Abstract
Within the typology of research orientations commonly represented in the social science literature — empiricist, interpretive and critical — it is the methodologies of the critical orientation that are burgeoning. Significantly, the moral imperative in the critical theorising which drives and shapes these methodologies is empowerment and emancipation. That is to say, critical educational research is potentially empowering because of its emancipatory intent. However, as cogently argued and demonstrated by a number of researchers, “an emancipatory intent is no guarantee of an emancipatory outcome” (Acker et al., 1983: 431). Just being informed by critical theory then, is no guarantee that a critical research approach will be empowering, or be empowering in a way we recognise as significant. This paper has been prepared with two objectives in mind: to clarify three ways empowerment has been conceptualised in the literature, and to use this conceptual scheme as a template to ascertain the empowerment potentials in critical educational research methodologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acker, J. Barry, K. and Esseveld, J. (1983), “Objectivity and truth: problems in doing feminist research”,Women’s Studies International Forum, 6(4), pp.423–435.
Anderson, G. (1989), “Critical ethnography in education: origins, current status and new directions”,Review of Educational Research, 59(3), pp.249–270.
Anderson, J. (1979),Public policy making, New York, Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
Barr, D.et al. (1984), “Family empowerment: an interview”,Human Ecology Forum, 14(1), pp.4–13, 34–35.
Bates, R. and Kynaston, E. (eds.) (1983),Thinking Aloud: Interviews with Australian Educators, Geelong, Deakin University Press.
Bosetti, L,et al. (1989), “Critical perspectives on educational planning and policy analysis”,The Canadian Administrator, 29(2), pp. 1–7.
Bredo, E. and Feinberg, W. (eds.) (1982),Knowledge and Values in Social and Educational Research, Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
Bullough, R. and Gitlin, A. (1991), “Educative communities and the development of the reflective practitioner”, in R. Tabachnick and K. Zeichner (eds.),Issues and Practices in Inquiry-oriented Teacher Education, London, Falmer, pp.35–55.
Carr, W. and Kemmis, S. (1986),Becoming Critical: education knowledge and action research, Geelong, Deakin University Press.
Carspecken, P. (1991), “Critical ethnography in educational research”,Critical Pedagogy Networker, 4(3), pp. 1–4.
Cochran, M. (1987), “The parental empowerment process: building on family strengths”,Equity and Choice, 4, pp.9–23.
Cohen, A. (1990), “Political symbolism”, in F. Manning and J. Philibert (eds.),Customs in conflict: the anthropology of a changing world, Ontario, Broadview Press, pp.28–57.
Common, D. (1987), “Power: the missing concept in the dominant model of school change”,Theory into Practice, 26, Special Issue, pp.338–345.
Cottle, T. (1975), “Show me a scientist who’s helped poor folks and I’ll kiss her hand”, in N. Steneck (ed.),Science and Society, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, pp.216–227.
Dudley, N. (1992), “Participatory principles in human inquiry: ethics and methods in a study of the paradigm shift experience”,Qualitative Studies in Education, 5(4), pp.325–344.
Ellsworth, E. (1989), “Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy”,Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), pp.297–324.
Fairclough, N. (1989),Language and Power, London, Longman.
Gage, N.L. (1992), “The paradigm wars and their aftermath: a ‘historical’ sketch of research on teaching since 1989”,Educational Researcher, 18(7), pp.4–10.
Gee, J.et al. (1992), “Discourse analysis”, in M. Le Compteet al. (eds.),The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, San Diego, Academic Press, pp.227–291.
Giroux, H. (1986), “Curriculum teaching and the resisting intellectual”,Curriculum and Teaching, 1(1 & 2), pp.33–42.
Gitlin, A. (1990), “Educative research, voice and school change”,Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), pp.443–466.
Gitlin, A.et al. (1989), “The politics of method: from leftist ethnography to educative research”,Qualitative Studies in Education, 2(3), pp.237–253.
Gitlin, A.et al. (1992),Teachers’ Voices for School Change: An Introduction to Educative Research, London, Routledge.
Goodman, J. (1992), “Theoretical and practical considerations for school-based research in a post-positivist era”,Qualitative Studies in Education, 5(2), pp.117–133.
Grimley, J. (1986), “Critical educational policy analysis: a discussion of perspectives”,Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 11(2), pp. 19–25.
Gross, S. (1985), “Personal power and empowerment”,Contemporary Education, 56(3), pp. 137–143.
Guba, E. (1990), “The alternative paradigm dialog”, in E. Guba (ed.),The Paradigm Dialog, Newbury Park, SAGE.
Hammersley, M. (1992), “The paradigm wars: reports from the front”,British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(1), pp. 131–143.
Henderson, J. (1992), “Curriculum discourse and the question of empowerment”,Theory into Practice, 31(3), pp.204–209.
Henry, C. and Kemmis, S. (1985), “A point-by-point guide to action research for teachers”,The Australian Administrator, 6(4), pp. 1–4.
Hill Collins, P. (1990),Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment, Boston, Unwin Hyman.
Howe, K. (1992), “Getting over the quantitative — qualitative debate”,American Journal of Education, 100(2), pp.236–256.
James, M. (1990) “Demystifying literacy: reading, writing, and the struggle for liberation”,Convergence, 23(1), pp. 14–25.
Kemmis, S. (1989), “Improving schools and teaching through educational action research”,Singapore Journal of Education, Special Issue, pp.6–30.
Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (eds.) (1988),The Action Researcher Planner, (3rd ed.) Geelong, Deakin University Press.
Kilpatrick, J. (1988), “Educational research: scientific or political?”Australian Education Researcher, 15(2), pp. 13–28.
Lather, P. (1985), “Empowering research methodologies”, paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, ED257727.
Lather, P. (1986a), “Issues of validity in openly ideological research: between a rock and a soft place”,Interchange, 17(4), pp 63–84.
Lather, P. (1986b), “Research as praxis”,Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), pp.257–277.
Lather, P. (1987), “Feminist perspectives on empowering reseach methodologies”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington DC.
Lather, P (1988), “Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies”,Women’s Studies International Forum, 11 (6), pp. 569–581.
Lather, P. (1991),Feminist research in education: within/against, Geelong, Deakin University Press.
Luke, A. (1992), “The social construction of literacy in the primary school”, in L. Unsworth (ed.),Literacy, Learning and Teaching: Language as Social Practice in the Classroom, Melbourne, Macmillan.
Maeroff, G. (1988), “A blueprint for empowering teachers”,Phi Delta Kappan, 69(7),pp.472–477.
Marshall, S. and Smith, R. (1992), “Teacher appraisal: reports from two South Australian schools on radical alternatives to the conventional wisdom”,South Australian Educational Leader, 3(6), pp. 1–13.
McConnell, S. (1992), “Literacy and empowerment”,The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 15(2), pp. 123–138.
McTaggart, R. (1989), “Principles of participatory action research”, paper presented to the Third World Encounter on Participatory Research, Manuagua, Nicaragua.
McTaggart, R. and Garbutcheon Singh, M. (1986), “New directions in action research”,Curriculum Perspectives, 6(2), pp.42–46.
Miller, J. and Martens, M. (1990), “Hierarchy and imposition in collaborative inquiry: teacher-research reflections on recurrent dilemmas”,Educational Foundations, 4(4), pp.41 -459.
Moore, B. (1988), “Towards a theory of curriculum decision-making: insights from critical praxis (Jurgen Habermas)”, course materials for UCS503 Curriculum Leadership and Evaluation, South Australian College of Advanced Education, pp.68–99.
Nisbett, J. and Broadfoot, P. (1980),The impact of research on policy and practice in education, Aberdeen, Aberdeen Univesity Press.
Popkewitz, T. (1984),Paradigm and ideology in education research: the social functions of the intellectual, London, Falmer.
Prunty, J. (1985), “Signposts for a critical educational policy analysis”,Australian Journal of Education, 29(2), pp. 133–140.
Ramdas, L. (1990), “Women and literacy: a quest for justice”,Convergence, 23(l),pp.27–41.
Rein, M. (1983), “Value-critical policy analysis”, in D. Callahan and B. Jennings (eds.),Ethics, the Social Sciences, and Policy Analysis, New York, Plenum Press.
Rizvi, F. (1986), “Bureaucratic rationality and the possibility of democratic governance in education”,Australian Administrator, 7(1), pp. 1–4.
Robinson, V. (1992), “Doing critical social science: dilemmas of control”,Qualitative Studies in Education, 5(4), pp.345–359.
Rosenman, M. (1980), “Empowerment as a purpose of education”,Alternative Higher Education, 4(4), pp.248–259.
Simon, R. and Dippo, D. (1986), “On critical ethnographic work”,Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 195–202.
Smith. R. (1993a), “Designs and methods in non-participatory criticalist research”, in H. Connoleet al. Issues and Methods in Research, study guide materials for UED601, Distance Education Centre, Adelaide, University of South Australia, pp.212–244.
Smith, R. (1993b), “Designs and methods in participatory criticalist research”, in H. Connoleet al. Issues and Methods in Research, study guide materials for UED601, Distance Education Centre, Adelaide, University of South Australia, pp.245–276.
Smyth, J. (1991),Teachers as Collaborative Learners: Challenging Dominant Forms of Supervision, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
Stanley, L. (ed.) (1990),Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology, London, Routledge.
Stenhouse, L. (1983), “What counts as research?” in J. Rudduck and D. Hopkins (eds.),Research as a basis for teaching: readings from the work of Lawrence Stenhouse, Oxford, Heinemann, pp.8–19.
Stromquist, N. (1988), “Women’s education in development: from welfare to empowerment”,Convergence, 21(4), pp.5–16.
Tripp, D. (1987), “Action research and professional development”, in P. Hughes (ed.),Better teachers for better schools, Carlton, The Australian College of Education.
Tripp, D. (1990a), “Socially critical action research”,Theory into Practice, 29(3), pp. 158–166.
Tripp. D. (1990b), “The ideology of educational research”,Discourse, 10(2), pp.51–74.
Wallerstein, N. and Bernstein, E. (1988), “Empowerment education: Freire’s ideas adapted to health education”,Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), pp.379–394.
White, R. (1992), “Implications of recent research on learning for curriculum and assessment”,Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), pp. 153–164.
Williams, F. (1989),Social Policy: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Zacharakis-Jutz, J. (1988), “Post-Freirean adult education: a question of empowerment and power”,Adult Education Quarterly, 39(1), pp.41–47.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, R. Potentials for empowerment in critical education research. Aust. Educ. Res. 20, 75–93 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219544
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219544