Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic dishonesty is a fundamental issue for the academic integrity of higher education institutions, and one that has lately been gaining increasing media attention. This study reports on a survey of 1206 students and 190 academic staff across four major Queensland universities in relation to student academic misconduct. The aim of the survey was to determine the prevalence of academic misconduct, and to investigate the extent to which perceptions of dishonesty are shared between students and staff, as preliminary steps toward developing effective strategies to deal with the academic dishonesty/misconduct problem. Results indicate a higher tolerance for academic misconduct by students in comparison to staff, particularly with respect to falsification of research results and plagiarism, as well as considerable underestimation by staff of the prevalence of virtually all forms of student academic misconduct. Overall, the study’s findings confirm the significance of the issue of academic dishonesty within the Australian tertiary sector, indicating considerable divergence between students and staff in terms of perceptions of the seriousness and prevalence of student academic misconduct. We suggest that university administrators need to examine this issue closely in order to develop mechanisms for managing and curtailing the level of academic misconduct, since a failure to do so may lead to a further undermining of the academic integrity of the Australian tertiary sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernardi, R., R. Metzger, R. Bruno, M. Hoogkamp, L. Reyes and G. Barnaby (2004) Examining the decision process of students’ cheating behaviour: an empirical study,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 50, pp. 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, A. (2004) Self-control, perceived opportunity and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty,The Journal of Psychology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. (1964)Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College, Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B. and D. Smith (1995) Effects of ethics instruction on the ethical perceptions of college business students,Journal of Education for Business, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 351–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. and M. Spiller (1998) Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of empirical research,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 17, pp. 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, F., L. Anderson and K. Lawrimore (1990) Perspectives on business ethics in management education,SAM Advanced Management Journal, vol. 9, pp. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lambert, K., N. Ellen and L. Taylor (2003) Prevalence of Academic Dishonesty in Tertiary Institutions: The New Zealand Story, Working Paper, Christchurch College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, M., J. Sheard and S. Markham (2001) Is it OK to cheat — the views of postgraduate students, Proceedings of the 6th Annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE Conference on Innovation and Technology, Canterbury, UK.

  • Diekhoff, G., E. LaBeff, R. Clark, L. Williams, B. Francis and V. Haines (1996) College cheating: ten years later,Research in Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. and W. Richardson (1994) Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 13, pp. 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, J. and R. Waugh (1997) Students’ perceptions of cheating in Australian independent schools,Education Australia, vol. 37, pp. 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. and T. Hirschi (1990)A General Theory of Crime, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, P. (2004) Dishonesty in academics and business: a cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 49, pp. 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V., G. Kiefhoff, E. Labeff and R. Clark (1986) College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment and the neutralising attitude,Research in Higher Education, vol. 25, pp. 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haswell, S., P. Jubb and B. Wearing (1999) Accounting Students and Cheating: A Comparative Study for Australia, South Africa and the UK,Teaching Business Ethics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, R. (2004) Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the ‘real world’?,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, R., K. Chapman and J. Weiss (2000) A cross-national exploration of business students’ attitudes, perceptions, and tendencies toward academic dishonesty,Journal of Education for Business, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. and W. Bowers (1994) Academic dishonesty among male college students: a thirty year perspective,Journal of College Student Development, vol. 35, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. and G. Pavela (2000) Some good news about academic integrity,Change, September/October, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. and L. Trevino (1993) Academic dishonesty: honour codes and other contextual influences,The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. and L. Trevino (1996) What we know about cheating in college,Change, January/February, pp. 29–33.

  • Nonis, S. and C. Swift (2001) An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: a multicampus investigation,Journal of Education for Business, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, C. and D. Laufer (1997) Undergraduate student cheating in the fields of business and economics,Journal of Economic Education, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. and R. Toombs (1993) A scale to assess perceptions of cheating in examination-related situations,Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 53, pp. 755–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. and C. Ballew (1994) Attitudes toward cheating of self and others by college students and professors,The Psychological Record, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, N. and D. McCabe (1995) Communication strategies for addressing academic dishonesty,Journal of College Student Development, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 531–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, S., D. Guffey and J. McMillan (2001) Truth, consequences and culture: a comparative examination of cheating and attitudes about cheating among US and UK students,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 31, pp. 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauser, J. (1990) The ethics of teaching business: toward a model for business professors,SAM Advanced Management Journal, vol. 9, pp. 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheard, J., M. Dick, S. Markham, I. Macdonald and M. Walsh (2002) Cheating and plagiarism: Perceptions and practices of first year IT students, Working Paper, Monash University.

  • Stern, E. and L. Havlicek (1986) Academic misconduct: results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys,Journal of Applied Health, vol. 5, pp. 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, J., E. Storch and P. Clark (2002) Academic dishonesty and neutralisation theory: a comparison of intercollegiate athletes and nonathletes,Journal of College Student Development, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 921–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. and D. Matza (1957) Techniques of neutralisation: a theory of delinquency,American Sociological Review, vol. 22, pp. 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Dran, G., E. Callahan and H. Taylor (2001) Can students’ academic integrity be improved? Attitudes and behaviours before and after implementation of an academic integrity policy,Teaching Business Ethics, vol. 5, pp. 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, T., S. Ravenscroft and C. Schrader (2004) Cheating and moral judgement in the college classroom: a natural experiment,Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Griffith University, Australia

    Mark Brimble & Peta Stevenson-Clarke

Authors
  1. Mark Brimble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peta Stevenson-Clarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brimble, M., Stevenson-Clarke, P. Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. Aust. Educ. Res. 32, 19–44 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216825

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216825

Keywords

Search

Navigation