Abstract
Educational psychology has a tradition of considering learning and motivation in terms of the individual and individual functioning. Short-term intervention studies have been common and quantitative measurement of the causes and effects of variables has been the aim of much research. When a sociocultural approach forms the basis of research into psychological constructs, a reappraisal of the research aims and the ways in which data are gathered and analysed is necessary. If the underlying assumption is that learning and motivation are socially and culturally situated, the design of research studies needs to encompass participation in authentic and purposeful activities. In order to develop a rich sociocultural understanding of these constructs, qualitative research designs become increasingly important.
In this article, we consider two current research projects, one focusing upon conceptual change amongst students in a first year university class, and the other a classroom-based qualitative study exploring primary (elementary) students’ interest in learning. In each project, data have been collected over time in relation to both social interaction and individual functioning in specific sociocultural contexts. Our frameworks for data collection and approaches to data analysis are discussed in this article, together with some of the issues which we have identified as problematic. In particular we are conscious of the difficulties associated with articulating and describing the nature of social and cultural contexts, especially those with which we are familiar, and of distinguishing their most salient features. We are also critically aware that because our research is situated within very familiar environments, we need to identify and explore our implicit assumptions about those environments and the ways in which our roles as teachers and researchers both coincide and occasionally conflict.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, P. A. and T. L. Jetton (1996) The role of importance and interest in the processing of text,Educational Psychology Review, vol. 8, pp. 89–121.
Anderman, L. H. and E. M. Anderman (2000) Considering contexts in educational psychology: Introduction to the special issue,Educational Psychologist, vol. 35, pp. 67–68.
Bergin, D. A. (1999) Influences on classroom interest,Educational Psychologist, vol. 34, pp. 87–98.
Blumenfeld, P. C. and L. Anderson (1996) Editor’s comments,Educational Psychologist, vol. 31, pp. 1–4.
Brown, A. L. (1997) Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters,American Psychologist, vol. 52, pp. 399–413.
Carelli, M. G. (1998) Internalization, participation and ethnocentrism,Human Development, vol. 41, pp. 355–359.
Chaiklin, S. (2003) The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction, in A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev and S. M. Miller, eds.,Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Chi, M. T. H., J. D. Slotta and N. de Leeuw (1994) From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts,Learning and Instruction, vol. 4, pp. 27–43.
Cobern, W. W. (1996) Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education,Science Education, vol. 80, pp. 579–610.
Coffey, A. (1999)The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity, Sage, London.
Dekkers, P. J. J. M. and G. D. Thijs (1998) Making productive use of students’ initial conceptions in developing the concept of force,Science Education, vol. 82, pp. 31–51.
Demastes, S. S., R. G. Good and P. Peebles (1996) Patterns of conceptual change in evolution,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 33, pp. 407–431.
Driver, R., H. Asoko, J. Leach, E. Mortimer and P. Scott (1994) Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom,Educational Researcher, vol. 23, pp. 5–12.
Erickson, F. and J. Shultz (1981) When is a context?, in J.L. Green and C. Wallat, eds.,Ethnography and Language in Educational Settings, Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ.
Garnett, P. J., P.J. Garnett and M. W. Hackling (1995) Students’ alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning,Studies in Science Education, vol. 25, pp. 69–95.
Gil-Perez, D. and J. Carrascosa (1990) What to do about science “misconceptions”,Science Education, vol. 74, pp. 531–540.
Hallden, O. (1999) Conceptual change and contextualization, in W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou and M. Carretero, eds.,New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
Hammersley, M. and P. Atkinson (1995)Ethnography: Principles in Practice (2nd ed.), Routledge, London.
Hidi, S. and D. Berndorff (1998) Situational interest and learning, in L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger and J. Baumert, eds.,Interest and Learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender, IPN, Kiel, Germany.
Hoffman, L., A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, and J. Baumert, eds. (1998)Interest and Learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender, IPN, Kiel, Germany.
Isaac, J. D., C. Sansone J. L. and Smith (1999) Other people as a source of interest in an activity,Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 35, pp. 239–265.
Jacobs, G. (1989) Word usage misconceptions among first-year university physics students,International Journal of Science Education, vol. 11, pp. 395–399.
Jarvela, S. (2001) Shifting research on motivation and cognition to an integrated approach on learning and motivation in context, in S. Jarvela and S. Volet, eds.,Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications, Pergamon and EARLI, Oxford.
Krapp, A. (2002) Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective,Learning and Instruction, vol. 12, pp. 383–409.
Krapp, A., S. Hidi and K. A. Renninger (1992) Interest, learning and development, in K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi and A. Krapp, eds.,The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.
Krapp, A., K. A. Renninger, and L. Hoffman (1998) Some thoughts about the development of a unifying framework for the study of individual interest, in L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A.Renninger and J. Baumert, eds.,Interest and Learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender, IPN, Kiel, Germany.
Lave, J. and E. Wenger (1991)Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Linder, C.J. (1993) A challenge to conceptual change,Science Education, vol. 77, 293–300.
Matusov, E. (1998) When solo activity is not privileged: Participation and internalization models of development,Human Development, vol. 41, pp. 326–349.
Matusov, E. and B. Rogoff (1995) Evidence of development from people’s participation in communities of learners, in J. Falk and L. Dierking, eds.,Public Institutions for Personal Learning: Establishing a Research Agenda, American Association of Museums, Washington.
Meyer, D. K. and J. C. Turner(2002) Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research,Educational Psychologist, vol. 37, pp. 107–114.
Mortimer, E. F. (1995) Conceptual change or conceptual profile change?Science and Education, vol. 4, pp. 267–285
Pintrich, P. R. (1999) Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change, in W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou and M. Carretero, eds.,New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
Pintrich, P. R., R. W. Marx and R. A. Boyle (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change,Review of Educational Research, vol. 63, pp. 167–199.
Posner, G. J., K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson and W. A. Gertzog (1982) Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change,Science Education, vol. 66, pp. 211–227.
Pressick-Kilborn. K. and R. Walker (2002) The social construction of interest in a learning community, in D. McInerney and S. Van Etten, eds.,Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT.
Renninger, K. A. (2000) Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation, in C. Sansone and J. M. Harackiewicz, eds.Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, Academic Press, San Diego.
Renshaw, P. (1999) Schools, communities and pedagogies: Diverse possibilities. Symposium paper presented at the Annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, Australia.
Rogoff, B. (1992) Three ways to relate person and culture: Thoughts sparked by Valsiner’s review ofApprenticeship in Thinking, Human Development, vol. 35, pp. 316–320.
Rogoff, B. (1998) Cognition as a collaborative process, in W. Damon, ed.-in-chief, D. Kuhn and R. Siegler, eds.,Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 2) (5th ed.), Wiley, New York.
Rogoff, B., J. Mistry, A. Goncu and C. Mosier (1993) Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers,Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, vol. 58 (8), serial no. 236.
Roth, W. (2001) Situating cognition,The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 10, pp. 27–61.
Sainsbury, E. and R. Walker (2000) Upper secondary school students’ concepts of acids and bases. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Sainsbury, E. and R. Walker (2002) Meaning-making in context: Discourse and conceptual change from a sociocultural perspective. Paper presented at the Fifth Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Säljö, R. (1999) Concepts, cognition and discourse: From mental structures to discursive tools, in W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou and M. Carretero, eds.,New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
Schiefele, U. (1991) Interest, learning and motivation,Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, pp. 299–323.
Schiefele, U. (1998) Individual interest and learning — what we know and what we don’t know, in L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K.A. Renninger and J. Baumert, eds.,Interest and Learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender, IPN, Kiel, Germany.
Schiefele, U. and A. Krapp (1996) Topic interest and free recall of expository text,Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 8, pp. 141–160.
Skeggs, B. (1999) Seeing differently: Ethnography and explanatory power,Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 26, pp. 33–53.
Tobias, S. (1994) Interest, prior knowledge and learning,Review of Educational Research, vol. 64, pp. 37–54.
Turner, J. C. & Meyer, D. K. (2000) Studying and understanding the instructional contexts of classrooms: Using our past to forge our future,Educational Psychologist, vol. 35, pp. 69–85.
Valsiner, J. (1987)Culture and the development of children’s action, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Valsiner, J. (1997a)Culture and the Development of Children’s Action: A Theory of Human Development (2nd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Valsiner, J. (1997b) Magical phrases, human development, and psychological ontology, in B. Cox and C. Lightfoot, eds.,Sociogenetic Perspectives on Internalization, Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J.
Valsiner, J. (1998) Dualisms displaced: From crusades to analytic distinctions,Human Development, vol. 41, pp. 350–354.
Valsiner, J. (2001)Comparative Study of Human Cultural Development, Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje, Madrid.
Volet, S. (2001) Emerging trends in recent research on motivation in learning contexts, in S. Jarvela and S. Volet, eds.,Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications, Pergamon and EARLI, Oxford.
Vosniadou, S. (1999) Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions, in W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou and M. Carretero, eds.,New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
Walker, R. and R. L. Debus (2002) Educational psychology: Advances in learning, cognition and motivation,Change: Transformations in Education, vol. 5, pp. 1–25.
Walker, R., K. Pressick-Kilborn, L. Arnold and E. Sainsbury (2004) Investigating motivation in context: Developing sociocultural perspectives,European Psychologist, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 245–256.
Wells, G. (1998) Dialogue and the development of the agentive individual: An educational perspective. Paper presented at the Fourth Congress of the International Society for Cultural Research and Activity Theory, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Wells, G. (1999)Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Wenger, E. (1998)Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pressick-Kilborn, K., Sainsbury, E. & Walker, R. Making sense of theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches: Exploring conceptual change and interest in learning from a sociocultural perspective. Aust. Educ. Res. 32, 25–47 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216818
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216818