparable, while hip fractures’ direct costs were higher and grew faster than costs for AMI. Hip fractures in Italy are a serious medical problem and a leading health-cost driver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. –(2002) Annuario statistico italiano, 2002. National Institute for Statistics, Rome

  2. Italian Senate Health Commission (eds) (2002) Official Report of the Survey on Osteoporosis. Italian Senate, Rome

  3. Osteoporosis in the European Community: a call for action. International Osteoporosis Foundation, Lyon (2002)

  4. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adami S, Giannini S, Giorgino R et al (2003) The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study. Osteoporos Int 14:198–207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Browner WS, Pressman AR, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (1996) Mortality following fractures in older women. The study of osteoporotic fractures. Arch Intern Med 156:1521–1525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ismail AA, O’Neill TW, Cooper C et al (1998) Mortality associated with vertebral deformity in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Osteoporos Int 8:291–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pluijm SM, Tromp AM, Smit JH et al (2000) Consequences of vertebral deformities in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res 15(8):1564–1572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D et al (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353(9156):878–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L et al (1999) Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women. Arch Intern Med 159:1215–1220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC et al (2000) Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporosis Int 11:556–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meyer HE, Tverdal A, Falch JA, Pedersen JI (2000) Factors associated with mortality after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 11:228–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Papaioannou A, Adachi JD, Parkinson W et al (2001) Lengthy hospitalization associated with vertebral fractures despite control for comorbid conditions. Osteoporos Int 12:870–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA (1993) Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ 307:1248–1250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagsten B et al (2006) Health-related quality of life and self-reported ability concerning ADL and IADL after hip fracture: a randomized trial. Acta Orthop 77(1):114–119, Feb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Di Monaco M et al (2006) Muscle mass and functional recovery in women with hip fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 85(3):209–215, Mar

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmermann S et al (2006) The lower extremity gain scale: a performance-based measure to assess recovery after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(3):430–436, Mar

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Latham NK (2006) Pattern of functional change during rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(1):111–116, Jan

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eisenstein EL et al (2001) Assessing the clinical and economic burden of coronary artery disease: 1986–1998. Med Care 39(8):824–835, Aug

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jonsson B et al (2001) The effects of cardiac events on quality of life and indirect costs. J Hum Hypertens 15(Suppl 1):S91–S93, Aug

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17(5 Suppl):505S–511S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Visentin P, Ciravegna R, Fabris F (1997) Estimating the cost per avoided hip fracture by osteoporosis treatment in Italy. Maturitas 26:185–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaccarino et al (1999) Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 341:217–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tu JV (2003) Introduction to the Canadian Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Team’s (CCORT) Canadian Cardiovascular Atlas project. Can J Cardiol 19(3):225–229, Mar 15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thom T et al (2006) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2006 update. A report from the american heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee circulation. 113:e85

  27. Piscitelli P, Iolascon G, Guida G et al (2005) Femoral fractures and orthopaedic surgery in Italy. J Orthopaed Traumatol 6:202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Autier P, Haentjens P, Bentin J et al (2000) Costs induced by hip fractures: a prospective controlled study in Belgium. Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group. Osteoporosis Int 11:373–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lippuner K, von Overbeck J, Perrelet R et al (1997) Incidence and direct medical costs of hospitalizations due to osteoporotic fractures in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 7:414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dolan P, Torgerson DJ (1998) The cost of treating osteoporosis fractures in the United Kingdom female population. Osteoporos Int 8:611–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnell O, Gullberg B, Allander E, Kanis JA (1992) The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources. MEDOS Study Group. Osteoporos Int 2:298–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ray NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, Melton LJ 3rd (1997) Medical expenditures for treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 12(1):24–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Johnell O (1997) The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century. Am J Med 103:20S–25S; discussion 25S–26S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a worldwide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Reginster J Y, The osteoporosis paradox: the neglected disease, Proceedings of a symposium held at the 2nd International Meeting on Social & Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis & Bone Disease in Liege, Belgium, (7 Dec 2000), International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), Lyon

  36. Access Economics Report (eds) (2001) The burden of brittle bones: costing osteoporosis in Australia. Access Economics, Canberra

  37. Rossini M, Piscitellli P et al (2005) Incidence and socioeconomic burden of hip fractures in Italy. Reumatismo 57(2):97–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. JAMA 285(6):785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis, clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment. Royal College of Physicians of London, London

  40. Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G et al (1999) Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 10:259–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikian JP et al (2001) American association of clinical endocrinologists 2001 medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 7:293–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kanis JA et al (2000) Comparison of the European and USA practice guidelines for Osteoporosis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 11(1):28–32, Jan–Feb

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Spierings AB (2003) Assessment of hip protectors and corresponding hip fracture risk using stress calculation in the femoral neck. Med Eng Phys 2005 Nov 3

  44. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S et al (2000) Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector. N Engl J Med 343:1506–1513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Jonsson B, Christiansen C, Johnell O et al (1996) Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in established osteoporosis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 103:30–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded and promoted by Second University of Naples (SUN). We thank Prof. M.L. Brandi (SIOMMMS President) for supporting our study group; we are grateful to Dr. L. Lispi and D. Del Gigante (General Direction for Planning Affairs, Italian Ministry of Health) for their help in the analysis of national hospitalization data. Many thanks to Senator L. Compagna (Parliamentary Commission for Education, University and Scientific Research) and to Commission XII (Public Health) of the Italian Senate. We are also grateful to Dr. G. D’Alò, Dr. R. Giorgino and Dr. W. Meier for all the indications that allowed the beginning of this study in 2002. Special acknowledgments go to Dr. F. Gnagnarella (LUM Jean Monnet, Bari), Prof. F. P. Calamo Specchia (Catholic University of Rome) and the CERSUM research group on osteoporosis, whose members are: G. Gaeta, L. Di Paola, G. Chitano and M. Benvenuto (Euro Mediterranean Scientific Biomedical Institute, ISBEM/IFC CNR, Brindisi). Other members of the SIOMMMS study group on epidemiological topics of femoral fractures are: Dr. Eugenio Quarta (AUSL Lecce1, Lecce), Dr. Giovanni Scuderi (AUSL Trapani/1), Dr. Fabio Di Salvo (SANICAM, Palermo), Dr. Guido Siciliano (University of Catania), Dr. Vito Martorana (CTO Palermo), Dr. Antonietta Matina (Palermo University Hospital), Dr. Carmela Sferrazza (Palermo University Hospital), Dr. Nicola Napoli (Palermo University Hospital), Dr. Andrea Dovio (University of Turin), Prof. Giulia Letizia (University of Palermo).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Piscitelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piscitelli, P., Iolascon, G., Gimigliano, F. et al. Incidence and costs of hip fractures compared to acute myocardial infarction in the Italian population: a 4-year survey. Osteoporos Int 18, 211–219 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0224-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0224-9

Keywords

Navigation