Skip to main content
Log in

Differing susceptibility toBacillus thuringiensis formulations ofThaumetopoea wilkinsoni populations between forests with differentBt management in Israel

  • Entomology
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The susceptibility ofThaumetopoea wilkinsoni larvae toBacillus thuringiensis (Bt) formulations was screened in 2003 and 2004. Eggs and larvae were collected from pine forests in 11 geographical locations in Israel. Larval mortality bioassays were conducted with commercial formulations (Delfin WG, Dipel DF and Foray 48B) at concentrations ranging from 0.001% to 0.1%. Significant differences in susceptibility toBt were recorded among populations that were treated withBt intensively, frequently, or never. The mortality recorded in a population that was never treated withBt was twice that in an intensivelyBt-treated population. The correlation between susceptibility toBt and the possible resistance to the microbe is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Battisti, A., Longo, S., Tiberi, R. and Triggiani, O. (1998) Results and perspectives in the use ofBacillus thuringiensis Berl. var.kurstaki and other pathogens againstThaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. et Schiff.) in Italy (Lep., Thaumetopoeidae).Anz. Schaedlkd. Pflanzenschutz Umweltschutz 71:72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Demolin, G. and Martin, J.C. (1998) Control of pine-tree processionary caterpillar. Effectiveness and persistence of the activity of two formulations based onBacillus thuringiensis.Phytoma 507:11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farinós, G., de la Poza, M., Hernández-Crespo, P., Ortego, F. and Castañera P. (2004) Resistance monitoring of field populations of the corn borersSesamia nonagrioides andOstrinia nubilalis after 5 years of Bt maize cultivation in Spain.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 110:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferré, J. and van Rie, J. (2002) Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance toBacillus thuringiensis.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:501–533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halperin, J. (1969) Prolonged pupal diapause inThaumetopoea wilkinsoni Tams.J. Appl. Entomol. 64:62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halperin, J. (1990) Life history ofThaumetopoea spp. (Lep. Thaumetopoeidae) in Israel.J. Appl. Entomol. 110:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huchon, H. and Démolin, G. (1971) La bioécologie de la processionaire du pin. Dispersion potentielle. Dispersion actuelle.Phytoma 23:11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iqbal, M., Verkerk, R.H.J., Furlong, M.J., Ong, P.C., Rahman, S.A. and Wright, D.J. (1996) Evidence for resistance toBacillus thuringiensis (Bt) subsp.kurstaki HD-1, Bt subsp.aizawai and Abamectin in field populations ofPlutella xylostella from Malaysia.Pestic. Sci. 48:89–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Y.B., Tabashnik, B. and Pusztai-Carey, M. (1996) Field-evolved resistance toBacillus thuringiensis toxin CryIC in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 89:798–804.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Masutti, L. and Battisti, A. (1990)Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Den. & Schiff.): bionomics and perspectives of integrated control.J. Appl. Entomol. 110:229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moore, I., Halperin, J. and Navon, A. (1962) Laboratory and field trials in the bacterial control of the pine processionary caterpillarThaumetopoea wilkinsoni Tams withBacillus thuringiensis var.thuringiensis Berliner.Isr. J. Agric. Res. 12:167–173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rausell, C., Martinez-Ramirez, A.C., Garcia-Robles, I. and Real, M.D. (2000) A binding site forBacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin is lost during larval development in two forest pests.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1553–1558.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. SAS Institute (2003) SAS/STAT User’s Guide for SAS. Cary, NC, USA.

  14. Shevelev, A., Battisti, A., Volynskaya, A., Novikova, S., Kostina, L. and Zalunin, I. (2001) Susceptibility of the pine processionary caterpillarThaumetopoea pityocampa (Lepidoptera: Thaumetopoeidae) towardδ-endotoxins ofBacillus thuringiensis under laboratory conditions.Ann. Appl. Biol. 138:255–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Solt, I. and Mendel, Z. (2002) The pine processionary caterpillarThaumetopoea pityocampa.Harefuah 141:810–814 (Hebrew, with English abstract).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tabashnik, B.E. and Carrière, Y. (2004) Bt transgenic crops do not have favorable effects on resistant insects.J. Insect Sci. 4:4 (published online).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tabashnik, B.E., Cushing, N., Finson, N. and Johnson, M. (1990) Field development of resistance toBacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 83:1671–1676.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tabashnik, B.E., Finson, N. and Johnson, M. (1991) Managing resistance toBacillus thuringiensis: lesson from the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 84:49–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Mendel.

Additional information

http://www.phytoparasitica.org posting Jan. 31, 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gindin, G., Navon, A., Saphir, N. et al. Differing susceptibility toBacillus thuringiensis formulations ofThaumetopoea wilkinsoni populations between forests with differentBt management in Israel. Phytoparasitica 35, 179–190 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981112

Key words

Navigation