Abstract
This paper presents an examination of the use of Rasch modelling in a major research project,Improving Middle Years Mathematics and Science (IMYMS). The project has generated both qualitative and quantitative data, with much of the qualitative data being ordinal in nature. Reporting the results of analyses for a range of audiences necessitates careful, well-designed report formats. Some useful new report formats based on Rasch modelling—the Modified Variable Map, the Ordinal Map, the Threshold Map, and the Annotated Ordinal Map—are illustrated using data from the IMYMS project. The Rasch analysis and the derived reporting formats avoid the pitfalls that exist when working with ordinal data and provide insights into the respondents’ views about their experiences in schools unavailable by other approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S.-T. (1996). Quest: The interactive test analysis system (Version 2) [Computer Software]. Melbourne: ACER.
Baker, F. B. (2001).The basics of Item Response Theory (2nd ed.). College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
Beltyukova, S. A., & Fox, C. M. (2004). Equating student satisfaction measures.Journal of Applied Measurement, 5(1), 62–69.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001).Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Doig, B. (2001).Summing up: Australian numeracy performances, practices, programs and possibilities. Melbourne: ACER Press.
Doig, B. (2003).Quality learning communities: Effective practices in the Middle Years of schooling. (Report prepared for the Middle Years Pedagogy Research and Development Project). Melbourne: Deakin University Consultancy and Development Unit.
Doig, B., & Groves, S. (2005). Reason for hope: Primary students’ mathematics learning environment. In Novotná, J. (Ed.),Proceedings of the International Symposium Elementary Maths Teaching (pp. 100–107). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
Doig, B., Groves, S., Tytler, R., & Gough, A. (2005). Primary and secondary mathematics practice: How different is it? In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce & A. Roche (Eds.),Building connections: Theory, research and practice (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, Vol. 1, pp. 305–312). Sydney: MERGA.
Gough, A., & Tytler, R. (2001). Researching effective teaching and learning in science: The Science in Schools research project. InCrossing borders: New frontiers in education research (Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education, AARE 2001 International Education Research Conference, pp. 1–4). Fremantle, WA: AARE.
Groves, S., & Doig, B. (2002). Developing conceptual understanding: the role of the task in communities of mathematical inquiry. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.),Proceedings of the 26th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 25–32). Norwich, UK: PME.
Haertel, E. H. (2004).The behavior of linking items in test equating. Los Angeles: CRESST/Stanford University.
Kolen, M. J. (1999). Equating of tests. In G. N. Masters & J. P. Keeves (Eds.),Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment (pp. 164–185). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes.Archives of psychology (Number 140).
Masters, G. N. (1988). Partial Credit model. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.),Educational research, methodology, and measurement (pp. 292–297). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Norusis, M. J. (1990).SPSS base system user’s guide. Chicago: SPSS.
Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Siegal, S. (1956).Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (International Student Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Thorkildsen, T. A. (2005).Fundamentals of measurement in applied research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Tytler, R., Waldrip, B., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Windows into practice: Constructing effective science teaching and learning in a school change initiative.International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 171–194.
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2005). Children’s perspectives of the mathematics classroom. In J. Novotná (Ed.),Proceedings of the International Symposium Elementary Maths Teaching (pp. 23 - 33). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982).Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doig, B., Groves, S. Easier analysis and better reporting: Modelling ordinal data in mathematics education research. Math Ed Res J 18, 56–76 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217436
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217436