Skip to main content
Log in

Technegas ventilation SPECT for evaluating silicosis in comparison with computed tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the subtle pulmonary parenchymal morphologic changes with ventilation function in patients with silicosis, the conventional CT, high resolution CT and technegas ventilation SPECT were performed. In 25 silicotic patients and six controls, the pulmonary ventilation state was evaluated by an index called the coefficient of variation (CV), which expresses the subliminal heterogeneous distribution of technegas in the lungs. The results showed that with silicosis the CV value is significantly higher than that without silicosis. The CV value was proved by multifactorial analysis to independently reflect the extent of the appearance of small scattered interstitial findings such as nodules, septal thickening and bulla, which were typical findings for silicosis. The CV value calculated from the technegas SPECT correlated well with the severity of silicosis. It is considered that the CV value can also express the functional state of the silicotic lung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Theriault GP, Peters JM, Johnson WM. Pulmonary function and roentgenographic changes in granite dust exposure.Arch Environ Health 28: 23–27, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Craighead JE, Vallythan NV. Cryptic pulmonary lesions in workers occupationally exposed to dust containing silica.JAMA 244: 1939–1941, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bégin R, Ostiguy G, Fillion R, Colman N. Computed to- mography scan in the early detection of silicosis.Am Rev Respir Dis 144: 697–705, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akira M, Yokoyama K, Yamamoto S, Higashihara T, Morinaga K, Kita N, et al. Early asbestosis: evaluation with high-resolution CT.Radiology 178: 409–416, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bégin R, Bergeron D, Samson L, Boctor M, Cantin A. CT assessment of silicosis in exposed workers.Am J Roentgenol 148: 509–514, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bégin R, Ostiguy G, Fillion R, Colman N, Bertrand P. Computed tomography in the early detection of asbestosis.Br J Ind Med 50: 689–698, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergin CJ, Muller NL, Vedal S, Chan-Yeung M. CT in silicosis: correlation with plain films and pulmonary function tests.Am J Roentgenol 146: 477–483, 1986.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins LC, Willing S, Bretz R, Harty M, Lane E, Anderson WH. High-resolution CT in simple coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, lack of correlation with pulmonary function tests and arterial blood gas values.Chest 104: 1156–1162, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bégin R, Ostiguy G, Cantin A, Bergeron D. Lung function in silica-exposed workers, a relationship to disease severity assessed by CT scan.Chest 94: 539–545, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Burch WM, Sullivan PJ, McLaren CJ. Technegas: a new ventilation agent for lung scanning.Nucl Med Commun 7: 865–871, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. International Labour Office. Guidelines for the use of the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses. Revised edition. Occupational Safety and Health Series. No. 22 (Rev 80). Geneva: International Labour Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gurney JW. Cross-sectional physiology of the lung.Radiology 178: 1–10, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christman JW, Emerson RJ, Graham WGB, Davis GS. Mineral dust and cell recovery from the bronchoalveolar lavage of healthy Vermont granite workers.Am Rev Respir Dis 132: 393–399, 1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mannting F, Morgan MG, Hedenstrom H, Maripuu E, Hedenstierna G. A comparative study of Xe-133 and Tc- 99m-gas for assessment of regional ventilation.Eur J Nucl Med 16: 429, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rimkus DS, Ashbum WL. Lung ventilation scanning with a new carbon particle radioaerosol (Technegas).Clin Nucl Med 15: 222–226, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sullivan PJ, Burke WM, Burch WM, Lomas FE. A clinical comparison of Technegas and xenon-133 in 50 patients with suspected pulmonary embolus.Chest 94: 300–304, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peltier P, Faucal P, Chetanneau A, Chatal JF. Comparison of technetium-99m aerosol and krypton-81 m in ventilation studies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.Nucl Med Commun 11: 631–638, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hilson AJW, Pavia D, Diamond PD, Agnew JE. An ultrafine 99m-Tc-aerosol (Technegas) for lung ventilation scintig-raphy—A comparison with Kr-81m.J Nucl Med 30: 744, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zwinenburg A, Royen EV, Dongen AV, Zanin D. Experience with99mTc-Technegas as a ventilation tracer; comparison with81mKr-gas.Eur J Nucl Med 16: 440, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lemb M, Oei TH, Günther B. Technegas: a study of particle structure, size and distribution.Eur J Nucl Med 20: 576–579, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bessis L, Callard P, Gotheil C, Biaggi A, Grenier P. Highresolution CT of parenchymal lung disease: precise correlation with histologic findings.Radiographics 12: 45–58, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Akira M, Higashihara T, Yokoyama K, Yamamoto S, Kita N, Morimoto S, et al. Radiographie type p pneumoconiosis: high-resolution CT.Radiology 171: 117–123, 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Hirano, H., Yamamoto, K. et al. Technegas ventilation SPECT for evaluating silicosis in comparison with computed tomography. Ann Nucl Med 10, 165–170 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165388

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165388

Key words

Navigation