Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Actors as Simulated Patients for Interprofessional Education

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) in health profession training is recognized as a key to improving patient care in practice settings. Though recognized as extremely important, implementation of IPE remains a challenge for many health profession programs. Despite challenges, the seven health profession (HP) programs at D’Youville College initiated IPE using healthcare simulation with professional actors serving as simulated patients. Faculty from chiropractic, dietetics, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physical therapy and physician assistant programs collaborated in this year-long implementation process. This manuscript provides a description of the planning, delivery and assessment of this innovative interprofessional simulation and the creation of the campus Interprofessional Clinical Advancement Center. Students reported enhanced understanding and respect of professional roles and responsibilities and ability to communicate effectively. Faculty reported an ability to encourage interaction and collaboration among HP students. Suggestions for curricular improvements and program sustainability included professional development and compensation. This manuscript should assist other health professional programs seeking guidance to implement and evaluate interprofessional education in academic institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Panel IECE. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel: Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel; 2011.

  2. Schroder C, Medves J, Paterson M, Byrnes V, Chapman C, O’Riordan A, et al. Development and pilot testing of the collaborative practice assessment tool. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2011;25(3):189–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. Transformative scale up of health professional ⋯ 2011:[20p. p.]. Available from: https://doi.org/www.who.int/hrh/resources/transformative_education/en/-22k.

  4. Scherer YK, Bruce SA, Graves BT, Erdley WS. Acute care nurse practitioner education: Enhancing performance through the use of clinical simulation. AACN Advanced Critical Care. 2003;14(3):331–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Issenberg SB, Scalese RJ. Simulation in health care education. Perspectives in biology and medicine. 2008;51(1):31–46. Epub 2008/01/15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker C, Pulling C, McGraw R, Dagnone JD, Hopkins-Rosseel D, Medves J. Simulation in interprofessional education for patient-centred collaborative care. Journal of advanced nursing. 2008;64(4):372–9. Epub 2008/09/04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillespie M, Peterson BL. Helping novice nurses make effective clinical decisions: the situated clinical decision-making framework. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009;30(3):164–70. Epub 2009/07/18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bray BS, Schwartz CR, Odegard PS, Hammer DP, Seybert AL. Assessment of human patient simulation-based learning. American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2011;75(10):208. Epub 2012/02/22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrows HS. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 1993;68(6):443–51; discussion 51–3. Epub 1993/06/01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ladyshewsky R, Baker R, Jones M, Nelson L. Evaluating clinical performance in physical therapy with simulated patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2000;14(1):31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Covey SR. The seven habits of highly effective people: restoring the character ethic. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1989. 340 s. p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dreifuerst KT. The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: a concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2009;30(2):109+.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cantrell MA. The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2008;4(2):e19–e23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Heukelom JN, Begaz T, Treat R. Comparison of postsimulation debriefing versus in-simulation debriefing in medical simulation. Simulation in Healthcare. 2010;5(2):91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fanning RMG, D.M. The Role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2007;2(2):115–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CHSE Physical Therapy Department, D’Youville College, 320 Porter Ave, Buffalo, NY, 14201, USA

    Karen Panzarella PT, PhD, Lynn Rivers, Beth Bright, Megan Whelan, Kirsten Butterfoss, Linda Russ, Andrew Case, Stephanie Brian, Heather Ferro, Lisa DeMarco, Denise Dunford, Kendra Schmitz, Helena Kittleson, Mary Kennedy, Donna Brzykcy, Lynn Pownall & Madonna Reddington

Authors
  1. Karen Panzarella PT, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynn Rivers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beth Bright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Megan Whelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kirsten Butterfoss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Linda Russ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrew Case
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Stephanie Brian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Heather Ferro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lisa DeMarco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Denise Dunford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Kendra Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Helena Kittleson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Mary Kennedy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Donna Brzykcy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Lynn Pownall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Madonna Reddington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Panzarella PT, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panzarella, K., Rivers, L., Bright, B. et al. Using Actors as Simulated Patients for Interprofessional Education. Med.Sci.Educ. 23 (Suppl 3), 438–448 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341666

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341666

Keywords

Search

Navigation