Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative evaluation of myocardial viability by thallium-201 imaging in patients with old myocardial infarction who underwent coronary revascularization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The myocardial uptake and redistribution in thallium scintigraphy and the regional wall motion by echocardiography were evaluated by a semi-quantitative method in 42 patients who previously had myocardial infarction (50 target vessels) and underwent coronary revascularization. The aim of this study was to elucidate the significance of the initial image, delayed image and redistribution on thallium-201 scintigraphy for clinical diagnosis of the myocardial viability. As a semi-quantitative analysis, we used a bull’s-eye display for thallium image and centerline method for echocardiographic wall motion, and compared the results before and after revascularization. As a result, the thallium grade improved postoperatively in all 17 areas which preoperative had showed redistribution, and also in 11 of the 32 areas without preoperative redistribution. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of preoperative thallium redistribution for predicting myocardial viability were 61%, 100% and 78%, respectively, when the postoperative improvement in the thallium grade was used as the standard. The postoperative probability of improvement in the thallium grade increased in proportion to the preoperative thallium grade (delayed image) (p≪0.01). There was no correlation between the preoperative thallium delayed image and postoperative improvement in wall motion. Postoperative improvement in thallium image and wall motion could not be predicted from the preoperative wall motion. Thus, postoperative improvement in thallium images can be anticipated if redistribution is present on the preoperative thallium image, and the preoperative thallium delayed image is useful for predicting myocardial viability. Improvement in wall motion could not be predicted preoperatively by these methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strauss HW: Thallium redistribution: Mechanisms and clinical utility.Seminar Nucl Med 10: 70–93, 1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rozanski A, Berman DS, Gray R, et al: Use of thallium-201 redistribution scintigraphy in the preoperative differentiation of reversible and non-reversible myocardial asynergy.Circulation 64: 936–944, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pohost GM, Zir LM, Moore RH, et al: Differentiation of transiently ischemic from infarcted myocardium by serial imaging after a single dose of thallium-201.Circulation 55: 294–301, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu P, Kiess MC, Okada RD, et al: The persistent defect on exercise thallium imaging and its fate after revascularization: does it represent scar or ischemia?Am Heart J 110: 996–1001, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Naruse H, Ohyanagi M, Iwasaki T, et al: Indications for coronary revascularization and the postoperative evaluations using thallium-201 exercise myocardial scintigraphy and a bull’s eye display.Am J Noninvas Cardiol 4: 352–357, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson RS, Watson DD, Taylor GJ, et al: Prospective assessment of regional myocardial perfusion before and after coronary revascularization surgery by quantitative thallium-201 scintigraphy.J Am Cardiol 1: 804–815, 1983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Depasque EE, Nody AC DePuey et al: Quantitative rotational thallium-201 tomography for identifying and localizing coronary artery disase.Circulation 77: 316–327, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sheehan FH, Bolson EL, Dodge HT, et al: Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function.Circulation 74: 293–305, 1986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rigo P, Bailey IK, Griffith LSC, et al: Value and limitation of segmental myocardial imaging for localization of coronary artery disease.Circulation 61: 973–981, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritchie JL, Trobaugh GB, Hamilton GW, et al: Myocardial imaging with thallium-201 at rest and during exercise. Comparison with coronary arteriography and resting and stress electrocardiography.Circulation 56: 66–71, 1977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolibash AJ, Call TD, Bush CA, et al: Myocardial perfusion as an indication of graft patency after coronary bypass surgery.Circulation 61: 882–887, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shabaro JA, Karunatne H, Cantez S, et al: Thallium-201 imaging in assessment of aortocoronary bypass graft patenty.Br Heart J 42: 552–561, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scholl JM, Chaitman BR, David PR, et al: Exercise electrocardiography and myocardial scintigraphy in the serial evaluation of the results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.Circulation 66: 380–399, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirzel HO, Nuesch K, Gruenzig AR, et al: Short and long term changes in myocardial perfusion after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty assessed by thallium-201 exercise scintigraphy.Circulation 63: 1001–1007, 1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wainwright RJ, Brennaud-Roger DA, Maisey MN, et al: Exercise thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy in the follow up of aortocoronary bypass graft surgery.Br Heart J 43: 56–66, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goodwin PN: Recent developments in instrumentation for emission computed tomography.Semin Nucl Med 10: 322–334, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Burow RD, Pond M, Schafer AW, et al: “Circumferential profiles: “A new method for computer analysis of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion images.J Nucl Med 20: 771–777, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Manyari DE, Knudtson M, Kloiber R, et al: Sequential thallium-201 myocardial perfusion studies after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: delayed resolution of exercise-induced scintigraphic abnormalities.Circulation 77: 86–95, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bodenheimer MM, Banka VS, Hermann GA, et al: Reversible asynergy. Histopathologic and electro-cardiographic correlations in patients with coronary artery disease.Circulation 53: 792–796, 1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gutman J, Berman DS, Freeman M, et al: Time to complete redistribution of thallium-201 in exercise myocardial scintigraphy: Relationship to the degree of coronary artery stenosis.Am Heart J 106: 989–995, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Senda M, et al: Value and limitation of stress thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography: Comparison with nitrogen-13 ammonia positron tomography.J Nucl Med 29: 1181–1188, 1988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naruse, H., Ohyanagi, M., Iwasaki, T. et al. Preoperative evaluation of myocardial viability by thallium-201 imaging in patients with old myocardial infarction who underwent coronary revascularization. Ann Nucl Med 6, 51–58 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164642

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03164642

Key words

Navigation