Skip to main content
Log in

Rural young people’s work/study priorities and aspirations: The influence of family social capital

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transition from school to secure work has become more difficult as young people bear the brunt of the restructuring of the Australian labour market. Young people raised in a rural community are over-represented in the most disadvantaged labour market group- those who have not participated in post-school training and who have experienced long periods of unemployment. Rural labour markets feature lower paid, less secure jobs than their urban counterparts. Education is a proven way of accessing the ‘better’ jobs offered by national labour markets. Why then do young people from disadvantaged rural areas not take up education and training opportunities to the same extent as their urban counterparts? The research discussed in this paper investigated ways in which family and school/community social capital influence young people’s work/study values and priorities with regard to post-school pathways. Family networks and information that are limited and concentrated in rural areas tend to be associated with a desire to find a job before completing school, preferably located near to home. Incomplete understanding and lack of trust of educational institutions and labour markets in urban centres based on local experience may be transmitted through advice of family and friends and influence young people toward current work rather than the longer term goal of post-compulsory education. The implications for regional and national programs of educational and community development are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abacus Concepts (1996)Statview Reference, Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott-Chapman, J., G. Easthope, and P. O’Connor (1997) The influence of student gender and parental socio-economic status on post-school careers,Australian Journal of Social Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainley, J. (1998) School participation, retention and outcomes, in Dusseldorp Skills Forum,Australia’s Youth: Reality and Risk, Sydney, pp. 51–65.

  • Ainley, J. and P. McKenzie (1999) The influence of school factors, inAustralia’s Young Adults: The Deepening Divide, Dusseldorp Skills Forum, Sydney, pp. 105–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977) Symbolic power, in D. Gleeson, ed.,Identity and Structure: Issues in the Sociology of Education, Nafferton, Driffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986) Forms of capital, in J. Richardson, ed.,Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and J.C. Passeron (1988)language and Symbolic Power, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and J.C. Passeron (1990)Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, 2nd edition, Corwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990)Foundations of Social Theory, The Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. (1995)A Truly Civil Society, ABC Books, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRLRA (2000)Managing Change through VET The Role of Vocational Education and Training in Regional Australia, CRLRA, Launceston http://www.crlra.utas.edu.au

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtain, R. (1999) Young people’s transition from education to work: performance indicators, Dusseldorp Foundation, Sydney http://www.dsf.org.au/

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, I. and S. Kilpatrick (2000) What is social capital? A study of a rural community,Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 1, no. 40, pp. 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galston, W. and K. Baehler (1995)Rural Development in the United States: Connecting Theory, Practice and Possibilities, Island Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, B. (1999) Policy implications and reflections, in Dusseldorp Skills Forum,Australia’s Young Adults: The Deepening Divide, Sydney, pp. 207–209.

  • James, R. (2000)TAPE, University or Work? The Early Preferences and Choices of Students in Years 10, 11 and 12, NCVER, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R., J. Wyn, G. Baldwin, G. Hepworth, C. Mclnnis and A. Stephanou (1999)Rural and Isolated School Students and their Higher Education Choices, National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Higher Education Council, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., P. Dwyer and J. Wyn (2000)Non-completion of School in Australia: The Changing Patterns of Participation Outcomes, Research Report 16, ACER Ltd., Camberwell, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1988) Social resources and social mobility: a structural theory of status attainment, in R. Breiger, ed.,Social Mobility and Social Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, A., F. Macdonald and H. MacDonald (1998) Young people and labour market disadvantage: the situation of young people not in education or full time work, in Dusseldorp Skills Forum,Australia’s Youth: Reality and Risk, Sydney, pp. 105–26.

  • McTaggart, D., C. Findlay and M. Parkin (1996)Economics, 2nd edn., Addison-Wesley, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. A. (1996)Trust in Modern Societies, Blackwell Ltd. Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, K. (1993)The Economics of Australian Labour Markets, 3rd edn., Longman Cheshire, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shucksmith, M. (2000)Exclusive Countryside? Social Inclusion and Regeneration in Rural Areas, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidotti, C. (2000)National Inquiry into Rural and Remote Education, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. and R. Brennan (2001) A foot in both camps: school students and workplaces. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association Conference. Adelaide, 29–30 March.

  • Stanton-Salazar, R. (1998) Defensive network orientations as internalised oppression: how schools mediate the influence of social class on adolescent development, in B. Biddle, ed.,Social Class, Poverty & Education, Missouri Symposium on Research and Educational Policy, vol. 3, Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. (1997)Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooden, M. and A. Van den Heuval (1999) The labour market for young adults, in Dusseldorp Skills Forum,Australia’s Young Adults: The Deepening Divide, Sydney, pp. 35–53.

  • Woolcock M. and D. Narayan (2000) Social capital: implications for development theory, research and policy,World Bank Research Observer, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 225–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilpatrick, S., Abbott-Chapman, J. Rural young people’s work/study priorities and aspirations: The influence of family social capital. Aust. Educ. Res. 29, 43–67 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219769

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219769

Keywords

Navigation