Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acute geriatric intervention increases the number of patients able to live at home. A prospective randomized study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: In a previous publication, we showed that treatment of acutely sick, frail elderly patients in a Geriatric Evaluation and Management Unit (GEMU) reduced mortality considerably when compared with the general Medical Wards (MW). The aim of this presentation was to study the impact of treatment in a GEMU on health care utilization. Methods: Acutely sick, frail patients, 75 years or older, who had been admitted as emergencies to the Department of Internal Medicine were randomized either to treatment in the GEMU (n=127) or to continued treatment in the MW (n=127). While usual treatment was given in the MW, the GEMU emphasized interdisciplinary and comprehensive assessment of all relevant disorders, early mobilization/rehabilitation, and discharge planning. After discharge from hospital, no specific follow-up was offered to any of the groups. Results: Of all subjects, 101 (80%) GEMU and 79 (64%) MW patients were still living in their own homes at three months (p=0.005); at six months the number was 91 (72%) and 74 (60%) (p=0.04) respectively. Median length of index stay was 19 days in the GEMU and 13 days in the MW group (p<0.001). After the initial stay, there were no statistically significant differences in admissions to or time spent in institutions. Conclusions: The results indicate the overall positive treatment effect of acutely sick, frail elderly in a GEMU, i.e. patients treated in the GEMU had increased possibilities of living in their own homes, an effect that was mainly related to considerably reduced mortality in the GEMU group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grimley EJ. 21st Century: Review: ageing and medicine. J Intern Med 2000; 247: 159–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sager MA, Franke T, Inouye SK, et al. Functional outcomes of acute medical illness and hospitalization in older persons. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 645–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steel K, Gertman PM, Crescenzi C, Anderson J. Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital. N Engl J Med 1981; 304: 638–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillick MR, Serrell NA, Gillick LS. Adverse consequences of hospitalization in the elderly. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 1033–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson K, Wieland GD, et al. Geriatric assessment on a subacute hospital ward. Clin Geriatr Med 1987; 3: 131–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993; 342: 1032–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Landefeld CS, Palmer RM, Kresevic DM, Fortinsky RH, Kowal J. A randomized trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1338–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Asplund K, Gustafson Y, Jacobsson C, et al. Geriatric-based versus general wards for older acute medical patients: a randomized comparison of outcomes and use of resources. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1381–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Counsell SR, Holder CM, Liebenauer LL, et al. Effects of a multicomponent intervention on functional outcomes and process of care in hospitalized older patients: a randomized controlled trial of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) in a community hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1572–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Wieland GD, English PA, Sayre JA. Kane RL. Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit. A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 1664–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Applegate WB, Miller ST, Graney MJ, Elam JT, Burns R, Akins DE. A randomized, controlled trial of a geriatric assessment unit in a community rehabilitation hospital. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1572–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen HJ, Feussner JR, Weinberger M, et al. A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 905–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brymer CD, Kohm CA, Naglie G, et al. Do geriatric programs decrease long-term use of acute care beds? J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 885–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Indredavik B, Bakke F, Solberg R, Rokseth R, Haaheim LL, Holme I. Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1991; 22: 1026–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saltvedt I, Mo ES, Fayers P, Kaasa S, Sletvold O. Reduced mortality in treating acutely sick, frail older patients in a geriatric evaluation and management unit. A prospective randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 792–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Winograd CH, Gerety MB, Chung M, Goldstein MK, Dominguez F. Jr. Vallone R. Screening for frailty: criteria and predictors of outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 778–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harris RD, Henschke PJ, Popplewell PY, et al. A randomised study of outcomes in a defined group of acutely ill elderly patients managed in a geriatric assessment unit or a general medical unit. Aust NZ J Med 1991; 21: 230–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nikolaus T, Specht-Leible N, Bach M, Oster P, Schlierf G. A randomized trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and home intervention in the care of hospitalized patients. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 543–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Styrborn K. Early discharge planning for elderly patients in acute hospitals — an intervention study. Scand J Soc Med 1995; 23: 273–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen FR, Poulsen H, Sorensen KH. A model of regular geriatric follow-up by home visits to selected patients discharged from a geriatric ward: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Clin Exp Res 1995; 7: 202–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart S, Pearson S, Luke CG, Horowitz JD. Effects of home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and out-of-hospital deaths. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46:174–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Naylor MD, Brooten D, Campbell R, et al. Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 1999; 281: 613–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Melin AL, Bygren LO. Efficacy of the rehabilitation of elderly primary health care patients after short-stay hospital treatment. Med Care 1992; 30: 1004–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen FR, Spedtsberg K, Schroll M. Geriatric follow-up by home visits after discharge from hospital: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing 1992; 21: 445–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Young J, Philp I. Future directions for geriatric medicine. Geriatricians must move with their patients into the community. BMJ 2000; 320: 133–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Boult C, Boult LB, Morishita L, Dowd B, Kane RL, Urdangarin CF. A randomized clinical trial of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 351–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Trondheim, 7006, Trondheim, Norway

    Ingvild Saltvedt MD, Ellen-Sofie Opdahl Mo & Olav Sletvold

  2. Unit of Applied Clinical Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway

    Ingvild Saltvedt MD, Turi Saltnes, Peter Fayers & Stein Kaasa

  3. Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Scotland

    Peter Fayers

  4. Palliative Medicine Unit, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway

    Stein Kaasa

  5. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

    Olav Sletvold

Authors
  1. Ingvild Saltvedt MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Turi Saltnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ellen-Sofie Opdahl Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Fayers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stein Kaasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Olav Sletvold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingvild Saltvedt MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saltvedt, I., Saltnes, T., Opdahl Mo, ES. et al. Acute geriatric intervention increases the number of patients able to live at home. A prospective randomized study. Aging Clin Exp Res 16, 300–306 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324555

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324555

Keywords

Search

Navigation