Abstract
Cloud is one of the uncertainty factors influencing the performance of a general circulation model (GCM). Recently, the State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics (LASG/IAP) has developed a new version of a GCM (R42L9). In this work, roles of cloud parameterization in the R42L9 are evaluated through a comparison between two 20-year simulations using different cloud schemes. One scheme is that the cloud in the model is diagnosed from relative humidity and vertical velocity, and the other one is that diagnostic cloud is replaced by retrieved cloud amount from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP), combined with the amounts of high-, middle-, and low-cloud and heights of the cloud base and top from the NCEP. The boreal winter and summer seasonal means, as well as the annual mean, of the simulated top-of-atmosphere shortwave radiative flux, surface energy fluxes, and precipitation are analyzed in comparison with the observational estimates and NCEP reanalysis data. The results show that the scheme of diagnostic cloud parameterization greatly contributes to model biases of radiative budget and precipitation. When our derived cloud fractions are used to replace the diagnostic cloud amount, the top-of-atmosphere and surface radiation fields are better estimated as well as the spatial pattern of precipitation. The simulations of the regional precipitation, especially over the equatorial Indian Ocean in winter and the Asia-western Pacific region in summer, are obviously improved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AMIP Modeling Groups, 1996: Evaluation of the Vertical Structure of Zonally Averaged Cloud amount and Its Variability in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project.J. Climate,9, 3419–3431.
Berlyand, T. G., L. A. Strokina, and L. E. Greshnikova, 1980: Zonal cloud distribution on the Earth.Meteor. Hydrol.,3, 9–15.
Gates, W. L., and coauthors, 1999: An Overview of the Results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP I).Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,80, 29–55.
IPCC, 2001:Climate Change 2001, The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. Van Der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA, 892pp.
Kalnay, E., and coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project.Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 437–471.
Kiehl, J. T., and K. E. Trenberth, 1997: Earth’s annual global mean energy budget.Bull. Amer. Meteror. Soc.,78, 197–208.
Liao, K. N., 1992:Radiation and Cloud Processes in the Atmosphere. Oxford University Press, New York, 487pp.
Manabe, R., J. Stouffer, M. J. Spelman, and K. Bryan, 1991: Transient responses of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric CO2. Part 1: Annual mean response.J. Climate,4, 785–818.
Mokhov, I. I., and M. E. Schlesinger, 1994: Analysis of global cloud amount.J. Geophys. Res.,99, 17045–17065.
Rossow, W. B., and R. A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud data products.Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 2–20.
Sellers, W. D., 1965:Physical Climatology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 272pp.
Slingo, J. M., 1987: The development and verification of a cloud prediction scheme for the ECMWF model.Quart. J. R. Meteor. Soc.,113, 899–927.
Stephens, G. L., 1978: Radiation profiles in extended water clouds: Theory.J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 2111–2122.
Wang Biao, Liu Hui, and Shi Guangyu, 2000: Chapter 3 Radiation and cloud scheme.IAP Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System Model, Zhang Xuehong, Shi Guangyu, Liu Hui, and Yu Yongqiang, Eds., Science Press, Beijing, New York, 28–49.
Warren, S. G., C. J. Hahn, J. London, R. M. Chervin, and R. L. Jenne, 1986: Global distribution of total cloud amount and cloud type amounts over land. NCAR Tech. Note TN-273+STR, Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo. 173pp.
Warren, S. G., C. J. Hahn, J. London, R. M. Chervin, and R. L. Jenne, 1988: Global distribution of total cloud amount and cloud type amounts over the ocean. NCAR Tech. Note TN-317+STR, Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo. 154pp.
Wu, Guoxiong, Liu Hui, Zhao Yucheng, and Li Weiping, 1996: A nine-layer atmospheric general circulation model and its performance.Adv. Atmos. Sci.,13, 1–18.
Wu, Tongwen, Liu Ping, Wang Zaizhi, Liu Yimin, Yu Rucong, and Wu Guoxiong, 2003: The performance of atmospheric component model R42L9 of GO-LAS/LASG.Adv. Atmos. Sci.,20, 726–742.
Xie P., and P. A. Arkin, 1996: Analyses of global monthly precipitation using gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model predictions.J. Climate,9, 840–858.
Zhang Xuehong, Shi Guangyu, Liu Hui, and Yu Yongqiang, 2000:IAP Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System Model. Science Press, Beijing, 252pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, T., Wang, Z., Liu, Y. et al. An evaluation of the effects of cloud parameterization in the R42L9 GCM. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 21, 153–162 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915701
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915701