Abstract
Genetic tests were carried out in the greenhouse to determine whether resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in the tomato cultivar Ontario 7710 and in the wild accession PI 126430 (Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium) was controlled by different genes. Ontario 7710 (genotype of resistance Pto/Pto), PI 126430, their F! and F2 progenies and F( x susceptible progenies were tested for resistance to the bacterial speck pathogen. No lesions appeared on inoculated leaves in plants of Ontario 7710, PI 126430 and the Fj hybrid. F2 progenies segregated for resistance (symptomless) and susceptibility (50-80 lesions per plant) at a ratio of 15:1. Plants from the cross Fj x susceptible segregated at a ratio of 3 resistant: 1 susceptible. These data indicate that the gene for resistance in PI 126430 is different from that found in Ontario 7710. The gene symbol Pto-2 is proposed for the resistance factor in PI 126430.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clayberg, CD., Butler, L., Kerr, E.A., Rick, CM. and Robinson, R.W. (1970) Rules for nomenclature in tomato genetics.Tomato Genet. Coop. Rep.20:3–5.
Fallilk, E., Bashan, Y., Okon, Y., Cahaner, A. and Kedar, N. (1983) Inheritance and sources of resistance to bacterial speck of tomato caused byPseudomonas syringae pv.tomato. Ann. appl. Biol.102:365–371.
Fallik, E., Bashan, Y., Okon, Y. and Kedar, N. (1984) Genetics of resistance to bacterial speck of tomato caused byPseudomonas syringae pv.tomato. Ann. appl. Biol. 104:321–325.
Gitaitis, R.D., Phatak, S.C., Jaworski, C.A. and Smith, M.W. (1982) Resistance in tomato transplants to bacterial speck.Pl. Dis. 66:210–211.
Laterrot, H. (1983) Reoccurrence of Pto.Tomato Genet. Coop. Rep. 33:2–3.
Laterrot, H. and Rat, B. (1981) Efficacité de ľorigine Canadienne de resistance à Pseudomonas tomato. Proc. Eucarpia Tomato Working Group (Avignon, France), pp. 257–267.
Lawson, V.F. and Summers, W.L. (1984) Resistance toPseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in wildLycopersicon species.Pl. Dis. 68:139–141.
Pelham, J. (1969) Isogenic lines to identify physiologic strains of TMV.Tomato Genet. Coop. Rep. 19:18–19.
Pilowsky, M. and Zutra, D. (1982) Screening wild tomatoes for resistance to bacterial speck pathogen (Pseudomonas tomato).Pl. Dis. 66:46–17.
Pitblado, R.E. (1983) Genetics of resistance to bacterial speck caused byPseudomonas syringae pv.tomato in field tomatoes.Diss. Abstr. Int. 44:1665B.
Pitblado, R.E. and Kerr, E.A. (1980) Resistance to bacterial speck (Pseudomonas tomato) in tomato.Acta Hort. 100:379–382.
Volcani, Z., Zutra, D. and Cohn, R. (1971) [Bacterial speck of tomato.]Hassadeh 51: 751–753. (in Hebrew)
Yunis, H., Bashan, Y., Okon, Y. and Henis, Y. (1980) Two sources of resistance to bacterial speck of tomato caused byPseudomonas tomato.Pl. Dis. 64:851–852.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pilowsky, M., Zutra, D. Reaction of different tomato genotypes to the bacterial speck pathogen (pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato). Phytoparasitica 14, 39–42 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980476
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980476