Skip to main content
Log in

Macroinvertebrate response to marsh management strategies in Utah

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the response of aquatic macroin vertebrates to three marsh management strategies. The three management practices compared were conventional full pool management, full pool management with carp(Cyprinus carpio) control, and controur furrowing (also with carp control). Significant differences in standing crops (both numbers and biomass) of invertebrates were observed among the three management strategies. The contour furrowed area had the highest standing crops of water column invertebrates, followed by the carp-controlled full pool area, while the conventionally managed area had the lowest standing crops. In the benthos, the two full pool areas (with and without carp) had higher standing crops than the contour furrowed area. Significant differences were noted in seasonal abundance, with all management practices having lowest densities of invertebrates in April and May. Implications for management include indications of the negative impacts of carp and winter drawdowns on invertebrates in managed marshes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Berry, C. B. 1982. Behavior and ecology of carp in the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge. Utah Cooperative Fishery Research Unit. Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danell, K. and K. Sjoberg. 1977. Seasonal emergence of chironomids in relation to egg laying and hatching of ducks in a restored lake (northern Sweden). Wildfowl 28: 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T. and G. C. Winberg. 1971. A manual on methodsfor the assessment of secondary production in fresh waters. IBP Handbook No. 17. Blackwell Scientific Pub. Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. M. 1973. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication 49.

  • Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecology 54: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, J. A. 1962. Effects of Drawdown on a Waterfowl Impoundment. Ecology 43:267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec, J. A. and L. M. Smith. 1984. Marsh plant establishment on newly flooded salt flats. Wildlife Society Bulletin 12:388–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, R. M. and H. R. Murkin. 1981. Evaluation of two devices for sampling nektonic invertebrates. Journal of Wildlife Management 45:493–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, R. M. and H. H. Prince. 1981. Dabbling duck activity and foraging responses to aquatic macroinvertebrates. Auk 98: 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krull, J. N. 1969. Seasonal occurrence of macroinvertebrates in a green-tree reservoir. N. Y. Fish and Game Journal 16: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krull, J. N. 1970. Aquatic plant macroinvertebrate associations and waterfowl. Journal of Wildlife Management 34: 707–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclachlan, A. J. 1974. Recovery of mud and fauna in a tropical lake. Limnology and Oceanography 19:74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murkin, H. R. 1983. Responses by aquatic invertebrates to prolonged flooding of marsh habitat. Ph. D. Dissertation. Utah State University. Logan, UT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murkin, H. R. and J. A. Kadlec. 1986. Relationships between waterfowl and macroinvertebrate densities in a northern prairie marsh. Journal of Wildlife Management 50:212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R. W. 1978. Freshwater invertebrates of the United States. 2nd ed. J. Wiley & Sons. Inc. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robel, R. 1961. The effects of carp populations on the production of waterfowl plant foods on a western waterfowl marsh. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Conference 26: 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shroeder. L. D. 1973. A literature review on the role of invertebrates in waterfowl management. Colorado Division of Wildlife Special Report 29.

  • Swanson, G. A. 1978. A simple lightweight core sampler for quantitating waterfowl foods. Journal of Wildlife Management 42:426–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A. and M. I. Meyer. 1973. The role of invertebrates in the feeding ecology of Anatinae during the breeding season. p. 143–185.In Waterfowl Habitat Management Symposium. Monction, NB, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voights, D. K. 1976. Aquatic invertebrate abundance in relation to changing marsh vegetation. American Midland Naturalist 95: 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weier, J. L. and D. R. Starr. 1950. The use of rotenone to remove rough fish for the purpose of improving waterfowl refuge areas. Journal Wildlife Management 14:203–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, W. R. 1976. Impoundments for waterfowl. Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper No. 22.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huener, J.D., Kadlec, J.A. Macroinvertebrate response to marsh management strategies in Utah. Wetlands 12, 72–78 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160588

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160588

Key Words

Navigation