Skip to main content
Log in

Larval shells of Late Palaeozoic naticopsid gastropods (Neritopsoidea: Neritimorpha) with a discussion of the early neritimorph evolution

  • Published:
Paläontologische Zeitschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extant neritimorphs with planktotrophic larval development have a convolute smooth larval shell which is internally resorbed. The oldest known larval shells of this type are of Triassic age. Well-preserved Late Palaeozoic neritimorph specimens have larval shells of two or more rapidly increasing well separated whorls. These larval shells resemble planktotrophic caenogastropod larval shells. This type of larval shell is possibly plesiomorphic in neritimorphs and caenogastropods. Permian/Pennsylvanian neritimorphs (Naticopsis, Trachyspird) have smooth larval shells (Naticopsidae) or larval shells with strong axial ribs (Trachyspiridae new family). The convolute low-spired round shell shape of modern neritimorphs is causally linked with the resorption of the inner teleoconch and protoconch whorls. Modern neritimorph shells with a uniform, undifferentiated inner lumen have probably evolved from naticopsid ancestors which lack resorption. It is possible that an elevated spire, deep sutures and protruding spiral larval shells would have made such internally undifferentiated shells more vulnerable for mechanical destruction and prédation. Suggestions that coiling evolved independently in neritimorphs and other Gastropoda are unlikely and contrast with the fossil record. The modern neritid larval shell has probably evolved from relatively low-spired smooth naticopsid larval shells like those reported here.

Kurzfassung

Heutige Neritimorpha mit planktotropher Larvalentwicklung besitzen eine konvolute, glatte Larvalschale, deren Windungen innen resorbiert sind. Die ältesten bekannten Larvalschalen dieses Typs sind triassischen Alters. Gut erhaltene spätpaläozoische neritimorphe Gastropoden besitzen Larvalschalen mit zwei oder mehr wohl separierten, schnell zunehmenden Windungen. Diese Larvalschalen gleichen planktotrophen Larvalschalen von Caenogastropoden. Dieser Larvalschalentyp ist möglicherweise bei Neritimorpha und Caenogastropoda plesiomorph. Permische und oberkarbonische Neritimorphe (Naticopsis, Trachyspird) haben glatte Larvalschalen (Naticopsidae) oder Larvalschalen mit starken Axialrippen (Trachyspiridae, neue Familie). Die stark kon volute niedrig gewundene, runde Schalengestalt der modernen Neritimorphen entwickelte sich zusammen mit der Resorbierung der Innenwindung des Teleoconchs und Protoconchs bzw. Beides bedingte einander. Die moderne Neritimorphenschale mit einem einheitlichen, undifferenzierten Innenraum lässt sich von einem naticopsiden Vorfahren herleiten, der noch nicht resorbiert war. Eine herausgehobene Spira, tiefe Suturen sowie eine gewundene herausragende Larvalschale hätten eine intern resorbierte Schale vermutlich anfällig für mechanische Verletzung und Angriffe von Räubern gemacht. Die Annahme, die Aufwindung habe sich bei Neritimorphen unabhängig von anderen Schnecken entwickelt ist unwahrscheinlich und steht im Widerspruch zum Fossilbericht. Die Larvalschale der modernen Neritiden entwickelte sich vermutlich aus einer glatten, niedrig gewundenen Larvalschale, wie sie hier bei karbonischen Naticopsiden dokumentiert wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandel, K. 1975. Embryonalgehäuse karibischer Meso- und Neo-gastropoden (Mollusca). — Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse1: 1–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel K. 1982. Morphologie und Bildung der frühontogenetischen Gehäuse bei conchiferen Mollusken. — Facies7: 1–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. 1988. Early ontogenetic shell and shell structure as aid to unravel gastropod phytogeny and evolution. — In:Ponder, W.F., ed., Prosobranch phylogeny. — Malacological Review, Supplement4: 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bändel, K. 1991a. Larger gastropod units present in the Triassic of the St. Cassian Formation. — Proceedings of the Tenth International Malacological Congress. Tübingen 1989: 497–502.

  • Bandel, K. 1991b. Über triassische “Loxonematoidea” und ihre Beziehungen zu rezenten und paläozoischen Schnecken. — Paläontologische Zeitschrift65: 239–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. 1991c. Schlitzbandschnecken mit perlmutteriger Schale aus den triassischen St. Cassian-Schichten der Dolomiten. — Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien92: 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. 1992. Platyceratidae from the Triassic St. Cassian Formation and the evolutionary history of the Neritomorpha (Gastropoda). — Paläontologische Zeitschrift66: 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. 1993. Trochomorpha (Archaeogastropoda) aus den St.-Cassian-Schichten (Dolomiten, Mittlere Trias). — Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien95: 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. 1997. Higher classification and pattern of evolution of the Gastropoda. A synthesis of biological and paleontological data. — Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg201: 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. 2000. The new family Cortinellidae (Gastropoda, Mollusca) connected to a review of the evolutionary history of the subclass Neritimorpha. — Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen217: 111–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. 2001. The history ofTheodoxus andNeritina connected with description and systematic evaluation of related Neritimorpha (Gastropoda). — Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg85: 65–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. 2002. Reevaluation and classification of Carboniferous and Permian Gastropoda belonging to the Caenogastropoda and their relation. — Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg86: 81–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. &Frýda, J. 1999. Notes on the evolution and higher classification of the subclass Neritimorpha (Gastropoda) with the description of some new taxa. — Geologica et Palaeontologica33: 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. &Heidelberger, O. 2001. The new family Nerrhenidae (Neritimorpha, Gastropoda) from the Givetian of Germany. — Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte12: 705–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. &Kiel, S. 2003. Relationships of Cretaceous Neritimorpha (Gastropoda, Mollusca), with the description of seven new species. — Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey78: 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K. &Riedel, F. 1994. The Late Cretaceous gastropod fauna from Ajka (Bakony Mountains, Hungary): A revision. — Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien96A: 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K.;Nützel, A. &Yancey, T.E. 2002. Larval shells and shell microstructures of exceptionally well-preserved Late Carboniferous gastropods from the Buckhorn Asphalt deposit (Oklahoma, USA). — Senckenbergiana letheae82: 639–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandel, K.;Riedel, F. &Weikert, H. 1997. Planktonic Gastropod larvae from the Red Sea: A Synopsis. — Ophelia47: 151–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, R.L. 1984.Neopilina, Neomphalus, andNeritopsis, living fossil molluscs. — In:Eldredge, N. &Stanley, S.M., eds, Living Fossils: 218–224, New York (Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøggild, O.B. 1930. The shell structure of the mollusks. — Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selkabs Skrifter, Naturvidenskabelig og Mathematisk Afdeling9: 231–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, D.R.;Work, D.M.;Mapes, R.H. &Barrick, J.E. 1994. Biostratigraphy of Middle and Late Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian-Virgilian) ammonoids. — Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin232: 1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockelie, T.G. &Yochelson E.L. 1979. Variation in a species of “worm” from the Ordovician of Spitzbergen. — Norsk Polarinstitutt, Skrifter167: 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchet, P.;Frýda, J.;Hausdorf, B.;Ponder, W.f.;Valdés, Á &Warén, A. 2005: Working classification of the Gastropoda. — In:Bouchet, P. &Rocroi, J.-P., eds., Classification and nomenclator of gastropod families. — Malacologia47: 1–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, G.C. 1909. Contribution to the morphology of the group Neritacea of aspidobranch gastropods. Part 1. The Neritidae. — Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London1908: 810–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J.G.;Bandel, K.;Buffrénil, V. de;Carlson, S.J.;Castanet, J.;Crenshaw, M.A.;Dalingwater, J.E.;Francillon-Viellot, H.;Géraudie, J.;Meunier, F.J.;Mutvei, H.;Ricqlés, A. de;Sire, J.Y.;Smith, A.B.;Wendt, J.;Williams, A. &Zylberberg, L. 1990. Glossary of skeletal biomineralization. — In:Carter, J.G., ed., Skeletal biomineralization: patterns processes and evolutionary trends: 609–671, New York (Van Nostrand Reinhold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A.;Nützel, A. &Frýda, J. accepted. Two Mississippian caenogastropod limpets from Australia and their meaning for the ancestry of the Caenogastropoda. — Journal of Paleontology.

  • Cox, L.R. &Knight, J.B. 1960. Suborders of the Archaeogastropoda. — Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London33: 262–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockery, D.T. 1993. The streptoneuran gastropods, exclusive of the Stenoglossa, of the Coffee Sand (Campanian) of northeastern Mississippi. — Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Geology, Bulletin129: 1–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzik, J. 1994. Evolution of ‘small shelly fossils’ assemblages of the Early Paleozoic. — Acta Palaeontologica Polonica39: 247–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frýda, J. 1998a. Did the ancestors of higher gastropods (Neritimorpha, Caenogastropoda, and Heterostropha) have an uncoiled shell? — In:Bieler, R. &Mikkelsen, P.M., eds., Abstracts, 13th International Malacological Congress, Washington DC: 107.

  • Frýda, J. 1998b. Higher classification of the Paleozoic gastropods inferred from their early shell ontogeny. — In:Bieler, R. &Mikkelsen, P.M., eds., Abstracts, 13th International Malacological Congress, Washington DC: 108.

  • Frýda, J. 1999a. Higher classification of the Paleozoic gastropods inferred from their early shell ontogeny. — Journal of the Czech Geological Society44: 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frýda, J. 1999b.Pragoscutula — oldest caenogastropod limpet. — Abstracts of the 65th Annual Meeting, American Malacological Society, Pittsburgh: 30.

  • Frýda, J. &Blodgett, R.B. 2001. The oldest known heterobranch gastropod,Kuskokwimia gen. nov., from the Early Devonian of west-central Alaska, with notes on the early phylogeny of higher gastropods. — Bulletin of the Czech Geological Survey76: 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frýda, J. &Heidelberger, D. 2003. Systematic position of Cyrto-neritimorpha within class Gastropoda with description of two new genera from Siluro-Devonian strata of Central Europe. — Bulletin of Geosciences8: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frýda, J. &Manda, Š. 1997. A gastropod faunule from theMonograptus uniformis graptolite Biozone (Early Lochkovian, Early Devonian) in Bohemia. — Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg80: 59–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryda, J. &Rohr, D.M. 2004. Gastropoda. — In:Webby, B.D.;Paris, F.;Droser, M.L. &Percival, I.G., eds., The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event: 184–195, New York (Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frýda, J.;Nützel, A. &Wagner, P.J. in press. Paleozoic gastropods. — In:Ponder, W.F. &Lindberg, D.L., eds, Molluscan Phylogeny, Proceedings of the World Congress of Malacology in Perth 2004.

  • Gainey, L.F. &Wise, S.W. 1980. Convergent shell morphology in intertidal gastropods. — Journal of Molluscan Studies46: 192–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, D.;Nützel, A. &Sasaki, T. in press. Phylogeny of Vetigastropoda. — In:Ponder, W.F. &Lindberg, D.L., eds, Molluscan Phylogeny, Proceedings of the World Congress of Malacology in Perth 2004.

  • Gemmellaro, G.G. 1889. La Fauna dei calcari con Fusulina della valle del fiume Sosio nella Provincia di Palermo. — Giornale di Science Naturali ed Economiche20: 97–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golikov, A.N. &Starobogatov Y.I. 1975. Systematics of prosobranch gastropods. — Malacologia15: 185–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M.J. &Yochelson, E.L. 1982a. ANaticopsis operculum found in situ (Gastropoda: Mississippian). — Journal of Paleontology56: 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M.J. &Yochelson, E.L. 1982b.Aptychus solidum is a MississippianNaticopsis (Gastropoda) operculum. — Journal of Paleontology56: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.E. 1847. A list of genera of Recent Mollusca, their synonyms and types. — Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London15: 129–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, B. 1937. La fauna perminiana del Sosio. — Palaeontographia Italica37: 58–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gründel, J. &Kaim, A. 2006. Shallow-water gastropods from Late Oxfordian sands in Kleby (Pomeriana, Poland). — Acta Paleontológica Polonica56: 121–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haszprunar, G. 1988. On the origin and evolution of major gastropod groups, with special reference to the Streptoneura. — Journal of Molluscan Studies54: 367–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, J.M. 1988. Sperm morphology and its systematic importance in the Gastropoda. — In:Ponder, W.F., ed., Prosobranch phylogeny. — Malacological Review, Supplement4: 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herholz, M. 1990: Mikromorphe Mollusken und Brachiopoden aus dem Oberkarbon des rheinisch-westfälischen Steinkohlereviers: Systematik, Paläoökologie und Stratigraphie. — Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, 141 p., Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.

  • Kaim, A. 2004. The evolution of conch ontogeny in Mesozoic open sea gastropods. — Palaeontologia Polonica62: 1–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaim, A. &Sztajner, P. 2005. The opercula of neritopsid gastropods and their phylogenetic importance. — Journal of Molluscan Studies71: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Y. 2006. Usefulness of the opercular nucleus for inferring early development in neritimorph gastropods. — Journal of Morphology267: 1120–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Y. &Kase, T. 2003. Genetic exchange between anchialine cave populations by means of larval dispersal: the case of a new gastropod speciesNeritilia cavernicola. — Zoologica Scripta33: 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Y.;Chiba, S. &Kase, T. 2002. Major adaptive radiation in ner-itopsine gastropods estimated from 28S rRNA sequences and fossil records. — Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B269: 2457–2465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J.B. 1933. The gastropods of the St. Louis, Missouri, Pennsylvanian outlier: VI. The Neritidae. — Journal of Paleontology7: 359–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J.B. 1934. The gastropods of the St. Louis, Missouri, Pennsylvanian outlier: VII. The Euomphalidae and Platyceratidae. — Journal of Paleontology8: 139–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J.B. 1941. Paleozoic gastropod genotypes. — Geological Society of America Special Papers32: 1–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J.B.;Cox, L.R.;Keen, A.M.;Batten, R.L., Yochelson, E.L. &Robertson, R. 1960: Systematic descriptions. — In:Moore, R. C, ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part I, Mollusca 1. — 1169–1310; Lawrence (Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koken, E. 1896. Die Leitfossilien. Ein Handbuch für den Unterricht und das Bestimmen von Versteinerungen. — 848 p., Leipzig (Tauchnitz).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, M.A. 1997.Byzantia: A new genus (Gastropoda: Neritopsi-dae) from the Permian of West Texas. — Journal of Paleontology71: 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kues, B.S. &Batten, R.L. 2001. Middle Pennsylvanian gastropods from the Flechado Formation, northcentral New Mexico. — Journal of Paleontology75, Supplement 1: 1–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kues, B.S.;Batten, R.L.;Erwin, D.H. &Pan Hua-zhang 2004. A Late Permian Chinese gastropod species, possibly larval, in the Middle Pennsylvanian of New Mexico. — Journal of Paleontology78: 420–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laube, G.C. 1869. Die Fauna der Schichten von St. Cassian. III. Abtheilung. Gastropoden. IL Hälfte. — Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe30: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsley, R.m.;Mapes, R.h.;Hui-JI, W. &Yochelson, E. 1989. Some new Paleozoic gastropod opercula (Pennsylvanian: Texas). — Journal of Paleontology63: 206–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, F.B. &Worthen, A.H. 1866. Descriptions of invertebrates from the Carboniferous system. — Illinois Geological Survey2:145–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwood, J.G. &Pratten, H. 1855. Notice of fossil from the Carboniferous series of the Western states. — Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Journal, second series2: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nützel, A. 1998. Über die Stammesgeschichte der Ptenoglossa (Gastropoda). — Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (E)26: 1–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nützel, A. &Frýda, J. 2003. Paleozoic plankton revolution: Evidence from early gastropod ontogeny. — Geology31: 829–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nützel, A. &Mapes, R.H. 2001. Larval and juvenile gastropods from a Mississippian black shale: Paleoecology, and implications for the evolution of the Gastropoda. — Lethaia34: 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nützel, A. &Senowbari-Daryan, B. 1999. Gastropods from the Upper Triassic (Norian-Rhaetian) Nayband Formation of central Iran. — Beringeria23: 93–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nützel, A.;Erwin, D.H. &Mapes, R.H. 2000. Identity and phylogeny of the late Paleozoic Subulitoidea (Gastropoda). — Journal of Paleontology74: 575–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Hua-zhang &Erwin, D.H. 2002. Gastropods from the Permian of Guanxi and Yunnan Provinces, South China. — Paleontological Society Memoir 56, Journal of Paleontology76, Supplement 1: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponder, W.F. &Lindberg, D.L. 1997. Towards a phylogeny of gastropod molluscs: an analysis using morphological characters. — Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society119: 83–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponder, W.F.;Colgan, D.J.;Healy, J.M.;Nützel, A.;Simone, L.R.L. &Strong, E.E. in press. Caenogastropod phylogeny. — In:Ponder, W.F. &Lindberg, D.L., eds, Molluscan Phylogeny, Proceedings of the World Congress of Malacology in Perth 2004.

  • Récluz, C.A. 1841. Description de quelques nouvelles espèces de Nérites vivantes. — Revue Zoologique de la Société Cuvier: 102–109, 147–152, 178–182, 273–278, 310–318, 333–343 (not seen, cited afterWenz 1938–44).

  • Riedel, F. 2000. Ursprung und Evolution der “höheren” Caenogastropoda. Eine paläobiologische Konzeption. — Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen (E)32: 1–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. 1971. Scanning electron microscopy of planktonic larval marine gastropod shells. — The Veliger14: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, T. 1998. Comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the Recent Archaeogastropoda. — The University Museum, The University of Tokyo Bulletin38: 1–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, R.L. 1976. Colour pattern ofNaticopsis (Naticopsis) worthe-niana, Buckhorn Asphalt Deposit, Oklahoma. — Journal of Paleontology50: 349–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S.;Togo, J. &Uozumi, S. 1991. Exoskeletal adaptations for life environment in neritacean gastropods. — In:Suga, S. &Nakahara, H., eds., Mechanisms and phylogeny of mineralization in biological systems: 397–401, Tokyo (Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, J. 1929–1935. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde. — 1154 p., Jena (Fischer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Troschel, F.H. 1856. Das Gebiss der Schnecken zur Begründung einer natürlichen Classification, Band 1. — 252 p., Berlin (Nicolaische Verlagsbuchhandlung).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waagen, W. 1880. Salt Range fossils. I, Productos Limestone fossils. 2, Pisces — Cephalopoda: supplement. Gasteropoda. — Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. Palaeontologia Indica, ser. 13, Part1(2): 73–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P.J. 2000. Exhaustion of morphological character states among fossil taxa. — Evolution54: 365–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenz, W. 1938–1944. Gastropoda, Teil I. — In:Schindewolf, O.H., ed., Handbuch der Paläozoologie6: 1639 p., Berlin (Borntraeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yochelson, E.L. 1956. Permian Gastropoda of the south-western United States: I. Euomphalacea, Trochonematacea, Pseudophoracea, Anomphalacea, Craspedostomatacea, Platyceratacea. — American Museum of Natural History Bulletin110: 173–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonge, C.M. 1947. The palliai organs of aspidobranch Gastropoda and their evolution throughout the Mollusca. — Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B232: 443–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, E.K. 1994. Early Carboniferous Mollusca from the Tamworth Belt, New South Wales, Australia. — Records of the Australian Museum46: 63–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Nützel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nützel, A., Fŕyda, J., Yancey, T.E. et al. Larval shells of Late Palaeozoic naticopsid gastropods (Neritopsoidea: Neritimorpha) with a discussion of the early neritimorph evolution. Paläontol Z 81, 213–228 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990173

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02990173

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation