Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using qualitative research methods in higher education

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

RESEARCHERS INVESTIGATING ISSUES related to computing in higher education are increasingly using qualitative research methods to conduct their investigations. However, they may have little training or experience in qualitative research. The purpose of this paper is to introduce researchers to the appropriate use of qualitative methods. It begins by describing how qualitative research is defined, key characteristics of qualitative research, and when to consider using these methods. The paper then provides an overview of how to conduct qualitative studies, including steps in planning the research, selecting data collection methods, analyzing data, and reporting research findings. The paper concludes with suggestions for enhancing the quality of qualitative studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altheide, D.L., & Johnson, J.M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485–499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H.R. (1988).Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R.C., & Bilden, S.K. (1992).Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1989).Educational research: an introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T. (1997). Technology, multimedia, and qualitative research in education.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 122–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, S. M., Klein, J. D., Jones, E.K., & Dwyer, H. (1995, February).Effects of cooperative learning and learner control modes in computer-based instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Communications and Technology, Anaheim, CA.

  • Davidson-Shivers, G.V., Rasmussen, K.L., Bratton, J., & Bratton, M.F. (1997). Investigating learning strategies generation in a hypermedia environment using qualitative methods.Journal of Computing in Childhood Education 8(2/3), 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1994). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 500–515). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, J. A. (2000).Promises unfulfilled: A university/school district partnership study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M.P. (1995). Paradigms for research in instructional systems. In G. Anglin (Ed.).Instructional technology: past, present and future (2nd ed., pp. 322–329). Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1984).Protocol analysis — verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson, D.A., Harris, E.L., Skipper, B.L., & Allen, S.D. (1993).Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espey, L. (2000, February). Technology planning and technology integration: A case study. InSociety for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference: Proceedings of SITE 2000 (pp. 95–100). San Diego, CA. ERIC ED 444 467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D.M. (1989).Ethnography: step by step. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (1994). Interviewing: the art of science. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–377). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. (1994). Fishing with the net for research data.British Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description. In C. Geertz (Ed.),The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. J., & Driscoll, M.P. (2002). Collaborative knowledge building: A case study.Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, J.P., & LeCompte, M.D. (1984).Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, N., & Rice, E. (1991). Teachers’ perspectives on competency-based testing.Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, V.J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, C. (1994). Investigating the cognitive structure of students studying quantum theory in an Open University history of science course: A pilot study.British Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 198–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E.G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lueddeke, G.R. (1998, November). The management of change towards an open learning framework: A higher education inquiry.Open Learning, 3–17.

  • Luetkehans, L., & Robinson, R. (2000).Qualitative methods in educational technology research: An examination of recent studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, Georgia.

  • Meloy, J.M. (1994).Writing the qualitative dissertation: Understanding by doing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, J. A., Gorard, S., Taylor, C., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2004, April).The underlying syntax of design experiments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Weitzman, E.A. (1994). Appendix: Choosing computer programs for qualitative data analysis. In M. B. Miles & A. M. Huberman (Ed.).Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed., pp. 311–317). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moallem, M. (1994, February).An experienced teacher’s model of thinking and teaching: An ethnographic study on teacher cognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.

  • Morse, J.M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.).Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 220–235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, D. (1989). Naturalistic inquiry and computer-based instruction: Rationale, procedures, and potential.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(3), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M.C. (1989).The effects of varying levels of informational feedback on concept learning in CAI programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Perez-Prado, A., & Thirunarayanan, M.O. (2002). A qualitative comparison of online classroom-based sections of a course: Exploring student perspectives.Education Media International, 39(2), 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 83–97). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R.A., & Mory, E.H. (1991). An examination of the systematic planning techniques of two experienced teachers.Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R.C., Klein, J., & Nelson, W. Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 1099–1130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.

  • Robinson, R.S. (1995).Qualitative research — a case for case studies. In G. Anglin (Ed.),Instructional technology: past, present and future (2nd ed., pp. 330–339). Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R.S. (1994). Investigating Channel One: A case study report. In A. De Vaney, (Ed.),Watching Channel One (pp. 21–41). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G.R. (2004). Experimental research methods. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.).Handbook of Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 1021–1043). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savenye, W.C., & Robinson, R.S. (2004). Qualitative research issues and methods: An introduction for educational technologists. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 1045–1071). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savenye, W.C., & Strand, E. (1989, February). Teaching science using interactive videodisc: results of the pilot year evaluation of the Texas Learning Technology Group Project. In M. R. Simonson & D. Frey (Eds.),Eleventh Annual Proceedings of Selected Research Paper Presentations at the 1989 Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology in Dallas, Texas. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.L., & Wedman, J.F. (1988). Read-think-aloud protocols: A new data-source for formative evaluation.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1(2), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J.P. (1980).Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J.M. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, R. (1990).Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York, NY: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1988).Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., & Sechrest, L. (1966).Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, E.A., & Miles, M.B. (1995).A software sourcebook: computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. (1989). Toward a rationale and theoretical basis for educational technology.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H.F. (1990).Writing up qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H.F. (1994).Transforming qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1989).Case study research (2nd ed.) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (1998, June). A qualitative study of learners’ use of an instructional multi/ hypermedia program in an educational training environment. InED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 98 World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications Proceedings, Freiburg, Germany, (pp. 2–6).ERIC ED 428 741.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University, USA

    Wilhelmina C. Savenye

  2. Northern Illinois University, USA

    Rhonda S. Robinson

Authors
  1. Wilhelmina C. Savenye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rhonda S. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savenye, W.C., Robinson, R.S. Using qualitative research methods in higher education. J. Comput. High. Educ. 16, 65–95 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961475

Keywords

Search

Navigation