Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of storage proteins ofPhaseolus caracalla L. with the proteins of some other representatives of the genusPhaseolus

  • Published:
Biologia Plantarum

Abstract

Storage proteins of the seeds (cotyledons) of the South-American speciesPhaseolus caracalla were compared by means of immunoelectrophoretic methods with other representatives of the genusPhaseolus. These proteins most resemble the proteins of the co-called tropical group (i.e. Ph. atropurpureus, Ph. geophilus, Ph. bracteatus, Ph. semierectus) and least the so-called American endemites (Ph. vulgaris, Ph. coccineus, Ph. acutifolius, Ph. lunatus), the main globulin of which is of a completely different specificity. The proteins ofPh. caracalla are less similar to the group of the so-called Asiatic species (Ph. aureus, Ph. calcaratus, Ph. angularis, Ph. aconitifolius, Ph. trilobus) including the analyzed representatives ofVigna sinensis; their main globulin is only partly similar to that ofPh. caracalla. Some considerations on the relationship ofPh. caracalla with the so-called tropical species is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boulter, D., Ramshaw, J. A. M., Thompson, E. W., Richardson, M., Brown, R. H.: A phylogeny of higher plants band on the amino acid sequences of cytochrome C and its biological implications. - Proc. roy. Soc. Lond. B181: 441–446, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkabt, A.: Las Leguminosae Argentines. - ACME Agency Soc. de Resp. Ltda, Buenoe Aires 1952.

  • Derbyshire, E., Wright, D. J., Boulter, D.: Legumin and vioilin, storage proteins of legume seeds.- Phytochemistry15: 3–24, 1976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faibbrothers, D., Mabry, E. J., Scogin, R. L., Turner, B. L.: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Chemotaxonomy. - Ann. Missouri bot. Garden62: 765–800, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassler, E.: Revisio speciarum austro-americanum generisPhaseoli L. - Candollea1: 417 to 472, 1922—24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J.: The Genera of Flowering Plants. Vol. I. - Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, N. R.: [Peculiarities in the originating of forms ofPhaseolus L. in the old and in the new world.] In Russ. - Tr. priklad. Bot. Genet. Selek.19: 185–212, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, N. R.: [Geographical regularities in the distribution of cultivatedPhaseolinae.] In Russ. - Tr. priklad. Bot. Genet. Selek. Ser.1, 2: 41–106, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, N. R., Budanova, V. J.: [To the systematics of the genusPhaseolus L.] In Russ. - Tr. priklad. Bot. Genet. Selek.51: 18–32, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, U.: Serologische Beitrage zur Systematik derRanunculaceae. - Bot. Jahrb. Syst.88: 204–268, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloz, J.: Serology of theLeguminosae. - In:HaRboRne, J. B., Boultbr, D., Turner, B. L. (ed.): Chemotaxonomy of theLeguminosae. PP. 309–365. Acad. Press, London-New York 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloz, J., Klozová, E.: The protein euphaseolin inPhaseolinae - a chemotaxonomical study. - Biol. Plant.16: 290–300, 1974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kloz, J., Klozová, E.: [Modification of the method of immunoelectrophoresis in agarose - starch gel and intensity determination of the precipitation reaction of layer formation.] In Russ. - Bot. Zh. (in press).

  • Kloz, J., Kxozová, E., Turková, V.: Chemotaxonomy and genesis of protein characters with special reference to the genusPhaseolus. - Preslia38: 229–236, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozova, N. S., Kutiavina, N. G., Tchupov, V. S.: Serological investigation in the familyRanunculaceae. - In: Abstracts of XII int. Bot. Congress. Pp. 28. Leningrad 1975.

  • Ohwi, J.: Flora of Japan. - Smiths. Inst. Wash. USA, Washington D.C. 1965.

  • Ouchterlony, O.: Antigen-antibody reaction in gel. - Acta pathol. microbiol. scand.26: 507 to 515, 1949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, C.V.: Studies in AmericanPhaseolineae. - Contrib. U.S. Nat. Herb. 22, part 9, 1926.

  • Škvařil, F.: [Micromodification of immunoelectrophoresis]. In Czech. - Chem. Listy (Praha)9: 1069–1080, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taubert, P.:Phaseolineae. - In:Engler, A., Prantl, K. (ed.) Natürliche Pflanzen-Familien, Vol. III-2. Pp. 379–380, 1894.

  • Vaughan, J. G.: Proteins and Taxonomy. - In:Harborne, J. B., Van Summers, C. F., (ed.): The Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Proteins. - Acad. Press, London-New York-San Francisco 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdcourt, B.: Studies in theLeguminosae - Papilionoideae for the flora of tropical East Africa. - Kew Bull.24, No. 3, 1970.

  • Vulf, E. (ed.): Kulturnaya Flora SSSR [Cultivated Flora of the USSR]. Vol. 4. Pp. 457–603. Leningrad 1937.

  • Wallace, D. G., Boulter, D.: Immunological comparisons of higher plant plastocyanins. In: Abstracts of XII. Intern. Bot. Congress. P. 22. Leningrad 1975.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klozová, E., Turková, V. & Platilová, I. Comparison of storage proteins ofPhaseolus caracalla L. with the proteins of some other representatives of the genusPhaseolus . Biol Plant 19, 278–283 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923129

Keywords

Navigation