Abstract
A response-to-intervention model (RTI) has been identified as a promising way to identify and intervene early with children who are experiencing learning difficulties. The general RTI approach also holds promise of preventing learning difficulties with preschoolers. This article examines the potential benefits of implementing a RTI model in preschool settings as well as the feasibility of implementation with respect to current preschool assessment technologies, teacher preparation, and program philosophical orientations. Although the research supporting the efficacy of systematic early literacy interventions in reducing pervasive reading problems is convincing, it is concluded that current preschool programs have not embraced these findings into everyday practice. Implications for school psychologists serving young children are addressed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barnett, D. W. (2002). Best practices in early intervention. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 1247–1262). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Barnett, W. S. (2004). Does Head Start have lasting cognitive effects: The myth of fade-out. In E. Zigler & S. J. Styfco (Eds.), The Head Start debates (pp. 221–249). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Baydar, N., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Furstenberg, F. F. (1993). Early warning signs of functional illiteracy: Predictors in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 64, 815–829.
Bowey, J. A. (1995). Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 476–487.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Burchinal, M. R., Roberts, J. E., Riggins, R., Zeisel, S. A., Neebe, E., & Bryant, D. (2000). Relating quality of center-based child care to early cognitive and language development longitudinally. Child Development, 71, 339–357.
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2004). Pupil personnel services credential: School psychology. Retrieved February 13, 2005, from http://www.ctc.ca.gov/credentials/leaflets/cl606.pdf
California Department of Education. (2005). Preschool for all. Retrieved June 10, 2005, from http://www.cde.ca.gov/eo/in/se/yr05preschoolwp.asp
Conway, S. J., & Kovaleski, J. F. (1998). A model for statewide special education reform: Pennsylvania’s instructional support teams. International Journal of Educational Reform, 7, 345–351.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.
Dickenson, D. K. (2001). Putting the pieces together: Impact of preschool on children’s language and literacy development in kindergarten. In D. K. Dickinson & P. O. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school (pp. 257–288). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Dickenson, D., & Sprague, K. (2001). The nature and impact of early childcare environments on the language and literacy development of children from low-income families. In S. Neuman & D. Dickenson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 263–280). New York: Guilford.
Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 172–186.
Fuchs, L. S. (1998). Evaluating solutions, monitoring progress, and revising intervention plans. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 153–181). New York: Guilford.
Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. (1982). Developing goals and objectives for educational programs. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204–219.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bahr, M. W. (1990). Mainstream assistance teams: A scientific basis for the art of consultation. Exceptional Children, 57, 128–139.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1990). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429–438.
Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disability construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157–171.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A., (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326–336.
Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (1999). School-based consultation theory and practice. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 598–637). New York: Wiley.
Heller, K. A., Holtzman, W. H., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Ikeda, M. J., Tilly, D. W., Stumme, J., Volmer, L., & Allison, R. (1996). Agency-wide implementation of problem-solving consultation: Foundations, current implementation, and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 228–243.
Justice, L. M., Chow, S., Capellini, C., Flanigan, K., & Colton, S. (2003). Emergent literacy intervention for vulnerable preschoolers: Relative effects of two approaches. American Journal of Speech-Langugage Pathology, 12, 320–332.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.
Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (1998). Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced application of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 113–142). New York: Guilford.
Kovaleski, J. F., Gickling, E. E., Morrow, H., & Swank, H. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170–183.
Kowalski, K., Pretti-Fronczak, K., & Johnson, L. (2001). Preschool teachers’ beliefs concerning the importance of various developmental skills and abilities. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 16, 5–14.
Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation in applied settings: An individual guide. New York: Plenum.
Lonigan, C. J., Bloomfield, B. G., Anthony, J. L., Bacon, K. D., Phillips, B. M., & Samwel, C. S. (1999). Relations among emergent literacy skills, behavior problems, and social competence in preschool children from low- and middle-income backgrounds. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 40–53.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18–78). New York: Guilford.
Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 187–200.
McConnell, S. R., Priest, J. S., Davis, S. D., & McEvoy, M. A. (2002). Best practices in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 1231–1246). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Missall, K. N., & McConnell, S. R. (2004). Psychometric characteristics of individual growth and development indicators: Picture naming, rhyming, and alliteration. (Tech. Rep. No. 8). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for Early Education and Development.
McGill-Franzen, A., Lanford, C., & Adams, E. (2002). Learning to be literate: A comparison of five urban early childhood programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 443–464.
National Academy of Sciences. (2003). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2003). The nation’s report card. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
National Association of School Psychologists. (1997). School psychology: A blueprint for training and practice II. Bethesda, MD: Author.
National Center on Student Progress Monitoring. (2005). Review of progress monitoring tools. Washington, D.C.: Author.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Literacy, National Institute of Child Heath and Human Development.
President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Pretti-Frontczak, K., Kowalski, K., & Brown, R. D. (2002). Preschool teachers’ use of assessments and curricula: A statewide examination. Exceptional Children, 69, 109–123.
Raz, I. S., & Bryant, P. (1990). Social background, phonological awareness and children’s reading. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 209–225.
Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickenson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford.
Shaywitz, S. E., Escobar, M. D., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading disability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145–150.
Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
Simmons, D. C., & Kaméenui, E. J. (Eds.). (1998). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Snow, C., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735–749.
Telzrow, C. F., McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C. L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology Review, 29, 443–461.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 137–146.
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders. In S. Neuman & D. Dickenson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11–29). New York: Guilford.
Whitehurst, G. J., Zevenbergen, A. A., Crone, D. A., Schultz, M. D., Velting, O. N., & Fischel, J. E. (1999). Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention from Head Start through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 261–272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagans-Murillo, K. Using a Response-to-Intervention Approach in Preschool to Promote Literacy. Contemp School Psychol 10, 45–54 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340920
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340920