Abstract
A modeling system was used to calculate the resource footprints (land, water, nutrients, energy, fuel, electricity, and carbon) on a large scale in agricultural production systems (Iran as a case study), and this report is an introduction of this modeling system for future studies. Under irrigated conditions, the highest land footprint was observed in pulses and oil grains (0.6 ha t−1). The lowest water footprints were found in silage corn (300 m3 t−1), and the highest water footprints were observed in oil grains (4525 m3 t−1). The highest footprints of nitrogen were observed in maize (31.7 kg t−1), wheat (30.9 kg t−1), and oil grains (30.4 kg t−1), and the lowest value belonged to production of sugar crops (2.6 kg t−1). Most of the energy, fuel, electricity, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were occurred under irrigated cropping systems compared with the rainfed systems. Under irrigated conditions, the highest footprints of energy, fuel, and electricity and GHG emissions occurred in the production of oil grains, and their values were 24397 MJ t−1, 161 L t−1, 1195 kWh t−1, and 1699 kg CO2eq. t−1, respectively. In general, wheat production in Iran has the highest cost in terms of resource use (water, elements, energy, and carbon) compared with the other plant products. Livestock and poultry products (especially red meat) also had the highest ecological footprint among the products.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
-The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
-All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
References
Akiyama H, Yan X, Yagi K (2010) Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 16:1837–1846
Allan T (1998) Watersheds and problem sheds: explaining the absence of armed conflict over water in the Middle East. Middle East Review of International Affairs. 2 (1). Archived from the original on November 27, 2006.
Camargo GG, Ryan MR, Richard TL (2013) Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from crop production using the farm energy analysis tool. BioScience 63:263–273
Chapagain A, James K (2011) The water and carbon footprint of household food and drink waste in the UK. Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), Banbury, Oxon, UK & WWF, Godalming, Surrey, UK.
Chowdhury S, Ouda OK, Papadopoulou MP (2017) Virtual water content for meat and egg production through livestock farming in Saudi Arabia. Appl Water Sci 7:4691–4703
FAO (2013) FAO Statistical Yearbool. FAO, Rome, Italy
Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O'hare M, Kammen DM (2006) Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:506–508
Flachowsky G, Meyer U, Südekum KH (2018) Invited review: resource inputs and land, water and carbon footprints from the production of edible protein of animal origin. Arch Anim Breed 61:17–36
Frorip J, Kokin E, Praks J, Poikalainen V, Ruus A, Veermäe I, Lepasalu L, Schäfer W, Mikkola H, Ahokas J (2012) Energy consumption in animal production-case farm study. Agron Res 10:39–48
Grönman K, Ypyä J, Virtanen Y, Kurppa S, Soukka R, Seuri P, Finér A, Linnanen L (2016) Nutrient footprint as a tool to evaluate the nutrient balance of a food chain. J Clean Prod 112:2429–2440
Günther J, Thevs N, Gusovius HJ, Sigmund I, Brückner T, Beckmann V, Abdusalik N (2017) Carbon and phosphorus footprint of the cotton production in Xinjiang, China, in comparison to an alternative fibre (Apocynum) from Central Asia. J Clean Prod 148:490–497
Hoekstra AY (2010) The water footprint of animal products. In: The meat crisis: developing more sustainable production and consumption, edited by: D’Silva J. Webster J, Earthscan, London, UK, pp 22–33
Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK (2007) Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. In Integrated assessment of water resources and global change (pp. 35-48). Springer, Dordrecht.
Huang H, Zhuo L, Wang R, Shang K, Li M, Yang X, Wu P (2021) Agricultural infrastructure: the forgotten key driving force of crop-related water footprints and virtual water flows in China. J Clean Prod 309:127455
IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories – agriculture, forestry and other land use, edited by: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T. Tanabe K, Hayama Kanagawa, Japan
Jokiniemi T, Mikkola H, Rossner H, Talgre L, Lauringson E, Hovi M, Ahokas J (2012) Energy savings in plant production. Agron Res 10:85–96
Kool A, Marinussen M, Blonk H (2012) LCI data for the calculation tool Feedprint for greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. GHG Emissions of N, P and K fertiliser production.
Leach AM, Galloway JN, Bleeker A, Erisman JW, Kohn R, Kitzes J (2012) A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment. Environ Dev 1:40–66 Pqp8c9qj
Leach AM, Majidi AN, Galloway JN, Greene AJ (2013) Towards institutional sustainability: a nitrogen footprint model for a university. Sustainability: J Rec 6:211–219
Leip A, Leach A, Musinguzi P, Tumwesigye T, Olupot G, Tenywa JS, Mudiope J, Hutton O, Cordovil CM, Bekunda M, Galloway J (2014) Nitrogen-neutrality: a step towards sustainability. Environ Res Lett 9:115001
Lesschen JP, Van den Berg M, Westhoek HJ, Witzke HP, Oenema O (2011) Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166:16–28
Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2011) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:1577–1600
Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2012) A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosyst 15:401–415
Mekonnen MM, Romanelli TL, Ray C, Hoekstra AY, Liska AJ, Neale CM (2018) Water, energy, and carbon footprints of bioethanol from the US and Brazil. Environ Sci Technol 52:14508–14518
Mesgaran M, Madani K, Hashemi H, Azadi P (2016) Evaluation of land and precipitation for agriculture in Iran. Standford Iran 2040 project. 28 p.
Mikkola HJ, Ahokas J (2009) Energy ratios in Finnish agricultural production. Agric Food Sci 18:332–346
Pierer M, Winiwarter W, Leach AM, Galloway JN (2014) The nitrogen footprint of food products and general consumption patterns in Austria. Food Policy 49:128–136
Platis DP, Anagnostopoulos CD, Tsaboula AD, Menexes GC, Kalburtji KL, Mamolos AP (2019) Energy analysis, and carbon and water footprint for environmentally friendly farming practices in agroecosystems and agroforestry. Sustainability 11:1664
Pradhan A, Shrestha DS, Gerpen JV, Duffield J (2008) The energy balance of soybean oil biodiesel production: a review of past studies. Trans ASAE 51:185–194
Ran Y, Lannerstad M, Herrero M, Van Middelaar CE, De Boer IJM (2016) Assessing water resource use in livestock production: a review of methods. Livest Sci 187:68–79
Rost S, Gerten D, Bondeau A, Lucht W, Rohwer J, Schaphoff S (2008) Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system. Water Resour Res 44:W09405
Roy K, Vrba J, Kaushik SJ, Mraz J (2020) Nutrient footprint and ecosystem services of carp production in European fishponds in contrast to EU crop and livestock sectors. J Clean Prod 270:122268
Shahbazi K, Besharati H (2013) Overview of agricultural soil fertility status of Iran. J Land Manag 1:1–15 (in Persian)
Shibata H, Galloway JN, Leach AM, Cattaneo LR, Noll LC, Erisman JW, Gu B, Liang X, Hayashi K, Ma L, Dalgaard T (2017) Nitrogen footprints: regional realities and options to reduce nitrogen loss to the environment. Ambio 46:129–142
Soltani A, Alimagham SM, Nehbandani A, Torabi B, Zeinali E, Zand E, Vadez V, van Loon MP, van Ittersum MK (2020a) Future food self-sufficiency in Iran: a model-based analysis. Glob Food Sec 24:100351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100351
Soltani A, Alimagham SM, Nehbandani A, Torabi B, Zeinali E, Dadrasi A, Zand E, Ghassemi S, Pourshirazi S, Alasti O, Hosseini RS (2020b) SSM-iCrop2: a simple model for diverse crop species over large areas. Agric Syst 182:102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102855
Soltani A, Alimagham SM, Nehbandani A, Torabi B, Zeinali E, Zand E, Ghassemi S, Vadez V, Sinclair TR, van Ittersum MK (2020c) Modeling plant production at country level as affected by availability and productivity of land and water. Agric Syst 183:102859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102859
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, De Vries W, De Wit CA, Folke C (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855
Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome, p 390
van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—a review. Field Crop Res 143:4–17
Villalobos FJ, Delgado A, López-Bernal Á, Quemada M (2020) FertiliCalc: a decision support system for fertilizer management. Int J Plant Prod 14:299–308
Vitousek PM, Menge DN, Reed SC, Cleveland CC (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems. Philos Trans R Soc 368:20130119
Ye Q, Li Y, Zhang W, Cai W (2019) Influential factors on water footprint: a focus on wheat production and consumption in virtual water import and export regions. Ecol Indic 102:309–315
Acknowledgements
The present paper is part of a joint study by Agricultural Research, Education and Expansion Organization of Iran (AREEO) and Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (GUASNR), Gorgan, Iran. The support from AREEO is highly appreciated.
Funding
The present paper was funded by the Agricultural Research, Education and Expansion Organization of Iran (AREEO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Afshin Soltani and Eskandar Zand. Data curation: Afshin Soltani and Majid Alimagham. Methodology: Afshin Soltani and Majid Alimagham. Formal analysis and investigation: Afshin Soltani, Majid Alimagham, and Elias Soltani. Writing—original draft preparation: Elias Soltani. Writing—review and editing: Elias Soltani and Afshin Soltani. Funding acquisition: Eskandar Zand. Resources: Afshin Soltani and Eskandar Zand; Supervision: Afshin Soltani.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(XLSX 22 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soltani, ., Soltani, A., Alimagham, M. et al. Ecological footprints of environmental resources for agricultural production in Iran: a model-based study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 68972–68981 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15119-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15119-3