Skip to main content
Log in

Literacy and technology studies: Past, present, future

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abtan, P. (1993) The gender gap,Computing Canada, vol. 19, no. 9.

  • Alexander, J. (1997) Out of the closet and into the network: Sexual orientation and the computerised classroom,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993) The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction,Review of Educational Research, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, T. (1988) The ENFI project: A networked classroom approach to writing instruction,Academic Computing, vol. 2, pp. 32–322, 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (1996) Ekphrasis, virtual reality, and the future of writing, in G. Nunberg ed,The Future of the Book, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, pp. 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (1998) Hypertext and the question of visual literacy, in D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo and R. D. Kieffer eds,Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-typographic World, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. and Grusin, R. (1999)Remediation: Understanding New Media, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C. (1997) Rhetorics of the Web: Hyperreading and critical literacy, in I. Snyder ed,Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 102–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C. and Callister, T. A. Jr (2000)Watch IT: The Risky Promises and Promising Risks of New Information Technologies in Education, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castner, J. (1997) The clash of social categories: Egalitarianism in networked writing classrooms,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catano, J. (1985) Computer-based writing: Navigating the fluid text,College Composition and Communication, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., Paris, C. L. and Kahn, J. L. (1991)Learning to Write Differently: Beginning Writers and Word Processing, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B. (1985) Reflections on inequities in computer education: Do the rich get richer?Education and Computing, vol. 1, pp. 179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B. (1997) Literacy, poverty and schooling: Working against deficit equations,English in Australia, vol. 119–20, pp. 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daiute, C. (1986) Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers,Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K. (1986) Cooperation, collaboration and computers: Integrating a computer into a second grade writing program,Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, C. and Green, B. (1998) Literacy and the new technologies in school education: Meeting the l(IT)eracy challenge? Position paper for NSW Department of Education and Training.

  • Flores, M. J. (1990) Computer conferencing: Composing a feminist community of writers, in C. Handa ed,Computers and Community: Teaching Composition in the Twenty-first Century, Boynton Cook, Portsmouth NH, pp. 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geest, van der, T. and Remmers, T. (1994) The computer as means of communication for peer-review groups,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard, L. (1999) Letter from the guest editor,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, Special Issue: Computers, Composition and Gender, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. D. (1978) Experiments on composing letters: Some facts, some myths and some observations, in L. Gregg and I. Steinberg, eds,Cognitive Processes in Writing, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp. 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabill, J. T. (1998) Utopic visions, the technopoor, and public access: Writing technologies in a community literacy program,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1975) An examination of the writing processes of seven year old children,Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 227–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1981) A case study observing the development of primary children’s composing, spelling and motor behaviours during the writing process,Final Report, NIE Grant No. G-78-0174, ERIC Reproduction Service Number 218 653, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (1988) Subject-specific literacy and school learning: A focus on writing,Australian Journal of Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 156–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (1997) Literacy, Information and the Learning Society. Paper presented at the Joint Conference of the Australian Association for the Teaching of English, the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association and the Australian School Library Association, Darwin High School, Darwin, Northern Territory, July 8–11.

  • Green, B. and Beavis, C. (1998) Editorial—Researching new literacies, new technologies, new kids, new times, new …,Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. i-vii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B., Bigum, C., Durrant, C., Honan, E., Lankshear, C., Morgan, W., Murray, J., Snyder, I. and Wild, M. (1997) In sites: Exemplary cases of literacies and new technologies in Australian classrooms,Secondary Thoughts, A Journal of the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, S. (1999)Children’s Literacy National Projects: Researchers’ Conference—Executive Summary, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawisher, G. E., LeBlanc, P., Moran, C. and Selfe, C. L. (1996)Computers and the Teaching of Writing in American Higher Education, 1979–1994: A History, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. (1985) Computers and girls: Rethinking the issues,Sex Roles vol. 13, pp. 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, A. (1987) Ethnographic study of a high school writing class using computers: Marginal, technically proficient and productive learners, in L. Gerrard ed,Writing at Century’s End: Essays on Computer-Assisted Instruction, Random, New York, pp. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honan, E., Durrant, C, Bigum, C, Green, B., Lankshear, C, Morgan, W., Murray, J., Snyder, I. and Wild, M. (1998) Digital rhetorics: Patterns, principles, practice,Literacy Learning: Secondary Thoughts, A Journal of the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joram, E., Woodruff, E., Bryson, M. and Lindsay, P. H. (1992) The effects of revising with a word processor on written composition,Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 167–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, N. and Farrell, E. (1994) Weavers of webs: A portrait of young women on the Net,The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture, vol. 2, no. 3.

  • Kramarae, C. (1988)Technology and Women’s Voices: Keeping in Touch, Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1997) Visual and verbal modes of representation in electroncially mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text, in I. Snyder ed,Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era, Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, Sydney, pp. 53–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1999) ‘English’ at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual, in G. L. Hawisher and C. L. Seife eds,Passions, Pedagogies and 21 st Century Technologies, Logan, Utah, Utah University Press and Urbana, Illinois, NCTE, pp. 66–88.

  • Landow, G. P. (1997)Hypertext 2.0: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., Bigum, C., Durrant, C., Green, B., Morgan, W., Murray, J., Snyder, I. and Wild, M. (1996) Literacy, technology and education: A project report,The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 345–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., Bigum, C., Durrant, C., Green, B., Honan, E., Morgan, W., Murray, J., Snyder, I. and Wild, M. (1997)Digital Rhetorics: Literacies and Technologies in EducationCurrent Practices and Future Directions, Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C, Snyder, I. with Green, B. (2000)Teachers and Technoliteracy: Managing Literacy, Technology and Learning in Schools, Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCourt, D. and Barnes, L. (1999) Writing multiplicity: Hypertext and feminist textual politics,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1997) Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media, in D. Reinking, L., Labbo, M., McKenna and R. Kieffer eds,Literacy for the 21 st Century: Technological Transformation in a Post-Typographic World, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T. and Gordon, C. (1989) Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes towards computers,Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 5, no. pp. 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConaghy, C. and Snyder, I. (2000) Working the Web in postcolonial Australia, in G. E. Hawisher and C. L. Seife eds,Global Literacies and the World Wide Web, Routledge, London & New York, pp. 74–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. and Olson, J. (1994) Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology,Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, C. (1999) Access: The A-word in technology studies, in G. L. Hawisher and C. L. Seife eds,Passions, Pedagogies and 21 st Century Technologies, Utah University Press, Logan, Utah and NCTE, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negroponte, N. (1996)Being Digital, Hodder & Stoughton, Rydalmere, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odin, J. K. (1997) The edge of difference: Negotiations between the hypertextual and the postcolonial,Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 598–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owston, R. D., Murphy, S. and Wideman, H. H. (1992) The effects of word processing on students’ writing quality and revision strategies,Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 249–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmquist, M. E. (1993) Network-supported interaction in two writing classrooms,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, D. (1998) Introduction: Synthesising technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographic world, in D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo and R. D. Kieffer eds,Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. xi-xxx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E. B. (1997) African women instructors: In a net,Computers and Composition: An International journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. and G. Barker (1999) PCs-for-all deal signed by ACTU,The Age Tuesday 23 November 1999, p. 3.

  • Romano, S. (1993) The egalitarianism narrative: Whose story? Whose yardstick?Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. (1998) Hypertext stories: A radical transformation in English pedagogy?English in Australia, vol. 121, pp. 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfe, C. L. (1990) Technology in the English classroom: Computers through the lens of feminist theory, in C. Handa ed,Computers and Community: Teaching Composition in the Twenty-First Century, Boynton Cook, Portsmouth NH, pp. 118–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfe, C. L. (1999) Technology and literacy: A story about the perils of not paying attention,College Composition and Communication, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 411–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slattery, P. J. and Kowalski, R. (1998) On screen: The composing processes of first year and upper level college students,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, E. A. (1985)The Effects of Word Processing and Writing Instruction on the Writing Processes and Products of College Writers, ERIC Reproduction Service No. 269 762.

  • Snyder, I. (1993) Writing with word processors: A research overview,Educational Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1995) Multiple perspectives in literacy research: Integrating the quantitative and qualitative,Language and Education: An International Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1996)Hypertext: The Electronic Labyrinth, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1997a) Research methods for studying the use of computers in literacy classrooms, in N. Hornberger and D. Corson eds,Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol 8: Research Methods in Language and Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 239–248.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1997b) Page to screen, in I. Snyder ed,Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, Sydney, pp. xx-xxxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (ed) (1997c)Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1997d) Beyond the hype: Reassessing hypertext, in I. Snyder ed,Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, Sydney, pp. 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1999a) Packaging literacy, technology and ‘enhanced’ learning,Australian Journal of Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1999b) Digital literacies: Renegotiating the visual and the verbal in communication,Prospect: A Journal of Australian TESOL, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (in-press) Hybrid vigour: Reconciling the visual and the verbal in electronic communication, in V. Ellis and A. Loveless eds,Subject to Change: Information and Communications Technology, Pedagogy and the Curriculum, Routledge, London.

  • Sorapure, M., Inglesby, P. and Yatchisin, G. (1998) Web literacy: Challenges and opportunities for research in a new medium,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staberg, E. M. (1994) Gender and science in the Swedish compulsory school,Gender and Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1984)Literacy in Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1998) New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education?Linguistics and Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, L. L. (1999) Wired women writing: Towards a feminist theorisation of hypertext,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayoshi, P., Huot, E. and Huot, M. (1999) No boys allowed: The World Wide Web as a clubhouse for girls,Computers and Composition: An International Journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1995)Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, M., Lankshear, C, Bigum, C, Durrant, C, Green, B., Morgan, W., Murray, J. and Snyder, I. (1998) Making sense of literacies and technologies in education in the digital era. Set special 1998: Technology, # 9,SET: Research Information for Teachers, New Zealand Council for Educational Research and Australian Council for Educational Research, New Zealand, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagelski, R. P. and Grabill, J. T. (1998) Computer-mediated communication in the undergraduate writing classroom: A study of the relationship of online discourse and classroom discourse in two writing classes,Computers and Composition: An International journal for Teachers of Writing, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, T. and Givon, H. (1991) Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerised writing partner,American Educational Research Journal, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snyder, I. Literacy and technology studies: Past, present, future. Aust. Educ. Res. 27, 97–119 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219723

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219723

Keywords

Navigation