Zusammenfassung
Die Arbeit behandelt die frühontogenetische Mollusken-Entwicklung der Schale und der diese bildenden Epithelien. Speziell werden Archaeogastropoden, Ammoniten und Neritaceen behandelt und mit einigen ausgewählten höheren Gastropoden verglichen, Archaeogastropoden, Neritaceen und höhere Gastropoden sind paläontologisch gut trennbare Gruppen, wenn die Bildung und Morphologie der frühontogenetischen Schalen verglichen werden. Eine Verbindung zwischen Archaeogastropoden und Ammoniten zeigt sich in der Art der Mineralisierung der organischen Primärschälchen. Cephalopoden sind generell eine ziemlich einheitliche Gruppe der Mollusken, deren Vorfahren den Vorfahren der Archaeogastropoden nahe verwandt waren. Neritaceen und höhere Schnecken verbindet die innere Befruchtung sowie der Besitz einer echten Larve, die den Archaeogastropoden wie auch den Cephalopoden fehlt. Die Ergebnisse werden in einem Schema des Entwicklungsablaufes in der Ontogenese dargestellt und zur Phylogenese des Molluskenstammes in Bezug gebracht. Hierzu werden auch einige Entwicklungsabläufe bei Käferschnecken, Muscheln und Scaphopoden miteinbezogen. Es erweist sich, daß einige in der Systematik bisher noch bewertete Eigenschaften und Merkmale nur sehr mit Vorsicht genutzt werden dürfen, während andere bisher wenig beachtete Kriterien mehr Aussagekraft besitzen als bisher vermutet. Die Bildung der Schalendrüse erweist sich als die zentrale Erfindung der Mollusken, die vermutlich während des oberen Kambriums die Conchifera entstehen ließ. Mit vielen Beispielen wird belegt, daß innerhalb aller behandelten Molluskengruppen eine Ausdeutung fossiler Schalenreste nur dann zu sinnvollen Ergebnissen führt, wenn die Bildungsweise der Schale bei rezenten Verwandten gut untersucht ist. Umgekehrt zeigt es sich, daß Modelle der Evolution der Mollusken, die nur auf Rezentbefunden basieren, in der Regel wenig Ähnlichkeit mit dem tatsächlichen Ablauf der Geschehnisse aufweisen.
Summary
The development of the early ontogenetic shell and the epithelia forming it is traced in archaeogastropods, ammonites, and neritaceans and is compared with that of some selected higher gastropods. Results are integrated into a scheme of evolution of molluscs. Here developmental stages of ontogeny are related to the evolution of mollusc classes, especially those of the conchifers. To do so in a more general way polyplacophoran, bivalve and scaphopod ontogenies are described with few examples.
The archaeogastropods form their primary shell in a way that is different from all other gastropod orders (Chapter 2). Here a bilaterally symmetrical purely organic shell is mechanically deformed by force of the soft body from the inside and the outside. During the transition from the free swimming stage to the crawling young the shell is thus pressed into trochospiral shape and mineralized rapidly afterwards by growth of aragonitic needles in the organic shell. In contrast to current theories about gastropod body torsion the coiling of the shell of archaeogastropods is independent from twisting of the soft parts inside it. This is demonstrated by the cuplike patellacean archaeogastropods. Here a bilaterally symmetrical shell can be produced by a normally torted animal. Similar independence of shell and body torsion can also be observed in quite different and unrelated gastropod groups outside of the archaeogastropods. Torsion has nothing to do with the ability of the embryo to withdraw into its shell, but is the result of differential growth of epithelia, mainly those of the visceral mass. Due to it foot and mantle cavity are brought into the right position needed in benthic life.
The early ontogentic shell of fissurellacean archaeogastropods shows several features of the same systematic value as those used in taxonomy but usually suggesting a different system. The formation of a slit occurs late during ontogeny and place of occurrence as well as absence and presence should not be overemphazised in systematics of molluscs. Shell pores also occur in these gastropods and thus are not restricted to bivalves and polyplacophores. The primary shell of the archaeogastropod can be a tool to differenciate these from all other gastropods including the Neritacea. An account of different morphologies and sculptures of the primary shell is provided.
Secretion and mineralization of the early ontogenetic shell of two Mesozoic ammonites are described and reconstructed in detail (Chapter 3). The absence of growth lines indicates the formation of the whole embryonic conch in uninterrupted contact to the gland cells (periostracum cells). After detachment from the latter the whole outer shell became mineralized, while the inner conch walls remained of organic structure. These and the whole interior of the conch were covered by mineral layers afterwards. Tissue shell connection migrated from the inner surface of the inner lip to the surface of the first septum and from there to the internal side of the third chamber during formation of the siphuncular system. The construction of the first septum preceeded that of the original siphuncular rod, while following septa were produced in connection to each segment of the siphuncle. Results are compared with some of the more modern interpretations of ammonite embryonic shell construction and function. A comparison with the development of the embryonic shell of recentSepia, Spirula, andNautilus and some fossil cephalopods provides two general trends in cephalopods: First, that the shape and mode of mineralization of the primary shell is connected to egg size and not to systematic placement, and second, that recent and fossil cephalopods alike lack a true larval stage and have extremely yolk rich eggs if compared with most other molluscs. Shape, size and structure of embryonic shells of fossil cephalopods allow the reconstruction of the course early ontogeny took. Shape size and structure of the scars formed by the attachment of the body to the shell makes it possible to differentiate endocochleates from ectocochleates. The data presented indicate that original cephalopods and primary archaeogastropods had a common ancestor, living in the Upper Cambrian, with direct development, a feature still present in both groups. First cephalopods can be reconstructed a bit more in detail and with more functional reason than found in literature up to now (Chapter 3.6.3).
The Neritacea (Chapter 4) are an independent group of gastropods, neither archaeogastropod, nor of meso-neogastropod relation. This is shown in their anatomy in their embryonic development, and in their shell morphology. The latter is analyzed in detail and will allow in the future to differentiate fossil nertiaceans from other molluscs. The shell detaches from the cells of the mantle during early ontogeny, before the visceral mass is covered by it. Early mineralization and growth lines as well as growth around the slightly torted body characterizes the embryonic shell. Its mode of coiling differs from that of the strongly convolute larval shell. These characters separate neritaceans with free larvae from all other gastropods, but when the larval phase occurs within the egg capsule a separation from higher gastropods with similar development is probelmatic.
Within Neritacea as well as within other unrelated gastropod families and orders limpet-like species are found (Chapter 4.5). The change from the coiled early ontogenetic shell to the cup-like adult shell goes along with a rearrangement of tissue shell attachment and a loss of the operculum. The animal no longer withdraws into its shell, but rather pulls its shell down onto the substrate, when in danger. The result is an externally and internally similar shell which also may become extremely similar to shells of untorted molluscs, like recent and fossil monoplacophores. It is documented that neither morphology of the internal mould, nor muscle scars, or apex position provide sound systematic evidence. The later can be gathered only from the early ontogenetic shell, but here restrictions must be taken into account.
The course of the embryonic development of higher gastropods (Chapter 5.1) is quite variable because a true larval phase is developed. During this phase plankton is eaten or this normal food of the free larva is substituted by nutrients provided within the egg capsule. The mode of development of a free larva provides systematic information expressed by the size, shape and sculpture of the shell. Where larval food is present within the egg capsule, embryonic development is adapted to this, and systematic information is lost. A number of cases shows how liquid yolk, yolk grains, and nurse eggs are taken by embryos at different stages of development. Distance from marine way of life masks the indirect course of development strongly. The fresh-water and land snails in addition, provide a good model for the formation of internal shells, that can be applied to the cephalopods as well. Here three types of tissue, originating in the shell gland and characterizing the mantle, are produced simultaneously. The muscle mantle can close over the shell gland before shell formation, thus making the shell an internal one.
Differences present in the ontogeny of molluscs makes it possible to gather information regarding the course in which evolution proceeded (Chapter 5.2). Polyplacophores branched off prior to the invention of an embryonic shell gland. Bivalves, scaphopods, archaeogastropods, cephalopods and higher gastropods developed their specific way of early shell formation independently from untorted bilaterally symmetrical common ancestors, probably at the end of the Cambrian. The protostome or deuterostome development, the type of swimming larva and the mode and way of feeding are variable features and of little use for reconstructing the phylogeny. Direct development with a adult organs appearing without transitional organs is the original type, present in archaeogastropods and cephalopods. Larvae having to metamorphose transitional organs into adult ones and thus carrying out indirect development characterize all higher gastropods and have developed independently within the bivalves.
Literatur
ABBOTT, R.T. (1974): American Seashells.—663 S., New York (Van Nostrand)
ANDERSON, D.T. (1965): The reproduction and early life histories of the gastropodsNotoacmaea petterdi, Chiazacmaea flammea, andPatelloidea alticostata.—Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales,90, 242–251, 17 Abb.
ANDREWS, E.A. (1936): Spherulites as specific characters in certain gastropods.—Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc.,56, 237–242, 3 Abb., Lancaster
AMIO, M. (1963): A comparative embryology of marine gastropods, with ecological considerations.— J. Shimonoseki Coll. Fish.,12/(2,3), 229–353, 52 Abb., Shimonoseki
ARKELL, W.J. (1957): Introduction to Mesozoic Ammonoidea.—Tratise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part L, Mollusca,4, L81-L129, Lawrence (Univ. Kansas Press)
BABIO, C.R. & THIRIOT-QUIEVREUX, C. (1975): Trochidae, Skeneidae et Skeneopsidae (Mollusca, Prosobranchia) de la region de Roscoff.—Cahiers Biol. Marine,16, 521–530, 4 Taf.
BANDEL, K. (1974): Fecal pellets of Amphineura and Prosobranchia (Mollusca) from the Caribbean Coast of Columbia (South America).—Senckenbergiana marit.,6, 1–31, 14 Abb., Frankfurt
— (1975a): Embryonalgehäuse karibischer Meso- und Neogastropoden (Mollusca).—Abh. Akad. Wiss. Lit., math.-naturwiss. Kl.,1975/1, 1–133, 21 Taf., 16 Abb., Wiesbaden
— (1975b): Embryonale und larvale Schale einiger Prosobranchier (Gastropoda, Mollusca) der Oosterschelde (Nordsee).—Hydrobiol. Bull.,9, 3–22, 26 Figs., Amsterdam
— (1975c): Das Embryonalgehäuse mariner Prosobranchier der Region von Banyuls-Sur-Mer. 1. Teil.—Vie et Milieu,25, 83–118, 6 Taf., Banyuls-Sur-Mer
— (1975d): Entwicklung der Schale im Lebensablauf zweier Gastropodenarten:Buccinum undatum undXancus angulatus (Prosobranchier, Neogastropoda).—Biomineralisation,8, 67–91, 17. Abb., 8 Taf., Stuttgart
— (1976a): Morphologie der Gelege und ökologische Beobachtungen an Muriciden (Gastropoda) aus der südlichen Karibischen See.—Verh. Nat. Ges. Basel,85, 1–32, 20 Abb., Basel
— (1976b): Morphologie der Gelege und ökologische Beobachtungen an Buccinaceen (Gastropoda) aus der südlichen Karibischen See.—Bonner Zool. Beitr.,27, 98–133, 19 Abb., Bonn
— (1976c): Die Gelege karibischer Vertreter aus den Überfamilien Strombacea, Naticacea und Tonnacea (Mesogastropoden, Mollusca).—Mitt. Inst. Colombo-Aleman Invest. Cient. Santa Marta (Kolumbien),8, 105–139, 13 Abb., Giessen
— (1976d): Observation on spawn, embryonic development and ecology of some Caribbean higher Neogastropoda (Mollusca),—Veliger,19, 176–193, 17 Abb., Berkeley
— (1977a): Übergänge von der Perlmutter-Schicht zu prismatischen Schichttypen bei Mollusken.—Biomineralisation,9, 28–47, 2 Abb., 5 Taf. Stuttgart
— (1977b): Die Herausbildung der Schraubenschicht der Pteropoden.—Biomineralisation,9, 73–85, 4 Abb., 3 Taf., Stuttgart
— (1979a): Übergänge von einfacheren Strukturtypen zur Kreuzlamellenstruktur bei Gastropodenschalen. —Biomineralisation,10, 9–37, 8 Taf., 5 Abb., Stuttgart
— (1979b): The nacreous layer in the shell of the gastropod-family Seguenziidae and its taxonomic significance.—Biomineralisation,10, 49–61, 3 Taf., Stuttgart
— (1981a): The structure and formation of the siphuncular tube ofQuenstedtoceras compared with that ofNautilus (Cephalopoda).—N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,161/2, 153–171, 9 Abb., Stuttgart
— (1981b): Struktur der Molluskenschale im Hinblick auf ihre Funktion.—Paläont. Kursbücher,1, 25–48, 17 Abb., München (Paläont. Ges.)
BANDEL, K. & BOLETZKY, S.V. (1979): A comparative study of the structure, development and morphological relationships of chambered cephalopod shells.—The Veliger 21, 313–354, 99 Abb., Berkeley
BANDEL, K. & CHRISTIAENS, J.: Fissurellacea and Patellacea from the Caribbean Sea (Columbia). —In Vorbereitung
BANDEL, K. & HEMLEBEN, C. (1975): Anorganisches Kristallwachstum bei lebenden Mollusken.— Paläont. Z.,49, 298–320, 38 Abb., Stuttgart
BANDEL, K., LANDMAN, N. & WAAGE, K.M. (1981): Micro-ornament on early whorls of Mesozoic ammonites: Implications for early ontogeny.—J. Paleont.56, 386–391, 2 Abb., Tulsa
BATTEN, R.L. (1975): The Scissurellidae- are they neotenously derived Fissurellids? (Archeogastropoda).— Amer. Mus. Novitates,2567, 1–29, 37 Abb., New York
BATTEN, R.L. & DUMONT, M.P. (1976): Shell ultrastructure of the Atlantidae (Heteropoda, Mesogastropoda)Oxygurus andProtatlanta, with comments onAtlanta inclinata.—Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,157/267–310, 60 Abb., New York
BATTEN, R.L., ROLLINS, H.B. & GOULD, S.J. (1967): Comments on “The adaptive significance of gastropod torsion.—Evolution,21, 405–406, Lawrence
BIRKELUND, T. (1967): Submicroscopic structures in early growth-stages of Maastrichtian ammonites (Saghalinites andScaphites).—Medd. Dansk Geol. Forening.,17, 95–101, Taf. 1–4, Kopenhagen
BIRKELUND, T. & HANSEN, H.J. (1968): Early shell growth and structur of the septa and the siphuncular tube in some Maastrichtian ammonites.—Medd. fra Dansk Geol. Forening. 18, 71–78, Taf. 1–4, Kopenhagen
— (1974): Shell ultrastructure of some Maastrichtian Ammonoidea and Coleoidea and their taxonomic implications.—Kong. Dansk. Vidensk. Sel. Biol. Skrift. 20, 1–34, 7 Abb., 16 Taf. Kopenhagen
BLIND, W. (1976): Die ontogenetische Entwicklung vonNautilus pompilius (LINNE).—Palaeontographica, Abt. A,153, 117–160, Stuttgart
BLOCHMANN, F. (1882): Über die Entwicklung derNeritina fluviatilis, Müll.—Z. wiss. Zool.,36, 125–174, 8 Taf., Leipzig
BOETTGER C.R. (1955): Beiträge zur Systematik der Urmollusken (Amphineura).—Zool. Anz. Suppl., 19, 223–256, 5 Abb., Leipzig
BOGGS, C.H. (1978): Development of HawaiianDiodora.—Hawaiian Shell News,26/10, 3–4, Honolulu
BONAR, D.B. & HADFIELD, M.G. (1974): Metamorphosis of the marine gastropodPhestilla sibogae Bergh (Nudibranchia, Aeolidacea).—J. exp. Biol. Ecol., 16, 227–255, 18 Abb.
BOLETZKY, S.V. (1974): The “larvae” of Cephalopoda: A review.—Thalassis Jugosl.,10/1–2, 45–76, 13 Taf., Zagreb
BONDESEN, P. (1940): Preliminary investigations into the development ofNeritina fluviatilis L. in brackish and fresh water.—Vidensk. Medd. Dansk. Nat. For.,104, 283–318, 5 Abb., Kopenhagen
BONIK, K., GRASSHOFF, M. & GUTMANN, W.F. (1976): Die Evolution der Tierkonstruktionen I–IV.—Natur und Museum,106/5,6,10, 129–143, 178–188, 303–316, Frankfurt
— (1979a): Selektionszwänge in der Ontogenese—Die Entwicklung dotterreicher Eier.— Natur und Museum,109/8, 268–278, 6 Abb., Frankfurt
BONIK, K., GRASSHOFF, M. & GUTMANN, W.F. (1979b): Die Evolution von Larven als Verbreitungsstadien bodenlebender Meerestiere.—Natur und Museum,109/3, 70–79, 6 Abb., Frankfurt
— (1979c): Die Evolution der Zellteilung in den frühen Embryonalstadien.—Natur und Museum,109/2, 52–59, 4 Abb., Frankfurt
BONIK, K., GRASSHOFF, M., GUTMANN, W.F. & KLEIN-RÖDDER R. (1977): Die Evolution der Tintenfische, ein Entwurf für das Schaumuseum.—Natur und Museum,107/8 244–250, 1 Abb., Frankfurt
BOURNE, G. (1908): Contribution to the morphology of the group Neritacea of aspidobranch gastropods. I. The Neritidae.—Proc. Zool. Soc. London,43, 810–887, London
BOUTAN, L. (1885): Recherches sur l'anatomie et le dévelopment de la Fissurelle.—Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., sér. 23/4, 1–173, Paris
BRANCO, W. (1880): Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der fossilen Cephalopoden.—Palaeotographica,27, 12–81, Stuttgart
CARRIKER, M.R. & PALMER, R.E. (1979): Ultrastructural morphogenesis of prodissoconch and early dissoconch valves of the OysterCrassostrea virginica.—Proc. Nat. Shellfish. Assoc. 69, 103–128, 63 Abb., Philadelphia
CONKLIN, E.G. (1897): The embryology ofCrepidula.—J. Morphol.,13, 1–226
COX, L.R.: General characteristics of Gastropoda.—Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, I (1), I84–I169, Lawrence
CROFTS, D.R. (1929):Haliotis.—L.M.B.C. Mem. typ. Br. mar. Pl. Anim.,29, Liverpool (University Press)
— (1937): The development ofHaliotis tuberculata, with special reference to the organogenesis during torsion.—Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B.,208, 219–268, London
— (1955): Muscle morphogenesis in primitive gastropods and its relation to torsion.— Proc. Zool. Soc. London,125, 711–750, London
D'ASARO, C.N. (1966): The egg capsules, embryogenesis, and early organogenesis of a common oyster predator,Thais haemastoma floridana (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia).—Bull. Mar. Sci.,16, 884–914, 10 Abb., Miami
— (1969): The comparative embryogenesis and early organogenesis ofBurea corrugata Perry andDistorsio clathrata Lamarck (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia).—Malacologia,9, 349–389, 18 Abb., Ann Arbor
DAUPHIN, Y. (1975): Anatomie de la Protoconque et des tours initiaux deBeudanticeras beudanti (Brongniart) etDemocerae latidorsatum (Michelin).—Ann. Paléont.61, 3–16, 4 Abb., Paris
— (1976): Microstructure des coquilles de Céphalopodes. I.Spirula spirula L. (Dibranchiata, Decapoda).—Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat., 3. ser.,382, 197–238, 23 Abb., Paris
— (1977): Anatomie de la Protoconque et des tours initiaux deUhligella walleranti Jacob (Desmoceratidae, Ammonitina) Albien de Gourdon (Alpes-Maritimes).—Ann. Paléont.63, 77–83, Paris
— (1979): Coquilles juvéniles de nautiles des îles Loyauté (Pacifique Sud).—Cahiers Indo-pacifique1/4, 447–460, 6 Abb., Montreuil
DAUTERT, E. (1929): Die Bildung der Keimblätter beiPaludina.—Zool. Jb. (Anat.),50, 433–496, Leipzig
DRUSHCHITS, V.V. & KHIAMI, N. (1969): Distinctive features in the early stages of ontogeny in certain early Cretaceous ammonites.—Misk. obshch. Ispytateley Prirody, Byull. Otdel. Geol.,2, 156–157, Leningrad
— (1970): Structure of the septa, protoconch walls and initial whorl in early Cretaceous ammonites.—Paleont. J.,1, 26–38, Falls Church
DZIK, J. (1978): Larval development of hyolithids.—Lethaia,11, 293–299, 7 Abb., Oslo
— (1980): Ontogeny ofBactrotheca and related hyoliths.—Geol. Fören. Stockholm Förh., 102/3, 223–233, 8 Abb., Stockholm
ERBEN, H.K. (1962): Über den Prosipho, die Prosutur und die Ontogenie der Ammonoidea.— Paläont. Z.,36, 99–108, Stuttgart
— (1964): Die Evolution der ältesten Ammonoidea.—N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,120, 107–212, Stuttgart
— (1966): Über den Ursprung der Ammonoidea.—Biol. Rev.,41, 641–658, 8 Abb.
ERBEN, H.K. & FLAJS, G. (1975): Über die Cicatrix der Nautiloideen.—Mitt. Geol. Paläont. Inst. Univ. Hamburg,44, 59–68, 6 Taf., 2 Abb., Hamburg
ERBEN, H.K., FLAJS, G. & SIEHL, A. (1969): Die frühontogenetische Entwicklung der Schalenstruktur ectocochleater Cephalopoden.—Palaeontographica, A132, 154, Stuttgart
ERBEN, H.K. & REID, R.E.H. (1971): Ultrastructure of shell, origin of conellae and siphuncular membranes in an ammonite.—Biomineralisation,3, 22–31, 2 Taf., 1 Abb., Stuttgart
FIORONI, P. (1966): Zur Morphologie und Embryogenese des Darmtraktes und der transitorischen Organe bei Prosobranchiern (Mollusca, Gastropoda).—Rev. Suisse Zool.,73, 621–876, 113 Abb., Genf
— (1967): Molluskenembryologie und allgemeine Entwicklungsgeschichte.—Verh. naturforsch. Ges. Basel,78, 283–307, Basel
— (1970): Umwegige Entwicklung.—Naturwiss. Rundschau,23, 353–360, 13 Abb., 4 Taf., Stuttgart
— (1974): Die Sonderstellung der Tintenfische.—Naturwiss. Rundschau,27, 133–143, 11 Abb., Stuttgart
— (1979): Phylogenetische Abänderungen der Gastrula bei Mollusken. In SIEWING, R. (Ed.): Ontogenese und Phylogenese. Erlanger Symp. für Strukturanalyse und Evolutionsforsch., 1977, 82–100, 7 Abb., Hamburg-Berlin (Parey)
FIORONI, P. & PORTMANN, A. (1968): Zur Morphogenese und der Larvalorgane vonFusus (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia).—Rev. Suisse Zool.,75, 833–882, 27 Abb., 5 Tab., Genf
FIORONI, P. & SCHMEKEL, L. (1975): Entwicklung und Biotopabhängigkeit bei Gastropoden—ein entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Vergleich.—Forma et Functio,8, 209–252, 10 Abb., Pergamon Press
FRETTER, V. (1965): Functional studies of the anatomy of some neritid prosobranchs.—J. Zool.,147, 46–74
— (1969): Aspects of metamorphosis in prosobranch gastropods.—Proc. Malac. Soc. London,38, 375–386, 3 Abb., London
— (1972): Metamorphic changes in the velar musculature, head and shell of some prosobranch veligers.—J. mar. biol. Ass.,52, 161–177, Plymouth
FRETTER, V. & GRAHAM, A. (1962): British prosobranch mollusks.—Royal Society, London, 1–755, London
FRETTER, V. & MONTGOMERY, M.C. (1968): The treatment of food by prosobranch veligers.— J. mar. biol. Ass.,48, 499–520, 4 Abb., Plymouth
FISCHER, F.P. (1980): Fine structure of the larval eye ofLepidochitona cinerea L.—Spixiana,3, 53–57, 6 Abb., München
FOURNIÉ, J. (1979): Etude des cellutes libres présentes à la surface interne de la coquille d'Agriolimax reticulatus (Müller), origine et rôle dans la mise en place de l'hypostracum.— Ann. Science Nat. Zool. Paris 13e série, Vol. 1, 169–185, 27 Abb., 1 Tab., Paris
GARSTANG, W. (1929): The origin and evolution of larval forms.—Rep. Br. Ass. Advmt. Sci. 1928 (Glasgow), sect. D, 77–98, Glasgow
GIESE, K. (1978): Zur Embryonalentwicklung vonBuccinum undatum L. (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia, Stenoglossa (Neogastropoda), Buccinacea).—Zool. Jb. Anat.,100, 65–117, 20 Abb., Jena
GÖTTING, K.J. (1974): Malakozoologie.—1–320, Stuttgart (G. Fischer)
— (1980): Argumente für die Deszendenz der Mollusken von metameren Antezedenten.—Zool. Jb. Anat.,103, 211–218, 2 Abb., Jena
GRANDJEAN, F. (1910): Le siphon des ammonites et des bélemnites.—Bull. Soc. géol. France, sér. 4,10, 496–519, Paris
GUTMANN, W.F. (1974): Die Evolution der Mollusken-Konstruktion: ein phylogenetisches Modell.—In: Schäfer, W. (Ed.): Aufsätze und Reden. Senckenberg. naturforsch. Ges.,25, 1–84, Frankfurt
HAAS, W. (1972): Untersuchungen über die Mikro- und Ultrastruktur der Polyplacophorenschale.,— Biomineralisation,5, 1–52, 6 Abb., 18 Taf., Stuttgart
HAAS, W. & KRIESTEN, K. (1974): Studien über das Mantelepithel vonLepidochitona cinera (L) (Placophora).—Biomineralisation,7, 100–109, 11 Abb., Stuttgart
— (1978): Die Ästheten mit intrapigmentärem Schalenauge vonChiton marmoratus L.— Zoomorphol,90, 253–268, 15 Abb.
— (1982): Evolution of calcareous hardparts in primitive molluscs.—Malacologia,21, 403–418, 14 Abb., Ann Arbor
HAAS, W., KRIESTEN, K. & WATABE, N. (1979): Notes on the shell formation in the larvae of the Placophora (Mollusca).—Biomineralisation,10, 1–8, 13 Abb., Stuttgart
HAMADA, T., OBATA, I. & OKUTANI T. (1980):Nautilus macromphalus in captivity. —Tokai University Press, 1–80, Tokio
HATSCHEK, B. (1978): Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Anneliden.—Arb. Zool. Inst. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien,1, 277–404, Wien
HESS, O. (1956): Die Entwicklung von Exogastrulakeimen bei dem Süßwasser ProsobranchierBithynia tentaculata.—Roux Archiv Entwicklungsmech.,148, 474–488, 9 Abb., Berlin
HOARE, R.D. & STURGEON, M.T. (1978): The Pennsylvanian gastropod generaCyclozyga andHeminthozyga and the classification of the Pseudozygopleuridae.—J. Paleont.,52, 850–858, 13 Abb., 2 Tab., Tulsa
HORNY, R.J. (1963):Archaeopraga, a new problematic genus of Monoplacophoran Mollusc from the Silurian of Bohemia.—J. Paleont.,37, 1071–1073, Tulsa
— (1965):Cyrolites Conrad, 1938 and its position among the Monoplacophora (Mollusca).— Sbornik Narodniho Mus. Racze,21, (B), 57–70, Prag
HYMAN, L.H. (1967): The Invertebrates. Vol. 6, 1–792, New York (McGraw Hill)
IHERING, H. (1922): Phylogenie und Systematik der Mollusken.—Arch. Molluskenk.,1, 1–115, Frankfurt
JEFFREYS, J.G. (1865): British Conchology. Vol. 3 393 S., London (Van Voorst)
JELETZKY, J.A. (1966): Comparative morphology, phylogeny, and classification of fossil Coleoidea.—Univ. Kansas Paleont. Contr., Mollusca, art. 7, 1–162, 12 Abb., 25 Taf., Lawrence
JORDAN, R. (1968): Zur Anatomie mesozoischer Ammoniten nach den Strukturelementen der Gehäuse-Innenwand.— Beih. geol. Jb.,77, 1–64, 10 Taf., 26 Abb., Hannover
JUNG, P. (1975): Quarternary larval gastropods from Leg 15, Site 147, Deep Sea Drilling Project, Preliminary Report.—The Veliger,18, 109–126, 120 Abb., Berkeley
KAISER, P. & VOIGT, E. (1977): Über eine als Gastropodenlaich gedeutete Eiablage in einer Schale vonPseudopecten aus dem Lias von Salzgitter.—Paläont. Z.,51, 5–11, 2 Taf., Stuttgart
KNIGHT, J.B., COX, L.R., KEEN, A.M., BATTEN, R.L., YOCHELSON, E.L. & ROBERTSON, R. (1960): Archaeogastropoda.—Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, I, Mollusca (1), I169-I309, Lawrecne
KNIGHT, J.B. & YOCHELSON, E.L. (1960): Monoplacophora..—Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, i, Mollusca (1), i77-i83, Lawrence
KNIPRATH, E. (1975): Das Wachstum des Mantels vonLymnaea stagnalis (Gastropoda).—Cytobiol.,10, 260–267, 6 Abb.
— (1977): Zur Ontogenese des Schalenfeldes vonLymnaea stagnalis.—Roux. Arch.,181, 11–30, 7 Abb., Berlin
KWALEVSKY, M.A. (1883): Embryogénie duChiton polii Phil., avec quelques remarques sur le développement des autres Chitons.—Ann. Mus. Hist nat. Marseille,1/1–46, Marseille
KULICKI, C. (1974): Remarks on the embryogeny and postembryonal development of ammonites.— Acta Palaeont. Polonica,19, 201–224, Taf. 4–9, 8 Abb., Warszawa
— (1975): Structure and mode of origin of the ammonite proseptum.—Acta Palaeont Polonica,20, 535–542, Taf., 38–39, 3 Abb., Warszawa
KULICKI, C. (1979): The ammonite shell: Its structure, development and biological significance.— Palaeontologia Polonica,398, 97–142, Taf., 24–48, 10 Abb., Warszawa
LACAZE-DUTHIERS, H., de, (1856–1857): Histoire de l'organisation et du développment du dentale.—Ann. Sci. nat., (Zool.),4/7, 171–255, Paris
LALLI, C.M. & CONOVER, R.J. (1976): Microstructure of the veliger shell of gymnosomatous Pteropods (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia).—The Veliger, 18/3, 237–240, Berkeley
LEBOUR, M.V. (1936): Notes on the eggs and larvae of some Plymouth prosobranchs.—J. mar. Ass.,20, 547–565, Plymouth
— (1937): The eggs and larvae of the British prosobranch with special reference to those living in the plankton.—J. mar. Ass.,22, 105–166, Plymouth
LEHMANN, U. (1976): Ammoniten, 1–171, 143 Abb., Stuttgart (Enke)
LEMCHE, H. (1957): A new living deep-sea mollusc of the Cambro-Devonian Class Monoplacophora.— Nature,179, 413–416, London
LEMCHE, H. & WINGSTRAND, K.G. (1959): The anatomy ofNeopilina galatheae Lemche, 1957.— Galathea Rept.,3, 9–71.
LEWIS, J.B. (1960): The fauna of rocky shores of Barbados, West Indies—Can. J. Zool,38, 391–435
LINDBERG, D.R. (1979):Problacmaea moskalevi Golikov & Kussakin, a new addition to the Eastern Pacific limpet fauna.—The Veliger,22, 57–61, 40 Taf., 13 Abb., Berkeley
MAPES, R.H. (1979): Carboniferous and Permian Bactritoidea (Cephalopoda) in North America.— The Univ. Kansas Paleont. Contr.64, 1–75, 14 Abb., 41 Taf., Lawrence
MAREK, L. & YOCHELSON, E.L. (1976): Aspects of the biology of Hyolitha (Mollusca).—Lethaia,9, 65–82, 4 Abb., Oslo
MCLEAN, J.H. (1979): A new monoplacophoran limpet from the continental shelf off Southern California.—Contr. Sci. Natur. Hist. Mus. Los Angeles County 307, 1–19, 25 Abb., Los Angeles
MEISENHEIMER, J. (1897): Entwicklungsgeschichte vonLimax maximus L.I. Furchung und Keimblätterbildung.— Z. wiss. Zool.,62, 415–468, Taf., 20–23, 10 Abb., Leipzig
— (1898): Entwicklungsgeschichte vonLimax maximus L. II Die Larvenperiode.—Z. wiss. Zool.,63, 573–664, Taf., 32–40, 20 Abb., Leipzig
MENZIES, R.J. (1968): New species ofNeopilina, of the Cambro-Devonian Class Monoplacophora from the Milne-Edwards Deep of the Peru-Chile Trench, R/V Anton Bruun.—Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, Proc. Sympos. Mollusca, Symp. Ser.,3, 1–9, Bombay
MILLER, A.K. & UNKLESBAY, A.G. (1943): The siphuncle of late Paleozoic ammonoids.—J. Paleont.17, 1–25, Tulsa
MOOR, B. (1977): Zur Embryologie vonBradybaena (Eulota) fruticum Müller (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Stylommatophora).—Zool. Jb., Anat.,97, 323–399, 27 Abb., Jena
MUTVEI, H. (1957): On the relations of the principal muscles in the shell inNatilus and some fossil Nautiloids.—Arkiv Min. Geol.,2/3, 10, 219–254, 20 Taf., 24 Abb., Stockholm
NAEF, A. (1921–1928): Die Cephalopoden.—Fauna und Flora des Golfs von Neapel 35. Monogr., 2 Bände, Neapel
— (1922): Die fossilen Tintenfische eine paläozoische Monographie.—1–322 Jena (G. Fischer)
OCKELMANN, K.W. (1965): Developmental types in marine Bivalves and their distribution along the Atlantic Coast of Europe.—In: COX, L.R., & PEAKE, J.F. (Ed.): Proc. 1. Europ. Malacol. Congr., 25–35, London
OTTO, H. & TÖNNIGES, C. (1906): Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung vonPaludina vivipara. —Z. wiss. Zool.80, 411–514, Taf. 22–27, 29 Abb., Leipzig
PEARSE, J.S., (1979): Polyplacophora.—In: GIESE, A.C., & PEARSE, J.S. (Ed.): Reproduction of marine invertebrates,5, 27–85
PELSENEER P. (1911): Recherches sur l'embryologie des gastéropodes.—Mem. Acad. Belg., Cl. Sci., Ser. II-3, 1–167, Brüssel
PILKINGTON, M.C., (1910): Young stages and metamorphosis in an atlantid heteropod occurring off South-Eastern New Zealand.—Proc. malac. Soc. London,39, 117–124, London
POJETA, J. (1978): The origin and early taxonomic diversification of pelecypods.—Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B284, 225–243, 20 Taf., 9 Abb., 2 Tab., London
POJETA, J. & RUNNEGAR, B. (1976): The paleontology of the rostroconch mollusks and the early history of the phylum Mollusca.—Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap.,968, 1–88, 54 Taf., 14 Abb., 3 Tab., Washington
RAVEN, C.P. (1952): Morphogenesis inLimnaea stagnalis and its disturbance by Lithium.— J. Exper. Zool.,121, 1–78
RICHTER, G. & THORSON, G. (1975): Pelagische Prosobranchier-Larven des Golfes von Neapel.— Ophelia13, 109–185, 20 Taf., Oslo
RISTEDT, H. (1971): Zum Bau der Orthoceriden Cephalopoden.—Palaeontographica, A137, 155–195, Taf., 28–42, 7 Abb., Stuttgart
ROBERT, A. (1902): Recherches sur le développement des Troques.—Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén. 3 ser.,10, 269–538
ROBERTSON, R. (1971): Scanning electron microscopy of planktonic larval marine Gastropod shells.—The Veliger,14, 1–12, 34 Abb., Berkeley
ROLLINS, H. & BATTEN, R. (1968): A sinus-bearing monoplacophoran and its role in the classification of primitive molluscs.—Palaeontology,11, 132–140, London
RUNNEGAR, B. & JELL, P. (1976): Australian Middle Cambrian molluscs and their bearing on early molluscan evolution.—Alcheringa1, 109–138, 11 Abb., Northfield
RUNNEGAR, B. & POJETA, J. (1974): Molluscan phylogeny: the paleontological viewpoint.— Science,186, 311–317, 5 Abb., New York
RUNNEGAR, B. (1976): Origin and evolution of the class Rostroconchia.—Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B284, 319–330, 12 Abb., Cambridge
SALVINI-PLAWEN, L. v. (1968): Beiträge zur Systematik der niederen Mollusken.—Marine Biological Association of India, Proc. Symp. 3/Mol. (1), 248–256, Calcutta
— (1969): Solenogastres und Caudofoveata (Mollusca, Aculifera): Organisation und phylogenetische Bedeutung.—Malacologia,9, 191–216, 15 Abb., Ann Arbor
— (1980a): A reconsideration of systematics in the Mollusca (phylogeny, and higher classification).—Malacologia 19, 249–278, 5 Abb., 4 Tab., Ann Arbor
— (1980b): Was ist eine Trochophora? Eine Analyse der Larventypen mariner Protostomier. —Zool. Jb. Anat.,103, 389–423, 15 Abb., Jena
— (1980c): Phylogenetischer Status und die Bedeutung der Mesenchymaten Bilateria.— Zool. Jb. Anat.,103, 354–373, 6 Abb., Jena
SANDBERGER, G.F. (1850–1856): Die Versteinerungen, des Rheinischen Schichtensystems in Nassau.—1–564, Wiesbaden
SASTRY, A.N. (1979): Pelecypoda (excluding Ostreidae).—In: GIESE, A.C. & PEARSE, J.S. (Eds.): Reproduction of marine invertebrates,5, 113–292
SCARLATO, O.A. & STAROBOGATOV, Y.I. (1978): Phylogenetic relations and the early evolution of the class Bivalvia.—Phil. Trans. Roy Soc. London, B,284, 217–224, 2 Abb., Cambridge
SCHÄFER, w. (1955): Über die Bildung der Laichballen der Wellhorn-Schnecken.—Natur und Volk,85, 92–97, 6 Abb., Frankfurt
SCHELTEMA, R.S. (1971): Larval dispersal as a means of genetic exchange between geographically separated populations of shallow-water benthic marine gastropods.—Biol. Bull.,140, 284–322, Abb. 12, 6 Tab.
— (1971): The dispersal of the larvae of shoal-water benthic invertebrate species overlong distance by ocean currents.—Fourth European Biol. Symp., z-28, 7 Abb., Cambridge (Univ. Press)
SCHINDEWOLF, O.H. (1928): Zur Terminologie der Lobenlinie.—Paläont. Z.,9, 181–186, Stuttgart
SCHRÖDER, O. (1907): Beiträge zur Histologie des Mantels vonCalyculina (Cyclas) lacustris Müller.—Zool. Anz.,31, 506–510, 2 Abb., Leipzig
SMITH, F.G. (1935): The development ofPatella vulgata.—Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., B.,225, 95–125, Cambridge
SATH, L.F. (1933): The evolution of the Cephalopoda.—Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.,8, 418–462, Cambridge
SPIESS, P.E. (1971): Organogenese des Schalendrüsenkomplexes bei einigen coleoiden Cephalopoden des Mittelmeeres.—Rev. Suisse Zool.,79, 167–226, 10 Taf., 15 Abb., 8 Taf., Genf
STASEK, C.R. (1972): The molluscan framework.—In: FLORKIN, M. & SCHEER, B.T. (Eds.): Chemical Zoology,7, Acad. Press, N.Y.
STASEK, C.R. & McWWILLIAMS, W.R. (1973): The comparative morphology and evolution of the molluscan mantle edge.—The Veliger,16, 1–19, Berkeley
STENZEL, H.B. (1964): LivingNautilus. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, K. Mollusca 3, K59-K93, Lawrence
STRATHMANN, R.R. (1978): The evolution and loss of feeding larval stages of marine invertebrates. —Evolution,32, 894–906, 2 Abb., Lawrence
SWEET, W.C. (1959): Muscle-attachment impressions in some Paleozoic nautiloid cephalopods.— J. Paleont.,33, 293–304, Tulsa
— (1964): Nautiloidea-Orthocerida.—Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, K, Mollusca 3, K216-K260, Lawrence
TANABE, K., FUKUDA, Y. & OBATA, I. (1980): Ontogenetic development and functional morphology in the early growth-stages of three Cretaceous ammonits.—Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus. Ser. C,6, 9–26, 5 Taf., Tokyo
TANABE, K., OBATA, I., FUKUDA, Y. & FUTAKAMI, M. (1979): Early shell growth in some Upper Cretaceous ammonites and its implications to major taxonomy.—Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus., Ser. C,5, 153–176, 6 Taf., Tokyo
TAYLOR, D.W. & SOHL, N.F. (1962): An outline of gastropod classification.—Malacologia,1, 7–32, Ann Arbor
TEICHERT, C. (1967): Major features of cephalopod evolution,—In: TEICHERT, C. & YOCHELSON, E.L. (Eds.): Essays in Paleontology and Stratigraphy, 162–210, Kansas Univ. Dept. Geol. Spec. Publ.,2, 20 Abb., 1 Tab., Lawrence
THIELE, J. (1929–1935): Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde, 2 Bänder, Jena, (Fischer)
THOMPSON, T.E. (1967): Adaptive significance of gastropod torsion.—Malacologia,5, 423–430, 3 Abb., Ann Arbor
THORSON, G. (1935): Studies on the egg capsules and development of Arctic marine prosobranchs. —Medd. Groenl.,100, 1–71, Kopenhagen
— (1946): Reproduction and larval development of Danisch marine bottom invertebrates.— Meddel. Komm. Havundersoeg., Ser. Plankton,4, 1–523, Kopenhagen
— (1967):Clanculus bertheloti D'Orbigny, 1839: Eine brutpflegende prosobranchiate Schnecke aus der Brandungszone von Teneriffa.—Z. Morph. ökol. Tiere,60, 162–175, 10 Abb., Berlin
TIMMERMANS, L.P.M.: (1969): Studies on shell formation in molluscs.—Netherl. J. Zool.,19, 417–523, 14 Taf., 6 Abb., Leiden
TROSCHEL, F.H. (1856–1893): Das Gebiss der Schnecken, zur Begündung einer natürlichen Classification,1, 1–252,2, 1–409, Berlin
UNDERWOOD, A. (1972): Spawning, larval development and settlement behavior ofGibbula cineraria (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia), with a reappraisal of torsion in gastropods.— Marine Biol.,17, 341–349
VOGEL, K. & GUTMANN, W.F. (1980): The derivation of pelecypods: role of biomechanics, physiology and environment.—Lethaia,13, 269–275, 2 Abb., Olso
WALLER, T.R. (1980): Scanning electron microscopy of shell and mantle in the order Arcoida (Mollusca: Bivalvia).—Smithsonian Contr. Zool.,313, 1–58, 1 Taf., 46 Abb., Washington
WALLER, T.R. (1981): Functional morphology and development of veliger larvae of the European oyster,Ostrea edulis Linné.—Smithsonian Contr. Zool.,328, 1–70, 152 Abb., Washington
WARD, J. (1966): The breeding cycle of the keyhole limpet,Fissurella barbadensis.—Bull. Mar. Sci.,16, 685–695, Miami
WEBBER, H.H. (1979): Gastropoda: Prosobranchia.—In: GIESE, A.C. & PEARSE, J.S. (Eds.): Reproduction of marine invertebrates,5.
WENZ, W. (1938–1944): Gastropoda, Teil 1, Allgemeiner Teil und Prosobranchia.—In: SCHINDEWOLF, O.H. (Ed.): Handbuch der Paläontologie,6, 1639 S., Berlin (Borntraeger)
WIERZEJSKI, A. (1905): Embryologie vonPhysa fontinalis L..—Z. wiss. Zool.,83, 502–706, Taf. 18–27, 8 Abb., Leipzig
YOCHELSON, E.L. (1971):Nevadaspira, a new Devonian septate gastropod.—In: DUTRO, J.T. (Ed.): Paleozoic Perspectives: a Paleontologic Tribute to G. Arthur Cooper. Smithsonian Contr. Paleont.,3, 233–241, London
— (1978): An alternative approach to the interpretation of the phylogeny of ancient mollusks.—Malacologia,17, 165–191, 1 Abb., Ann Arbor
YOCHELSON, E.L., FLOWER, R.H. & WEBERS, G.F. (1973): The bearing of the new Late Cambrian genusKnightoconus Mollusca: Monoplacophora) upon the origin of the Cephalopoda.— Lethaia,6, 275–310, 10 Abb., Oslo
YONGE, C.M. (1960): General characters of Mollusca.—Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, I, Mollusca 1, 13–136, Lawrence
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bandel, K. Morphologie und Bildung der frühontogenetischen Gehäuse bei conchiferen Mollusken. Facies 7, 1–197 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02537225
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02537225