Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices

  • SESSION 4B: PACS Technology and Design
  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contrast-detail characteristic of a display system is a powerful tool for evaluating displayed image quality. It takes into account the physical properties of the display, the psychophysical aspects of the observer, and the viewing conditions. It is a more sensitive measurement of the displayed image quality than a simple Society of Motion Picture and Television (SMPTE) pattern. Yet, it is relatively simple to measure and requires no special equipment or analysis tools. In this presentation, the results of the evaluation of several cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors and a digital projector will be presented. Contrast-detail characteristics of these display devices were measured under various gamma and display settings. The results show excellent intraobserver and interobserver variance (<1 step on the grayscale). Extraneous light, such as room lighting, affects the contrast threshold more severely at low background levels more than at high background. Gamma settings on graphics adapters affect the shapes of the contrast-detail curve for all display types. Gamma settings of approximately 2.0 result in a better contrast threshold for both high and low background brightness. The results show complex differences in contrast-detail characteristics for different display types. The digital projector display not only has significantly worse performance than CRT monitors, but also is affected more by extraneous light. High-brightness monitors with optimal monitor and graphics adapter settings have better performance than color or low-brightness monitors. However, under some settings, the performance of high-brightness monitors is not always better at all object sizes and background levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roehrig H, Willis CE, Damento MA: Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field. J Digit Imaging 12:152–165, 1999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Metter RV, Zhao B, Kohm K: The sensitivity of visual targets for display quality assessment. Proc SPIE 3658:254–268, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hangiandreou NJ, Fetterly KA, Bemats SN, et al: Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality. J Digit Imaging 11:180–186, 1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Krupinski EA, Roehrig H: Influence of monitor luminance and tone scale on observers’ search and dwell patterns. Proc SPIE 3663:151–156, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hemminger BM, et al: Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms. Med Phys 26:2266–2272, 1999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Langer S: A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for PACS. J Digit Imaging 10:158–168, 1997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blume H, Roehrig H, Brown M, et al: Comparison of the physical performance of high resolution CRT displays and films recorded by laser image printers and displayed on light-boxes and the need for a display standard. Proc SPIE 1232:97–114, 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blume H, Hemminger BM: Image presentation in digital radiology: Perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application. Radiographics 17:769–777, 1997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spekovius G: Characterization of color CRT display systems for monochrome applications. J Digit Imaging 12:102–113, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Song KS, Lee JS, Kim HY, et al: Effect of monitor luminance on the detection of solitary pulmonary nodule: ROC analysis. Proc SPIE 3663:212–216, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. American College of Radiology-National Electrical Manufacturers Association DICOM Working Group, 11 report, 1998 (http://medical.nema.org/dicom/.1998)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jihong Wang PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, J., Anderson, J., Lane, T. et al. Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices. J Digit Imaging 13 (Suppl 1), 162–167 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167651

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167651

Keywords

Navigation