Abstract
It is often difficult to specify weights for weighted least squares nonlinear regression analysis of pharmacokinetic data. Improper choice of weights may lead to inaccurate and/or imprecise estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters. Extended least squares nonlinear regression provides a possible solution to this problem by allowing the incorporation of a general parametric variance model. Weighted least squares and extended least squares analyses of data from a simulated pharmacokinetic experiment were compared. Weighted least squares analysis of the simulated data, using commonly used weighting schemes, yielded estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters that were significantly biased, whereas extended least squares estimates were unbiased. Extended least squares estimates were often significantly more precise than were weighted least squares estimates. It is suggested that extended least squares regression should be further investigated for individual pharmacokinetic data analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. G. Boxenbaum, S. Riegeiman, and R. M. Elashoff. Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 2:123–148 (1974).
W. G. Kramer, R. P. Lewis, T. C. Cobb, W. F. Forester, Jr., J. A. Visconti, L. A. Wanke, H. G. Boxenbaum, and R. H. Reuning. Pharmacokinetics of digoxin: comparison of a two and a three-compartment model in man.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 2:299–312 (1974).
D. S. Brownlee.Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering. Wiley, New York, 1960, pp. 306–307.
N. R. Draper and H. Smith.Applied Regression Analysis. Wiley, New York, 1981, pp. 141–183.
J. Netter and W. Wasserman.Applied Linear Statistical Models. B. D. Irwin, Homewood, Ill., 1974, pp. 97–131.
C. C. Peck and L. A. Hopkins. Problems in analyzing pharmacokinetic data. Proc. 22nd Conf. Design of Experiments. U.S. Army Research Office, Research Triangle Park, N. C. (1976).
J. Myhill. Investigation of the effect of data error in the analysis of biological tracer data.Biophys. J. 7:903–911 (1967).
G. L. Atkins. Weighting functions and data truncation in the fitting of multi-exponential functions.Biochem. J. 138:125–127 (1974).
P. Chennavasin, R. A. Johnson, and D. C. Brater. Variability in derived parameters of furosemide pharmacokinetics.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 9:623–633 (1981).
S. Beal. Adaptive M estimation with independent nonidentically distributed data. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles (1974).
S. L. Beal. Asymptotic properties of optimization estimators for the independent nonidentically distributed case with application to extended least-squares estimators. Technical Report, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of California at San Francisco (1982).
R. I. Jennrich and M. L. Ralston. Fitting nonlinear models to data.Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 8:195–238 (1979).
G. E. P. Box and W. J. Hill. Correcting inhomogeneity of variance with power transformation weighting.Technometrics 16:385–389 (1974).
D. J. Finney. Radioligand assay.Biometrics 32:721–740 (1976).
D. J. Finney and P. Phillips. The form and estimation of a variance function, with particular reference to radioimmunoassay.Appl. Stat. 26:312–320 (1977).
C. C. Peck and B. B. Barrett. Nonlinear least-squares regression: programs for microcomputers.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 7:537–541 (1979).
D. L. Horowitz and L. D. Homer. Analysis of biomedical data by time-sharing computers. I. Non-linear regression analysis. Project No. MR005:20-0287, Report No. 25. National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md. (1970).
A. I. Nichols and C. C. Peck. LSNLR general nonlinear least squares regression program user's manual. Technical Report No. 5, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Uniformed Services of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md. (1981).
S. L. Beal and L. B. Sheiner. NONMEM users guide, part I. Technical Report. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of California at San Francisco (1980).
A. I. Nichols and C. C. Peck. Comparability of LSNLR with NONLIN, SAS, and BMDP on their test problems. Technical Report No. 13. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md. (1983).
C. M. Metzler, G. L. Elfring, and A. J. McEwen.A Users Manual for NONLIN and Associated Programs. The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Mich., 1974.
W. J. Dixon and M. B. Brown (eds.).BMDP-79 Biomedical Computer Programs P-Series. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1979, pp. 465–476.
SAS User's Guide, 1979 ed. SAS Institute, Raleigh, N. C., 1979, pp. 321–327.
G. E. P. Box and M. Muller. A note on the generation of random normal deviates.Ann. Math. Stat. 29:610–611 (1958).
P. Lewis, A. Goodman, and J. Miller. A pseudo-random number generator for the System 360.IBM Syst. J. 8:136–146 (1969).
P. J. Bickel and K. A. Doksum.Mathematical Statistics: Basic Ideas and Selected Topics. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1977, pp. 209–232.
A. I. Nichols and C. C. Peck. ELSNLR, extended least squares nonlinear regression program, version 1.0. Technical Report No. 9. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md. (1981).
M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier. Method of residuals: appendix 3. InPharmacokinetics. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1975, pp. 281–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by USUHS Grant RO-7516 and NIH Grants GM26676 and GM26691.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peck, C.C., Beal, S.L., Sheiner, L.B. et al. Extended least squares nonlinear regression: A possible solution to the “choice of weights” problem in analysis of individual pharmacokinetic data. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 12, 545–558 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01060132
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01060132