Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis and Storage of Sucrose in Relation to Activities of Its Metabolizing Enzymes in Sugarcane Cultivars Differing in Maturity

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metabolic changes in the contents of sucrose and hexoses in relation to the activities of invertase, sucrose synthase and sucrose-phosphate synthase in early (CoJ 64) and late (Co 1148) maturing cultivars of sugarcane have been studied. During early stages of cane growth, lower activities of sucrose synthase and sucrose-phosphate synthase in leaf blade In CoJ 64 over Co 1148 were observed. However, sucrose content in sheath/blade was higher in CoJ 64 than in Co 1148. With the advancing age, the activity of soluble acid invertase (pH 5.4) in stem declined more rapidly in CoJ 64. This resulted in building up of high ratio of sucroselinvert sugars in stem tissue of this cultivar. Feeding uniformly-labelled sucrose and glucose to the cut discs of leaf sheath resulted in higher uptake of 14C in CoJ 64 than in Co 1148. Uptake by stem tissue discs of 14C from sucrose was less than that from hexoses. Based on these results, it is suggested that (i) the rapid fall in the activity of soluble acid invertase in stem concomitant with fast accumulation of sucrose in this tissue is an index of early maturity of the cane, and (ii) high content of sucrose in sheath is a reflection of an efficient translocation of this sugar in early maturing cultivars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DAP:

days after planting

UDPG:

uridine diphosphoglucose

NaAc:

sodium acetate

NaPi:

sodium phosphate

EtOH:

ethanol

References

  1. Batta SK & Singh R, Phytochemistry, 25 (1986) 2431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huber SC & Huber JL, Plant Physiol, 99 (1992) 1275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Glasziou KT & Gayler KR, Bot Rev, 38 (1972) 471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thorn M, Geti HP & Maretzki A, Physiol Plant, 86 (1992) 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wendler R, Veith R, Dancer J, Stitt M & Komor E, Planta, 183 (1990) 31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hatch MD, Sacher JA & Glasziou KT, Plant Physiol, 38 (1963) 338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gayler KR & Glasziou KT, Physiol Plant, 27 (1972) 25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Batta SK, Singh J, Sharma KP & Singh R, Plant Physiol Biochem, 29 (1991) 415.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ricardo CPP, Planta, 118 (1994) 333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Venkataramana S & Naidu MK, Phytochemistry, 32 (1993) 821.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dendsay JPS, Dhawan AK & Sehtiya HL, Plant Physiol Biochem, 19 (1992) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma KP, Kanwar RS & Batta SK, Indian Sugar, 32 (1983) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lingle SE & Smith RC, Corp Sci, 31 (1991) 172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh JP, Cooperative Sugar, 25 (1994) 291.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Singh R & Metha SL, J Scient Ind Res, 45 (1986) 336.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar R & Singh R, J Agric Food Chem, 32 (1984) 806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson N, J Bioi Chem, 153 (1944) 375.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gascon S & Lampen JO, J Bioi Chem, 243 (1968) 1567.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hawker JS, Biochem J, 105 (1997) 943.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vattuone MA, Fleischmacher OL, Prado FE, Vinals AL & Sampietro AR, Phytochemistry, 22 (1983) 1361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL & Randal RJ, J Bioi Chem, 193 (1951) 265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hawker JS & Hatch MD, Physiol Plant, 18 (1965) 444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bray AC, Anal Biochem, 1 (1960) 279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Partridge SM, Biochem J, 42 (1948) 238.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Trevelyan WE, Procter DP & Harrison JS, Nature, 166 (1950) 444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh R, Karamdeep L, Bhullar SS & Gupta AK, Plant Physiol Biochem, (1994) In press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kohler J, Komor E, Thom M & Maretzki A, Phytochemistry, 27 (1988) 1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stitt M, Wilke I, Feil R & Heldt HW, Planta, 174 (1988) 217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Avigad G, In Encyclopedia of plant physiology, Vol. 13A (FA Loewus, W Tanner, Editors), Springer-Verlag Berlin, New York (1982) pp 217–347.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Venkataramana S, Naidu KM & Singh S, Plant Sci, 74 (1991) 65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh R & Maclachlan G, J Exp Bot, 37 (1986) 1164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batta, S.K., Kaur, K. & Singh, R. Synthesis and Storage of Sucrose in Relation to Activities of Its Metabolizing Enzymes in Sugarcane Cultivars Differing in Maturity. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 4, 17–22 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262944

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262944

Key words

Navigation