Abstract
The impact assessment of the consumption of abiotic resources, such as fossil fuels or minerals, is usually part of the Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) in LCA studies. The problem with the consumption of such resources is their decreasing availability for future generations. In currently available LCA methods (e.g. Eco-indicator’ 99/Goedkoop and Spriensma 1999, CML/Guinée 2001), the consumption of various abiotic resources is aggregated into one summarizing indicator within the characterization phase of the LCIA. This neglects that many resources are used for different purposes and are not equivalent to each other. Therefore, the depletion of reserves of functionally non-equivalent resources should be treated as separate environmental problems, i.e. as separate impact sub-categories. Consequently, this study proposes assigning the consumption of abiotic resources to separate impact sub-categories and, if possible, integrating them into indicators only according to their primary function (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil → consumption of fossil fuels; phosphate rock → consumption of phosphate). Since this approach has been developed in the context of LCA studies on agricultural production systems, the impact assessment of the consumption of fossil fuels, phosphate rock, potash salt and lime is of particular interest and serves as an example. Following the general LCA framework (Consoli et al. 1993, ISO 1998), a normalization step is proposed separately for each of the subcategories. Finally, specific weighting factors have been calculated for the sub-categories based on the ’distance-to-target’ principle. The weighting step allows for further interpretation and enables the aggregation of the consumption of different abiotic resources to one summarizing indicator, called the Resource Depletion Index (RDI). The proposed method has been applied to a wheat production system in order to illustrate the conceptual considerations and to compare the approach to an established impact assessment method for abiotic resources (CML method, Guinée 2001).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BMWi (1995): Energiedaten ‘95, Nationale und internationale Entwick-lung. BMWi (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft), Bonn, Germany
Brentrup F, Küsters J, Lammel J, Barraclough P, Kuhlmann H (2002): Investigation of the Environmental Impact of Agricultural Crop Production using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Methodology. Part II: Application of the LCA methodology to investigate the environmental impact of different N fertilizer rates in cereal production. Europ. J. Agronomy, submitted for publication
BUWAL (1998): Bewertung in ökobilanzen mit der Methode der ökologischen Knappheit, ökofaktoren 1997, Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 297. BUWAL (Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft), Bern, Switzerland
Cqnsoli F et al. (1993): Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), Brussels, Belgium
EEA (1998): Europe’s Environment: The Second Assessment. EEA (European Environment Agency), Copenhagen, Denmark
EFMA (2000): Understanding Phosphorus and its Use in Agriculture. EFMA (European Fertilizer Manufactures Association), Brussels, Belgium
EIA (2000): Annual Energy Review 1999. EIA (Energy Information Administration, Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government). http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/contents.html
FAO (2001): FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), FAO Statistical Databases, http://apps.fao.org/
Finnveden G (1996): Resources and related impact categories, in: Udo de Haes H A (1996): Towards a methodology of life cycle impact assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Brussels, Belgium
Goedkoop M (1995): NOH report 9523. The Eco-Indicator 95. Final Report. Pré Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands, The Netherlands
Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (1999): The Eco-Indicator 99. A damage oriented method of Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Methodology Report. Preliminary Internet version. Pré Consultants B.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands, http://www.pre.nl/eco-indicator99/default.htm
Guinée J B, Heijungs R (1995): A proposal for the definition of resource equivalency factors for use in product life-cycle assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14, 917–925
Guinée J B (2001): Life Cycle Assessment: An operational guide to the ISO standards. Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University, The Netherlands, http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/lca2/index.html
Heijungs R, Guinée J B, Huppes G (1997): Impact categories for natural resources and land use, CML report 138, Section Substances & Products. Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden University, The Netherlands
ISO (2000): Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Life cycle impact assessment, International Standard ISO 14042:2000. ISO (International Organization for Standardization), Geneva, Switzerland
Küsters J, Jenssen T (1998): Selecting the right fertilizer from an environmental life cycle perspective. IFA 1998 Technical Conference, Marrakech, Morocco. International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA), Paris, France
Müller-Wenk R (1998): Depletion of abiotic resources weighted on base of ‘virtual’ impacts of lower grade deposits used in future, IWö-Diskussionsbeitrag Nr. 57. Institut für Wirtschaft und ökologie (IWö), St. Gallen University, Switzerland
Patyk A, Reinhardt G A (1997): Düngemittel — Energie- und Stoffstrom-bilanzen. Vieweg, Wiesbaden, Germany
Udo de Haes H A, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild, M., Krewitt, W., Müller-Wenk, R. (1999): Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Part II. Int JLCA 4, 167–174
Unternehmensgruppe Schöndorfer (2001): http://www.dolomit.de/
USGS Minerals Information (2001): Mineral Commodity Summaries. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey), Reston, USA. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/
Van Oers L (Ed.) (2001): LCA normalization data for the Netherlands 1997/1998, Western Europe 1995 and the World 1990 and 1995. Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
VROM (1998): National Environmental Policy Plan 3. VROM (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment), The Hague, The Netherlands
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987): Our Common Future (the Brundtland Report). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
WEC (2002): World Energy Survey 2001. WEC (World Energy Council), London, United Kingdom
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J. et al. Impact assessment of abiotic resource consumption conceptual considerations. Int J LCA 7, 301–307 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978892
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978892