Summary
A new algorithm (FADHA) for computing pharmacokinetic parameter estimates has been developped.
This technique is based on the simplex method which is used to minimize a nonlinear cost function. An important property of this program is that the convergence is ensured contrary to the well-known linear or nonlinear least-squares regression analysis which lead to a lack of convergence or to a false one. Two investigations of the comparative performances of FADHA program and other algorithms were undertaken (hexamethylmelamine and Piracetam ® pharmacokinetics). Least square analysis of data yielded biased estimates whereas FADHA estimates were unbiased and more precise. This new technique, takes into account all the possible observation errors and uses the concept of a weighting function rather than weights as such.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Marquardt D.W.: DPE-NLIN, Share general Library Program no 7-1354.
Sedman A.J. and Wagner J.G.: AUTOAN, Upjohn Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Michigan, An. Arbor, MI.
Wagner J.G. (1975): Do you need a pharmacokinetic model and, if so, which one? J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.,3, 457–478.
Holford N.H.G. (1981): MKMODEL, in Perry H.M. and Wood J.J. (Eds.) Public Procedures Notebook, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Mass. pp. 8–51.
Vinod H.D. and Ullah A. (1981): Recent advances in Regression methods, Dekker, New York, N.Y., pp. 1–9.
Gomeni R. (1982): The impact of computer technology on drug information, Manell P. and Johansson s.G., Eds, Elsevier North Holland, p. 32.
Peck C.C., Beal S.L., Sheiner L.B. and Nicholas A.I. (1984): Extended least squares nonlinear regression: a possible solution to the «choice of weights» problem in analysis of individual pharmacokinetic data. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.,12, 545–558.
Hartley H.O. (1961): The modified Gauss-Newton method for the fitting of nonlinear regression functions by least squares. Technometrics,3, 269–280.
Spendley W., Hext C.R. and Himsworth F.R. (1962): Sequential application of simplex designs in optimization and evolutionary operation. Technometrics,4, 441–461.
Neider J.A. and Mead R. (1965): A simplex method for function optimization. Comput. J.,7, 308–313.
Umeda T and Ichikawa A. (1971): A modified complex method for optimization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Develop.,10, 229–236.
Lesuisse R. (1973): Optimisation statique de processus industriels, mise au point et amélioration d’une méthode de type complexe. Travail de spécialisation en automatique. Service d’automatique, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Hanus R., Hanocq M., Van Damme M. and Molle L. (1977): Une nouvelle méthode numérique de détermination par spectrophotométrie de constantes d’ionisation se chevauchant. Anal. Chim. Acta,90, 167–172.
Hanus R. (1979): Identification de systèmes dynamiques par la méthode du complex. Thèse de doctorat en Sciences Appliquées. Service d’automatique, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Cohen I. (1982): Le simplex s’applique à l’optimisation de fonction de coût généralisée telle qu’elle peut se rencontrer dans la validation des mesures sous contraintes. Thèse annexe de doctorat. Service d’automatique, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Hanus R., Cohen I., Lemoine E. and Tolfo F. (1983): The simplex technique as a general optimization method in IFAC Workshop on applications on non linear programming to optimization and control. San Francisco, Pergamon Press, 170–177.
Dubois J., Hanocq M., Atassi G. and Molle L. (1985): High performance liquid chromatography analysis of hexamethylmelamine and its demethylated and hydroxylated metabolites in mice plasma. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., accepted for publication.
Boxenbaum H.G., Riegelman S. and Elashoff (1974): Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm.,2, 123–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abikhalil, F., Dubois, J., Hanocq, M. et al. A new algorithm for computing the parameters of linear compartment models in pharmacokinetics. European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 11, 51–59 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189775
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189775