Skip to main content
Log in

A new technique for measuring lower oesophageal sphincter competence in patients

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Oesophageal sphincter measurements were carried out on 80 patients using the stationary pull through technique; Normals (n=21), Nutcracker (n=12), Refluxers (n=21), and Barrett’s (n=26). Sphincter pressure (LOSP), abdominal length of sphincter, and overall sphincter length were measured. The Sphincter Function Index (SFI) was calculated as the product of sphincter pressure and percentage sphincter length (AL) exposed to abdominal pressure. Patients also had routine endoscopy and 24 hour pHmetry. SFI values discriminated between all four groups. LOSP was significantly different for Barrett’s (p<0.01) and Nutcracker (p<0.01) compared to normals. AL was significant for Refluxers (p<0.001) and Barrett’s (p<0.001) compared to normals. SFI gives better discrimination than LOSP or AL alone and may be useful in evaluating the response to treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeMeester, T. R., Wernly, J. A., Bryant, G. H., Little, A. G., Skinner, D. B. Clinical and in-vitro analysis of determinants of gastroesophageal competence. Amer. J. Surg 1979; 137: 39–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaninotto, G., DeMeester, T. R., Schwizer, W., Johansson, K. E., Cheng, S. C. The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Amer. J. Surg. 1988; 155: 104–111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goyal, R. K., Paterson, W. G. Esophageal Motility. In: Handbook of Physiology, Wood, J., Bethesda, M. D. Eds: American Physiological Society 1988.

  4. Dent, J., Dodds, W. J., Sekiguchi, T., Hogan, W. J., Amdorfer, R. C. Interdigestive phasic contractions of the human lower esophageal sphincter. Gastroenterology 1983; 84: 453–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goyal, R. K., Ratten, S. Neurohumoral, hormonal and drug receptors for the lower esophageal sphincter. Progress in Gastroenterology 1978; 74: 598–619.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogilvie, A. L., Atkinson, M. Influence of the vagus nerve Upon the reflux control of the lower oesophageal sphincter. Gut 1984; 25: 253–258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dent, J., Dodds, W. J., Friedman, R. H., Sekiguchi, T., Hogan, W. J., Arndorfer, R. C., Petrie, D. J. Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J. Clin. Invest. 1980; 65: 256–267.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mughal, M. M., Bancewicz, J., Marples, M. Oesophageal manometry and pH recording does not predict the bad results of Nissen fundoplication. Br. J. Surg. 1990; 77: 43–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonavini, L., Evander, A., DeMeester, et al. Length of the distal esophageal sphincter and competency of the cardia. Am. J. Surg. 1986; 151: 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boesby, S. Relationshipbetweengastroesophagealacidreflux, basal gastroesophageal sphincter pressure and gastric acid secretion. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1977; 12: 547–551.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel, C. I., Hendrix, T. R. Esophageal motor abnormalities induced by acid perfusion in patients with heartburn. J. Clin. Invest. 1963; 42: 686–695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Waterman, D. C., Dalton, C. B., Ott, D. et al. The hypertensive lower oesophageal sphincter: what does it mean? J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 1989; 11: 139–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byrne, P.J., Stuart, R.C., Lawlor, P. et al. A new technique for measuring lower oesophageal sphincter competence in patients. I.J.M.S. 162, 351–354 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942165

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942165

Keywords

Navigation