Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of the GATS on transnational tertiary education: Comparing experiences of New Zealand, Australia, Singapore and Malaysia

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) on transnational higher education in four countries: New Zealand, Australia, Singapore and Malaysia. The GATS is a multilateral agreement through which WTO members commit to voluntary liberalisation of trade in services, including education. Transnational (or offshore) education refers to education that is delivered by an institution based in one country to students located in a different country. Two of the countries considered, New Zealand and Australia, have made commitments under GATS to allow relatively unrestricted cross-border provision of education in their countries, while the other two countries, Singapore and Malaysia, have made no such commitment. There is currently considerable activity in renegotiating countries’ commitments to GATS as part of the Doha round of WTO negotiations, and simultaneously bilateral free trade agreements are being proposed between countries in the region. In this context, this paper examines the practical impact that GATS has had on these two countries that have made commitments regarding education, and the likely impact that similar commitments by Malaysia and Singapore would have on the tertiary education systems in those major importing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P. G. (2001) Higher education and the WTO: globalization run amok,International Higher Education, no. 23, pp 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • APEC (2001)Measures Affecting Trade and Investment in Education Services in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Report to the APEC Group on Services, Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (Organization), Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, M. and H.-J. Robertson (1996) Homogenization of education, in J. Mander and E. Goldsmith, eds.,The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local, Sierra Club Books, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, L. (2001) Singapore tops in globalisation,The Straits Times, 10 January, p. 1.

  • Brown, D. (1998) Globalization, ethnicity and the nation-state: the case of Singapore,Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, K. (1999) Mental health: Greenwich University,Senate Hansard, 12 May, p. 4847.

  • Challenger Concept (2000)Education Guide Malaysia, 6th ed., Challenger Concept, Petaling Jaya.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETYA (2000a)Higher Education Report for the 2000 to 2002 Triennium, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETYA (2000b)National Protocols for Higher Education Approval Processes, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFAT (1997)Closer Economic Relations: Background Guide to the Australia-New Zealand Economic Relationship, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFAT (2001)The General Agreement on Trade and Services, Commonwealth Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, viewed 23 August 2002, 〈http://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/negotiations/gats_factsheet.html〉

  • Drew, J. (1999) Private higher education: threat or a promise?Association of Commonwealth Universities Bulletin, no. 137, online, viewed 29 October 2003, 〈http://www.acu.ac.uk/yearbook/137-private.html〉

  • Education (2000) Profile of an educationist: Dr Thomas Khoo,Education: Singapore’s Knowledge Industry Journal, June/July, p. 21.

  • Education International and Public Services International (2000)The WTO and the Millennium Round: What is at Stake for Public Education, Education International, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Quarterly (2000) Didn’t get into local varsity?Education Quarterly, pp. 72-7.

  • Education Quarterly (2001) World class: international students in Malaysia,Education Quarterly, no. 14, pp. 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (2000)Corporate Universities, Higher Education and the Future: Emerging Policy Issues, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, viewed 14 May 2001, 〈http://www.detya.gov.au/highered/otherpub/corp_uni.htm〉

  • GATE (1999)Trade in Transnational Education Services, Global Alliance for Transnational Education, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, R. (1997) The role of the private sector in Malaysian education, in Z. Marshallsay, ed.,Educational Challenges in Malaysia: Advances and Prospects, Monash Asia Institute, Clayton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johari, B. M. (2000) Higher education planning in Malaysia,Education Quarterly, no. 11, pp. 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandasamy, M. and R. Santhiram (2000) From national interest to globalization: the educational system of Malaysia, in K. Mazurek, M. A. Winzer and C. Majorek, eds.,Education in a Global Society: A Comparative Perspective, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, J. (1997) The globalisation of tertiary education: implications of GATS, in M. Peters, ed.,Cultural Politics and the University, Dunmore Press, Palmerston North.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, J (1999)10 Reasons Why the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is Bad for Public Education, Association of University Staff of New Zealand, viewed 17 April 2001, 〈http://aus.ac.nz/〉.

  • Kelsey, J (2000) Free trade Trojan horse,Advocate: Journal of the National Tertiary Education Union, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. N. (1999)Private Higher Education in Malaysia, University Sains Malaysia School of Educational Studies, Penang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, B. (2000) Private higher education: backwards and forwards,Education Quarterly, pp. 62-70.

  • Malaysia (1991)The Way Forward: Vision 2020, Prime Minister’s Office, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Ministry of Education (1993)Educational Statistics of Malaysia, Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysian Ministry of Education (1997)Private Higher Educational Institutions (Conducting Courses of Study) Regulations, Jabatan Pendidikan Swasta, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBurnie, G. and C. Ziguras (2001) The regulation of transnational higher education in Southeast Asia: case studies of Hong Kong, Malaysia and Australia,Higher Education, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNutty, S. (2000) Singapore aims to be centre of advanced academic excellence,Financial Times, 23 August, p. 4.

  • Neville, W. (1998) Restructuring tertiary education in Malaysia: the nature and implications of policy,Higher Education Policy, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 257–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand (2001)Agreement Between New Zealand and Singapore on a Closer Economic Partnership, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Education (2000)New Zealand’s Tertiary Education Sector Profile and Trends 1999, Ministry of Education, New Zealand, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • NTEU (2000) What is happening on 11–13 September 2000?Nexus Update: Newsletter of the National Tertiary Education Union Victorian Division, 1 September, pp. 1–2.

  • NTEU (2001)The General Agreement on Trade in Services: Implications for the Domestic Regulation of Higher Education and Professional Accreditation, National Tertiary Education Union, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • NZAPEP (2000)A Submission to TEAC on the Shape of the Sector, November 2000, New Zealand Association of Private Education Providers, viewed 20 April 2001, 〈http://www.teac.govt.nz/submissions/140.pdf〉

  • OECD (2002)Current Commitments under the GATS in Educational Services: Background Document Prepared for the OECD/US Forum on Trade in Educational Services, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. A. (1999) Changes in the Singapore university student demand since the currency crash,Higher Education in Europe, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 203–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, N. (2000) Chicago Graduate School of Business,Education: Singapore’s Knowledge Industry Journal, pp. 34–6.

  • Rudner, M. (1997) International trade in higher education services in the Asia Pacific Region: the ASEAN experience and the role of APEC,World Competition: Law and Economics Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. G. and H. M. Scott (2000)New Zealand University Funding Over the Last Two Decades, Working Paper Series 2/2000, Massey University College of Business and Association of University Staff of New Zealand, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, G. (1996) Silence of the lambs,Far Eastern Economic Review, 14 November, pp. 24–6.

  • Singapore Department of Statistics (2000) Educational upgrading through external degree programmes, 1998,Statistics Singapore Newsletter, January, pp. 17–18. Singapore Department of Statistics (2001)

  • Educational upgrading through external degree programmes, 1999,Statistics Singapore Newsletter, January, pp. 13–14.

  • Singapore Management University (2000)Background Information, Singapore Management University, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Ministry of Education (1998)Education in Singapore: An Overview, Ministry of Education, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Ministry of Education (2000a)Education Statistics Digest, Management Information Branch, Planning Division, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Ministry of Education (2000b)Information Notes: Registration of Distance Learning Programmes, Private Schools Section, Ministry of Education, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Ministry of Education (2001),Private Schools in Singapore, Singapore Ministry of Education, viewed 27 May 2001, 〈http://www1.moe.edu.sg/privatesch/privates.htm〉

  • Snape, R. (1998) Reaching effective agreements covering services, in A. Krueger, ed.,The WTO as an International Organization, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEAC (2001)Shaping the System, New Zealand Tertiary Education Advisory Commission, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • UCGSB (2001) University of Chicago Graduate School of Business website, viewed 6 February 2001, 〈http://gsb.uchicago.edu〉

  • UNESCO and Council of Europe (2000)Code of Good Practice in the Provision of Transnational Education, UNESCO-CEPES, Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States International Trade Commission (1997)General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS): Examination of Asia/Pacific Trading Partners’ Schedules of Commitments, United States International Trade Commission, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Department of Education and Training (2002)Application for Registration, Quality Assurance and Review Division, Office of Training and Tertiary Education, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee, C. J. W. L. (1999) ‘Asian values’, Singapore, and the Third Way: re-working individualism and collectivism,Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 332–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (1996)Global Competitiveness Report, World Economic Forum, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1995)General Agreement on Trade in Services, World Trade Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1998)Communication from the United States: Education Services, World Trade Organization Council for Trade in Services, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2000)Communication from the United States: Higher (Tertiary) Education, Adult Education and Training, World Trade Organization Council for Trade in Services, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2001a)Communication from Australia: Negotiating Proposal for Education Services (S/CSS/W/110), World Trade Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2001b)Communication from New Zealand: Negotiating Proposal for Education Services (S/CSS/W/93), World Trade Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, S. H. and S. L. Yeo (1999) Educational upgrading through external degree programmes,Statistics Singapore Newsletter, no. 8, pp. 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RMIT Globalism Institute, Australia

    Christopher Ziguras

Authors
  1. Christopher Ziguras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziguras, C. The impact of the GATS on transnational tertiary education: Comparing experiences of New Zealand, Australia, Singapore and Malaysia. Aust. Educ. Res. 30, 89–109 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216799

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216799

Keywords

Search

Navigation